Petition updateDemand Scott Wiener's Immediate Removal From Office for Committing Felony

It Appears Not Elected Official Filed an Oath for 2025, Including Wiener; Please Help Me Verify This

christi grabUnited States
7 Mar 2025

Here is the full update: https://gwsandiego.net/blog/?p=3259
 
For those that prefer video, here is an interview I did this morning. My segment starts at the 9-minute mark and goes to the 38:00 minute mark: https://rumble.com/v6q8q8a-shawn-and-rick-talk-with-christi-grab-as-she-continues-her-fight-against-ca.html?mref=4jj09p&mrefc=2
 
The most pertinent details:
 
I requested oaths on 100 people. It could be a mistake, but it looks like not one person filed oaths with the Secretary of State for the 2025 – 2026 legislative cycle. I am asking you all for help to confirm whether or not oaths were filed... prima fascia evidence indicates that it is not an error...
 
...Mr. Nam stated that he did not get the message from Jeovana and appeared to not know what I was talking about (despite the fact that he had gotten the email I’d sent the day prior). Mr. Nam said he’d look into it and get back to me. Mr. Nam did not say that the oaths had been filed. Mr. Nam did not offer to send over the oaths in accordance with the LORA request that is now almost three months past due, nor did he mention sending the oaths in the future.... 
 
...On Wednesday, I called Scott Wiener’s San Francisco office and explained the situation. The person I spoke with said he’d look into it. Then I called the Sacramento office. The person I spoke with was unfamiliar with the situation. When I asked to be transferred to someone who was familiar with it, the person he transferred me to laughed at me (it actually sounded like multiple people laughing) and then slammed the phone down. On Thursday, I called the San Francisco office to follow up. I spoke with Dominic, who said that antiquated laws don’t apply to Mr. Wiener...
 
...At this point, it is looking like the lack of filing by the State Senate is intentional. This means our entire legislature is fraudulent and must immediately cease operation. But why would every legislator choose not to file an oath?Not taking and filing an oath is a penalty punishable with up to three years in prison. Treason of oath is a felony punishable up to and including death. 

Given that the Trump administration views the California legislature’s protective view regarding undocumented migrants to be treason of oath, I believe that the reason no oaths were filed with the SOS is because the California legislature as a collective has taken a calculated risk: they have decided that if they are prosecuted for standing up for the migrants, they want their punishment to be 3 years in prison for not taking the oath vs death for committing treason of oath. 

The problem with this strategy is that our entire current government is illegitimate and must immediately cease operations.

Please help me verify whether or not oaths have been filed, and if not, whether all the legislators are in on the conspiracy . Please call your own state senator and assemblyman and tell them there seems to be an issue with oath filing this year. Ask them if they have filed an oath, and if so, ask who filed it on their behalf and for a copy of the allegedly filed oath. Please forward the information on to me. My email is christi at gwsandiego dot net. (I have spelled it out to evade spambots). This tool will help you find your legislators.

Copy link
WhatsApp
Facebook
Nextdoor
Email
X