The case against my Stalker has been dropped two days before the trial hearing. The only explanations given to the officer in the case were transparently contrived, and he is pushing back. Just for a change, this is not the fault of the SNT in this case but undoubtedly that of the CPS not wanting to be bothered and finding a transparent excuse to delete this.

My stalker will again feel he is immune and return to the attacks which had dropped away while he was facing this case.

An interesting side issue has come up. The third extension of my bail was due to expire on 3rd December and could not be renewed without the specific consent of the DPP and the further approval of an officer of Commander status or above. ....Three days before that expiry the officer in the case told my carer by a phone call that my bail period had been 'frozen' because the papers were with the CPS. He was unable to provide any authority for that action other than that he had talked to the custody sergeant. We only received a short email just before I was due to answer bail confirming that I did not need to attend and then only because we pushed for it.

That extension was 'only until' the 12th December [coincidentally the day before the trial was meant to have happened?] and I have now been told that it has been extended further for the same reason until 20th December again on the authority of the custody sergeant.

No researches we have made, both directly and via AI, can find any authority for this arbitrary extension and the only reference we found was a passing reference on the CPS website which cites as an authority two sections of PACE which patently do not include any such authority.

Has anyone else out there come across this come on or is it just further persecution of me by Cannon Hill SNT who have had me on bail now since January 2023 in one form or another and seem desperate to perpetuate it at whatever cost!