Evidence of desperation.....
Afew days ago, my carer had a suspicious meeting request from the copper who is reportedly meant to be assisting me in prosecuting my case agents a particular individual.
However, the officer spent practically the whole time trying to convince my carer that it would be "better for my case" to stop sending in any more video evidence ANY CRIME.
Apparently, the reason for this is that Robin, the bent copper who went to school with a particular individual also automatically gets access to, and will try to use as evidence of my stalking them, anything I submit to the authorities, for what ever reason.
To me, this only strengthens my belief that the other side were being completely dishonest when they claimed in writing on 21 March that the case against me had, at that time, been handed to the CPS, the exact words:
From Robin Young: “The case has been submitted by myself to the Evidential Review Officer, who in turn has submitted to Crime Management Team and onto the Crown Prosecution Service for a charging decision.”.
If that clear & unbiguous statement were true, then logically, according to this equally clear & unbiguous statement, from the meeting, that "no additional evidence I provide could be added to the file", so submitting new evidence would booth not help may case and may actually harm the case against the other guy, so, it now seems very likely at least one of these statements, having already has not passed scrutiny, indeed may actually just further demonstration scraping the bottom of the barrel to invent nonsense counterclaims – the nonsense that as every piece of video evidence showing the commission of continuing crimes, any crimes, even unrelated incidens commited gainst us may also just happen to show a any small non-descript piece of their property, then that is, *somehow* evidence of *my* opessive video surveillance and stalking of them, despite the fact that the reason for we need videos of agent system to start with was because of their direct crimes against me, and in fact the police said at the time we should get video surveillance to prove any future crimes we allenge.
This is exactly what they have just done, someoneelse who appears to have a problem with the same particular individual who recently egged his work van on the same day as eggs been launched over our garden, add previously has been catapulting stones over our property into that garden, and the video evidence I submitted out of concern for the danger to a innocent child. Is itself apparently now being used as evidence of *my* stalking this particular individua, just because a part of thsir shed is, by virtue of the crime, visible in the video I've provided to be police of this happening.
Also, these underhanded tactics, tell me that, instead of helping the other side in the way they think it does, by intimidating me, in actuality only further undermine whatever case they thought they could build, and worse, demonstrates a almost comically obvious level of desperation on their part.
Instead of being afraid of a prosecution, I actually welcome this, because the only outcome would make the police look incredibly stupid and piss off the judge something rotten in the process.
If it wasn't bad enough the other side already had so little to work with, already reduced to invading my home without warning, without a warrant, and under false pretenses, even with complete free run of my home unsupervised, as I lay unconscious on the stairs, actively prevented anybody assisting me which itself is it crime in its own right, even then, the only evidence of stalking and harassment they could manage to "find" involved using my runestones against me in evidence which is a human rights violation for I start.
Obviously, I can't publish a record on the meeting, but I can publish our summary of the meeting we sent back afterwards, enjoy:
"Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 9:27 PM
To: Peter.Harold@met.police.uk
Subject: RE: Contact
Thank you for your time today, but it has turned out to be somewhat fruitless because of Michael's absence, I think his presence would have helped you a lot.
Everything in this matter should be viewed in the context that not only is Michael autistic and severely sight impaired, he is extremely intelligent and for him to be constantly accused of idiocy because of his disabilities is extremely distressing and offensive to him.
A preliminary point. At PC Young's prompting, [deleted] tells every police officer that we are permanently recording [deleted]. When challenged, he can never provide any evidence to support these causations, because it doesn't happen.
Because [deleted] is so glib and manipulative, every police officer believes him, without checking, and then we have to go through the rigmarole of proving the negative, when [deleted] as the accuser, is the one who should be challenged to prove what he is saying.
The video you showed me of [deleted] walking up and down [deleted] [deleted] , peering aggressively over it, may incidentally have [deleted] 's voice in the background but after reviewing we found no image of him. It was not normal behaviour by [deleted], and not normal use of his [deleted], and is itself oppressive behaviour which is intimidating.
Again, the 'horn' video I have rechecked and as I thought [deleted], if there at all, remained within the van at all times and was never visible on the video extract sent to you.
Again when ever [deleted] makes a statement how ridiculous, it is believed without even the most basic scrutiny.
It was correct that [deleted] did carry [deleted] in to view to get him in the van during the video of the misconducted incident, which was sent in as evidence of police misconduct to the professional standards delicate, following another recent air rifle incident, but if you check you will see hes back is to the cameras view throughout and the video is of such low quality that regardless, [Deleted] is not identifiable and of course this was never published in its entity anyway, the only copy was provided in confidence without fear or favour to the police as part of an ongoing investigation into misconductor and even the idea but something like this may be tinted inhibitance against us is ridiculous and ultra-virus.
The 'moving' camera at the [deleted] has been there over a year, was put there because we were advised we needed evidence of the air rifle being used after Michael was told in no one certain terms no offence was apperant because he, being effectively blind, didn't see the gun, and has achieved almost a year of success. In the absence of a police search to seize the weapon, it would be extremely reckless to stop it doing its job.
As to the angle of the camera at the front, please remember that whenever it has been disabled in the past, [deleted] has been told, in a secret, then felt free to commit further damage and harassment with no possibility of it being evidenced. The last time [deleted] deliberately tried to electrocute Michael by pouring water over him while he was mending the electrics [deleted] had broken.
How will you guarantee Michael's safety if we do this again? [deleted]'s camera points straight at our garden to try and intimidate us, but we don't ask for it to be masked because we don't do anything to be ashamed of a blind spot in our own security system.
In terms of the egg throwing, Michael tells me that he sent you a split screen video from 3 different views, clearly showing that he was inside the house, behind the shut French windows, when that occurred. Whatever it may look like, that egg did not come from #54. This is before you take into account Michael's physical inability to see much beyond the end of his nose and his inability to throw anything, let alone straight.
(Michael actually believes your statement is itself evidence of direct discrimination)
Also, in accordance with strict Data Protection Rules all video captured passively by our camera system is deleted automatically, and only footage which evidences a crime, continued harassment or bail condition breaches is retained for proper record keeping/evidential purposes.
You noted my complaint that the noxious fumes from the flue of no [deleted] represented an ongoing act of harassment and health hazard, and that this morning's emissions were particularly poisonous, causing the alarm in Michael's room to go off for some ten minutes. The fact I had to wake him despite the noise shows he was in actual danger. I confirm my willingness to pay for a proper expert gas engineer to come and inspect [deleted] 's boiler and its emissions. We still believe you are being fooled by [deleted]'s gas 'credentials', incidentally.
Every time we have checked with Gas Safe they have confirmed to us that [deleted] doesn't hold the annually renewable fitness to practice licence that each engineer requires in addition to the business registration.
Please note also that [deleted]' s broke his bail conditions, again, while I was with you - Michael was at the door to take in a parcel, [deleted] arrived in his van and shouted abuse at him. No wonder Michael is terrified to go out.
Please do find out for us if you can:
1) What Michael is being accused of
2) What was the actual reason that should have been given to Michael at the time as to why an arrest of Michael was 'necessary, appropriate or proportionate'
3) What complaints have been received about him since his 'arrest' and what evidence is being supplied to support these complaints (you say everything we send has to be shown to [deleted] , so why not vice versa)???
4) Why does no one keep him abreast of the case against him, when you do so for [deleted] ?
5) Why has the DVR not been returned despite its privileged content?
6) Why do we still not have a list of items taken months after the event?
7) Why was the missing power plug for the lap top not been returned with it
8) Why have we not been given the opportunity to inspect the items taken?
9) That the broken glass with the bullet hole and the slug, which caused it, has been properly logged and available as evidence?
PS - I am a little concerned that you are unaware of the fan breaking incident. Please remember that on Michael's behalf [deleted] of Merton CIL presented a huge body of evidence of the stalking and harassment Michael was suffering in 2021 at [deleted]'s hands to the evidence officer at Wimbledon Police Station in December 2021. Presumably that is fully disclosable in any prosecution.
If you need convincing about what you are watching on Michael’s videos, you need to go through them with him. Let me know when that would be convenient."