Although I can't share the full disclosure document......

....It turns out the fair dealing doctrine exceptions of the copyright Act 1998 actually work in my favour here, nothing in the disclosure or in PACE makes any of this legally privileged information, so as long as I make a good faith effort at commentary for the purpose of education, honour is satisfied, of course, they're going to say that you can't publish this because [insert legally insufficient jargon]. (even if there was a valid reason, it would still be a mute point, as no case against me is ever going anywhere near the court system)

So for your education (the lesson being that nothing good can ever come from the talking to the police, when the guy interviewing you just so happens to be the same guy who is the subject of several active investigations, amounting to oppression of the severely sight impaired and autistic person being interviewed.

I present to you all, one of the most idiotically stupid documents ever committed to official record, and as for my commentary, this document is a load of nonsense.

I've made this video to help demonstrate the absurdity of what they were trying to accomplish, but the short version is that our amendments alone are as long as the original document! 

But as I've mentioned before, the minute they produced my rune stones in a bag, supposedly as evidence of stalking, it became obvious this so-called "interview" was just a sham & nothing more than another form of intimidation.... 

I mean, if you think about this for just one moment it quickly unravels... ask yourself, what do you think would happen if they actually attempted to introduce ceremonial objects of religious expression into evidence in open court?