Australian Attorney General, Christian Porter, announced last week that Family Courts fail families. And he said he wants to amalgamate Family Court with another Court that Chief Justice of Family Court for the past 14 years (Diana Bryant) helped set up before she was planted into Family Court as Chief Justice by then Attorney General Phillip Ruddock without due process. During Diana Bryant's rein in the Family Court, Australian children and divorcing families paid by their innocent lives and livelihoods, the heftiest price of her greed and endemic and by design organised crime under the guise of a "Court of Law" which Family Courts never were. Diana Bryant would not leave these Courts until her 70th birthday, where by law she had to retire. This was October 2017, 6 months ago. The Australian Government could no longer hide the stench of systemic and endemic corruption on every level of these hell holes of abuse and organised criminals looting of Families' assets. Not Good Enough Mate! Over the last two decades in particular hundreds and thousands of lives have been destroyed due to unqualified appointment of Chief Justice Bryant and other judges. Palpable and multi-layered Corruption, Destruction of young innocent lives, Alienation of Parents and Children, MoneyLaundering, Looting of Families' Assets, Child Trafficking, Judicial Misconduct, Legal Abuse, Bullying, Silencing Lawyers, Silencing Victims,..., Suicide, Murder, Bankruptcy, Homelessness,...., Blood and tears cannot be whitewashed with amalgamating one court with another court where Operators and those who set these Courts up are the same people. Nothing short of an all encompassing Royal Commission into all aspects of these courts, including Judges' bank accounts and financial affairs can expose the extent of crime in Family Courts of Australia. The Attorney General must ask himself why are the Judges of Family Court trying to undermine any investigation or change in their system. They know that the Attorney General has in his possession undeniable evidence of Mafia Style criminal conduct of all involved in the operation of Australia's most notorious "Courts", the Evil Family Court. However, opening this can of worm (once opened) will not only expose the Family Court Operatives but also those who actively participated in the coverup of crimes against families in the highest Offices and members and ministers of Liberal (National) and Labour Parties. No government can afford to pay back to the victims of these Courts what the Operatives and their cronies looted from innocent divorcing families' life savings and livelihoods. There is no price to the human cost of Family Courts' crimes against children and their families. Therefore, the Australian Government, first called a parliamentary enquiry, then a Family Law Enquiry and now they want to amalgamate to cover up the crimes committed against innocent people. Australian Victims of Family Courts say: #NotGoodEnoughMate They will fight until each and every perpetrator of crimes against children and their parents (protected by self serving laws) is brought to justice and victims are compensated. Call A Royal Commission into decades of Corruption, Organised Crimes, Judicial Misconduct, Coverup in Family Courts of Australia. Below is the Australian article dated 26 May 2018, by Nicola Berkovi and Chris Merritt. The structure of the family law system is “letting down” thousands of Australian families by causing confusion, delay and inefficiency, federal Attorney-General Christian Porter says, flagging major changes to the way the courts handle parenting and property disputes. Mr Porter has also delivered a stinging rebuke to the Family Court’s judges, amid revelations of infighting, alleged bullying and a plot by judges to undermine possible court changes. The internal court ructions have occurred while families face delays of up to three years or more for their disputes to be resolved. The ­Attorney-General said courts did “not exist for the benefit of legal practitioners or those inside the court system, including judges”. “No one in the wider community has much interest in or time for spats between people inside the courts’ systems,” he told The Weekend Australian. “What they care about is what really matters, which is how we reduce delays in the system for families.” Mr Porter’s comments follow The Australian revealing that Family Court Chief Justice John Pascoe had warned judges bullying on the court would “not be tolerated”, and concerns that some appeal judges may have allowed their personal views of lower-level judges to colour their decisions. However, the head of the Law Council’s family law section, Wendy Kayler-Thomson, yesterday said it was “scandalous” to suggest any appeal judges had made decisions based on their personal opinion of a trial judge; they decided cases “in accordance with the law and without bias”. The Australian also revealed appeal judge Michael Kent emailed colleagues on Monday seeking their support for a constitutional challenge if rumoured plans for the Federal Court to take over family law appeals ­became reality. Mr Porter is expected soon to unveil structural changes to the federal courts. These could include clearer rules about which cases are handled by the Family Court and lower-level Federal Circuit Court, which both cover family law, and possible closer links between the two. Mr Porter yesterday said the existing structure “lets down both the people who administer it as well as, and most importantly, the thousands of families that need to use the system ... Different courts with different rules and forms and processes covering essentially similar family law matters are bound to create duplication, confusion, inefficiency, delay and tension. The system itself has not allowed for the best use of highly skilled and trained legal and ­judicial officers”. Mr Porter said the government wanted to “make life easier for families” during the difficult period of relationship breakdown. Changes are expected to ­improve the efficiency of the Family Court’s appeal division. This could involve shifting ­appeals to the Federal Court, or appointing judges to both courts so they can share appeals. However, Ms Kayler-Thomson said the community was “best served” by having specialist judges deal with family law matters. “Cases involving child sexual abuse, family violence and the like — that’s not the diet of a Federal Court judge,” she said. Taxpayers last year spent about $466,000 on flights and ­accommodation for Family Court appeal judges and their spouses to travel to hearings, or about $55,000 a judge. About 75 per cent of Family Court appeals ­involved three judges sitting ­together. In the Federal Court, three judges were used for just 12 per cent of appeals in 2016-17.