Family Courts are designed to take advantage of vulnerable people at their most stressful time in their lives (Divorce is only 2nd to Death being the most stressful life events according to the Holmes And Rahe Stress Scale) and their most financially lucrative time. A married Couple has a home, savings, cars, savings,... accumulated over many years. They also have children. How these courts operate is to use the Children as pawns to syphon the Families' assets into ban accounts of the Court Operatives. They will not let go of the divorcing couple until one or both are bankrupted. The irreparable damage to children caused by the operations of Family Courts will then become the responsibility of the State via Child Protection Agencies funded by the governments. If Family Courts' operatives were not protected by unconstitutional laws drafted by lawyers/judges and legislated by lawyers in Parliaments, victims would be able to sue them for +Unconscionable Conduct +Profiteering from tragedies affecting lives of most vulnerable people +Denial of Human Rights These Courts were designed for profiteering and until a thorough investigation into the financial dealings of Judges, Lawyers, Report Writers is conducted, the extent of these crimes remains hidden to the public at large. This is not an unknown entity to victims of Family Courts (anyone attending these courts as Applicants or Respondents). Victims of Family Court will testify with undeniable evidence, in every single case before these courts, that the sole purpose of existence of Family Courts is Trafficking for Profit. They have no resemblance to Courts of Law. Families, Parents and Children are not the only victims of these Courts, Truth, Justice, morality and Human Conscience are the ultimate victims of Family Courts. Definition of Unconscionable Conduct ---------------------------------------------- Unconscionable conduct is generally understood to mean conduct which is so harsh that it goes against good conscience. Under the Consumer Protection Laws, businesses must not engage in unconscionable conduct, when dealing with other businesses or their customers. Unconscionable conduct does not have a precise legal definition as it is a concept that has been developed on a case-by-case basis by courts over time. Conduct may be unconscionable if it is particularly harsh or oppressive. To be considered unconscionable, conduct must be more than simply unfair—it must be against conscience as judged against the norms of society. Business behaviour may be deemed unconscionable if it is particularly harsh or oppressive, and is beyond hard commercial bargaining. For example, courts have found transactions or dealings to be 'unconscionable' when they are deliberate, involve serious misconduct or involve conduct which is clearly unfair and unreasonable. Determining whether conduct is unconscionable There are a number of factors a court will consider when assessing whether conduct in relation to the selling or supplying of goods and services to a customer, or to the supplying or acquiring of goods or services to or from a business, is unconscionable. These include: +the relative bargaining strength of the parties +whether any conditions were imposed on the weaker party that were not +reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the stronger party +whether the weaker party could understand the documentation used +the use of undue influence, pressure or unfair tactics by the stronger party +the requirements of applicable industry codes +the willingness of the stronger party to negotiate +the extent to which the parties acted in good faith. This is not an exhaustive list and it should be noted that the court may also consider any other factor it thinks relevant. Definition of Profiteering ------------------------------ Disproportionately large or grossly unfair profit, generated often through manipulation of prices, abuse of dominant position, or by exploiting a bad or unusual situation such as temporary scarcity. There is usually no governmental control over profiteering unless it involves illegal means. Like all full scale atrocities committed in human history, the operation of Family Courts will be exposed. It is much more difficult and will take much longer time than sexual abuse of children by Catholic Church and other religious institutions, to name but one recent global criminal enterprise. It is more difficult because victims of these courts are speaking against a Court of Law, Lawyers, Judges, Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Social Workers,...who enjoy a blanket protection against prosecution by self-made laws. That time will come and the Operators of these Courts will be prosecuted and brought to justice and its many millions of victims will be apologised to and adequately compensated, simply because Family Courts have left their victims with nothing more to lose. Join close to 25,000 who signed this petition against #OrganisedCrime operating at the heart of Family Courts.