BACK FROM THE BRINK  FOR BRITAIN/EUROPE…UNSUSTAINABLE ASYLUM

Petition Closed

This petition had 1 supporter

The Issue

For the Attention of:  All MPS In the Westminster Government,  and all EU National Leaders and their populations who are suffering Asylum/Immigration overload as do we in  the UK. 

Asylum laws  are onerous (one sided) against the host nations and are abused by claimants. They are bankrupting the UK and other European nations financially and culturally. A worldwide or European wide  Asylum   moratorium/ ban  must be  announced urgently  by the UK, and each European nation as deemed appropriate by their leaders. Also   the UK and other nations to trigger  “ Article 15 of  ECHR Derogation in time of emergency, only to be invoked in time of war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation. This aptly describes the state of the UK and many other European nations. It is a courtesy request and we cannot be wait for permission, and it is likely to be permanent ban on Asylum.

The flow of immigration/Asylum must be stopped,  otherwise what  is the point of us working at all with government borrowing  mounting on top of the 2.7 trillion debt  we already have, alongside the  daily increasing immigrant numbers and free support of the same paid by the Taxpayer. Every Government budget and policy is a nonsense until the immigration flow  is  halted. 

Therefore the signatories of this Petition,  suggest/request  the following first 10 URGENT  changes in our nation which is collapsing due to already tested and failed policies,  which we know will end in an IMF (International Monetary Fund)  loan and  a third world standard of living unless immigration is stopped immediately. The remaining 14 policy suggestions  are for media discussion should we find the petition gathers interest,  as not all signing will agree with all policies beyond the first 10. They all could be discussed with MPs  over  the media or possibly added to the website of www.restorebritain.org.uk  for individual  petition and take part in a  direct democracy system of government if the aims of the first 10 requests for change are successful. There is unrest in some EU nations over similar issues and  we are trying to “jaw jaw, not war war” and we appeal to the Labour Government and its MPs  and the BBC., that we all must start “thinking” differently,  to avoid  disaster.   

We cannot wait 4 years for a change of government as  it will be too late to save the nation, debts are  mounting as does the immigration/asylum claims. It may be the case that not all of  our UK MPs are blind to the pending financial disaster, including Labour and other political  party MPs. We trust that as our  elected leaders, they  will also want to   save the nation and  not destroy it by  misguided tried and failed past  policies, which the  public and many professionals can  see are not succeeding but leading us to chaos and bankruptcy.  Let us choose to  make adjustments now, before it is too late, the MPs in particular. Please consider current events, think for yourselves, do not follow the crowd, or the party whip, but make history  and start saving  the nation from the brink of disaster. As follows:

1)We suggest that this  is not a time for  a responsible Government to have a  “summer recess”  of 6 weeks, nor a time for Party  Conference, but a time of emergency where civil war  and bankruptcy is being predicted and with a Budget coming up to unjustly increase taxes to the working population  to pay for this without  any significant attempt of controlling this great  influx of  people immediately.  We ask that a recall of Parliament  and a cancellation of all Party Conferences occur and this time instead is spent triggering all, or part  of  the requests  below in order to “bring us back from the brink”. It cannot be business as usual. 

2) Trigger  “ Article 15 of  ECHR: Derogation in time of emergency, only to be invoked in time of war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation”, and to suggest to other EU nations struggling with same problem to do the same. It is courtesy notification and we are unable to wait for permission, and it is likely to be permanent. 

3) We ask for  an immediate  motion/private members bill/Labour Bill  or a simple official MP  request for Military/Navy/RAF/Border Force  to provide options for stopping the Channel boat crossings, by force if need be, and for  the options to be made known publicly.  France is a safe nation, these  people are not fleeing from war,  and many may have an agenda to damage our  nation, hence the 10’000 immigrants in our prisons. Claims of family in the UK is no reason to be allowed into the UK when the Taxpayer is paying for all the costs.

4)As this is an emergency situation, in order to quickly  reverse the pending  financial bankruptcy and decline of the UK (and perhaps other EU nations) and the cause of it, we want  steps taken  for  Asylum claims and appeals and processing   to cease this year,  together with Legal Aid for Asylum, welfare payments, NHS care except emergency care, dentistry, housing, translation, education. We ask for the approximate annual collective cost of all these services provided to Asylum seekers calculated over the last 5 years, added together with the full Foreign  Aid Budget over those years. So that we can then calculate what the next 5 years might cost  and  we can see if  all  this money can be better  used  for permanently resolving this issue. We want these figures by September 2025 and for them  to be made public.

5) Call an election now in order that others who have greater  knowledge of business  and economic  growth issues  can take power. Alternatively, a form of emergency coalition agreed so that Labour   concede more influence  to other party MPs with regard to dealing with the economic and business issues. Ideally   the Labour Chancellor working closely/daily with  Richard Tice whom   as representing  www.reformparty.uk  on an ongoing basis  on the matters of the economy, tax  and spending. and with whom Labour may agree  to work with to reach a combined solution to  begin to resolve  these issues. This should be seen as  temporary emergency alternative means of running the nations economy,  to turn it around,  and may  become permanent if it works. // The website of Rupert Lowe www.restorebritain.org,uk is not a political party but a step towards Direct Democracy where the public vote more directly on some policies which may be an option as time passes. Ben Habib is also setting up party and  his supporters  may also take part in this manner.  The two party system has failed/needs to evolve  and MPs should consider  becoming  a voluntary parliament of   Independents by rejecting the "whip" and  voting for what is best for the nation, not  for the party or a failing ideology which many can see are  leading us to civil war and bankruptcy.  It is not logical that each party should promote different policies just for sake of being different.  It is  logical that there is  only one likely  path for progress, and MPs must come together to discuss what is best to find that path, looking at what has worked before.  We will still have MPs and a Prime Minister  elected every 5 years.  It will never become a  one party system as the MPs need to be elected every 5 years at least, it is more along ancient Greek democracy perhaps. The current chancellor has no business experience and this is the problem. Tony Blair was a Lawyer. current Labour MPs in high office are Human Rights Lawyers, Bank of England office workers, or Union Representatives with no extensive education who left school at 16, many who only have union representation experience. We must balance essential social need  with the reality that we need business people  to create jobs,  and that most people must work unless they have serious physical or mental disability. Labour were trying to do the right thing in reforming the welfare state but were thwarted by idealist MPs who do not realise, due to DEI and woke thinking, that  we cannot keep paying money out to people not working, that could. We also have to create and encourage business, and cut multiple costs/expenditure . We cannot keep taxing the working  people.  None of us can think “left or right” politics anymore, just what needs to be done to avoid bankruptcy and cultural chaos. It is not acceptable to accuse someone of being  a Nazi or far right  because they want to  reform welfare payments, reject Asylum claims/mass immigration, or  pay reparations.  The facts are the numbers entering the Uk are too great, and there is no  money left to spend and a wealth tax just  drives the wealthy and tax income  away.

6) This is a national emergency, or will be if we do not act now.  Due to the pending dire financial and cultural bankruptcy of the UK and other nations,   if a  general election is refused by the Labour leadership, then we ask that all MPs reconsider their  position and collectively/individually refuse the “whip” and all MPs choose to  become “Independents”. They should announce at the same time if  they  are affiliated as   Independents  for themselves, Labour, Tory, Liberal, Reform etc but that they  want the freedom in these difficult times to vote for what is best for the nation and by conscience  i.e.  free speech, law and order and justice for all “without fear or favour”. i.e. not for a minority  with  “protected characteristics” of race,  religion, gender.  This is a failed   system/experiment  and toxic to society and economic growth as is “woke” and DEI.   The  2010 Equality Act and DEI (Diversity, Equality Inclusion) will no longer be tolerated. Good words do not always amount to a “good” outcome, and these are all  leading us to bankruptcy and cultural disaster, division and extinction.

7)If there is no other means to do so,  we  ask that  these  Independent MPs and/or Reform MPs to put forward private members bills on behalf of those who sign this petition, or by some other method known to them as appropriate. The Speaker of the House should compelled   not to block these private members bills listed here.   We want an immediate motion/law  to reverse the 2010 Equality Act with immediate affect, it is making the host nation  population 2nd class citizens in their own land, even losing permanent power over it for each job or public service appointment made by DEI rules.

8) In addition to revoking the 2010 Equality Act,  we want all DEI jobs  and departments terminated and made illegal in private and public institutions by the end of 2025. This will save significant funds in many Taxpayer funded institutions, i.e. Council, NHS, Education, Government, Police, Military etc. They are serving no  practical purpose except promoting/teaching  these policies that cause division and injustice, if revoking another law is required for this, then let this be put forward also. We also ask that  an approximate annual savings total  will be calculated from ending the above and announced to the public what this figure is. This in order that we can all  see and hear how  these funds saved  will be used, to offset the debt,  or  some other purpose.   We want these figures by September 2025. // We suggest that a Common Courtesy Culture is introduced instead of DEI and Human Rights (please see www.BritishIndependentInternationalParty.org  - virtual party only). We cannot legalize  multiple cultures,  preferring some over others, the only one that should be preferred is the English in England, the Welsh in Wales etc.  It is our nation and others have chosen to come and live in it  over the decades. It is not for the host nation to absorb the demands of many conflicting cultures and pay for it,  and has made the host nation population 2nd class citizens in their own nation. We reject the defamation of British history and its replacements by a false contrived narrative.  Immigrants of 20 years or more  should be as concerned as the English as to what is is occurring and make a stand against it.

9)We ask that an immediate motion/private members bill  for all  10’000 immigrants in our prisons   are deported /repatriated to their home nation, and that the EU and UN without fail supports this for all nations that apply in this time of crisis. It is the UN and EU  that cared in a biased manner for the Asylum seekers and has  compelled leaders   by law to take in  millions of immigrants  to the detriment of  their own  population. They need to acknowledge their error in this policy and assist in the repatriation of these criminals and care as much for the safety of host nation populations i.e.  the current and future  victims of  the  10’000  UK crimes in this instance,  some of which were murder, rape and assault. Face/eye pupil recognition should be used to ensure these do not re enter the UK once deported, or improved passport systems. 

10) We ask that all LGBTQ teaching in schools is banned,  also from using  third party teaching materials on this subject such as Mermaids. Teachers  should  refer the children to speak with their parents on such issues. If teachers  speak on sex education,  they should only speak on the biological norms, not the various modern and sometimes perverted options, eventually affecting teenage groups “thinking “ that partial strangulation is part of  love making. Children also do not know what  normal and healthy thinking is with so many "theories" of gender.   It is also a waste of valuable teaching time and creates confusion in susceptible/vulnerable   minds.  We should ask  ourselves why it is that some children who are sexually  abused when young, then become  gay or similar when  adults (not all do). This is because we do not fully understand the minds and emotions  of humans  and that it is possible to “train” a child’s  mind and emotions  into the “unusual”, in a similar way we can train them into good behaviour and a skill.  This is what grooming gangs and pedophiles do, the state education system with DEI and gender issues is “grooming” our children in school into accepting something against biological norms.   Even as we can  unwittingly train our children into  being bullies, if we are bullies, into criminals,  if we are criminals. Children learn from our example.  Encouraging children into thinking on multiple genders, same sex marriage,  choosing to be a  boy or girl opposite to their biological sex  should be  banned, as should  alternate pronouns “they/them”  instead or I/me.  It is a  national abuse on our  children,  and a form of  schizophrenia we are teaching. Even most adults are  confused. Counseling should be accessible for those that may want/need it, but we cannot confuse all children for the sake of  the few that think differently/or have a mental health/behaviour issue such  ADHD/Autism etc. Children  are  in school to  learn the 3Rs and more, and skills to build on talents to obtain a job. At present many are coming out of school without being able to read or write, or starting school not able  speak English, or handle a knife/fork  properly, nor toilet trained.  Teaching on DEI (Diversity Equality Inclusion)   in schools should also be banned,  as these laws should  soon be revoked. They were  an experiment by some  which is   destroying  national cohesion and causing national  bankruptcy. As an example, a  judge  made a  judgement  on Birmingham   Council in 2023 that they should pay “back pay” to  women, based on the lack of  equality of pay between  men and women. This bankrupted the Council and they had to sell off  historic town buildings in order to pay this “back pay”. This cannot be allowed by Unions/Strikes/Judges, it is unsustainable. (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-67053587

11)We thank the 50% of doctors who have not voted to strike in 2025. We ask those that are,  to delay for another year  such an action as the nation and NHS is in a state of emergency  and they had an unprecedented pay rise in 2024.  Doctors / nurses should not be allowed to strike, it is a form of blackmail and  manslaughter. Give their  notice in if they  are unhappy, but strikes are not acceptable morally.  Multiple patients do die earlier than they would due to cancelled appointments. They were called junior doctors because they are still undergoing training from Consultants. Their salaries rise annually and many on £60'0000 pa. Once trained they can command very high salaries. They are in breach of their oath "to do no harm". They cannot expect privately funded  salaries while still training and in a public funded institution. 

12) We are not agreement with the Indian Trade Deal which allows visas for 3 years with no payment of NI  for that period and allowing dependents  to arrive and accessing our NHS service. This  while UK born employers are paying an increased  NI  rate for  their employees as per the  2024 budget. Many Hospice, Care Homes, small business have closed due to this. It  is totally unacceptable that a Trade Deal allows such an injustice. We want this Trade Deal, or this aspect of it revoked immediately.  Let experts review this deal including ReformUK and previous members of it, and revoke this  deal  if need be. No deal is better than another onerous  deal. 

13) We do not agree   with the  tentative and vague UK -  French  “one in one out”  deal with regard to the illegal migration,  we want all  these channel  boats stopped this year at the latest  with no special “safe routes” to resolve it. We  are happy with closer ties with France and  the French, but not with the  EU membership rules, particularly if once any deal is signed, we will be obliged to pay yet more money to extricate ourselves. This  deal also gives  further "fishing rights" away. Let experts review this deal including ReformUK and Ex members of it,  and revoke this  deal if need be, before it is confirmed.  No deal is better than another onerous  deal. 

14) We understand multiple companies  and universities are issuing multiple visas, as is the London Mayors office and who are  also paying their visas of £1’200 approximately each,  i.e. paid by the Taxpayer. We have millions in London looking for work, do DEI rules extend to employing those actually abroad now? We also want such visa consents to cease immediately and  that all visa issue is via the Home Office only. 

15)We want all Mayor positions to be revoked by April 2026. The London Mayors position  has  increased  our Taxpayer  Council  Tax costs by about a third. Mayors  have  too much power and influence  over the Police and too much money to spend on things biased toward the immigrant population, London belongs tot he nation which is still 73% English. The London Mayor  provides little actual  service, only art, or removing it, or preferential treatment for immigrants with regard to London, and other damaging policies.  The London Mayor did not discourage  the BLM protests in 2020  while we were in Lockdown and protecting each other and the NHS.  Nor did the Ethiopian  Director General of the World Health Organization. What an  irony that the director of a world health agency  did not ban the BLM Protests while the world was being  told “not to go out”,   yet said  BLM Protests were a special case and could.  In both instances,  these individuals were   partisan to the BLM cause, not for the common good. This was  an Abuse of Public Office and Trust.  We ask that steps are  taken to remove these men  from office, and the   “title”  Sir  removed for the London Mayor.  Some  Mayors are good,  but it is  a position  that is easily abused and another layer of costly bureaucracy.  

16) Democracies are successful because we  generally have small families, work, and obey the law, we reject the suggestion of removing the 2 child benefit  cap which will only benefit large immigrant families often not working, Failing nations around the world are in poverty because they have  more than 2 children. In the UK they have them too young i.e. before 25, often with no job or reliable  partner.  In  some nations there is no contraception, or pressure from their partner to refuse it, which needs to be rectified for the sake of a woman’s choice in  these struggling nations.   We also cannot overcome poverty and homelessness in the UK  while mass immigration continues and we will not pay more tax to alleviate these issues until immigration is stopped.  It is foolish of the Government MPs to suggest this and we do not want more Taxpayer money spent on this issue until the boats and immigration is stopped as it is a bottomless pit of demand.. After it is stopped  we can discuss the  PIP, Welfare and Pension  reforms. They announced on the BBC that  homelessness has doubled since Covid, this is disingenuous (insincere) and misleading,  Covid is not the reason, but the mass immigration. We also ask for a  breakdown of every  race, gender and age of every person registered homeless  and the date they arrived in the UK and a summary of this list to be made public. We want this by September 2025.

17) The Rental Reform Bill  is being rushed through even though the Courts are already  overwhelmed.  If tenants fail to pay rent  or severe  ASB  (anti social behaviour) issues occur,  this  will mean severe delays for Landlords to remove tenants  while receiving no rent,  or on going problems/complaints from neighbours suffering ASB. The Section 21 notice was introduced in 1988  as owners were unable to regain occupancy of their properties. This Bill is again  too weighted against landlords, it is regression. It also gives too much leeway for multiple dog ownership  in cities. This is leading to increased fouling in parks and streets, dogs not on leads  in tubes and railways stations, restaurants, pubs and most dangerous of all in the supermarkets, owners often refuse point blank to leave when asked by staff.  As dog  owners increase,  often with two or more dogs, we are going to have increased noise nuisance from barking,  and health and safety risks  from fouling and dog urine contamination  on the streets,  Toxicariasis  risks from fouling,   and  children and adults being bitten. Some dogs are very large and I have been caught between two wanting to attack  each other   while walking, and was bitten by another small dog this  year while walking in the park. This part  of the Rental Reform Bill (enforced acceptance of dogs on council and private   landlords)  will be increasingly costly   to Councils and  dangerous for society from fouling  as the dog numbers increase. There is a reason dogs being allowed or not  were  down to landlord choice and in a cities. The Bill has also  now removed the need for Pet Insurance in case of damage to property, again reducing protections to Landlords.  The Rental Reform Bill should be delayed for a year and even revoked, as it  is making Landlords leave the  rental market when the Councils need more property rentals.  In my experience the Section 21 was only used for difficult Tenants. 

18) Since the Rental Reform Bill pending, Landlords have been  selling  large portfolios of their properties en masse to  large business and institutions, often overseas. These properties  are usually in the first/second  time buyer range. We need an URGENT  law to stop this so that we do not lose this price range of homes for the youth now, and in the future. The new law should also state that Buy to Let Properties can only be sold singly to  owner occupiers, this will bring property prices down to manageable levels. In this same law, Buy to Let mortgages  should no longer be offered  on properties under £500’000 (figure to be reviewed 5 yearly)  to ensure that first and second buyers as owner occupiers are not constantly outbid by Buy to Let owners. This law should also consider restrictions on purchasing  second home ownership unless for a relative who will be living in it  throughout the year. This is to avoid the problem of holiday homes being bought up for holiday lets or summer use only, and locals unable to rent or buy. There should be a general expectation that the law promotes  one home for one person or family, not that one person or business owns many of the cheapest homes available. 

19) A law should immediately be  passed to ban first cousin marriages which is known to cause severe child disabilities, causing suffering to the child and huge costs to the NHS. In the UK the  British English are taught as a child that such a marriage  is not acceptable/advised. Those willfully entering these marriages should be registered by law  and  will be deported with their families who have often been coerced into  such a marriage for cultural or religious reasons. To avoid deportation a  compulsory amniotic test taken, and an abortion if advised by the Doctor.  

20) The Voting age should not be reduced to  16 years. If anything it should be raised to 25 and greater basic education on Politics and the Economy. This  lower voting age is only  suggested  to boost  Labours voting base, not for the common good, the nation, or the 16 year olds. Labour is in the process of  bankrupting the UK  following Marxist/Communist style policies. Most (not all)  of us  do not know what we are doing  when voting,  often guessing or following  the lead of friends or family. With multiple cultures, many not even  speaking English,  more and more will be voting blind and “partisan” to a religion, or a “group”, or family. Adding 16 year olds will compound this problem.

21) The BBC should be compelled with other institutions  to  divest  itself of DEI positions and appointments   and employ staff  only by talent. We  also ask that the  BBC  has TV and Radio discussions on  the policies listed on this Petition with experts/commentators from  politically left and right leaning, while on the  same program and   with equal number of participants on both sides of the political argument. They can be  MPs or those of Political  standing and influence  and  those linked to Reform UK. Also Rupert Murdoch, Ben Habib,  Matt Goodwin, Douglas Murray, Winston Marshall, David Starsky, Dominic Cummings, Jordon Peterson Tommy Robinson,  Peter Whittle and those connected to  The New Culture  Forum and multiple others not mentioned here as suggested by the above.  With regard to Gaza, the original “Son of  Hamas” should be invited,  Mosab Hassan Yousef  " American author and ex-Palestinian militant who defected to Israel in 1997, thereafter working as an Israeli spy for the Shin Bet until he moved to the United States in 2007. His father is Hassan Yousef, a co-founder of the Palestinian Islamist organization Hamas", He as more experience of the Palestinians  and Israel  than any man on earth, but the BBC do not  interview him, this is a  very biased act of  omission.  In fact it would "appear" the BBC assisted  Hamas to usurp the name “Son of  Hamas” by the recent documentary  film of a child using that title  and that was then rightly  withdrawn by Tim Davie due to lack of journalistic   investigation. Nevertheless if one searches “Son of Hamas” this child’s name  now comes up, so Hamas achieved their aim of usurping the real “Son of Hamas”  leader, assisted by the biased BBC  staff, was this done purposely by some. The BBC may well be preventing peace and discord worldwide by its bias and “woke” philosophy of its staff due to DEI rules, or allowing itself  to be coerced into  by individuals and DEI rules,

22)It  should be reiterated  by the BBC and to  the Government  before  any discussion about  “peace”  being  demanded of  Israel with Hamas, that the speakers/MPs are reminded every time that 1) Hamas has said they  will do again and again.  what they did to Israel on 07.10.23.  2) That the attack on 07.10.23 was an  ISIS Islamic style of war on the innocent and defenseless. It was a slaughter, supposedly sanctioned by God, as all  attackers were Muslim.  3)That hostages have been  cynically held in order to exchange for Palestinian  prisoners, violent or otherwise we know not,   with an exchange rate of 1 hostage (often already dead), for 100 Palestinian prisoners.  The war could have ended 2 years ago if Hamas  had released the hostages. The West and those against Israel, including the public and celebrities causes Israel to be humiliated with such an exchange rate, yet still demand unilateral  submission by Israel to the demands of Hamas who started this violence,  and blame Israel only. If the UK  had been attacked from Wales and they were holding hostages for money lets say,  would we be so understanding? Hamas is a violent religious group whose holy book says they can kill  if need be. The UK is  also now in  a  "group think” with  the woke and left wing  UN  and EU, and  instead of leading the way to a just and fair response to an ally in severe  trouble with the equivalent of  ISIS on its border. It applies sanctions, and does nothing to reprimand  Hamas, stopping Foreign Aid or similar. The current Labour Government mean to apply sanctions on Israel unless they submit to their demands, yet as the Ukrainians are  the front line for Russian aggression,  Israel are the front line for ISIS style   terrorism.  Hamas  leaders are millionaires and are very safe in Qatar, also receiving Foreign Aid, while their peoples suffer. If peace is enforced and access is given to Hamas to other land in Israel for a two state solution, they will not keep any peace deal, as they want all  the land and for  Israel not to exist. Israel is being asked to put themselves danger,  by those not in danger i.e. UN/EU/UK and others.  This war is a very deep and ancient sibling rivalry, as well as about the land,  explained in the Bible  more  than the Quran. If we do not know this in detail, we have no right to discuss or make a judgement on the matter. Students, celebrities, the media, who   seem to think  that Hamas  can start the war, benefit  from it and  the hostages,  and   then demand a unsustainable  peace with the aimto   eventually destroy Israel. Unless God Is around of  course, he may be. (Zephaniah 2:1-15 /1Thessolonians 5:3 enter refs into www.BibleHub.com) . Please note the Ukraine gave up its  nuclear weapons to Russia  in 1994   with  security assurances  from the USA, UK, and Russia. Now Ukraine stands alone with no sure security of assistance from any of these nations. The UK, UN, USA may well  also not stand by Israel  in the future if  the UN and others compel Israel to capitulate to the peace demanded by these same nations and other  groups.  If Hamas then  breach any peace agreement and attack Israel  once again, it may well be  a successful full  destruction of Israel next time.  This is what is at stake, no one should be thinking that  calling peace will solve the problem.

23) The Gaza War is a religious and ancestral/family  war which no one will understand properly (if then) without reading the Bible and Quran and knowing some of  the actual history of who has occupied/ruled  the land since ancient times and particularly since 1900 and how the name Palestine evolved. If we do not know, or do not have a a least a  broad idea of the issues,  we will only have a biased opinion. Celebrities, students and others so very vocal on this issue,  may well be relying on biased  “soundbites” and  woke/DEI beliefs.  To assist  a better  understanding, we ask for  a respectful discussion instigated by the BBC, about Human Rights and their authenticity or not,  and the obvious errors (when the Bible and Quran are read in full) in the Muslim and Christian religion. The Public and Politicians  are compelled to adhere to  EU and UN  Human Rights which are causing this immigration/Asylum disaster, yet  Human Rights and English law contradict  each other and support  the breach of English  Law.  For instance   “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief…,”   what happens if the commands in a religious  Holy Book (Quran)  says “ wife may be scourged/chastised if disobedient” (Surah 4:35 Quran). We will never abolish domestic abuse against women with  such commands  as if from God, and  then the religion  is also  protected/condoned by Human Rights. Also  that  believers   “should  not befriend Jews and Christians” (Surah 5:52 Quran)  which is anti semitic and also a command not to integrate. There are also many verses to fight, slay or kill   unbelievers,  who are “a people without intelligence” (Surah 8:65 Quran). All these commands will be in the “thinking” of  Muslims we pass in the street, and those elected and unelected in our Government, due to the book they read/believe i.e. "They long that ye should disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level (with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor helper from among them "(Surah 4:89 Quran) This verse is a present active command and is saying if a believer  turns away from the religion, it is right that they  be killed, this  is in direct conflict with Article 18 of  UN Human Rights.  We should also ask, how safe are those Muslims in the Government, or in the  public eye who publicly denounce their faith for instance, or are compelled by other Muslim  to follow the demands of their faith group rather than the common good of all, possible through fear of  reprimand according to Islamic Law and family or religious group. 

24)  Due to the above, we reject the idea by Labour of an “Islamophobia” definition which means “unreasonable fear” of Islam, and all such laws or definitions must be revoked as they are based on error. There is good reason to fear Islam due to the above verses and many others,  and why terrorism occurs by  believers in  the Quran. This is not the fault of the people/believers, but the book, which is often  not read in full by many,   nor do all people read ALL the Bible either, on which the Quran  is loosely based.  We therefore also ask for a respectful Media discussion worldwide,  instigated by the BBC,  of  both the  Christian and Islamic faith. The Christian faith also has a problem, though different to  Islam. Millions of people believe the Bible  and the interpretation by  the Roman  Catholic or Protestant (those not Catholic)  Churches who teach  its message with varying deviations. It could be said the Quran was the first deviation from the Gospel of Jesus Christ (the New Testament  in the Bible). The Gospel and  its words promote peace and mercy  and  the “way” we  can receive eternal life. It is not by killing others,  and always by choice to believe or not. It does  have an horrendous ending  for mankind in Revelation,  and one last war involving Gaza  bizarrely, and the Jerusalem, Judah (the jews). This  seems to be  a punishment  from God himself on all mankind, or nations who do not believe in Jesus Christ. We can escape this great trouble it seems, if we believe in Jesus Christ and his  words, which is the only way we can live again after death, so it is written. There are not multiple ways to God,  all religions do not all lead to life after death  it seems, or  to be part of  the “kingdom of God”, which I think might be  slightly different to just being raised to life again. The Kingdom seems to be those who come with Christ when he returns for  a 1000 years to rule on earth it appears, there then is a another final resurrection after the 1000 years for the rest  of mankind, but it’s a time of judgement for them. This seems to be how the story goes, IF it is true. Due to the mention of Gaza and Jerusalem/Judah in the Bible and of  “Gaza breaching/magnifying themselves against Israels borders” (Zephaniah 2:1-15 enter ref into www.BibleHub.com) and that these verses were  written/spoken maybe 3000 years ago,  we should ask ourselves  “how did they get it the future so right?  Why would 2 “nations”  or named  areas/ peoples,  of  such  small numbers be mentioned in that ancient  time, but  are  now the key peoples causing worldwide discord at this moment? We should   take note of this, is it coincidence,  or something more? There are also verses in the Old Testament in the Bible where it is predicted that the world would no longer be run as Empires but become multiple  smaller nation (see pages 119,120, 121 on www.ACertainMyth.com It also says that  the “people”  will  not easily mix/integrate during that time,  again,  how was this known 3000 years or so ago?   // There are also 2 major errors in the Christian church and what their leaders preach/teach. The first  is that God is 3  “personas”   in some way, i.e. the Trinity,"Father, Son, Holy Ghost", and that  Jesus is God as well as the Son of God. The Muslims/Quran  would   agree that these are errors,  but Muslims/Quran reject Jesus as the Son of God. The Quran does say we should  read and believe the “scriptures from aforetime” which is the Bible and which includes the Torah.  The Quran also  says we  believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah and to obey him, Muslims are  instructed to read the Gospels therefore (the New Testament in the Bible), but the Gospel message has been confused with the above 2 errors. I have read both the Quran and Bible front to back several times. It seems clear to me that Jesus Christ  is the Son of God with the actual spirit of God IN him, which is the Holy Spirit, also called Spirit of Truth Comforter etc, just  different names. The bible verse confirms this, but different church leaders interpret it differently i.e. the trinity and that Jesus is God as well as the Son when he is not, if we go by what is written.// The Message of this part of the Gospel, seems to be  that it is just God, his Son  who was  miraculously conceived by God’s Spirit and power,  and then God’s Spirit was   IN/with his Son,   and then IN us when we believe his words. This will will raise us to life again, as Jesus was raised and who was  the “first born of the dead” to prove what he said was true, that we could live again, and this was the way.   It seems this is because his  words are  “spirit” and “truth”.  The   words we humans speak  are also our spirit, but not necessarily  truth.  The  human spirit in us, that living, feeling invisible being IN us,  is how we are the “image” or likeness of God,  but it  is our human  spirit speaking,   and  our words are not all truth, nor bring everlasting life, except when we preach the Gospel.  Which if  true, is why it may be very important which words we follow and believe, whatever race we are, or  belief  we currently follow, what we all believe may be  incomplete still. If we are those who  hope  there is a God in the world that can give us eternal life/paradise we should consider this possibility.   Please  go to www.BritishIndependentInternationalParty.org   and www.ACertainMyth.com (oR iS iT tRUE) for further information on this and all the above. Which should  to be used as a basis for the  media discussions suggested,  and with regard to the religious issues, to  include the Muslim, Christian and secular world,  and Jewish participants if they choose.  

 

avatar of the starter
Linda GPetition Starter

Petition Updates