HERITAGE LAWS & SPOT REZONING IS DENYING AUSTRALIANS OF THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS”.
Copy of Submission Objection sent to: All Randwick Councillors.
RE: OBJECTION TO RANDWICK COUNCILS TARGETING OF PROPERTIES & SUBMISSIONS SUCH AS “DA #944/2018”
It might be said, that when local Councillors are elected by their electorate, that we, the Australian citizens, place our destinies for many aspects of our daily lives, in “Councillors Care”.
Whilst we may hope (though we may no longer expect), that despite whatever party the respective Councillor might represent or align themselves with, that as an elected official, that their goals and objectives, would also aim to both protect and enhance the lives for ALL citizens within their electorate (ie. In this instance, the ratepayers, citizens and all those people choosing to live within Randwick electorate).
This submission, is objecting to the protagonist action being taken by select group of Randwick Councillors, that are fighting the legal entitlements, of Australian property owners, when planning or making development submissions, such as DA #944/2018.
As an Australian, I feel the recent barrage of proposals being undertaken by small groups of Councillors in various cities throughout Australia, that have resulted in the “Spot Rezoning” of local properties under the guise of Heritage and Conservation listing, is both “DISCRIMINATORY and MORALLY UNJUST”.
DISCRIMINATING in its nature against the views held by the majority of all Australians, and specifically, those Australian that are actual and real property owners (now and in the future).
MORALLY UNJUST for property owners that have purchased properties in good faith, mindful of the current laws and town plans in place, only to find themselves adversely impacted, and financially and emotionally devastated, by these proposals and submissions and outcomes. I believe these proposals are immoral and unethical, and that they are occurring outside of the normal practices for changes being made to Town Planning laws and guidelines abided around Australia.
If , “in your hands, do we trust our future, or do we hold our hopes”, these very actions are threatening to destroy our belief in all levels our Governments use of the systems, its processes, and the Laws we hold faith in.
“Blind Freddy” can see that these Council actions will rob us, and strip us, and DENY us, of our Australian property rights.
Councillors believe that their actions can be justified, as being for the greater good of all. This logic is simply untrue, and is certainly misguided.
I believe, my submission, objecting to this practice, represents the majority of Australians. Australians that want to protect their AUSTRALIAN PROPERTY OWNERSHIP RIGHTS first and foremost. Australian that cherish and want to maintain the RIGHTS to our families CASTLE. I state here-in that these rights are not for others to have, nor are they yours to play with as you wish. I challenge ALL COUNCILLORS here and now, for you to prove me wrong.
If Councils continue to condone this form of action and process, we will be reducing, if not eliminating, any real and tangible property ownership rights, that we as Australians might have in the future. Maybe I am wrong, but I don’t believe the majority of other Australians or Australian politicians, believe that this outcome is desired or correct.
I would ask, that all Randwick Councillors again consider that their proposals to Heritage and Conservation list private properties, and realise that their actions are “not” benefiting the majority of Australians as a whole.
Our submission, is about achieving a fair outcome for ALL AUSTRALIANS, and not just for the minorities or minority groups.
Our submission is 100% focused on changing the Heritage Act to protect all "Australians Property Rights", and is intended for every AUSTRALIAN, whether they currently own a home or not. This submission is taking aim at laws that allow minority groups, to steal, strip away and rob us, and deny us, of our Australian rights.
Changes are needed, to prevent parties that have NO FINANCIAL STAKE invested, or outlaid, with owning any specific AUSTRALIAN FAMILY PROPERTIES.
OUR SUBMISSION SEEKS TO SUPPORT “ DA #944/2018” APPROVAL BY THE RANDWICK COUNCIL.
We are asking that the Randwick Council assist our efforts, to and help us have the Heritage Act amended.
“We are asking here-in, that the HERITAGE ACT be amended to include provisions, that make it compulsory for any and all proposer/s, seeking to list a property for either Heritage Listing or Conservation listing, that such proposer/s are made responsible for, obtaining the written consent and agreement from the current Property Owners, before the current property owners property, can be proposed, considered or approved, for either Heritage Listing or Conservation listing, in any Local, State or Federal Government listing or register etc, in any State or Territory, of Australia".
Our submission is about seeking a FAIR GO for all Australians, and not just the more vocal ones, promoting their own cause.
With the Randwick Councils support and assistance, I believe this action would be greatly appreciated by the majority of Australians, and citizens of Randwick in particular, and that their real support, would be in the interests of all Australians.
Lastly, we would also welcome the reversal of the decisions, as they might be applied to our property at 38 Dudley Street, Coogee NSW 2034. We ask for the removal of our house/property, from any Heritage or Conservation lists/registers, that it might currently be on, or approved to be on, in this respect.
This petition, is for people supporting that changes BE made to the Heritage Act. This petition will continue until we are able to bring about these changes that are needed to be made to the Heritage Act, as described here-in above.
If elected Councillors continue to spot change our laws and town plans around us, a lack of confidence will certainly result with our system).