This update is an excerpt of comment on FB with respect to this petition. ------------------------------- The Wikipedia is adamant to change its article. If you talk of peer-reviewed scientific studies, there are hundreds of studies - peer reviewed, published in mainstream journals with high "impact factors"! Everytime, we try to insert a valid study on Wikipedia, the page is locked, nobody can edit it. Despite repeated tries, no one can get there, because it is "locked" deliberately. Wikipedia must be open minded, as a mandate, but in this case it is not. Let the science be rejected by science, and not by idiotic skepticism. If someone wants to disprove homeopathy, he must do it by research. The rigorous studies with positive outcomes are more in number than the negative ones. If we have allegations that we only "say" homeopathy, so does the skeptics when they "say" it doesn't work. But we have "Scientific Proof"!!!!! http://researchinhomeopathy.org/database/fundamental-research/ http://researchinhomeopathy.org/database/clinical-research/ https://www.hri-research.org/resources/research-databases/ and much more....... A substantial fundamental and basic research work is being done by various scientists/authorities like Iris Bell, Paolo Bellavite, Anisur Khuda-Bukhsh, Jayesh Bellare, Karin Lenger, Nirmal Chand Sukul, Anirban Sukul, Chaturbhuja Nayak, Papiya Nandy, Anil Khurana, Demangeat, CR Mahata, Alexander Tournier Homeoinst, John Benneth and many more people for whom I would need couple of hours to write. And this list does not include the authorities who worked on homeopathy and high dilutions in past! It clearly shows the vested interests of lobbyism which is reflecting through the unequal policies of Wikipedia!