Alternative way or “plan B” is obtaining an Advisory opinion from International Court of Justice on the Legality of Additional Conditions (Draft) United Nations Resolution (UNGA/UNSC) The General Assembly / The Security Council Considering Article 2 (1,7) of the Charter of the United Nations, Considering Article 4 (1) of the Charter of the United Nations, Considering Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, Considering the General Assembly Resolution 113/II of 1947, Considering the General Assembly Resolution 197/III of 1948, Considering the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of 28 May, 1948, For the purpose to determine whether additional conditions were imposed in the procedure of admitting “The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” to the membership of the United Nations, outside the scope of the exhaustive conditions of Article 4(1) of the Charter of the United Nations, Decides to submit the following legal question to the International Court of Justice: Are the specific conditions enshrined in resolutions GA Res. 47/225 (1993) of the General Assembly and SC Res. 817 (1993) of the Security Council in their parts relating to the denomination “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”, with the requirement for settlement of the “difference that has arisen over the name of the State”, outside the scope of the exhaustive conditions of Article 4(1) of the Charter of the United Nations and legally in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations? (After positive outcome in the International Court of Justice, after adoption of the Answer from the International Court of Justice by UN, United Nations will implement Advisory Opinion and provide for continuation of membership for the Subject State as the Republic of Macedonia.) Note: Bilateral agreement between Macedonia and Greece (1995) can not prevent actions of the United Nations organs or delivering of the ICJ Advisory Opinion.