No white ethnic group permits its domination by another.

The white countries of Europe are living proof of the power of ethnic nationalism, and the consequences of a lack of common identity and language. They are also living examples of the adage that a ship that has 2 captains sinks. Since 1990, 34 new countries have been created nearly all of them in Europe.
 
1991 – Soviet Union, a country of several white ethnic groups, separated peacefully, initially into 12 Republics.
 
1992 – Yugoslavia, a country of 6 white ethnic groups, broke up in conflict into Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia.
 
1993 – Czechoslovakia, a country of 2 ethnic groups, broke up peacefully into Czech Republic and Slovakia.
 
Even where white ethnic groups cohabit, they still do not accept for one group to dominate over another. In the UK, for example, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales live their separate lives. In Canada, French-speaking Quebec lives its own separate live from the English-speaking provinces. In Switzerland, not only do the German, French, Italian and Roman ethnic groups live their separate lives, they also take turns to govern the combined country.
 
Like Czechoslovakia, the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, Nigeria comprises of very distinct nationalities housed within their own separate traditional boundaries. Therefore, Nigeria could be separated along natural ethnic boundaries without much ado. And, since Nigeria has no cross-boundary ventures, there is no requirement for negotiations to divide assets. The different ethnic nationalities in Nigeria can simply get up and go. Nationalist aspirations are today simply too widespread for the Nigeria army to successfully supress as it had been able to do in the past. What Nigeria needs now is a broker, a role that President Bush admirably performed in 1991 for the peaceful breakup of the Soviet Union. Britain, as creator of Nigeria, is ideally suited for this role.