Honors Services Fraud, Conflict of interest, and Raketeering.

The racketeering allegations include predicate acts of mail or wire fraud, and predicate state law crimes including obstruction of justice and child abduction.. The alleged federal crimes also include the theft, misuse or conversion of federal funds received by the court. This example, and other systemic conflict of interest violations that permeate Sacramento Family Court ultimately result in the public being denied the federally protected right to honest government services (18 USC 1346), a federal crime. http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/search/label/CONFLICT%20OF%20INTEREST The judge has repeatedly been reassigned because of incompetence, complaints, and misconduct, including being caught by a bailiff in his chambers with a female court employee. The incident led to the judge's wife filing for divorce. Currently, Judge Matthew Gary reportedly has a consensual, but nonetheless improper relationship with his court clerk, Christina Arcuri. For more information about the institutionalized corruption - which includes the predicate acts and crime elements required under the federal racketeering statute (I8 USC 1962) - in the family law division of Sacramento Superior Court, visit this URL: http://sacramentocountyfamilycourtnews.blogspot.com/p/temporary-judges.html Every attorney who appears before Judge Matthew Gary is a potential customer of his wife, or is a customer of his wife. Under state law (CCP § 170.1) this constitutes a conflict of interest that requires, at a minimum, disclosure to parties and attorneys. Under state law, the judge should disqualify himself in cases where an attorney is a customer of his wife. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxmoWgmUghgadnJfV2liU3hlaUE/view?usp=sharing