Nearly 20 months after being suspended, and over 17 months after my Investigation hearing, I was sent by email on November 2nd in hospital a list of charges and a bundle of 189 pages. I was told I had till December 1st to get a response in and my hearing, at a venue yet to be decided, was on December 11th. I was given no choice as to the date of my hearing. It would seem that there are 2 categories of those who are accused. Because I was sent a letter from Jane Shaw, Secretary to the National Constitutional Committee, Labour’s Kangaroo Court, to another suspended member a Mr X stating that ‘A panel of the NCC will now be appointed to hear this case and details of the hearing will be given to you as soon as possible. Hearings are currently being arranged to take place in January 2018 and every effort will be made to accommodate you according to your availability if you can let me know before 28 November which dates you could not attend a hearing in January.’ I was given no opportunity to decide what dates I could and could not make. December 11th was set in stone. I therefore wrote to Jane Shaw, enclosing a copy of the email from Mr X and asking why the disparity in treatment. Ms Shaw, who I had not previously suspected had a sense of humour sent me the following email: On 22 November 2017 at 15:53, Jane Shaw wrote: Dear Mr Greenstein, The Party never discusses matters relating to individual members with third parties. To which I responded: Dear Ms Shaw, I confess that when I read your statement 'The Party never discusses matters relating to individual members with third parties. ' I had to rub my eyes in astonishment. I can think of only 3 explanations for your statement. i. Either you are in possession of one of those extendable Pinnochio noses or ii. You are in possession of a sense of humour, a quality not normally known amongst Labour's Blairite civil service or iii. You are suffering from delusions, hallucinations or other symptoms of a psychotic disorder, in which case you have my sympathy. I first learnt about the reasons for my suspension when I read the Telegraph and Times of 2nd April 2016. Up to then the Compliance Unit had refused to tell me what it was that I was alleged to have said that had led to my suspension. This could only have come from a leak from Labour Party staff such as yourself. Jackie Walker and others have complained about having been leaked against suggesting that it is an unofficial policy condoned by Iain McNicol. McNicol has consistently resisted my suggestion that he Inquire into these leaks. It is of course understandable that he should resist having a leak Inquiry since there is no purpose in inquiring into that which you already know. Perhaps I should remind you what Shami Chakrabarti said in her Report, a Report that is no longer available on the Labour Party's website. In a section titled Publicity she wrote: 'It is completely unfair, unacceptable and a breach of Data Protection law that anyone should have found out about being the subject to an investigation or their suspension by way of the media and indeed that leaks, briefing or other publicity should so often have accompanied a suspension pending investigation.' Your absurd statement was sent in response to my having pointed out that you were saying one thing to me and another thing to others who are suspended in respect of time limits for preparing submissions. You have not said where the NCC hearing is. Please be advised that because of care for my son I will, like the Investigation Hearing, be unable to make a meeting at a venue outside Brighton and Hove. Tony Greenstein It is clear that my Expulsion Hearing has been Expedited at the urging of Labour’s crooked General Secretary Iain McNicol and the Zionist Jewish Labour Movement. For more information go to Labour Against the Witchhunt https://www.facebook.com/groups/1511823672245906/?fref=ts Labour Against the Witch-hunt http://www.labouragainstthewitchhunt.org/