Please see the following emails sent to a number of attorneys regarding the mishandling of Lyme disease...
When “evidence-based medicine” has been spun to fit bias agendas and the patient voice has been intentionally ignored who investigates the dishonest science?
---------- Original Message ----------
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: 1 Undisclosed Recipient
Cc: 7 Undisclosed Recipients
Date: 06/30/2024 11:01 AM EDT
Subject: Calling all criminal lawyers!
Consider the following...
Allegations of fabricated research undermine key Alzheimer’s theory
https://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/alzheimers-theory-undermined-accusations-fabricated-research-rcna39843
“Allegations that part of a key 2006 study of Alzheimer's disease may have been fabricated have rocked the research community, calling into question the validity of the study's influential results.”
Imagine if your clinical trial is based on the hypothesis of an original clinical trial, published 16 years ago, that has just made shocking headline?
Let’s go back to 2001 when the NIH funded antibiotic trials for Lyme disease set the stage for treatment denial as no evidence of persistent infection was found in a total of more than 700 different blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples from the 129 patients in these studies but in 2018 all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.
Lyme patient Vicki Logan’s 1991 positive culture test performed by the Centers for Disease Control should have set off a red flag but was ignored while the focus remained on discrediting the sick and disabled Lyme patient population. The patient died after the insurer refused additional IV antibiotic therapy.
Vicki Logan’s CDC Fort Collins Positive CSF Culture Report: (Personal Dropbox account)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vthfdpn7gv8bne2/Logan%20CDC%20Fort%20Collins%20Positive%20CSF%20%20Culture%20Report.JPG?dl=0
In addition, there are 700 peer reviewed publications identifying persistent infection.
So why is all this evidence ignored? Are those antibiotic trials flawed or even worse, deliberately fabricated? The twenty-three year old Klempner antibiotic trials stopped all government funding to find a cure (better antimicrobials) but clinicians on the front lines advanced the science (dapsone, disulfiram for example) and privately funded research by Northeastern professor Kim Lewis is now investigating hygromycin A.
The only new product on the market for Lyme is a vaccine which is highly, highly suspicious as any new antimicrobial would give the public an excuse not to take a vaccine. Didn’t we just witness this through Covid and the ivermectin scandal? It should be no surprise that the NIHfunded ACTIV-6 ivermectin study found no benefit for treating Covid.
How Ivermectin Trials Were Designed to Fail
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/how-ivermectin-trials-were-designed-to-fail-5616759
Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 221 studies
https://c19ivm.org/
Klempner’s antibiotic trials set the foundation for the IDSA’s Lyme treatment guidelines and the excuse for insurance companies to deny reimbursement outside of those very restrictive guidelines. Finding serious flaws (or fabrication) in those trials topples the IDSA’s house of cards. A chronic/relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model as you cannot prove vaccine efficacy in a disease where we do not know who has or does not have the infection.
So, deny chronic Lyme through an NIH funded study, deny seronegative disease, and ignore all other evidence that we have been dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug; in other words, patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits over lifesaving care. It should be noted that Klempner is now looking for his piece of the Lyme vaccine pie.
Hundreds of thousands if not millions worldwide have been left to fend for themselves when 2-4 weeks of antibiotics as dictated by the IDSA does not work.
Do we have an uninvestigated crime on our hands?
When “evidence-based medicine” has been spun to fit bias agendas and the patient voice has been intentionally ignored who investigates the dishonest science?
Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH
“In the fullness of time, the mainstream handling of Chronic Lyme Disease will be viewed as one of the most shameful episodes in the history of medicine because elements of academic medicine, elements of government, and the entire insurance industry colluded to deny a disease.” -Kenneth B. Liegner, MD, Internal Medicine, New York
Follow-up email.....
---------- Original Message ----------
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: 1 Undisclosed Recipient
Cc: 7 Undisclosed Recipients
Date: 07/01/2024 8:04 AM EDT
Subject: Re: Calling all criminal lawyers!
On 06/30/2024 11:01 AM EDT CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net> wrote: "... any new antimicrobial would give the public an excuse not to take a vaccine."
Case in point: (From a 2016 letter addressed to Ian Smith MD, Executive Director of the WHO's Director-General's Office)
In 2008 Nordin Zeidner published his study regarding single dose Doxycycline for tick bite. Pamela Weintraub interviewed Zeidner for her book:
Cure Unknown (Revised Edition): Inside the Lyme Epidemic
By Pamela Weintraub
https://books.google.com/books?id=kEWqCFNrqt4C&pg=PA347&lpg=PA347&dq=Nordin%27s.+Zeidner&source=bl&ots=vKN7k50McS&sig=UFhzYWAEeh1PfE_7VdbH9-38DfA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_rYefwLjJAhVIVT4KHWrZCLI4ChDoAQghMAE#v=onepage&q=Nordin's.%20Zeidner&f=false
Excerpt:
“Immunologist Nordin Zeidner, chief of the CDC's Vector-Host laboratory in Fort Collins, Colorado, told me internal agency studies had found the strategy questionable, and definitely ineffective in mice.”
“With the support of his CDC colleagues, Zeidner had begun to work with industry to develop an alternative: a form of injectable Doxy that could be sustained in the body for nineteen days.”
“Trying his formulation on mice, Zeidner found that 100 percent were protected from Lyme as well as the coinfection, anaplasmosis.”
“…..single dose doxy stopped Lyme disease not in 87% of mice, but rather, in 20 to 30 percent at most.”
_____________________________
Dr Gary Wormser of New York Medical College (who has controlled the Lyme disease narrative for the past three decades) published a study earlier promoting the use of single dose Doxy for tick bite. (See Wormser’s 2001 flawed NEJM article)
I understand that it was Wormser who called Zeidner’s superiors at the CDC to put an end to Zeidner’s work. Zeidner was told to discard the mice sera instead of testing for antibodies as he had promised.
Zeidner’s research was terminated for “lack of industrial support” Mead, and he was promoted, and his email address inactivated.
A search of the HHS Employee Directory for Zeidner will show he is no longer listed. (Previous email address: Naz2@cdc.gov) The CDC stopped his research, sent him to Europe, and promoted him.
There are other stories of overt intimidation, even threats of job loss for researchers who don't toe the line.
I have attached Zeidner’s 2008 study for your review.
Wormser’s single dose Doxycycline is still promoted today as I received a frantic call last week from a good friend in Massachusetts who was given a prescription for a single day’s supply of Doxycycline. The tick had been attached for over 72hrs.
Practitioners who are experiencing the devastation of Lyme disease are prescribing 28 days.
The last published paper I see for Zeidner (PubMed) looks like he now is in Bangladesh.
Center for Communicable Diseases, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
AHI Officer—Nord Zeidner, DVM, PhD
nord@icddrb.org
What is the point to all of this you might ask? World health agencies are blindly following what has been wrongly established here in the United States as the 30yr dogma prevails while Lyme patients across the globe remain severely debilitated with no treatment options for this antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug.
Will the World Health Organization step in and upgrade Wormser’s “nuisance disease” to the serious public health threat that it represents or will the WHO turn a blind eye to all the evidence indicating (What I believe as do many others) that a serious crime against humanity has been committed?
Carl Tuttle