Petition Closed

I want the Indian Supreme Court and the Government to Release Sadhvi Pragya

This petition had 650 supporters

In India the majority Hindus and Hindu religious leaders are deprived of equality before law and faiths under the cover of secularism and socialism. Both secularism and socialism are not defined either in the preamble of the Indian Constitution or in the official gazettes of the union/federal government or that of the provincial governments. It was Indira Gandhi infamous for the draconian suspension of the Constitution through the suspension of the Fundamental Rights who cleverly inserted these foreign words in to the Indian Constitution when India's literacy rates were hovering around 50% even in Indian languages let alone in English. The literacy rates in English could not have been even 10% in the 1970s.

The impressionable citizens of India were thus cheated out of their centuries old heritage of welcoming all faiths through Sadbhavana or equanimity for all faiths. Even after 65 years of India's independence the bulk of the draconian British colonial laws are still in tact allowing massive miscarriages of justice across India. It's through such draconian laws terrorists, dictators, colonialists, dynastic rulers subjugate their citizens and perpetuate their influence needs to be borne in mind.

Universal Human Rights by virtue of its name should be available to all those who are accused of terrorism and not merely for Islamic terrorists or for left-wing terrorists. In the case of Saddvi Pragya she is only an accused according to the state manned by a corrupt police system run on trading favours such as in the appointment of three of India's recent CBI bosses(Central Bureau of Investigation; the national investigative agency) as state governors or 18 out of the 21 Supreme Court judges given lucrative post retirement assignments leaving out only three in the past one decade. A wholesale buying off judicial favours under any civilised barometer even if a Westminster yardstick is employed let alone EU or the US standard on post retirement assignments to Supreme Court Judges. Even a former retired High Court Judge was made a Chief Minister by this same government all leaving too many DNA footprints of buying off the judiciary.

It's in this context one has to see that Sadhvi Pragya is not formally charged or bailed or discharged or convicted and has been in jail for several years now without trial.

This petition is not to an attempt to declare the innocence or guilt of Sadhvi Pragya but to help her get her universal human rights restored to her. Even Dr. Binayak Sen was accorded a bail although he was convicted for sedition and assisting a terrorist organisation in india called the Maoists. Even whilst under conviction but out on bail Dr.Sen was given a highly sought after posting in the Planning Commission of India headed by the Prime Minister of India under the Super Prime Minister Sonia Gandhi which flouted the norms for high government postings where the conviction in assisting an organisation waging war against India ought to have been material as he is simply out on bail. This is the nature of trading favours in India under Sonia Raj helped out in good measure by the Indian Supreme Court Judges who receives favours under her dispensation. How can legitimate human rights protection be ever possible under this Sonia Raj dispensation mandated to implement human rights as well as constitutional freedoms when the fence itself devours the crop to quote a Malayalam saying?

The Sadhvi for whose human rights protection this petition is for, is a woman, a Hindu religious leader or priestess or equivalent to a Christian nun and on top of that the Sadhvi is also a cancer patient undergoing treatment. The Sadhvi is a staunch indian nationalist and a vocal critic of Sonia Gandhi India's Supreme Leader and advocated her to be beaten up, her German Magazine quoted $19 billion ill-gotten assets stripped and sent back to Italy like Fujimori. Sonia Gandhi reminds one of Imelda Marcos in an Indian sari with as many millions as the number of Ms Marcos' shoes! Sadhvi Pragya also asserted that her saffron priestly robes symbolises fire a sign of her purity of thoughts and deeds and that Sonia Gandhi is assisting terrorists by giving terror sympathisers prominent positions and that the Sadhvi would make sure that terrorists who torment Indians are turned in to ashes like a modern day Draupadi a re-incarnation of the Hindu Goddess Parvathi. Such criticisms of Sonia Gandhi even if they were false could not be a ground to violate Sadhvi Pragyas human rights under any civilised system. The Sadhvi is also accused of causing or assisting two or three terror attacks against Muslims by a highly corrupt or biased or pliable Indian police and judicial apparatus.

The Sadhvi's father recently passed away and grounds for the Sadhvi to get human rights are more favourable than Binayak Sen's or the Italian naval officers who are accused of killing two Indian fishermen inside India's territorial waters and thus waging war against India.

These Italian naval officers were recently given two breaks in Italy one for their Christmas celebrations and the other for voting in the Italian elections by none other than the Indian Supreme Court. These favours done to the accused Italian naval officers is unheard of in any civilised western democracy and certainly not a privilege enjoyed by the Indian nationals accused of similar crimes and are behind bars or the under trials/those awaiting trial for decades and in custody even for silly offences most of them trumped up by corrupt policemen. This is the nature and the abhorrent human rights affirmative action standards of the Indian Supreme Court and their judges. It has reached a stage where true human rights protection can only become possible only when the failing judges and the Supreme Court is thoroughly exposed and brought before the public for enforcing their accountability and discharging of duties for which the tax payer is paying them and ceding them massive immunity.

These Italian naval officers mentioned above after getting such a release and visits to Italy even refused to return to India possibly to test Indian nerves and had to be brought back by proceeding against Italy's Ambassador in India and their assets under intense opposition and popular outcry springing from Sonia Gandhi's Italian origins and suspicions about her holding dual citizenship.

In addition to the Italian naval officers the Italian witnesses too in this matter after getting a reprieve to visit Italy are now refusing to come back to India to testify in Indian courts. It's in this context that one should fully appreciate the immorality of the Supreme Court in not granting bail to Sadhvi Pragya as she is not seeking a discharge or an acquittal without a trial but just the bail.

A word or two about the gross violation of constitutional and human rights in general by the Supreme Court of India will not be non-contextual and is reproduced as below;

1. India now has an extra constituional Super Prime Minister or Supreme Leader of Italian birth and suspected dual nationality and she is recognised as the most powerful person in India including by the Forbes Magazine besides the majority of Indians. This alters the basic fabric of the Indian Constitution for which millions sacrificed their lives, liberties and livelihood under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi.

2. Indian police forces and investigative agencies are one of the most corrupt in the world and is the reason why India is in the high eighty rankings in global corruption index even according to Transparency International. The Indian Police and the investigative agencies are overwhelmingly corrupt not because of any moral or genetic flaws but the Supreme Court and their judges and the courts below allow them to get away with massive corruption under one pretext or another. There are no effective sanctions against corruption other than the laws which are hardly implemented or enforced due to the incompetence of the Indian judges and the judiciary. The Indian courts under the watch of the Indian judges are rife with massive subversion of fair trial through evidence tampering. lying under oath, witnesses turning hostile, witness intimidation, frequent adjournments, judicial corruption amongst other social evils. It is this corrupt police system that has accused Sadhvi Pragya of terrorism and there's more than 80% chance that she is totally innocent even by a conservative assessment so long as human rights are universal and not dispensed according to ideologies.

3.The Indian Supreme Court and the High Courts being the custodian of the Fundamental Rights of the citizens of India are squarely to blame for the massive police and judicial corruption in India. A judge or a court which doesn't admit its own role or complicity in corruption is a threat to the constitution and its fabric besides its human rights.

4.Every incidence of corruption violates one or more of the human rights as well as fundamental rights being violative of the right against extortion, right against exploitation, right against discrimination, rights against harassment and bullying.

The massive corruption in India also upsets the right to equality before law, equal protection of the laws, right to dignity which are all guaranteed fundamental rights under the Indian Constitution. This is in addition to the penal provisions for corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

This massive corruption besides bias now threatening the human rights of Sadhvi Pragya was brought about by the State Monopolies and an icompetent, elitist, insensitive "English" speaking judges, their delayed justice and dynastic rule. This is now damaging the basic human rights of Sadhvi Pragya besides thousands of others who are not favoured by the system under Sonia Raj as she is an avid critic of the Indira-Nehru dynasty and its last remnants such as Sonia Gandhi and their family whose whereabouts in India and abroad are more secret than India's state secrets.

The Sadhvi's case also demonstrates the biased nature, funding and conduct of Indian and international human rights organisations and activists because about 40 European and Indian Nobel Prize winners, the Indian media besides the European Union's Observers were mobilised to invoke the human rights of Binayak Sen who was accused of assisting a UN banned terrorist outfit called Maoists/Naxals in India which is a left-wing terrorist organisation a bit like the Shining Path and the FARC leftwing terrorist outfits.

Therefore I appeal to all independent minded and unbiased Indian citizens and visitors to this site to vote for this petition wholeheartedly and tell your friends and family so that they too can vote for this petition and pass this link to them. I firmly believe that we should never allow the idea of human rights to be hijacked by one section of the political fringe namely the leftist or the Islamic fringe as there is no justification for selective dispensation under the universal human rights.

Human Rights therefore should be available to all terror accused unfettered by their gender,ideology, religion, faith, fame, establishment or political patronage or political leanings or social standing or any such flimsy grounds so that it remains universal and all inclusive every time. I quote Martin Lutherking's prophetic words, "Injustice Anywhere is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"

Is this too much to ask from the Indian Supreme Court, their judges, the media, the human rights champions, the International Community and the Indian State? Please make this petition a roaring success so that we defeat all bias that have crept in to the working of all human rights based institutions in India and abroad! 

Today: Johnson is counting on you

Johnson Karingozhakal needs your help with “The Chief Justice and His Fellow Judges of the Supreme Court of India: I want the Indian Supreme Court and the Government to Release Sadhvi Pragya”. Join Johnson and 649 supporters today.