Ooooh our 5G animation is stirring the pot big time. Check out how much they rip into it in this article in the newspaper (see attached photo for the article) titled 5G network scare powered by videos.

If you haven’t seen the animation yet you can check it out here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESmIKsTOFto and sign the nationwide petition to stop the 5G rollout at bit.ly/stop5gaus

Here’s my reply to this newspaper article.

In response to Mark Presling.

I have to say that it concerns me that you clearly haven’t bothered to research the very real health concerns in relation to 5G. The animation I paid $1300 to have made and recorded to help educate the public is based on tens of thousands of peer reviewed studies and the concerns of scientists, academics and medical professionals globally.

I have never made a cent from my youtube channel, as I don’t have advertising in my videos.

Interesting that you would have a crack at this though, given telcos are the biggest industry in the entire world and the profits from 5G are immense.

The only gain I have from using my own money to create an animation video is to educate the public and raise awareness, given our protection and safety agencies blatantly refuse to protect and keep us safe.

Unfortunately the video is shocking and controversial because 5G and it’s very real concerns for humans, animals, plants and insects including bees is shocking and controversial.

Anyone can make something appear “safe” for the public by burying evidence, defunding studies that show health concerns, cherry picking their data and paying a few high profile scientists to assure the public everything is a ok. Just take a look at the findings from the Australian senate inquiry.

“It was contended that the telecommunications industry will try to influence research into electromagnetic emissions to show that there are no ill effects from its technology: If you are a researcher doing research that is being funded by industry, if you are coming up with results that are not what the company wants to hear, you will not get further funding. But if you give results that look good you tend to get further funding. So there is very much a bias to slant your research towards the person who is providing the funding. Some submissions have claimed that industry cover-ups and interference in the publication of research results, and selection bias in the choice of studies to be funded, are reasons for the failure to replicate many studies that have shown a relationship between EMR and biological and health effects.”

This is just SOME of the damning evidence within this senate inquiry.

ORSAA have independently reviewed the research and found that when Industry fund studies, no effect is found 62% of the time, but when Institutions fund studies, no effect is only found 12% of the time. 

So the constant industry claim that science is "inconclusive" is incorrect. They are swaying results.

I feel sorry that you have no understanding of just how dangerous this new technology is, that instead of researching it for yourself you spend time patronising concerned members of the public.

It is wrong and irresponsible for you to BLATANTLY IGNORE the massive body of science and research. To allow your fellow humans to be experimented on and to have a complete disregard for the fact that not one SINGLE biological test for safety has been done on this technology.

Thank you for advising that we read a scientific journal.

I have.

You might like to do the same.

Feel free to start with these.

https://ehtrust.org/scientific-research-on-5g-and-health/
https://bioinitiative.org/ – 4000 studies
http://www.justproveit.net/– 1168 studies
https://www.emf-portal.org/en – 23,840 studies
https://www.powerwatch.org.uk/ – 1,032 studies

Plus this study which cost $25 million by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) clearly show that biological impacts occur at non-thermal exposures like those that take place from cell phones today.  https://ehtrust.org/clear-evidence-of-cancer-concludes-the-expert-panel-to-the-us-national-toxicology-program-on-cell-phone-radiation-study-findings/

You can also search the ORSAA database for many studies in relation to non-ionising radiation and biological health concerns https://www.orsaa.org/orsaa-database.html

I also appreciate your recommendation to consult Wiki Scholar or read a school issued physics text book where I will find that non ionising radiation doesn’t cause cancer.

It’s unfortunate that you do not choose to update your understandings based on new evidence. If you did you would understand that the hypothesis that non ionising radiation doesn’t harm humans is extremely outdated and completely obsolete.

As Markov and Grigoriev have stated,
 
“Today standards do not consider the real pollution of the environment with nonionizing radiation”. Hundreds of scientists have proven that many different kinds of acute and chronic illnesses and injuries are caused without heating (“non-thermal effect”) from radiation levels far below international guidelines. Biological effects occur even at near-zero power levels.
 
Despite widespread denial, the evidence that radio frequency (RF) radiation is harmful to life is already overwhelming. The accumulated clinical evidence of sick and injured human beings, experimental evidence of damage to DNA, cells and organ systems in a wide variety of plants and animals, and epidemiological evidence that the major diseases of modern civilization—cancer, heart disease and diabetes—are in large part caused by electromagnetic pollution, forms a literature base of well over 10,000 peer-reviewed studies.
Information from https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal

Unfortunately crisis not averted, not celebrating until the rollout has been stopped.

So Mark Presling, kindly shove your tin foil hat references where the sun don’t shine, this is not a conspiracy, it’s science, unfortunately for the telcos the science isn’t saying what they want it to say to protect their profits.

Funny how you choose to only love science if it tells you what you want to hear. But any science with an opposing position you reject as conspiracy.

Please do not urge others to share your ill informed views. Kindly educate yourself, the sky may not be falling, but every living thing in close proximity to a 5G tower or small cell is in danger as a result of this technology and is being exposed without consent. Again without a SINGLE test for biological safety.

Telstra have already been hit with a formal warning by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) for failing to comply with regulations governing the deployment of mobile base stations. https://tottnews.com/2019/07/09/telstra-formally-warned-acma/

If you’re concerned please continue to spread the word about 5G and encourage others to sign and share the petition.

We have started our 5G tell 5 campaign on social media. 

Check out the post here https://www.facebook.com/getafreshstart/photos/a.214181955407869/1347174752108578/?type=3&theater

and Tag 5 friends to help spread the word or if you're on instagram head to https://www.instagram.com/jessie_reimers/ to tag 5 on my latest post.

We need to get to 100k signatures and beyond to really put pressure on the Government, protection agencies and media to start reporting the facts and stop the rollout.

Thanks for your support!

Jessie Reimers, Gold Coast