Gypsy Rose's ally said “the wrong son died”, now he's creating her anti-bullying spreadsheet.


...read that sentence again.
a grieving mother received a voicemail from a man publicly linked to the online identity now known as sir morbid x (James Nam).
her son had died.
his recorded words were:
"i apologized that the wrong son died."
he went further, suggesting she should look at her surviving son and wonder why he had not died instead.
this is not an ordinary disagreement. this is a recording of someone's bereavement being used to inflict humiliation.
and this is the history that deserves examination now that sir morbid x is publicly associated with gypsy rose blanchard's campaign against online bullying.
a public comment from Gypsy's friend Sheena Woodall Morales states that "morbid made that spreadsheet."
if that account is correct, a man whose archived broadcasts contain this extraordinary cruelty has been involved in compiling allegations of cyberbullying against other people.
how can that possibly be left unexplained?
the historical record also includes allegations of doxxing, abusive contact with relatives and a recorded $900 dispute involving a woman named wendy. the financial allegations remain unresolved, but the dispute itself is documented.
his more recent broadcasts contain repeated personal attacks against liam bosonnet, audrey, casestudyz, becca scoops and other identifiable individuals.
yet the public is being asked to take a bullying spreadsheet seriously without knowing whether its reported creator's own conduct has been included.
gypsy rose blanchard should address this directly.
did sir morbid x prepare or contribute to the spreadsheet?
was his history examined?
were the people subjected to his public attacks afforded the same consideration as everyone else?
and why should anyone trust a record of online cruelty if the person reportedly compiling it is exempt from scrutiny?
an apology does not erase a recording. a friendship does not erase a history. reconciliation does not erase what was said.
a man recorded telling a grieving mother that the wrong son died should not be beyond scrutiny while helping decide who else deserves to be labelled a cyberbully.
if this campaign is genuinely about accountability, then start with the people involved in producing its evidence.
the public deserves the full record. not a spreadsheet with convenient omissions.