
Malik MalikLondon, ENG, United Kingdom
Feb 10, 2015
* FINAL = MINI-HOLLAND UPDATE *
This is the final update I shall be giving unless its ward specific.
Firstly a reminder that we was NEVER against Mini-Holland, but against the way it’s been done. The original purpose was to improve road safety for cyclist however had been hijacked into blocking roads and gaining capital and so on.
1. PETITION: We had a petition of 3000 Against Mini-Holland and there was a 600 For Mini-Holland. We handed the petition in to more than one source, digital and printed. The council have not taken this in account. They have said the majority of residents are for it. We asked to see this. We have had no reply.
2. DISABILITY: The council said they will let Google maps know where the mobility bound can drive up to and that their parking will have to be further.
3. ELDERLY: The council said they will let Google maps know where the elderly, carers etc can drive up to.
4. BUSINESS: We provided individual signed evidence that the majority of businesses are against Mini-Holland. Council docked information and said the vast majority are for it. We asked to see this. We have had no reply.
5. POLLUTION: We asked the council why they haven’t done a pollution assessment of where the pollution is being moved too. They replied “No comment”.
6. CONGESTION: We asked the council why they haven’t done a congestion assessment of where the pollution is being moved too. They replied “No comment”.
7. ROAD BLOCKS: Majority have asked for Mini-Holland without road blocks. Council has refused.
8. £30 MILLION: This money is in the account of LBWF, they are now deciding who gets the CONTRACTS
9. THE MOST HELPFUL COUNCILORS WHO LISTENED TO EVERYONE:
(This does NOT mean they are for or against, just means they help both parties allot)
- Cllr Johar Khan (Mark House - Labour)