Further consideration of the CAS decsion

Sports Lawyer Allistar Twigg from Snedden Hall & Gallop Lawyers writes: "It is a fundamental tenet of justice that a decision-maker must be fair, and be seen to be fair. Failure to do so may constitute a breach of the rules of natural justice. It is arguable that the CAS has breached the rules of natural justice in making the Essendon 34 decision because it was not independent in making that decision. Accordingly, the decision can be said to be in conflict with the public policy of Australia and should be set aside by an Australian court". Read the full article below. You have to ask yourself: Why are our sports people subject to a bureaucratic twilight zone where all normal rights and options one would have, are either taken from them or lost if you want to play? If you haven't already signed the petition, please do so and share it with your friends. If you have already signed, please continue to share this article/petition to your friends. Thank you for your support