KINDESMISSHANDLUNG STOPPEN
Das Anliegen
KINDESMISSHANDLUNG STOPPEN
DEUTSCH + ENGLISH
Vivianne G. geboren in Kenia, kam 2002 in die Schweiz und heiratete dort 2003 einen Schweizer, im gleichen Jahr wurde Ihre Tochter A. geboren. Die Ehe zerbrach, Vivianne verlor Ihre Arbeit und Sie erhielt Sozialhilfe - verbunden mit Auflagen, wie Beschäftigungsprogramme, durch das Sozialamt.
Vivianne geriet mit dem Sozialamt in Konflikt und die Sachbearbeiterin Irene S. entzog der Mutter in Folge von Auseinandersetzungen das Sorgerecht der Tochter.
Die Polizei kam ohne Durchsuchungsbefehl und brachte die Tochter gewaltsam in ein Kinderheim. Vivianne hatte niemals eine Vollmacht oder irgendwelche Dokumente bezüglich des Sorgerechts Ihrer Tochter unterzeichnet.
Vivianne wurde zur gleichen Zeit von Sozialamtsmitarbeitern und ihr fremden anderen Personen gangstalked, massiv bedrängt und bedroht. Vivianne sagt, man hat versucht Ihr mehrfach das Leben zu nehmen. Die unabhängige Menschrechtsorganisation „augenauf“, vermittelte Ihr daraufhin einen Strafrechtsanwalt und wurde wegen des Entzugs des Sorgerechts für die Tochter tätig.
Vivianne wurde nach 12 Jahren in der Schweiz durch das besondere Bemühen der Sachbearbeiterin des Sozialamtes Irene S. nach Kenia abgeschoben.
Sie kam ein Jahr später mit einem Zwei-Wochen-Visum mit Hilfe einer Organisation zurück. Sie wechselte mehrere Anwälte, um das Sorgerecht für ihre Tochter zurückzubekommen. Anwälte von „Augenauf Basel“ legen Widerspruch ein - ohne Erfolg.
Eine zweite Abschiebung war geplant, sie floh nach Deutschland und beantragte dort Asyl.
Die heutige Leiterin des Sozialamtes der Stadt Rapperswil-Jona Irene S. veranlasste, dass die Tochter 6 Monate vom Heim zur Schule polizeilich begleitet wurde. Sie durfte auch 6 Monate keinen telefonischen Kontakt zur Mutter aufnehmen. In den Schulpausen wurde die 10-jährige Tochter in einen überwachten Raum separiert und durfte mit den anderen Kindern nicht zusammen sein ! Das Heim durfte Sie ebenfalls nicht verlassen, während die anderen Kinder regelmässig zu Ihren Eltern oder Kontaktpersonen durften.
Die Begründung, mit welcher Irene S. diese unverhältnismässigen Massnahmen durchführte, war die Gefahr einer angeblichen Entführung durch die Mutter. Die Mutter hatte dem Kinderheim jedoch mitgeteilt, dass sie in Deutschland lebt und Asyl beantragt hat. Sie versuchte fast täglich vergeblich mit Ihrer Tochter zu sprechen,Ihr wurde stets der Kontakt zur Tochter verwehrt.
Vivianne fordert Gerechtigkeit für die Verletzung ihrer grundlegenden Menschenrechte.
In Raperswil-Jona, wurde Viviannes Tochter gewaltsam durch die Schweizer Behörden in das berüchtigte Kinderheim “Speerblick” gebracht. Das “Tagblatt” berichtete am 14.01.2020 über die desaströsen Zustände in diesem Heim.
Die Tochter A. verließ später das Kinderheim, nachdem die Situation außer Kontrolle geraten war. Mehrere Eltern zeigten den Heim-Mitarbeiter Herrn Stephan A. wegen auffälliger körperlicher Nähe zu den Kindern an. Dieser Mitarbeiter wurde entlassen und durch Frau Petra W. ersetzt, welche ebenfalls durch die Beschwerden der Eltern in die Medien geriet, da Sie den Kindern zu wenig Essen gab.
Bis heute leidet die Tochter unter seelischen Störungen und gesundheitlichen Problemen.
Nachdem der Vater nach langer Krankheit gestorben war, schrieb die nun 17-jährige Tochter einen Brief an die Schweizer Behörde, mit der Bitte, dass die Mutter wieder zu Ihr in die Schweiz kommen darf. Das wurde mit der Begründung abgelehnt, dass Ihre Mutter dem Staat 97.000 CHF aus der Sozialhilfe schuldet.
Der Entzug des Sorgerechts, sowie die Abschiebung durch das Schweizer Sozialamt sind nach Artikel 8 der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention nicht möglich.
Die Sachbearbeiterin des Sozialamtes Irene S. veranlasste, sämtliche Zeugnisse, Dokumente, Photos, Erinnerungen, sowie alle persönlichen Gegenstände einzubehalten. Trotz mehrerer Briefe durch Rechtsanwälte an die Sachbearbeiterin Irene S. erhielt Vivianne bis heute nichts zurück.
Der durch Irene S. eingesetzte „Beistand“ der Tochter, Frau Melanie D. blockierte und schränkte den mütterlichen Einfluss völlig ein, durch fragwürdige esoterische Praktiken in der Erziehung wurde das Kind in seiner Entwicklung gehemmt unter den Folgen der rigorosen Trennung von der Mutter leidet das Kind bis heute psychisch sehr.
Vivianne fordert für den erlittenen körperlichen und seelischen Schaden der Tochter eine Entschädigung und Entschuldigung durch den Schweizer Staat.
Ebenso für die offensichtlich durch Irene S. weggeworfenen Unterlagen und persönlichen Dinge.
Betreff: SOLIDARITY WITH VIVIANNE
Vivianne Achieng
Berliner Sparkasse
IBAN: DE20100500001075678478
BIC: BELADEBEXXX
Quellenangaben und Veröffentlichungen zum Fall Vivianne G., sowie der Kindes-Misshandlung durch die Schweizer Behörden
- Tages-Anzeiger 13.01.2020 - "Fragwürdige Vorgänge im Kinderheim"
- DMZ - Die Mittelländische Zeitung - 14. Januar 2020 "Seltsame Vorgänge in St. Galler Kinderheim"
- blue News - bluewin.ch - 14.1.2020 "Seltsame Machenschaften stellen Kinderheim in schiefes Licht"
- Berliner Morgenpost - 12.01.2015 - Nicht ohne ihre Tochter
ENGLISH
STOP CHILD ABUSE
Vivianne G. was born in Kenya, came to Switzerland in 2002 and married a Swiss man in 2003, in the same year her daughter was born.
The marriage broke up and Vivianne lost her job. She received social assistance, and undertook employment programs by the social welfare office.
Vivianne came into conflict with this office, and the case worker, Irene S., withdrew the custody of her daughter as a result of these disputes.
The police arrived, without a warrant, and forcibly took her daughter to a children's home. Vivianne had never signed a power of attorney or any documents regarding the custody of her daughter.
At the same time, Vivianne was gangstalked, harassed and threatened by social services staff and others who were unknown to her. Vivianne says they tried to take her life several times. The independent human rights organization “Augen Auf" managed to arrange for her to see a criminal lawyer and took action to retain custody of her daughter.
Vivianne was then deported to Kenya after 12 years in Switzerland through the special efforts of Irene S., the case worker at the social welfare office.
She returned a year later on a two-week visa with the help of an organization. She used several lawyers to attempt to get back custody of her daughter. Lawyers from "Augenauf Basel" filed an appeal - without success.
A second deportation was planned, and she fled to Germany to apply for asylum there.
The current head of the social welfare office in the city of Rapperswil-Jona, Irene S., arranged for the daughter to be accompanied by the police from home to school for 6 months. She was also not allowed to have any telephone contact with her mother for 6 months. During school breaks, the 10-year-old daughter was separated into a monitored room and was not allowed to be with the other children! She was also not allowed to leave the home, while the other children were allowed to visit their parents or contact persons regularly.
The reason Irene S. used to carry out these disproportionate measures was the risk of an alleged kidnapping by her mother. However, the mother had informed the children's home that she lives in Germany and has applied for asylum. She tried to call her daughter almost every day in vain and was always denied contact with her daughter.
Vivianne demands justice for the violation of her basic human rights.
[beginning "augenauf" Article]
Child's welfare neglected, mother expelled after custody revoked
Created: 19 June 2014
The case of Ms. G. demonstrates the disproportionality of the implementation of the law on foreigners, as well as the violation of the best interests of the child and the human right to a family life by the Swiss authorities.
Laws in Switzerland do not always provide protection against arbitrariness, but can themselves be unjust, as demonstrated by legal discrimination against non-Swiss nationals. Racism begins with the distinction between nationals and non-nationals, which subjects people to different rights and fewer freedoms based on their origin and nationality. In Switzerland, the law on foreigners often serves to eliminate the fundamental rights of foreigners. Examples of this are the tearing apart of families, the deportation and detention for Sans-Papiers, and increased identity checks for people with dark skin color. Ms. G. is representative of this.
After the withdrawal of her daughter’s custody in 2010, Ms. G.'s right of residence in Switzerland was also withdrawn in January 2012 and she has been deported to Kenya. From the point of view of the best interests of the child and the right to a family life together, this is disproportionate. The mother's legal right to family life and the daughter's right to build a relationship with her mother have both been made impossible by the mother's entry ban, which is valid until January 19, 2016 and covers the entire territory of the Schengen states. A mother and daughter cannot realistically have a relationship if the mother lives in Kenya without financial means and the daughter lives in Switzerland. Also, Mrs. G. cannot take her daughter with her to Kenya, because her biological father lives in Switzerland. Mrs. G. must therefore have the possibility to live near her daughter, otherwise her basic right to lead a family life becomes obsolete. Augen Auf Basel therefore demands an immediate lifting of the entry ban.
In bi-national marriages and marriages between foreigners in Switzerland, the best interests of the child are generally given too little weight when it comes to questions of immigration law and are subordinate to other criteria that are in the "interests of society" (for example, in the case of debts and social welfare payments). This is the case for Ms. G., and there are numerous other examples of this too. In our opinion, the coercive measures under immigration law are disproportionate and violate Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In addition to the best interests of the child, the rights of the parents have also been disregarded or given too little consideration, including the human right to a family life. This disregard is blatant, especially in a society in which family values are held very high - but apparently apply primarily to Swiss citizens - and economic interests are subordinate. The same applies here as with the best interests of the child: the measures are disproportionate and a violation of a human right.
[end of "augenauf" Article]
In Raperswil-Jona, Vivianne's daughter was forcibly taken by the Swiss authorities to the notorious Speerblick children's home. The Tagblatt reported on 14.01.2020 about the disastrous conditions in this home.
The daughter later left the children's home after the situation there got out of control. Several parents had reported an employee, Mr. Stephan A., for conspicuous physical proximity to the children. This employee was dismissed and replaced by Mrs. Petra W., who also came to public attention because of complaints from the parents about how little food she gave the children.
To this day, the daughter suffers from mental disorders and health problems.
After her father died after a long illness, the now 17-year-old daughter wrote a letter to the Swiss authorities asking for her mother be allowed to rejoin her in Switzerland. This was refused on the grounds that her mother owes the state 97,000 CHF from social welfare.
The deprivation of custody and deportation by the Swiss social welfare office are not possible according to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The case worker at the social welfare office, Irene S. tooked all testimonies, documents, photos, memories, and personal belongings and never gave them back. Despite several letters by lawyers to the case worker Irene S., Vivianne has received nothing back.
The "counsellor" of the daughter, Melanie D., appointed by Irene S., blocked and completely limited the maternal influence, using questionable esoteric practices in her education of the child. She was inhibited in her development from the rigorous separation from her mother, and the child still suffers psychologically.
Vivianne demands compensation and an apology from the Swiss state for the physical and psychological damage suffered by her daughter, and for the documents and personal things which have obviously been thrown away by Irene S..
reference: SOLIDARITY WITH VIVIANNE
Vivianne Achieng
Berliner Sparkasse
IBAN: DE20100500001075678478
BIC: BELADEBEXXX
Sources and publications about the case of Vivianne G., as well as her mistreatment by the Swiss authorities:
- Tages-Anzeiger 13.01.2020 - "Questionable events at children's home"
- Blue News - bluewin.ch - 14.1.2020 "Strange occurrences put children's home in a poor light"
- Berliner Morgenpost - 12.01.2015 - not without her Daughter
1.459
Das Anliegen
KINDESMISSHANDLUNG STOPPEN
DEUTSCH + ENGLISH
Vivianne G. geboren in Kenia, kam 2002 in die Schweiz und heiratete dort 2003 einen Schweizer, im gleichen Jahr wurde Ihre Tochter A. geboren. Die Ehe zerbrach, Vivianne verlor Ihre Arbeit und Sie erhielt Sozialhilfe - verbunden mit Auflagen, wie Beschäftigungsprogramme, durch das Sozialamt.
Vivianne geriet mit dem Sozialamt in Konflikt und die Sachbearbeiterin Irene S. entzog der Mutter in Folge von Auseinandersetzungen das Sorgerecht der Tochter.
Die Polizei kam ohne Durchsuchungsbefehl und brachte die Tochter gewaltsam in ein Kinderheim. Vivianne hatte niemals eine Vollmacht oder irgendwelche Dokumente bezüglich des Sorgerechts Ihrer Tochter unterzeichnet.
Vivianne wurde zur gleichen Zeit von Sozialamtsmitarbeitern und ihr fremden anderen Personen gangstalked, massiv bedrängt und bedroht. Vivianne sagt, man hat versucht Ihr mehrfach das Leben zu nehmen. Die unabhängige Menschrechtsorganisation „augenauf“, vermittelte Ihr daraufhin einen Strafrechtsanwalt und wurde wegen des Entzugs des Sorgerechts für die Tochter tätig.
Vivianne wurde nach 12 Jahren in der Schweiz durch das besondere Bemühen der Sachbearbeiterin des Sozialamtes Irene S. nach Kenia abgeschoben.
Sie kam ein Jahr später mit einem Zwei-Wochen-Visum mit Hilfe einer Organisation zurück. Sie wechselte mehrere Anwälte, um das Sorgerecht für ihre Tochter zurückzubekommen. Anwälte von „Augenauf Basel“ legen Widerspruch ein - ohne Erfolg.
Eine zweite Abschiebung war geplant, sie floh nach Deutschland und beantragte dort Asyl.
Die heutige Leiterin des Sozialamtes der Stadt Rapperswil-Jona Irene S. veranlasste, dass die Tochter 6 Monate vom Heim zur Schule polizeilich begleitet wurde. Sie durfte auch 6 Monate keinen telefonischen Kontakt zur Mutter aufnehmen. In den Schulpausen wurde die 10-jährige Tochter in einen überwachten Raum separiert und durfte mit den anderen Kindern nicht zusammen sein ! Das Heim durfte Sie ebenfalls nicht verlassen, während die anderen Kinder regelmässig zu Ihren Eltern oder Kontaktpersonen durften.
Die Begründung, mit welcher Irene S. diese unverhältnismässigen Massnahmen durchführte, war die Gefahr einer angeblichen Entführung durch die Mutter. Die Mutter hatte dem Kinderheim jedoch mitgeteilt, dass sie in Deutschland lebt und Asyl beantragt hat. Sie versuchte fast täglich vergeblich mit Ihrer Tochter zu sprechen,Ihr wurde stets der Kontakt zur Tochter verwehrt.
Vivianne fordert Gerechtigkeit für die Verletzung ihrer grundlegenden Menschenrechte.
In Raperswil-Jona, wurde Viviannes Tochter gewaltsam durch die Schweizer Behörden in das berüchtigte Kinderheim “Speerblick” gebracht. Das “Tagblatt” berichtete am 14.01.2020 über die desaströsen Zustände in diesem Heim.
Die Tochter A. verließ später das Kinderheim, nachdem die Situation außer Kontrolle geraten war. Mehrere Eltern zeigten den Heim-Mitarbeiter Herrn Stephan A. wegen auffälliger körperlicher Nähe zu den Kindern an. Dieser Mitarbeiter wurde entlassen und durch Frau Petra W. ersetzt, welche ebenfalls durch die Beschwerden der Eltern in die Medien geriet, da Sie den Kindern zu wenig Essen gab.
Bis heute leidet die Tochter unter seelischen Störungen und gesundheitlichen Problemen.
Nachdem der Vater nach langer Krankheit gestorben war, schrieb die nun 17-jährige Tochter einen Brief an die Schweizer Behörde, mit der Bitte, dass die Mutter wieder zu Ihr in die Schweiz kommen darf. Das wurde mit der Begründung abgelehnt, dass Ihre Mutter dem Staat 97.000 CHF aus der Sozialhilfe schuldet.
Der Entzug des Sorgerechts, sowie die Abschiebung durch das Schweizer Sozialamt sind nach Artikel 8 der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention nicht möglich.
Die Sachbearbeiterin des Sozialamtes Irene S. veranlasste, sämtliche Zeugnisse, Dokumente, Photos, Erinnerungen, sowie alle persönlichen Gegenstände einzubehalten. Trotz mehrerer Briefe durch Rechtsanwälte an die Sachbearbeiterin Irene S. erhielt Vivianne bis heute nichts zurück.
Der durch Irene S. eingesetzte „Beistand“ der Tochter, Frau Melanie D. blockierte und schränkte den mütterlichen Einfluss völlig ein, durch fragwürdige esoterische Praktiken in der Erziehung wurde das Kind in seiner Entwicklung gehemmt unter den Folgen der rigorosen Trennung von der Mutter leidet das Kind bis heute psychisch sehr.
Vivianne fordert für den erlittenen körperlichen und seelischen Schaden der Tochter eine Entschädigung und Entschuldigung durch den Schweizer Staat.
Ebenso für die offensichtlich durch Irene S. weggeworfenen Unterlagen und persönlichen Dinge.
Betreff: SOLIDARITY WITH VIVIANNE
Vivianne Achieng
Berliner Sparkasse
IBAN: DE20100500001075678478
BIC: BELADEBEXXX
Quellenangaben und Veröffentlichungen zum Fall Vivianne G., sowie der Kindes-Misshandlung durch die Schweizer Behörden
- Tages-Anzeiger 13.01.2020 - "Fragwürdige Vorgänge im Kinderheim"
- DMZ - Die Mittelländische Zeitung - 14. Januar 2020 "Seltsame Vorgänge in St. Galler Kinderheim"
- blue News - bluewin.ch - 14.1.2020 "Seltsame Machenschaften stellen Kinderheim in schiefes Licht"
- Berliner Morgenpost - 12.01.2015 - Nicht ohne ihre Tochter
ENGLISH
STOP CHILD ABUSE
Vivianne G. was born in Kenya, came to Switzerland in 2002 and married a Swiss man in 2003, in the same year her daughter was born.
The marriage broke up and Vivianne lost her job. She received social assistance, and undertook employment programs by the social welfare office.
Vivianne came into conflict with this office, and the case worker, Irene S., withdrew the custody of her daughter as a result of these disputes.
The police arrived, without a warrant, and forcibly took her daughter to a children's home. Vivianne had never signed a power of attorney or any documents regarding the custody of her daughter.
At the same time, Vivianne was gangstalked, harassed and threatened by social services staff and others who were unknown to her. Vivianne says they tried to take her life several times. The independent human rights organization “Augen Auf" managed to arrange for her to see a criminal lawyer and took action to retain custody of her daughter.
Vivianne was then deported to Kenya after 12 years in Switzerland through the special efforts of Irene S., the case worker at the social welfare office.
She returned a year later on a two-week visa with the help of an organization. She used several lawyers to attempt to get back custody of her daughter. Lawyers from "Augenauf Basel" filed an appeal - without success.
A second deportation was planned, and she fled to Germany to apply for asylum there.
The current head of the social welfare office in the city of Rapperswil-Jona, Irene S., arranged for the daughter to be accompanied by the police from home to school for 6 months. She was also not allowed to have any telephone contact with her mother for 6 months. During school breaks, the 10-year-old daughter was separated into a monitored room and was not allowed to be with the other children! She was also not allowed to leave the home, while the other children were allowed to visit their parents or contact persons regularly.
The reason Irene S. used to carry out these disproportionate measures was the risk of an alleged kidnapping by her mother. However, the mother had informed the children's home that she lives in Germany and has applied for asylum. She tried to call her daughter almost every day in vain and was always denied contact with her daughter.
Vivianne demands justice for the violation of her basic human rights.
[beginning "augenauf" Article]
Child's welfare neglected, mother expelled after custody revoked
Created: 19 June 2014
The case of Ms. G. demonstrates the disproportionality of the implementation of the law on foreigners, as well as the violation of the best interests of the child and the human right to a family life by the Swiss authorities.
Laws in Switzerland do not always provide protection against arbitrariness, but can themselves be unjust, as demonstrated by legal discrimination against non-Swiss nationals. Racism begins with the distinction between nationals and non-nationals, which subjects people to different rights and fewer freedoms based on their origin and nationality. In Switzerland, the law on foreigners often serves to eliminate the fundamental rights of foreigners. Examples of this are the tearing apart of families, the deportation and detention for Sans-Papiers, and increased identity checks for people with dark skin color. Ms. G. is representative of this.
After the withdrawal of her daughter’s custody in 2010, Ms. G.'s right of residence in Switzerland was also withdrawn in January 2012 and she has been deported to Kenya. From the point of view of the best interests of the child and the right to a family life together, this is disproportionate. The mother's legal right to family life and the daughter's right to build a relationship with her mother have both been made impossible by the mother's entry ban, which is valid until January 19, 2016 and covers the entire territory of the Schengen states. A mother and daughter cannot realistically have a relationship if the mother lives in Kenya without financial means and the daughter lives in Switzerland. Also, Mrs. G. cannot take her daughter with her to Kenya, because her biological father lives in Switzerland. Mrs. G. must therefore have the possibility to live near her daughter, otherwise her basic right to lead a family life becomes obsolete. Augen Auf Basel therefore demands an immediate lifting of the entry ban.
In bi-national marriages and marriages between foreigners in Switzerland, the best interests of the child are generally given too little weight when it comes to questions of immigration law and are subordinate to other criteria that are in the "interests of society" (for example, in the case of debts and social welfare payments). This is the case for Ms. G., and there are numerous other examples of this too. In our opinion, the coercive measures under immigration law are disproportionate and violate Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
In addition to the best interests of the child, the rights of the parents have also been disregarded or given too little consideration, including the human right to a family life. This disregard is blatant, especially in a society in which family values are held very high - but apparently apply primarily to Swiss citizens - and economic interests are subordinate. The same applies here as with the best interests of the child: the measures are disproportionate and a violation of a human right.
[end of "augenauf" Article]
In Raperswil-Jona, Vivianne's daughter was forcibly taken by the Swiss authorities to the notorious Speerblick children's home. The Tagblatt reported on 14.01.2020 about the disastrous conditions in this home.
The daughter later left the children's home after the situation there got out of control. Several parents had reported an employee, Mr. Stephan A., for conspicuous physical proximity to the children. This employee was dismissed and replaced by Mrs. Petra W., who also came to public attention because of complaints from the parents about how little food she gave the children.
To this day, the daughter suffers from mental disorders and health problems.
After her father died after a long illness, the now 17-year-old daughter wrote a letter to the Swiss authorities asking for her mother be allowed to rejoin her in Switzerland. This was refused on the grounds that her mother owes the state 97,000 CHF from social welfare.
The deprivation of custody and deportation by the Swiss social welfare office are not possible according to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The case worker at the social welfare office, Irene S. tooked all testimonies, documents, photos, memories, and personal belongings and never gave them back. Despite several letters by lawyers to the case worker Irene S., Vivianne has received nothing back.
The "counsellor" of the daughter, Melanie D., appointed by Irene S., blocked and completely limited the maternal influence, using questionable esoteric practices in her education of the child. She was inhibited in her development from the rigorous separation from her mother, and the child still suffers psychologically.
Vivianne demands compensation and an apology from the Swiss state for the physical and psychological damage suffered by her daughter, and for the documents and personal things which have obviously been thrown away by Irene S..
reference: SOLIDARITY WITH VIVIANNE
Vivianne Achieng
Berliner Sparkasse
IBAN: DE20100500001075678478
BIC: BELADEBEXXX
Sources and publications about the case of Vivianne G., as well as her mistreatment by the Swiss authorities:
- Tages-Anzeiger 13.01.2020 - "Questionable events at children's home"
- Blue News - bluewin.ch - 14.1.2020 "Strange occurrences put children's home in a poor light"
- Berliner Morgenpost - 12.01.2015 - not without her Daughter
Updates zur Petition
Diese Petition teilen
Petition am 19. März 2023 erstellt