CCC retaliates further against local union steward by excluding her from all services

Despite Olivia not setting foot at a single CCC location since her firing, she received this letter in the mail permanently banning her from all CCC locations with the claim that she “harassed” people. There is not a location named nor a time and date mentioned. No specifics were given at all. We will be requesting this information AND camera footage evidence, which should exist if this incident actually occurred and isn’t part of their general pattern this entire situation of outright fabricating claims against my wife as part of a blatant union busting effort due to her organizing against changing working conditions for Health Assistants.

Meanwhile, in reality, Olivia was moving into a new apartment since her retaliatory firing with the help of several friends. She also, despite what her manager and the Labor Relations HR guy were told, did not pick up her final check. That was me, her wife. I was on the phone with our AFSCME union representative at the time I picked it up. Neither person knew she was banned, evident by how I contacted both of them to coordinate picking up her office items and was told “she was told she could pick up her items when she picked up her final check [sic] and she can do this at any time.” So they were misinformed about who picked up the final check, what communication was given to either her or me, and were uninformed that their superiors had permanently banned her from entering any of their buildings thus giving me unimportant and irrelevant advice.

Permanent bannings for “harassment” [citation needed] are rare to unheard of at CCC. Physical violence is usually the metric organizations such as CCC and TPI use for permanent bannings, which is the highest offense a client can commit on property. She is not being accused of physical violence without evidence (yet) so this much like her firing despite having no previous disciplinary record is a disproportionate response on the behalf of CCC management against a union organizer they clearly do not want fraternizing with other union members but do not have the ability to enforce a communication ban. She continues to speak with coworkers outside the job, now they’ve made it so any future organizing effort cannot physically include her.

We are concerned about future retaliation, including against me who relies on CCC services for low income medical care and was targeted by management for termination in March. Falsely making claims against a patient preventing them from receiving care would be medical discrimination and would open them up to liability, but we cannot trust CCC management not to play dirty.

Please contact the number in the letter to DEMAND evidence (time, date, location, details of incident and camera footage) be released by CCC and failing to provide any, must immediately rescind their libelous exclusion AND release a public apology addressed directly to Olivia on ALL official CCC communication platforms for making these false claims without evidence.