After another round of highly questionable coercive emails from David McGinness of the Cannon hill Safer neighbourhoods team, here is a quote from one of the final messages which sums up the utter futility & hopelessness of the nightmare I am facing.
"The sum was that I do not see a necessity for a meeting. You are free to make whatever representations you like to Inspector French-Greenslade but as far as I am concerned, this situation entails you not liking a decision I have taken. This is a complaint issue, I have not changed my mind on the decision.
Respectfully,"
After anouth call with 101 to lodge another complete against the David, the result is they will not hear the complaint because It is according to them , it is "not appropriate" for hem to take to complain about an investigating officeee Involved in the active investigation against me. Of course, they said I should contact the IUP CC but as everybody knows they are not independent and it will take at least 8 weeks for someone to even look at the case file and by that time I would already have been subject to another oppressive interview and most likely been found guilty of a crime despite all evidence Which supports the fact of innocence!
So there is literally no way to prevent a crime from being committed against me, even when the officer literally telling me, in writting, his intention is to presume my guilt of an offense which can be easily proven to not have occurred, where what evidence they had in conflicts with their Assumption of guilt has either been physically dened to us or outright destroyed!
A good example which clearly demonstrates intent to ensure that any facts that may inconveniently contradict their narrative are actively deing destroyed l....
So, the current alleged offence, which I am supposedly already guilty of...after having made zero attempt to investigate, is that, according to the complainant, a troll with a documented history of exaggerated and fraudulent reports made in order to get me arrested.... Is that
I have intentionally been "spraying some sticky substance onto the patio belonging to complainant"
As can be seen from my video of this event, hervclam is utterly insane, I'm just glad I have video to demonstrate what actually happened as opposed to her fabricated report.... Well , following a her filming me in my own private bedroom, within less than ten minutes David mcguinness, arrived at the complainant's property alone.
Now, remember It's been less than twenty minutes since I started so im as still out frun cleaning the bird c*** off my gutters and windows as David leaves... In fact , there is a point when I am out for front just as he is arriving too.... So obviously I am still on thev premises and available to be questioned, but as the facts would establish my innocence, he just leaves having made no attempt to ascertain for facts or make any attempt to hear my alternative version of events.
At no point did the officer investigate, or even ask what I was actually spraying on my My property to clean the bird crap, I was literally at one point out for front of the, while continuing my work when the officer came and then left, without making contact.....
It would have been so easy to falsify the fabricated claim, by just asking to see the spray bottle I was still using.
The guy was quite literally there.I was right there, as clearly seen on my CCTV, it would have taken ten minutes to completely and totally dispel any possibility of the alleged offence as described by a none lying, dishonest vindictive little troll....
And indeed conversely, if they really thought I was guilty of this 'crime'... Well, would not the best evidence to support their version of events be to have a matching sample of the supposed 'sticky liquid' from her patio AND a sample taken from my cleaning bottle?
That would quite conclusively prove my criminal intent, or maybe at least it would support the reason for that creepy video taken my young lady secretly into a blind persons bedroom!