Petition Closed

Normal 0 21 false false false CS X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Normální tabulka"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

petition to the congres of the united states of america

Dear Congresmen,

We are aware that some agencies of the U.S. government (and possibly some other entities or individuals in this country) are in the possession of technical means enabling remote control of human nervous system. This is proved by the European parliament’s STOA (Science and Technology Options Assessment) report on  Crowd  control technologies, which states: “In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their  place in allied arsenals”; and “In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency weapons”   (pg. Xlvi).  Directed energy system is further defined by the STOA document:  „Directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level“ 6-67 – for more information see  It is obvious that the use of such means for manipulation of human beings is in sharp contrast with the constitution of this country guaranteeing its citizens the right to personal freedom. If personal nervous system was manipulated from outside it would be a major abuse of his or her free will. Under those circumstances it is hard to understand why there is no law in this country prohibiting the possession of means enabling remote manipulation of human nervous system and their use against people. Of course such law should include provisions establishing teams equipped with technologies capable to detect those detrimental radiations and their sources. According to the bill proposed by Dennis J. Kucinich in the U.S. congress the means capable to manipulate human nervous system include "land-based, sea-based or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons or populations" . Therefore we ask the U.S. Congres  to take decisive steps toward the legislation which would protect the citizens of this country against those radiations, which can be used for remote manipulation of their nervous system and consequently their thoughts and behaviour. In our opinion the teams capable to detect detrimental radiations should be supervised by either the ombudsman or some human rights commission with participation of representatives of Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch.




Letter to
Congres of the United States of America
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Congres of the United States of America.

enact the law baning remote control of human nervous system

It is a very basic human right to control personal nervous system. If it would be controled from outside it would be a major abuse of a free will of an individual.