To see more on my story Google 'monster brisbane place bispham '

The article was written when he was first sentenced and he also was originally being charged with 8 offences however ended up being charged with 10 due to evidence from other people. 

If he gets out, he has multiple mental health conditions, sat in court with a clip board writing what I said down to look like he had no idea what I was going to say.

Either he doesn't care about what he did or he is that mentally unstable that he believes his own lies. Either way why is it okay for him to be allowed to not serve his whole sentence, to deny it still when all the proof and evidence was concrete, the whole jury found him guilty.

Why just because the trial was before th3 new law, he can be released, yet the new rules include cases in the past, so why not this one, why not on a case by case basis? Why no parole? No extensive check on his mh records, no having to stay in until he is aware of what he did, the impact it caused and shows he understands and is sorry, or admits it?