SEC Office of the Inspector General -- Don't Sell Out the Shareholders of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
The Issue
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its SEC Enforcement Division Attorneys, John M. McCoy, Molly M. White, and Leslie Hakala (hereinafter the SEC Enforcement Division Attorneys will be collectively referred to as "malfeasant SEC Attorneys") are indisputably grossly negligent and seemingly criminally complicit for breaching their mandated duties pertaining to the pump and dump fraud of the previous management of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKM), which caused:
1. said fraud to continue and perpetuate. In essence, the SEC created an environment in which the fraudsters were able to run their pump and dump fraud with impunity, and therefore the SEC contributed to the losses suffered by CMKM investors;
2. the infra civil and criminal litigation pertaining to said fraud to be rife with contradictions, inconsistencies, and discrepancies, all of which ultimately render them incomplete, inaccurate, and inadequate: Civil Action No. 08-CV-0437, Securities and Exchange Commission vs. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al, Complaint, 4-7-08, United States District Court, District of Nevada; Grand Jury Superseding Indictment 2-09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ, United States of America vs. John M. Edwards et al, 5-27-09, United States District Court, District of Nevada, and Second Superseding Indictment 2-09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ, United States of America vs. John M. Edwards et al, 3-24-10, United States District Court, District of Nevada;
3. the illegal naked short sellers of CMKM's stock to get away with defrauding CMKM shareholders.
On 8-18-11, I started a Petition Letter on change.org in which I demanded that the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys correct their mistakes pertaining to CMKM and implement efficient new systems to ensure that they don't make the same mistakes in the future.
On 8-30-11, SEC Attorney Rinell Randolph emailed a generic letter to one signer of the Petition Letter in which he feebly attempts to circumvent the demands in the Petition Letter by referencing civil litigation that is unrelated to the litigation referenced in the Petition Letter.
On 9-2-11, I filed Complaint, Report #115613986, with the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG) against SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys for the failure of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys to comply with the demands listed in the Petition Letter.
On 9-19-11, the OIG opened a preliminary inquiry into possible SEC staff misconduct pertaining to the failure of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys to comply with the demands listed in the Petition Letter.
Furthermore, the SEC is indisputably grossly negligent and seemingly criminally complicit for breaching its mandated duties pertaining to the ongoing frauds that are being perpetrated against existing CMKM shareholders and unsuspecting investors which causes:
1. the ongoing frauds to continue and perpetuate;
2. the creation of an environment in which the fraudsters are able to run their ongoing frauds with impunity, and therefore the SEC contributes to the losses suffered by CMKM investors;
On 12-20-10, I filed a 166-page Complaint, Case Number HO102219 (SEC Complaint), with the SEC in which I exposed said ongoing frauds.
Because the SEC failed to even acknowledge receipt of my SEC Complaint -- which contradicts the improvements the SEC allegedly has made since its TCR Database went into operation -- I began an investigation, which led to a telephone conversation with Merrily W. Katz, SEC Investor Assistance Specialist, (Katz).
Katz not only failed to thank me for filing the SEC Complaint, she was rude, obnoxious, and underhanded, and when she failed to intimidate me, she abruptly hung up the telephone.
The SEC and Katz are obviously stonewalling my SEC Complaint to cover up for the SEC's indisputable gross negligence and seeming criminal complicity pertaining to said ongoing frauds.
On 9-1-11, I filed Complaint, Report #115612564 (OIG Report), with the OIG against the SEC and Katz for the SEC’s and Katz’s stonewalling my SEC Complaint.
But instead of responding to my OIG Report, which it is mandated by law to do, the OIG stonewalled it just as the SEC had stonewalled my SEC Complaint.
Because the OIG stonewalled my OIG Report, I emailed the OIG on 10-24-11 and respectfully requested that the OIG provide me with valid reasons for its stonewalling my OIG Report.
Furthermore, I informed the OIG that if it failed to provide me with the requested valid reasons, I will start a Petition Letter on change.org in which I document the OIG's stonewalling my OIG Report.
Because the OIG failed to respond to said email, I started this Petition Letter on 10-30-11.
Petition Closed
The Issue
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its SEC Enforcement Division Attorneys, John M. McCoy, Molly M. White, and Leslie Hakala (hereinafter the SEC Enforcement Division Attorneys will be collectively referred to as "malfeasant SEC Attorneys") are indisputably grossly negligent and seemingly criminally complicit for breaching their mandated duties pertaining to the pump and dump fraud of the previous management of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKM), which caused:
1. said fraud to continue and perpetuate. In essence, the SEC created an environment in which the fraudsters were able to run their pump and dump fraud with impunity, and therefore the SEC contributed to the losses suffered by CMKM investors;
2. the infra civil and criminal litigation pertaining to said fraud to be rife with contradictions, inconsistencies, and discrepancies, all of which ultimately render them incomplete, inaccurate, and inadequate: Civil Action No. 08-CV-0437, Securities and Exchange Commission vs. CMKM Diamonds, Inc. et al, Complaint, 4-7-08, United States District Court, District of Nevada; Grand Jury Superseding Indictment 2-09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ, United States of America vs. John M. Edwards et al, 5-27-09, United States District Court, District of Nevada, and Second Superseding Indictment 2-09-CR-00132-RLH-RJJ, United States of America vs. John M. Edwards et al, 3-24-10, United States District Court, District of Nevada;
3. the illegal naked short sellers of CMKM's stock to get away with defrauding CMKM shareholders.
On 8-18-11, I started a Petition Letter on change.org in which I demanded that the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys correct their mistakes pertaining to CMKM and implement efficient new systems to ensure that they don't make the same mistakes in the future.
On 8-30-11, SEC Attorney Rinell Randolph emailed a generic letter to one signer of the Petition Letter in which he feebly attempts to circumvent the demands in the Petition Letter by referencing civil litigation that is unrelated to the litigation referenced in the Petition Letter.
On 9-2-11, I filed Complaint, Report #115613986, with the SEC Office of Inspector General (OIG) against SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys for the failure of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys to comply with the demands listed in the Petition Letter.
On 9-19-11, the OIG opened a preliminary inquiry into possible SEC staff misconduct pertaining to the failure of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys to comply with the demands listed in the Petition Letter.
Furthermore, the SEC is indisputably grossly negligent and seemingly criminally complicit for breaching its mandated duties pertaining to the ongoing frauds that are being perpetrated against existing CMKM shareholders and unsuspecting investors which causes:
1. the ongoing frauds to continue and perpetuate;
2. the creation of an environment in which the fraudsters are able to run their ongoing frauds with impunity, and therefore the SEC contributes to the losses suffered by CMKM investors;
On 12-20-10, I filed a 166-page Complaint, Case Number HO102219 (SEC Complaint), with the SEC in which I exposed said ongoing frauds.
Because the SEC failed to even acknowledge receipt of my SEC Complaint -- which contradicts the improvements the SEC allegedly has made since its TCR Database went into operation -- I began an investigation, which led to a telephone conversation with Merrily W. Katz, SEC Investor Assistance Specialist, (Katz).
Katz not only failed to thank me for filing the SEC Complaint, she was rude, obnoxious, and underhanded, and when she failed to intimidate me, she abruptly hung up the telephone.
The SEC and Katz are obviously stonewalling my SEC Complaint to cover up for the SEC's indisputable gross negligence and seeming criminal complicity pertaining to said ongoing frauds.
On 9-1-11, I filed Complaint, Report #115612564 (OIG Report), with the OIG against the SEC and Katz for the SEC’s and Katz’s stonewalling my SEC Complaint.
But instead of responding to my OIG Report, which it is mandated by law to do, the OIG stonewalled it just as the SEC had stonewalled my SEC Complaint.
Because the OIG stonewalled my OIG Report, I emailed the OIG on 10-24-11 and respectfully requested that the OIG provide me with valid reasons for its stonewalling my OIG Report.
Furthermore, I informed the OIG that if it failed to provide me with the requested valid reasons, I will start a Petition Letter on change.org in which I document the OIG's stonewalling my OIG Report.
Because the OIG failed to respond to said email, I started this Petition Letter on 10-30-11.
The Decision Makers
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on October 30, 2011