Ex The US Constitution is the Laws of the United States which shall be make in Pursuance thereof, shall be the Supreme Law of the Land: and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby.
Every judge takes two oaths, and to defend the integrity of the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic;…that ends “So help me God.” They bind their soul and their HONOR to their oath to defind the integrity of the Constitution.
The fifth mandate of the FIRST AMENDMENT is a command that is clear and unambiguous.
“Congress shall make no law respecting…the right of the people peaceably…to petition the government FOR A RESRESS of grievances.”
I have repeatedly made a Lawful challenge of several laws used to oppress the grievance process under USA v. Butler, 297 us 1 which states, “The Constitution is the supreme law of the land ordained and established by the people. All legislation must conform to the principles it lays down. When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty, -to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide whether the latter squares with the former. All the court does, of can do, is to announce its considered judgment upon the question.”
As judges they know Marbury v. Madison, 5 us 137.
“The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on this subject. It is in these words: “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as, according to the best of my abilities and understanding agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States.”
Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United Stated, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?
If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery, To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.
It is also not entirely unworthy of observation, that in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the constitution, have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United Stated confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”
I repeatedly challenge Laws that are repugnant of this First Amendment mandate only to have them and all persons in government refuse to HONOR their oath to defend the integrity of the Constitution. Judge Joseph R. McCorey, Email: mccrorey_ecf@scd.uscourts.gov and George Ross Anderson, Jr, Email: ganderson_ecf@scf@scd.uscourts.gov both refuse to HONOR their oath and give redress to this challenge. They would rather conspire against GOD and Country to facilitate the ongoing oppression of the Constitution than give a Full and Fair Redress on the record as their duty would require.
I was very clear of this challenge in the case before them now Theodore Wagner v. President Barack Obama, et al , 3:13-cv-708. They repeatedly use sophistry to hide the challenge by calling it an objection or ignoring it totally. Every petition including this one is for the purpose of having a Full and Fair Redress of this challenge just as is presented in USA v Butler.
President Bush also passed a Law that it is unlawful to sue a Telecom companies for aiding the government in unconstitutional wire tapping in violation of the Fourth Amendment. There are hundreds of Laws made that are repugnant of this mandate made and used to oppress the people’s right FOR A REDRESS OF GREAVANCES.
I also have a petition at: //wh.gov/JgyP .
A blog at: firstamendmentrightofredress.blogspot.com
Twitter: Theodore_Wagner@Twitter.com
Facebook: Theodore.Wagner.520@FaceBook.com
These judges as well as everyone else in government will continue to be complicit and enable this ongoing conspiracy to oppress the commanded right to a Full and Fair Redress of grievances without your help! Please demand the court give this challenge a Full and Fair Redress on the Record as presented in USA v. Butler.