Reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

Reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

The Issue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 https://secure2.convio.net/psr/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=383&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr011=yyp33tqs61.app1b

reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

Reprocessing does not belong in a climate bill

Dear ,
 
Some members of Congress think they have the answer to what to do with high-level radioactive waste:  “reprocessing”.  Nuclear reprocessing separates plutonium and uranium from spent nuclear reactor fuel.  Supporters of this costly and dangerous technology want to add reprocessing provisions to the Senate climate bill that is planned to be debated this fall.
 
Reprocessing would cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, undermine U.S. nonproliferation policy, pollute the environment, and threaten public health. According to the National Academy of Sciences, the cost of reprocessing existing spent fuel in the United States would total more than $500 billion. The development of reprocessing technology in the US would make it harder to prevent other countries from pursuing this nuclear weapons technology.
 
Moreover, reprocessing complicates the nuclear waste problem, rather than solves it. Reprocessing is the most polluting part of the nuclear fuel cycle and actually increases the amount of waste that must be managed.
 
Please contact your Senators today and tell them that reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

Click Here to Take Action

Sincerely,

https://secure2.convio.net/psr/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=383&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr011=yyp33tqs61.app1b

Reprocessing does not belong in a climate bill

 

Please contact your Senators today and tell them that reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

If your information below is out of date, please click here to update your account.

 Recipients

Your Senators

avatar of the starter
B FPetition StarterWelcome: I am active and recruit actively, if you don't want action invites in your message box, please don't add or request me. I came to Change to work with people that want to make a difference in the world. If you are one of those people, welcome aboard! <br>"Mente manuque praesto" Which means: ready with heart & hand<br><br>There is Power in numbers, be one more voice!!!<br>(Me)<br><br>The Greatest Impediment To Progress Is Not Ignorance; Rather It's The Illusion Of Knowledge! (unknown)<br><br>A man full of words, but not full of deeds, is just like a garden, packed full of weeds.<br>(G. Page)<br><br>The problems we are faced with to solve today, cannot be resolved at the same level of thinking used when we created them.<br>(A. Einstein)<br><br>In times of "change", learners inherit the Earth, while the learned find themselves equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists!<br>(unknown)<br><br>
This petition had 65 supporters

The Issue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 https://secure2.convio.net/psr/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=383&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr011=yyp33tqs61.app1b

reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

Reprocessing does not belong in a climate bill

Dear ,
 
Some members of Congress think they have the answer to what to do with high-level radioactive waste:  “reprocessing”.  Nuclear reprocessing separates plutonium and uranium from spent nuclear reactor fuel.  Supporters of this costly and dangerous technology want to add reprocessing provisions to the Senate climate bill that is planned to be debated this fall.
 
Reprocessing would cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars, undermine U.S. nonproliferation policy, pollute the environment, and threaten public health. According to the National Academy of Sciences, the cost of reprocessing existing spent fuel in the United States would total more than $500 billion. The development of reprocessing technology in the US would make it harder to prevent other countries from pursuing this nuclear weapons technology.
 
Moreover, reprocessing complicates the nuclear waste problem, rather than solves it. Reprocessing is the most polluting part of the nuclear fuel cycle and actually increases the amount of waste that must be managed.
 
Please contact your Senators today and tell them that reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

Click Here to Take Action

Sincerely,

https://secure2.convio.net/psr/site/Advocacy?pagename=homepage&page=UserAction&id=383&autologin=true&JServSessionIdr011=yyp33tqs61.app1b

Reprocessing does not belong in a climate bill

 

Please contact your Senators today and tell them that reprocessing is not a solution for spent fuel and does not belong in a climate bill.

If your information below is out of date, please click here to update your account.

 Recipients

Your Senators

avatar of the starter
B FPetition StarterWelcome: I am active and recruit actively, if you don't want action invites in your message box, please don't add or request me. I came to Change to work with people that want to make a difference in the world. If you are one of those people, welcome aboard! <br>"Mente manuque praesto" Which means: ready with heart & hand<br><br>There is Power in numbers, be one more voice!!!<br>(Me)<br><br>The Greatest Impediment To Progress Is Not Ignorance; Rather It's The Illusion Of Knowledge! (unknown)<br><br>A man full of words, but not full of deeds, is just like a garden, packed full of weeds.<br>(G. Page)<br><br>The problems we are faced with to solve today, cannot be resolved at the same level of thinking used when we created them.<br>(A. Einstein)<br><br>In times of "change", learners inherit the Earth, while the learned find themselves equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists!<br>(unknown)<br><br>

The Decision Makers

Petition Updates