United Nations Recognize #ParentalAlienation As #Violence And Abuse Against Children
  • Petitioning Samantha Power

This petition will be delivered to:

United States Ambassador to the United Nations
Samantha Power
Prime Minister of Canada
Mr. Stephen Harper
Free The Slaves, Executive Director
Mr. Maurice I. Middleberg
UN Secretary-General
Mr. Ban Ki-moon
Comisión Interamericana Derechos Humanos
Mr. Emilio Alvarez Icasa
Dalai Lama
His Holiness Dalai Lama
UN Secretary-General
Mr. Ban Ki-moon
UN Economic and Social Council
Mr. Otto Gustafik
Anti Slavery, Director
Mr. Aidan McQuade
The Carter Center
President Jimmy Carter and Mrs Carter
Desmond Tutu Peace Center
Archbishop Desmond Tutu
Freedom House, President
Mr. David J. Kramer
Oak Foundation, President
Ms Kathleen Cravero-Kristofferson
UN General Assembly President, Uganda Foreign Minister
Mr. Sam Kahamba (UN General Assembly President, Uganda Foreign Minister)
United Nations, Germany
Mr. Harald Braun
Member of Parliament, Canada
Ms Diane Ablonczy
United Nations, Brazil
Mr. Antonio de Aguiar Patriota
The Nobel Foundation
Mr. Lars Heikensten
United Nations, Austria
Mr. Martin Sajdik
Minister of Foreign Affairs Italy
Ms Federica Mogherini

United Nations Recognize #ParentalAlienation As #Violence And Abuse Against Children

    1. EG GE
    2. Petition by

      EG GE

      Athens, GA

Written in ENGLISH, FRENCH, GERMAN, SPANISH, AFRIKAANS, PORTUGUESE, RUSSIAN, GREEK

Professionals in different disciplines identified and defined Parental Alienation as the pervasive practice of one divorcing parent against the other parent to destroy the relationship of the targeted parent with his or her children. This is usually done with the intent to gain financial benefits in court.

Since 1990, the year that The Convention on Rights of the Child entered into force, a more pernicious form of Parental Alienation has permeated global societies. In order to comply with the yearly resolutions  suggested by NGOs to the Committee on the Rights of the Child, States and their governments initiated, developed and sustained a persecution against parents to separate them from their children. Those resolutions are accepted unquestiongly and never contested.
  
Children Protection agencies are heartlessly taking children away from their homes and their parents, grandparents and family under the most unreasonable and heinous excuses in order to give them away to foster homes and adoption places.
This absurd cruelty and brutality has to stop now!

** Mexico

Parental Alienation Law, May 9th, 2014

Civil Code Capitulo III, Art. 323 Septimus

** Brazil

Law 12318, August 26, 2010

Defines and punishes Parental Alienation

 

GERMAN

Worum geht es?

Eltern-Kind-Entfremdung (englisch Parental Alienation Syndrome PAS)
wird von Experten in unterschiedlichen Disziplinen als fortgesetzte
Handlungen eines Elternteils zur Zerstörung der Beziehung des Kindes
zum anderen Elternteils definiert. PAS tritt typischerweise im
Zusammenhang mit gerichtlichen Auseinandersetzungen auf und ist oft
durch die finanziellen Auswirkungen von Scheidungen begründet.

Die Kinderrechtskonvention ist 1990 in Kraft getreten und seit damals
verbreitet sich eine fortgeschrittene, noch schädlichere Form von PAS
in den Vertragsstaaten. Die von Nichtregierungsorganisationen (non
governmental organizations NGOs) erstellen Zielvorgaben des
Kinderrechtsausschusses führen zum planmässigen Vorgehen staatlicher
Stellen gegen die natürlichen Eltern vieler Kinder und zur Trennung
der Kinder von ihren Eltern. Diese Zielvorgaben wurden bisher weder
auf staatlicher noch auf internationaler Ebene kritisch hinterfragt.

Einrichtungen der Jugendwohlfahrt entfernen Kinder rücksichtslos aus
ihren Wohnungen und trennen sie unter fadenscheinigen Vorwänden von
ihren Eltern, Grosseltern und der gesamten Familie, damit sie für
Adoptionen und Fremdunterbringung verfügbar werden.

Dieses brutale und widersinnige Vorgehen muss aufhören!

FRENCH

POURQUOI CE TEXTE EST IMPORTANT

Plusieurs professionnels de divers milieux ont identifié et défini l’Aliénation Parentale comme pratique insinuante d’un parent contre l’autre parent afin de détruire la relation de cet autre parent avec ses enfants. Ceci est généralement fait avec l’intention d’obtenir des gains financiers en cour.

Depuis 1990, l’année où La Convention sur les Droits de l’Enfant entra en vigueur, une autre forme encore plus pernicieuse d’aliénation parentale s’est inflitrée dans les sociétés globales. Afin de se conformer aux résolutions annuelles suggérées par NGOs au Comité sur les Droits de l’Enfant, des Etats et leurs governments ont initié, élaboré et maintenu une persécution contre les parents afin de les séparer de leurs enfants. Ces résolutions sont acceptées inconditionnellement et ne sont jamais contestées.

Sans scrupule, les Services de Protection de l’Enfance enlèvent les enfants de leur foyer, de leurs parents, grandparents et famille en se servant d’excuses déraisonnables et ignobles afin de les offrir à des familles d’acceuil ou en adoption.

Cette cruauté absurde et cette brutalité doivent cesser à l’instant!

 AFRIKAANS

WAAROM DIT BELANGRIK IS

Deskundiges op verskillende vakgebiede het Ouerlike Vervreemding geidentifiseer en gedefinieer as die deurdringende poging van een ouer om gedurende 'n egskeiding die ander, geteikende ouer se verhouding met sy of haar kinders te vernietig. Die oogmerk is gewoonlik om finansiële voordele in die hof te verkry.

Sedert 1990, die jaar wat die Konvensie op die Regte van die Kind in werking getree het, het 'n meer skadelike vorm van Ouerlike Vervreemding die internasionale gemeenskap binnegedring. Ten einde te voldoen aan die jaarlikse voornemens wat voorgestel word deur Nie-Regerings Organisasies en die Komitee vir die Regte van die Kind, het Staatspartye en hul regerings die vervolging van ouers begin, ontwikkel en word dit nou volgehou om sodoende ouers van hul kindeers te skei. Hierdie voornemens word onvoorwaardelik aanvaar en word nooit betwis nie.

Kinderbeskermings-organisasies neem kinders harteloos weg van hul wonings en hul ouers, grootouers en familie op grond van die mees onredelike en afskuwelike redes om hulle sodoende in pleegsorg te plaas of vir aanneming op te gee.

Hierdie onsinnige wreedheid en onmenslikheid moet stopgesit word, nou!

SPANISH

PORQUE ESTO ES IMPORTANTE

Profesionales en diferentes disciplinas identifican y definen Alineación Parental como la perversa practica de un progenitor en contra del otro progenitor cuando se divorcian para destruir la relación entre el primogenitor atacado y los hijos. Inicialmente la intención es obtener beneficios económicos en los tribunales.

Desde 1990, el año en que la Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño entró en vigor, una forma más perniciosa de Alienación Parental ha permeado las sociedades mundialmente. Para cumplir con las resoluciones anuales sugeridas al Comité sobre los Derechos del Niño por NGO, las organizaciones no gubernamentales, los Estados y sus gobiernos iniciaron, desarrollaron y sostienen una persecución contra los progenitores para separarlos de sus hijos. Las resoluciones son aceptadas sin objeción alguna y nunca son impugnadas.

Los organismos de protección a los niños están desalmadamente arrancado a los niños de sus hogares y de sus padres, abuelos y familiares bajo los más odiosos e irracionales pretextos con el fin de dárselos a casas de acogida y en adopción.

¡ Hay que parar esta absurda y cruel brutalidad ya!

RUSSIAN

Просите Организацию Объединенных Наций признать отчуждение ребенка от своих родителей  как насилие и злоупотребление правами детей!

 

Специалисты в различных областях выявили и определили, что ювенальная юстиция т.е. отчуждение ребенка от родных родителей, во время развода, когда  один из родителей против другого родителя, используется
как повсеместная практика , чтобы разрушить отношения биологических родителей со своими детьми. Как правило это  делается с целью получения финансовой выгоды для суда.
С 1990 г., когда Конвенция о правах ребенка вступила в силу, и более опасная форма родительского отчуждения глобально проникла в наше  общество. Для того, чтобы соответствовать ежегодной резолюции предложенной  Неправительственными Организациями в Комитет по правам ребенка, государства и их правительства начали, развили и поддерживают преследование в отношении родителей, чтобы отделить их от своих детей. Те резолюции приняты бесспорно и никогда не оспаривались.
 
Службы по  защите детей  безжалостно забирают детей из своих домов и от их родителей, от  бабушек и дедушек и под  самыми отвратительными и  необоснованными  предлогами для того, чтобы отдать их в детские дома и приемные семьи.
Эта абсурдная жестокость и зверство должны быть остановлены сейчас!

GREEK

Ζητήστε από τα Ηνωμένα Έθνη να αναγνωρίσει την Γονική Αποξένωση ως πράξη βίας και κακοποίησης των παιδιών.
Οι ειδικοί διαφόρων κλάδων προσδιόρισαν και καθόρισαν την Γονική Αποξένωση ως την μόνιμη πρακτική του ενός διαζευγμένου γονέα προς τον άλλο γονέα, για να καταστρέψει τη σχέση του στοχοποιημένου γονέα με τα παιδιά του ή της. Αυτό γίνεται συνήθως με την πρόθεση να αποκτήσουν οικονομικά οφέλη από το δικαστήριο.
Από το 1990, το έτος κατά το οποίο η Σύμβαση για τα Δικαιώματα του Παιδιού τέθηκε σε ισχύ, η πιο ολέθρια μορφή της Γονικής Αποξένωσης έχει διεισδύσει στις παγκόσμιες κοινωνίες. Προκειμένου να συμμορφωθούν με τα ετήσια ψηφίσματα που προτείνονται από τις ΜΚΟ στην Επιτροπή για τα Δικαιώματα του Παιδιού, τα κράτη και οι κυβερνήσεις τους κινήθηκαν, αναπτύχθηκαν και διατήρησαν διώξεις κατά των γονέων για να τους χωρίσουν από τα παιδιά τους. Αυτά τα ψηφίσματα έγιναν αποδεκτά ανεξήγητα και ποτέ δεν αμφισβητήθηκαν.
Οι υπηρεσίες προστασίας των παιδιών παίρνουν με απονιά τα παιδιά μακριά από τα σπίτια τους και τους γονείς τους, τους παππούδες και την οικογένεια κάτω από τις πιο παράλογες και ειδεχθείς δικαιολογίες, προκειμένου να τα δώσουν σε μακρινές κατοικίες και χώρους υιοθεσίας.
Αυτή η παράλογη σκληρότητα και η βιαιότητα θα πρέπει να σταματήσει τώρα!

Recent signatures

    News

    1. In the news Parental Alienacion in Argentina.

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer
      La justicia dispuso no exhibir parte de un documental sobre padres separados de sus hijos

      El juez ordenó que se recorten los cuadros donde aparecen los testimonios de los demandantes. El juez civil Guillermo Blanch dispuso no exhibir parte del documental sobre padres separados de sus hijos, "Borrando a Papá", cuyo estreno había sido demorado por el INCAA.

    2. PARENTAL ALIENATION IS A GLOBAL ISSUE.

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      La justicia dispuso no exhibir parte de un documental sobre padres separados de sus hijos
      Un magistrado ordenó que se eliminen de la película "Borrando a papá" una serie de testimonios del film; el producto se quejó de "un acto de censura"
      Comentá127 Facebook930Twitter139

      El juez ordenó que se recorten los cuadros donde aparecen los testimonios de los demandantes.
      El juez civil Guillermo Blanch dispuso no exhibir parte del documental sobre padres separados de sus hijos, "Borrando a Papá", cuyo estreno había sido demorado por el INCAA.

      Por su parte, y el productor del film, Gabriel Balanvosky, consideró "inadmisible" que un magistrado convalide un hecho de censura.

      El juez ordenó que se eliminen de la película una serie de testimonios ofrecidos por profesionales entrevistados en el film, afirmaron productores en un comunicado.

      El documental, que tiene más de 30 mil visitas en la red social de Internet Youtube, fue subsididado por el Instituto Nacional de Cine y Artes Audiovisual (INCAA) y cuestionado por organizaciones.

      La medida cautelar fue presentada por la médica María Cristina Ravazzola, la abogada Hilda María Radrizzani y la psicóloga Susana Tesone, cuyos testimonios aparecen en el documental "defendiendo posiciones polémicas sobre el abordaje que desde algunos sectores de la salud mental y el derecho de familia se realiza en casos de padres alejados de sus hijos", reportaron los productores.

      El juez ordenó que se recorten los cuadros donde aparecen los testimonios de los demandantes y advirtió que se "abstengan de cualquier transmisión y/o retransmisión de imágenes y (o videos referidos a las peticionarias sin su consentimiento".

      El magistrado dispuso, además, que "se inhiban de utilizar las imágenes de las indicadas en fotografías o videos, entrevistas para documentales y/o cualquier tipo de impresión gráfica, ya sea: Internet, cine, televisión y cualquier otro formato de edición".

      Balanvosky dijo que resulta inadmisible que un juez convalide un hecho de censura y manifestó que todos los entrevistados brindaron sus testimonios frente a cámara y en presencia de testigos, pero después de haber visto el documental y de que quedara en evidencia la forma en que piensan y sus propios dichos defendiendo prácticas antijurídicas y antiéticas se arrepienten y piden que sus testimonios sean eliminados.

      "Es imposible borrar sus testimonios sin desvirtuar el documental, por lo que la reedición que propone el juez representa lisa y llanamente un acto de censura", expresó Balanvosky.

      APELARÁN LA MEDIDA

      Balanvosky sostuvo que acatará la resolución judicial, por lo que se levantará el documental de Youtube, y consideró violatoria de la libertad de expresión y de otros derechos y garantías consagrados en la Constitución Nacional".

      Una de las directoras, Ginger Gentile, expresó que los entrevistados se rasgan ahora las vestiduras porque han reconocido, por primera vez en un registro audiovisual, que cometen y promueven aberraciones jurídicas y morales como estrategias cotidianas y recurrentes en sus roles de asesores y patrocinantes de casos de violencia doméstica y conflictos de familias".

      EL DOCUMENTAL

      "Se están organizando proyecciones y debates en los Estados Unidos, España, Chile, México, Finlandia, Perú, Francia y en decenas de salas en universidades, escuelas, sindicatos, bibliotecas, y cines de todo el país", expresaron desde la productora del film..

    3. PARENTAL ALIENATION IN ARGENTINA

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      http://youtu.be/21vZpXtyiaQ

      Argentina government censorship of the movie Erasing Dad a blatant act of Parental Alienation and attack against Freedom of Speech.

      Borrando a Papá Trailer (Erasing Dad)

      Urgente: están intentando censurar el documental! Estreno 28 de agosto 2014 fue levantado y proyección en colegio abogados cancelado después de pedido de censura. Documental sobre la obstrucción de vínculos familiares. Con el apoyo del INCAA. Facebook: Borrando a Papá https://www.facebook.com/pages/Borrando-a-Pap%C3%A1/531274843612046 twitter @borrandoapap http://www.borrandoapapa.com.ar (ERASING DAD TRAILER click on CC for English subtitles) URGENTE!

    4. PARENTAL ALIENATION IN THE WORDS OF AN ALIENATED CHILD

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      The snatched generation is coming of age and is peaking out. Fight parental alienation perpetrated by the other parent or and by Child Protective Agencies. It is a global! Spread the word.

      http://youtu.be/l73HumVNtUg

      Rosy Stanesby - Children Screaming To Be Heard Conference

      Rosy Stanesby Children Screaming To Be Heard Conference London 25th July 2014

    5. THE HUMAN TRADE. WHY IS UN SECRETARY-GENERAL IGNORING IT

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer
      Why the explosion in child-snatching is big business - Telegraph

      A Norfolk reader sends me photographs of an advertisement placed on the back of local buses by Norfolk and Suffolk county councils. "New challenge," it reads. "Have you thought of fostering? If so you can earn £590 a week." Two things are interesting about this, one general, one specific.

    6. Borrando a papa.

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Child Protective agencies, men and women alienators use the same narcissistic techniques.

      Thank you Argentina for exposing the Parental alienation industry!

      http://www.borrandoapapa.com.ar/erasing-dad-english/

    7. CHILD RIGHTS and PROTECTION EUPHEMISMS FOR CHILD for PROFIT

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      CHILD FOR PROFIT WEALTH-FARE
      NEED EVIDENCE?

      Are Child Protective Services agencies specialized in emotional torture?

      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2755853/It-amazing-moment-Social-worker-gloats-Facebook-breaking-family-revelling-massive-rollicking-judge-gave-parents.html

      Are Child Protective Services a United Nations legalized mafia?

      http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/09/15/nsw-police-deny-removing-aboriginal-children-gunpoint

      Are Child Protective Services in control of freedom of expression?

      http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/questioning-foster-care-should-not-be-allowed-says-association-head-1.2442387

      Are Child Protective Agencies creating and applying laws on the spot?

      http://thegazette.com/subject/news/judge-rules-iowa-dhs-practices-in-removing-children-are-unconstitutional-20140703

      Child Protective Agencies Whistle blowers a must!

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zKKkVrLpzc
      Feb 7, 2013 - Uploaded by POStOLFRONT
      GEORGIA SENATOR NANCY SCHAEFER ON CPS CORRUPTION AFTER A FOUR YEAR ...

      http://donnellyjustice.me/2014/06/25/ex-social-worker-tells-all-please-listen-to-this/

      Social worker who gloated on Facebook over breaking up a family

      Siobhan Condon bragged on social media about court proceedings Said judge had given parents a 'massive rollicking' over children Family court proceedings are normally shrouded in secrecy The 41-year-old gave enough detail to identify family in public Facebook post By Andrew Levy for Daily Mail A social worker gloated about having three children taken into care on her publicly accessible Facebook page.

    8. ACT NOW. PARENTAL ALIENATION IS VIOLENCE!

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Citizens demand for Family Law Reform is a fallacy. International-Domestic Family Laws are based on the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the yearly "Recommendations" enforced to State Parties Member of United Nations (UN) by the Committee on the Rights of the Child based in Geneva, Switzerland.

      The CRC is an international binding treaty never debated in Parliaments, House of Commons, Congress or presented to Citizens. The treaty and subsequent Protocols are signed between UN and your Nation through the Office of the Minister of Foreign Affairs. Although, every Nation must report to the Committee every 5 years, the 18 members of the Committee are accountable to nobody. The Committee questions, criticizes, instructs and issue written "Recommendations" that impact Family Law, specially the relationship between parents-children. The "Recommendations" are adopted immediately by governments as mandated by the Committee. All "Recommendations" of the Committee are implemented through National Judicial System and Child Protective Agencies. The "Recommendations" affect divorce and child custody proceedings, removal of children from their parents, placement in foster care, institutions and adoption.

      Under the umbrella of Children Rights there are 80 NGO's (non-government organizations) lobbying on behalf of UN with a tendency to prejudice parents. NGO's exert a strong influence at the Committee of CRC, their suggestions are mostly accepted without delay at the Geneva Headquarters.

      The power of the Committee and NGO's over all 193 State Party should give an insight of why, in spite of citizens outcry, national legislators tend to defeat Bills to reform Family Law. By the same token, parents, relatives and citizens complaints or protests about parental alienation, degrading and inhuman treatment by judicial systems during divorce as well as social workers abuses are ignored. Those issues are neither acknowledged by the Committee of CRC nor addressed by Nations legal or administrative systems except for Brazil (2010) and Mexico (2014) that outlawed Parental Alienation.

      Parental Alienation and child removal from fit parents will stop when the roots and sources that foster prejudice against parents and unjustified removal of children are starved. That is, dismantle misleading propaganda on Children Rights and abusive practices of the likes of United Nations, UNICEF, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, The Committee on the Rights of the Child, NGO's, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Presidents or Prime Ministers.

      In order to stop Parental Alienation and regain Parental Rights, all parents, grandparents and citizens have the inalienable Right and moral obligation to demand their Nation to withdraw from the draconian Convention on the Rights of the Child. Withdrawal is done by invoking Article 52 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child which says,

      "A State Party may denounce (withdraw) the present Convention by written notification to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Denunciation becomes effective one year after the date of receipt of the notification by the Secretary-General"

      Blitz Members of Parliament, Presidents and Prime Ministers, International Human Rights organizations and social media. Denounce and demand outlaw of Parental Alienation NOW!
      https://www.change.org/p/united-nations-recognize-parentalalienation-as-violence-and-abuse-against-children

      United Nations Recognize #ParentalAlienation As Violence And Abuse Against Children

      Written in ENGLISH, FRENCH, GERMAN, SPANISH, AFRIKAANS, PORTUGUESE, RUSSIAN, GREEK Professionals in different disciplines identified and defined...

    9. The Federal Senate Inquiry into Children in Care in Australia 2014 Submissi

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      https://www.alecomm.com/lime/index.php/survey/index/sid/695235/newtest/Y/lang/en

      Australian Senate has open an inquiry. Copy and paste the Link above to read, fill and send the survey.

      This a step forward for parents and children.

    10. Reached 15,000 signatures
    11. OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CRC ON COMMUNICATIONS PROCEDURES

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      #WHERE IS DEMOCRACY? CUT THE SHACKLE FROM UN!

      On April 14th, 2014 the United Nations Optional Protocol to the Convention of the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure entered into force. It means that children worldwide and their representatives can submit complaints against anyone directly to the Committee on the Rights of the Child based in Geneva, Switzerland

      The Convention and the four Protocols were signed by the Ambassador to UN of your country without ever being discussed or presented to citizens, parents or Parliament. It is enforced by the Committee on the Rights of the Child and carried out by NGO's and Child Protective agencies.

      Do citizens and politicians of Albania, Bolivia, Gabon, Germany, Montenegro, Portugal, Spain, Thailand, Slovakia and Costa Rica know that their Ambassador to UN are the only ones that have signed the Protocol?

      Invoke article 52 of the Convention to withdraw from the Convention, stop alienation against you, your child and your country.

    12. Published in the Daily Mirror UK July 13, 2014

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Home
      News UK News Social services
      Multi-millionaire helps pregnant women flee UK to keep babies from being taken into care
      Jul 13, 2014 15:32 By Grace Macaskill, George Woodfield
      Ian Joseph has spent over £30,000 helping 200 women to avoid having their newborns taken away by social services
      Keeping mum: Ian Joseph is paying mothers at risk of having their babies taken off them to flee Britain
      A multi-millionaire is helping pregnant women whose babies are deemed at risk to flee the UK.
      Ian Joseph has spent over £30,000 helping 200 women to avoid having their newborns taken away by social services.
      He pays for their fares to a new life and offers them free legal advice, even paying for lawyers in some cases.
      Around 50 have fled to Ireland on his money while another 150 went to France, Spain and Italy.
      Forced adoption opponent Mr Joseph, who runs a language business and has a law degree, defended his decision to fund their escape, despite many already having children in care.
      He said: “Social services have moved away from giving families support and are now too quick to take children away.
      “I know what I do is controversial. People ask how I know the people I’ve helped don’t go on to do something wicked, but my reply is that even killers are entitled to lawyers.
      “These woman are entitled to a fair chance to keep their children if they have not been convicted of any crime of cruelty and aren’t on drink or drugs.”
      The dad of seven set up a website and receives “around a thousand” calls a year from mothers.
      Britain is the only EU country allowing forced adoption. Last year, 1,860 children were adopted without parental consent.
      Mr Joseph, 82, features in an ITV ­documentary on Tuesday. He is shown advising a woman called Mary with previous mental health issues who has two children in care and is expecting another.
      Mary, who now raises her child in France, said: “The social services here are helpful and supportive, the opposite of the UK.”
      Mr Joseph says he ploughs through piles of documents before agreeing to help.
      He said: “Adoption shouldn’t go ahead if a mother is begging to get her child back. They should be given a fair chance.
      “Social services used to only take children away if a parent was convicted of cruelty. Now social workers are feared and hated.
      But one GP who works with social ­services said: “People think they are right to help a mother but they do not have all the background to a case.
      The documentary, which shows secret filming of social workers and police taking a child away, also features retired Court of Protection Judge, Sir Mark Hedley who claims there is “increased pressure” on social workers to intervene because of cases like Baby P.
      http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/multi-millionaire-helps-pregnant-women-flee-3850528#ixzz37SecBhVV

      Multi-millionaire helping mums flee UK to keep babies from care

      Ian Joseph has spent over £30,000 helping 200 women to avoid having their newborns taken away by social services A multi-millionaire is helping pregnant women whose babies are deemed at risk to flee the UK. Ian Joseph has spent over £30,000 helping 200 women to avoid having their newborns taken away by social services.

    13. MEXICO OUTLAWS PARENTAL ALIENATION

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Parents, grandparents, families, signatories,
      This is a great news. The Government of Mexico passed the law against Parental Alienation. Changes are coming for parents, children and society worldwide. The Mexican law can be found at,

      Código Civil
      Capítulo III
      Artículo 323 Septimus

      UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION FROM SPANISH

      "Commits family violence the family member that transforms the consciousness of a child in order to prevent, hinder or destroy its links with one of their parents.
      The conduct described in the preceding paragraph, is called parental alienation when performed by one of the parents, who credited such conduct will be suspended in the exercise of parental rights of the child and, therefore, visitation and cohabitation that, if any, have decreed."

      Rejoice, sign and share the news and the petition with the entire!

      www.change.org/.../ask-united-nations-to-recognize-parental-alienation-as- violence-and-abuse-against-children

    14. Mayo 26th, 2014 to June 13, 2014 Meeting of the Commitee on the Rights of t

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Do not expect changes to improve parents and children well-being. The United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child is only interested in achieving total control of your country internal Legislative, Administrative, Judicial, and Economic system. If United Nations failed it's mandate to prevent wars, then how do we expect them to protect children's natural right to enjoy a peaceful life at home with their parents. Parents don't give up, we will take our children and Parental Rights back!

    15. PARENTS

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

    16. Attend the Committee on the Rights 27th May-14 June 2013

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Request an accreditation form to be an observer of the Committee on the Rights of the Child session from 27 May - 14 June 2013. Please fill out the accreditation form (available in pdf and Word), sign and send it by email by Monday, 13 May 2013 at the latest.
      Accreditation will enable participants to obtain a badge from the UN Security Unit, which will permit access to the conference room. The session will take place at Palais Wilson (Ground Floor Conference Room), 52 rue de Pâquis, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.

      Request accreditation from:
      Fax: +41 22 917-9008 Geneva, Switzerland
      Phone: +41 22 917-9141
      email: crc@ohchr.org

    17. Reached 12,500 signatures
    18. PARENTAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT INTRODUCED June 6,2012

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      “The Supreme Court has accurately said that parental rights are ‘perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by [the] Court,’ yet those rights now lack sufficient legal protection under the Constitution,” Farris continues. “Thanks to concerned citizens and engaged leaders in Congress, we look forward to correcting that problem through the adoption of this amendment” says Michael Farris, president of ParentalRights.org,

    19. Reached 1,000 signatures
    20. 61th Session of United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      The Committee on the Right of The Child (CRC) will meet on September 17, 2012
      Palais Wilson (Ground Floor Conference Room),
      52 rue de Pâquis, 1201
      Geneva, Switzerland
      crc@ohchr.org
      Telephone: +41 (0) 22 740 4730
      Fax: 41 (0) 22 740 1145

      Linguistically Alienation and Apartheid have the same meaning, to separate a person from another one.
      The purpose of alienating parents from their children is to create hostility and as consequence made them emotionally estrangers.
      Apartheid is a government policy of segregation involving political, legal, economic discrimination against a person or group of persons. In law and Human Rights it is a crime against humanity.
      Therefore alienating parent from their child is PARENTAL APARTHEID

    21. Reached 750 signatures
    22. THANK YOU FOR THE SUPPORT

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Dear Signatories:

      There is a myth about the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) as a panacea to all social ailments and children own growing pains. However, parents do not understand the structure, content, purpose and effect of CRC on parent’s rights. The CRC is a directive to States, which excludes parents. Children are for all intent and purposes property of the State and parents mere caregivers.

      Principle 6 of the 1959 Declaration of the Rights of the Child stated "the child shall wherever possible grow up in the care and under the responsibility of his parents in an atmosphere of affection and of moral and material security" This Principle is not longer part of the Convention on the Rights of the Child neither is affection and moral security.

      Best regards,

    23. Reached 500 signatures
    24. Committee on the Rights of the Child will meet Jan 14 to Febr 01 2013

      EG GE
      by EG GE
      Petition Organizer

      Greetings,

      A paragraph has been added to the petition letter to include a request that this petition letter be taken as formal proposal to be presented to the Committee on the Rights of the Child on the abovementioned dates.

      Article 50 -1 of the Rights of the Child states that ANY State Party may propose an amendment and file it with the Secretary - General, hopefully a country like Brazil may and should propose it. The meetings of the Committe on the Rights of the Child are public and accept submissions by Non Governmental Organizations. We alienated parents have to include ourselves. Times have changed therefore we too are sending this petition to:

      Mr. Jean Zermatten
      Chairperson Committee on The Rights of The Child
      Email : crc@ohchr.org
      Palais Wilson (Ground Floor Conference Room),
      52 rue de Pâquis, 1201
      Geneva, Switzerland.

      Telephone: +41 (0) 22 740 4730
      Fax : +41 (0) 22 740 1145

    25. Reached 50 signatures

    Supporters

    Reasons for signing

      • about 2 hours ago

      Weil ich keine Angst habe.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
      • about 3 hours ago

      Fui alienada

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Leroy Bader STE. GENEVIEVE, MO
      • about 18 hours ago

      Children are innocent victims of a selfish parent and should not be exposed to emotional abuse and thought of as a means for cash.

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
      • 2 days ago

      日本の拉致司法に断罪を

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:
    • Scott Adams MIAMI, UNITED STATES
      • 2 days ago

      The BEST Parent is BOTH Parents!

      REPORT THIS COMMENT:

    Develop your own tools to win.

    Use the Change.org API to develop your own organizing tools. Find out how to get started.