Heading: Pierce V. President of United States of Matters found to be “Dirty Laundry”

Seeking: Advocates/ Activist/ Law Students/ Lawyers/ Supporters

Links: http://californialegalprejudice.wordpress.com​ http://legalprejudice8usc4.wordpress.com​ http://www.facebook.com/seavon.pierce.1

Contact Info: Seavon Pierce (#F13921)

P.O. Box 290066

Represa, CA 95671

Email/ Gmail: pierce28usc591598@gmail.com

Public rights are to be protected of these violations being concealed, acts to be reported to the public or affected parties of the violations of the laws of the United States, matters also defined as matters of a public interest. Briefly, upon the filing of a complaint with signed written affadavits by the defendants which admit the violation(s) of the U.S. constitution, actions recorded as Pierce V. Gonzales, President Barack Obama, 2011 U.S. Dist. Lexis 21888 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2011) ;13-15114, original case No. 1:10-00285 (JLT) of the Fresno Federal Court. The Federal judge(s) excluded defendants from the action after or upon the receipt of out of court evidence received from the defendants which weighs liability. The ruling, acts which excludes defendants, requires a judicial determination that these defendants are not liable for the violations, and allows for appeal. Upon multiple request for enforcement, the associated judges excluded the affected plaintiffs, intentionally violating the rights to joint remedy, rights to joint relief, rights to a joint action, of plaintiffs listed as “the media, the press and multiple lawyers” still recorded as persons/ organizations of whom evidence of these violations were to be sent. As a strategy or tactic, concerted acts exist as intentional acts to forfeit these valid claims and prevent liability of the defendants for these violations of the United States Constitution. The acts still, as continuing violations, conceals the violations from the appropriate authorities and affected plaintiffs who have also suffered damages. The law further instructs that concealment establishes the violation(s)!  Of these same matters to be reported which have been submitted to the public corruption section by Seavon Pierce by U.S. mail. The public record still reflects that on 12-3-12, participation of attorneys (1) David L. Saine (2) Jeniffer Esqivol Zahry, and (3) Unknown at present, attorney General. These facts exist as evidence that a claim was considered, that the federal judge received separate facts or evidence from the defendants out of court before the action was to be filed as a 42 USC 1983 complaint, matters which are still being concealed. Considering these facts still located upon the public record. No public agency has denounced these acts as acts of public corruption which includes a report of public corruption reported directly to President Donald J. Trump of these same facts above. The presence of counsel can only exist if a claim has been found to exist under these circumstances which still mandate remedy and relief. The record reflects that federal Judge Jenniffer L. Thurston found as evidence, these matters to be “dirty laundry” as evidence of knowledge of multiple violations found to exist at the time the statements were recorded and the facts relied upon. In the same action, case No. 1:10-00285 (JLT), the judge exempted over 30 C.D.C.R. employees, President Barack Obama, the U.S. Government, the California office of the inspector general etc. without notice to any parties as plaintiffs or defendants upon the evidence of participation of the above attorneys of the action. The judicial determination must find that these defendants are not liable for the violations or claims, a ruling which allows for an objection and appeal. Signatures are requested to request enforcement, to become a party of interest or relator, as the law instructs that anyone can be a party of interest of matters defined as matters of public interest. : I agree to be a party of interest, I invoke all rights to joinder, joint remedy, or relief of matters to be enforced as law or duty (regulations) and invoke all rights of matters defined as a public interest matter. My name, address, and signature is provided for these reasons. Further, see californialegalprejudice.wordpress.com, legalprejudice18usc4.wordpress.com for further evidence of concealment.