Academies: Scrap your Section 28 Rule!

The Issue

Under the freedom granted to Academies and the lack of a national curriculum on Sex and Relationships Education (SRE) several schools have retained or reintroduced their own version of Section 28. We have found multiple schools still using SRE policies which ban the promotion of homosexuality. Stirling work by the British Humanists Association has found that fourty four schools still have such outdated homophobic policy in place. The full details are available here:

https://humanism.org.uk/2013/08/19/bha-identifies-44-schools-that-continue-to-have-section-28-like-policies/

Each have in place (or until very recently) Section 28 style policy. Section 28 was an incredibly harmful rule introduced under Thatcher's government that banned the "promotion of homosexuality". In the SRE policy the rules state "The Governing Body will not permit the promotion of homosexuality." 

Section 28 had devastating effects as it left teachers effectively gagged. It meant they were unable to tackle homophobic bullying, unable to provide sexual education for gay, lesbian and bisexual teenagers or for some teachers it meant they could not be open about their own sexuality.

It's been suggested that this documentation could be a result of Place Group, a service provider that updates school's policies, failing to update school policies, as detailed here: https://mtpt.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/section-28-reborn-or-why-you-should-revise-standard-documents/.

If so it's a troubling oversight that has left schools with homophobic policy and a lack of support for LGBT students. It's clear that pressure must be put in place on these academies to update their policy as well as Department of Education to bring in mandatory Sex and Relationship Education that is supportive of LGBT students.

UPDATE

Siobhan MacMahon, spokesperson for the LGBTIQ Green Party Group, condemned the policy. “This is a deeply worrying development. With the scrapping of Section 28 tackling homophobic bullying in schools has finally started to progress. Hearing that schools still have their own Section 28 rule is a damaging step backwards. It’s clear that there should be a national mandatory curriculum ensuring that every school gives students the information they need about sex and sexuality. The freedom granted to Academies and Free Schools to introduce such homophobic policy leaves LGBT students out in the cold. School must be a safe space for LGBT students and teachers, the reintroduction of Section 28s does not allow for that.”

 UPDATE TWO

Since our petition a number of schools have withdrawn the document with outdated Section 28 style policy. Excellent work!

 

This petition had 7,262 supporters

The Issue

Under the freedom granted to Academies and the lack of a national curriculum on Sex and Relationships Education (SRE) several schools have retained or reintroduced their own version of Section 28. We have found multiple schools still using SRE policies which ban the promotion of homosexuality. Stirling work by the British Humanists Association has found that fourty four schools still have such outdated homophobic policy in place. The full details are available here:

https://humanism.org.uk/2013/08/19/bha-identifies-44-schools-that-continue-to-have-section-28-like-policies/

Each have in place (or until very recently) Section 28 style policy. Section 28 was an incredibly harmful rule introduced under Thatcher's government that banned the "promotion of homosexuality". In the SRE policy the rules state "The Governing Body will not permit the promotion of homosexuality." 

Section 28 had devastating effects as it left teachers effectively gagged. It meant they were unable to tackle homophobic bullying, unable to provide sexual education for gay, lesbian and bisexual teenagers or for some teachers it meant they could not be open about their own sexuality.

It's been suggested that this documentation could be a result of Place Group, a service provider that updates school's policies, failing to update school policies, as detailed here: https://mtpt.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/section-28-reborn-or-why-you-should-revise-standard-documents/.

If so it's a troubling oversight that has left schools with homophobic policy and a lack of support for LGBT students. It's clear that pressure must be put in place on these academies to update their policy as well as Department of Education to bring in mandatory Sex and Relationship Education that is supportive of LGBT students.

UPDATE

Siobhan MacMahon, spokesperson for the LGBTIQ Green Party Group, condemned the policy. “This is a deeply worrying development. With the scrapping of Section 28 tackling homophobic bullying in schools has finally started to progress. Hearing that schools still have their own Section 28 rule is a damaging step backwards. It’s clear that there should be a national mandatory curriculum ensuring that every school gives students the information they need about sex and sexuality. The freedom granted to Academies and Free Schools to introduce such homophobic policy leaves LGBT students out in the cold. School must be a safe space for LGBT students and teachers, the reintroduction of Section 28s does not allow for that.”

 UPDATE TWO

Since our petition a number of schools have withdrawn the document with outdated Section 28 style policy. Excellent work!

 

The Decision Makers

Mrs R Robinson, BA
Mrs R Robinson, BA
Headteacher of Swindon Academy
Responded
Dear , Thank you for taking the time to email me/sign the change.org petition concerning our Sex and Relationships policy. Obviously we take this very seriously and I am sorry if anyone has taken any offence or misinterpreted a paragraph of a policy that has been drafted carelessly. Across the range of policies we operate as a school, our commitment to diversity and equality is crystal clear. This particular sentence does not reflect practice in our classrooms but this does not excuse the risk of it being misunderstood. We are proud of our track record both as an employer and educator in dealing with issues surrounding diversity and are opposed to discrimination of any kind. Before this became news over the weekend, no-one from neither Stonewall nor any other organisation had raised this with us. Likewise, we have never had any complaints from students, staff, parents or the large number of organisations with whom we interact every term on issues such as bullying, diversity and equality. If anyone had contacted us about this with their concerns we would of course have amended the policy before now. As it is, United Learning has been in discussions with Stonewall today, with whom we already have a strong and productive relationship, and have amended our policy to remove any unintended interpretation. Wes Streeting, Head of Education at Stonewall has released a statement saying: “We know from our own work with United Learning schools that homophobic bullying is taken very seriously and some schools are leading the way on issues like tackling homophobic language. We’re pleased that United Learning are committed to reviewing all their school policies in line with good practice and Stonewall is committed to supporting their efforts. “Swindon Academy has been doing some excellent work on tackling homophobic bullying, not least through their work on homophobic language as part of the Wiltshire-wide ‘ZeeTee’ campaign. Unfortunately, the government guidance on sex and relationships hasn’t been updated since the repeal of Section 28 in 2003, so some schools are still using outdated language. That’s why we’re working with Swindon Academy through our School Champions programme to help them review their policies in line with national best practice so that all children can attend school without fear of bullying or prejudice.” Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. These issues are important and I hope that, in the future, you will continue to take an interest in our school and see the strong and positive work that is underway here as further evidence of our overall approach to tackling discrimination and encouraging fairness and equality for all. Yours faithfully Ruth Robinson Principal Swindon Academy What would you like to say?
E-ACT
E-ACT
Executive Principal
Responded
E-ACT wish to make clear we do not promote or practice any discrimination in any form. It was a genuine and very regrettable oversight that the old policy was mistakenly on the Crests’ website. The policy is no longer online. The policy, as previously phrased, does not reflect either the ethos or the behaviour of the Crest Academies. We want young people in our academies to be confident and able to engage fully in the modern and diverse society in which we live. We consider objective and sensitive study of sexuality as being central to enabling that to happen. The Crest Academies are committed to developing an inclusive culture where young people and staff of all races, faiths, cultures, sexual orientations and sexual identities learn and work together. A policy reflecting this practice will be added to the websites shortly. We apologise wholeheartedly for any offence or upset that may have been caused.
Mr A Perry
Mr A Perry
Headteacher of Colston Girl's School
Frank McCarron
Frank McCarron
Principal of Stockport Academy
Peter Mulholland
Peter Mulholland
Principal of WHGS Academy

Petition updates

Share this petition

Petition created on 17 August 2013