Animals first, always.
Lake Erie Allegheny Partnership (LEAP), Reverse Position on White-Tailed Deer Management
Lake Erie Allegheny Partnership is the prime mover behind the deer-killing in the northern areas of the southern Great Lakes states, including the frenzied deer-killing now seen in Northeast Ohio. LEAP's Wildlife Conflict Committee ratified its "Position for White-Tailed Deer Management" at Cleveland's Office of Sustainability -- through the Office's Coordinator, Cathi Lehn -- in May 2013, with no public knowledge or input. Now, LEAP members, well-known, heavy hitters in environmental conservation -- Cleveland Museum of Natural History (Jim Bissell), Cleveland Metroparks (Chief of Natural Resources Terry Robison), Cuyahoga Valley National Park (Lisa Petit, Chief Natural Resources), and Ohio Division of Wildlife (Geoffrey Westerfield, assistant wildlife mgmt. supervisor) -- just four of LEAP's dozens of members -- who we look to as leaders in the conservation movement, and whose organizations profit by millions annually -- do NOT promote or implement sound, scientific, and humane solutions to "manage" deer. Instead, they continue to use outdated models of conservation, make disprovable claims, and continue to implement war on OUR wildlife, all in the name of "controlling" deer populations in all our public parks, suburban/urban neighborhoods, and private business properties (i.e. Lakeview Cemetery, Hopkins Airport, etc.) This is a violation of the Public Trust Doctrine, and the players MUST face legal consequences. From LEAP's website and "Position" to kill deer: “At times it is necessary to use human intervention to manage deer population numbers at acceptable levels for desired healthy ecosystems, to reduce nuisance situations, and to increase humane safety.” (visit http://www.leapbio.org/members for a complete list.) But our very comprehensive, fine-tooth scouring of open pubic records revealed NO human fatalities resulted from deer-vehicle crashes in Cuyahoga County for over five years, no Lyme disease in the county, and no Chronic Wasting Disease or starving deer in all Ohio's herd. The claim that deer threaten ecosystems is hypocritical, considering our species is the true threat. OUR PUBLIC, TAXPAYER FUNDED park systems that engage in systematic removal -- and rebounding populations -- of deer for "conservation" purposes is a joke. These parks are for profit, have significantly paved over most of the habitats for which they claim to be stewards, and make hordes of money. Cleve. Metroparks' Brian Zimmerman, for example, earns over $262,000 annual salary! LEAP has influenced all the big NE Ohio decision makers, including public park systems and most suburban/urban areas; one of LEAP's published "recommendations" includes encouraging "municipalities to work with the Ohio Division of Wildlife" to use lethal measures. It doesn't take much to connect the dots between LEAP's ratification/recommendations, and the huge increase in deer killing now seen in numerous NE Ohio communities. Metadata prove ALL lethal measures result in "compensatory rebound effect;" sudden, lethal reductions in herd sizes result in increased herd fertility (does give birth to more multiples, and yearlings conceive earlier). Less competition for food + increased herd fertility = rebounding numbers. In other words, no lethal measures permanently reduce deer herd sizes, and are nothing more than a feedback loop for profit for all the dirty players and politicians. Ohio Division of Wild"Death" admits to compensatory rebound effect, AND to deliberately maintaining a large herd for profit, known as "maximum sustained yield" through rebounding populations. A civilized society does NOT hand over power to its leaders; it takes back control.
STOP KILLING DEER IN CLEVELAND METROPARKS WEST CREEK RESERVATION!
We want Metroparks (CMP) head of natural resources Terry Robison to stop killing deer. He claims it's for "conservation," while admitting that the reason there are so many deer in Ohio is because of hunting; this means he acknowledges killing results in rebounding numbers, but then, he condones killing. This is a blatant contradiction. We also want Robison to stop his radio collaring, telemetry study on deer, which results in deer mortality and stress, especially because he told this petitioner that the study results will make no difference in his decision to kill or not. Since CMPs annual deer killing has not "solved the problem," it actually results in the same or more deer. If that is the case, why not leave them alone? Now that CMP has added its new gem in the emerald necklace, West Creek Reservation in Parma, to its annual slaughterfest where sharpshooters have killed close to 80 deer the past two years, terrified deer egress the park and move southward; they are refuge-seeking. These animals have moved into suburban neighborhoods in Parma and Seven Hills, and now, residents incorrectly perceive there are more deer, and are looking to bow hunting to solve "the problem." This domino effect clearly caused by CMP deer killing has also resulted in an increase in deer-vehicle crashes on Broadview Road between Parma and Seven Hills. Because West Creek was once a lightly patronized marshy greenspace, safe for wildlife, but is now paved over, built on, and frequented on- and off-trail by exponentially more humans. The ripple effect extends to Broadview Heights, North Royalton, Strongsville, and other communities, now with bow hunting on the ballot March 2016. If the parks would just leave the deer alone, they would return to their homes, and balance would be somewhat restored.
Do Not Kill OUR Deer by Sharpshooting, Captive Bolt, or ANY Means!
Officials just admitted they'll use sliencers on sharpshooters to kill at least 350 every year until 2020, basically, all the deer there are in the CVNP! NPS Midwest Regional Acting Director PATTY TRAPP SIGNED THIS FEB. 13. They're now working with Cleveland Metroparks -- a ghoulish, shameful public display of "Groupthink" because every player at every level is guilty of thinking it must be okay because everybody else thinks it is -- which has been killing hundreds annually since 1998. This cannot be described in any terms other than a Holocaust, a war on wildlife. Just look at the image. There's no worse violation of the Public Trust Doctrine -- that wildlife belongs to everyone -- than this! There's a loophole in CVNP's deer kill plan to allow for Rocket Net, a horribly violent explosion that captures and kills the deer via captive bolt. (See video link below.) Head of natural resources Lisa Petit's own research and PowerPoint presentation in Fall 2013 proved that deer have DECLINED by over half over a 16 year period. This petitioner filibustered that meeting, demanding to know why they plan to kill when Petit's own research indicated a huge drop in deer populations over 16 years. Why wouldn't she push for a nonl-lethal solution? Because the NPS claims five criteria have to be met. PZP birth control, a humane method, is all but guaranteed to work, and has worked in many captive mammal settings for decades. There is no good reason not to use PZP, except park loopholes. Petit's research was predominantly based on an outdated, faulty, myopic study about flora damage in the park. A volunteer who proved nonnative earthworms compact the soils, a bigger cause of understory underdevelopment, NOT DEER BROWSING, has been supressed.. The real kicker, according to all cross-referenced data and widllife biology research, experts know that killing only results in the paradox of rebound. The final authority, Patty Trapp, who I pressed on this point did not deny it.
Seven Hills, Ohio: Mayor, Council, Law, Etc.: Drop Bow Hunting Discussion
Killing Deer Does NOT Manage Populations; Proof It Only Fulfills Division of Wild"Death" Coffers: "All of this helps explain why, even after decades of hunting, deer numbers remain high in much of the country. In fact, the basis for hunting regulations such as hunting seasons and bag limits (how many deer a hunter is permitted to kill), are premised on this compensatory theory. The goal is to allow the sport of killing to take place while at the same time, conserve enough deer for hunters to enjoy the following season. But how many deer exactly should each state allow to be killed and still have enough for next year? In other words, what is the "maximum sustained yield"? This is one of the persistently difficult and challenging questions facing state wildlife managers; and since these managers are compelled to satisfy their hunting constituency, the more deer in the field the better. If there aren't enough deer, the wildlife managers may end up without jobs(see prior blog post 9/25/09 "The Structure of our State Wildlife Agency System..)" AND "Hundreds of communities across the country are grappling with issues related to deer populations. After 10 years of culling, Princeton, New Jersey has recently decided to take a break. However new culling programs are being proposed almost daily. Controversial culls have been introduced throughout Westchester county and parts of upstate New York, as well as many towns in Connecticut, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Michigan. Residents are told, often by representatives of their state wildlife agency, that killing is necessary because deer are very adaptable and their numbers can increase out of control. But given the number of species struggling today under the stress of environmental conditions such as global warming, under what biological theory could deer be overpopulating themselves? Being highly adaptable seems a bit unscientific and perhaps not the full explanation. AND "Basic biology dictates that animal populations, including deer, do not just grow exponentially out of control." --Katherine McGill, from http://www.examiner.com/article/realities-of-hunting-as-a-population-control-why-there-are-so-many-deer-today
Reform ODOW and Abolish Deer Hunting and "Culling" in Ohio parks, urban and suburban areas
Ohio Division of Natural Resources (DNR). DNR the DNR! Every year in late Sept., deer hunting season begins. It is my hope to reform our state-run hunters' club by bringing it into the 21st century. Let's reverse the trend of urban/suburban hunting and public parks slaughter -- under the guise of "nuisance control" -- perpetuated by profit-driven ODOW and the small minority who hunts. Let's usher in an Ohio Division of Wildlife that is by the people, for the people, and one that is: - NOT comprised of a board of directors of all hunters, but ELECTED officials who have been vetted, and are equal stakeholders sworn to uphold the spirit of The Public Trust Doctrine: that "wildlife belongs to everyone;" - NOT recruit biologists and game managers with hunting/trapping backgrounds, but 'best practice' non-lethal-minded ones who will not kill or recommend killing; - NOT profit by over 50 percent annually off "maximum sustained yield" through deliberately maintained large, stable deer populations (aka" compensatory rebound effect") or cater to the six percent who hunt but, instead, be held to a new financial structure based on small increases in Ohio tax filing fees, monies collected from real wildlife "consumers:" park-goers, wildlife watchers, hikers, bird watchers (book and binocular purchases in Ohio and "hotspot" trips to migratory corridors, etc.), and other broad-based sources; - NOT dispatch armed ODOW officers to constituents' homes or businesses to threaten, intimidate, or harass well-meaning, compassionate Ohioans to surrender rescue injured or orphaned deer, raccoons, etc. to be "euthanized" but, instead, work with Ohioans and others -- including legitimate, thoroughly vetted rehabbers -- who genuinely care about animals to find humane solutions to wildlife in dire need; - NOT spread propaganda that killing deer helps "manage" their populations but, instead, educate Ohioans with recommendations for only non-lethal solutions for "nuisance" problems like landscape browsing, based on wildlife biology (i.e., killing actually perpetuates stable deer populations, rather than reducing them; deer browsing, trampling and feces are critically important to ecosystems, as they have been for five to 10 million years on N. American continent where deer and plants have co-evolved; and human fatalities related to deer-vehicle accidents have held steady, nationally, despite robust herds). Ironically, Ohioans saw a spike in Deer-Vehicle Accidents (DVAs) concurrent with Ohio's most "successful" hunting season; they have correspondingly decreased with a decline in Ohio hunting. FIRST DAY OF HUNTING sees highest number of DVAs because frightened deer run away from hunters into roadways. Ohio Division of Wildlife already admits that, since deer were reintroduced in Ohio in 1950 as a game species -- expressly to satisfy hunters and for profit -- the steady increase in hunting has paradoxically caused more suffering, harm, stress, and loss to Ohioans and native deer. Unfortunately, their only recommendation is more killing. The time for reform is now.