Petition to City of Renton, WSDOT
Help save Longacres DIY
WSDOT wants to tear out our safe haven from the rain! If you believe in our cause, and the positive impact we have been making in our area and our community please sign our petition and share! We want to show the city of Renton and WSDOT that this place is nothing but a positive thing for this under utilized piece of property underneath I405. We have been cleaning up the area by maintaining shrubbery, picking up litter and debris, and providing a safe, dry place to skate for kids and adults of all ages. Please take a minute to help our cause and share this petition to everyone you know. If we get enough support, they just might listen.
Petition to Ron Nirenberg, Dr. Francine S. Romero
PETITION TO POSTPONE OR DENY ZONING CHANGE REQUEST
Petition to Postpone or Deny Zoning Change Request Case Number: Z2017078 S ERZD Land Description to be Rezoned: unofficial 0.83 Acre tract of land located within 8.508 acres tract described Volume 13770, Page 2487, Official Public Records of Real Property of Bexar County, Texas, Abst. 574, County Block 4766, N.C.B. 15825, San Antonio, Texas 78249. Address: Located within 5000 Beckwith Blvd, San Antonio, Texas 78249 Summary of Proposed Rezoning or Zoning Change: San Antonio Television, LLC (“WOAI”) is attempting to rezone a small portion of property located within the larger vacant tract referenced above so that a 250 foot tall wireless communications tower can be built within an area that restricts the construction or development of these structures within such close proximity to residentially zoned property and other commercially zoned property. Officially, the request is phrased as a change in zoning from the current classification: “C-2 MLOD ERZD" Commercial Camp Bullis Military Lighting Overlay Edwards Recharge Zone District” to the requested changed zoning of "C-2 S MLOD ERZD Commercial Camp Bullis Military Lighting Overlay Edwards Recharge Zone District with Specific Use Authorization for a Wireless Communication System.” (emphasis added). Status: - HEARING: Zoning Commission will vote to approve or deny this zoning application on April 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM. - LOCATION OF VOTE: 1901 South Alamo, San Antonio, TX 78204. - ATTENDANCE: ALL affected, adjacent neighborhood residents are highly encouraged to attend and voice their opposition to the zoning change. A voice at the hearing speaks louder than 10 signatures on a petition. Please make time to attend this hearing. The Vote Should Be Postponed, or, in the alternative, the Zoning Change Request should be DENIED for the following reasons: 1. NOTICE: Notice is required to be given to all adjacent property owners within a specific distance of the property being rezoned. Notice was not properly provided to the neighborhood of Woodland Park. Notice was mailed to the incorrect address of Woodland Park’s Home Owner’s Association (HOA) despite the HOA having its correct address properly filed of record with the county clerk in the real property records. Notice was not provided by certified mail. Notice was not mailed to Oakland Heights HOA. a. Woodland Park residents will be directly affected as the tower is directly across the street to the entrance of the neighborhood, and the tower will be visible from every property within the neighborhood. The HOA President was not alerted of this rezoning request being scheduled until Wednesday, March 29, 2017, when she was told of a meeting being held by WOAI to provide information about the tower and construction project. Accordingly, no information was available to residents and homeowners of Woodland Park until the evening of March 29, 2017. The vote to change the zoning of this portion of the property is scheduled only 3 business days after everyone in Woodland Park could be notified about the details of the zoning change and impact of the tower. b. To prevent requiring individual notice to be sent to numerous homeowners within Woodland Park, only a small portion of the subject property (0.83 acres) has been surveyed for the placement of the 250’ tower. This small tract is strategically located at such a distance that individual notice is not required, meaning that notice would only be sent to the HOA circumventing the intent of the zoning regulations. Now, the residents most affected by this request have no opportunity to voice their concerns or meet as a group to discuss options and generate a consensus as a community regarding their opposition, if any, to such development. 2. TIME IS NEEDED TO EVALUATE THE PROJECT: All residents and affected property owners should be allowed more time to consider the following factors listed below, and then present their concerns to the zoning commission, the proposed developers, and their representatives. Factors to consider: a. Consistency with the adjacent property as zoned and the large number of residential properties within a close proximity. b. Adverse impacts on the neighboring lands. Everything from property values, nuisance, community impact, aesthetics, effects on infrastructure, effects on the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone, and more need to be discussed with the residents and such concerns addressed. Citizens that are possibly affected in these areas should have the time and right to evaluate these factors independent of the recommendations of lobbyists, hired engineers, and architects. Moreover, the city employees tasked with an evaluation and recommendation of this project have been limited to a partisan application and presentation of the proposed project/rezoning due to the reasons stated herein. c. Suitability of the Current Zoning of the subject property. When the property was originally annexed and zoned as a Temporary Single-Family Residence District. While there are commercially zoned properties adjacent to the subject land, nothing even close to the magnitude of a 250’ communication tower can be seen along Vance Jackson from DeZavala to UTSA blvd. Other than the recent retail outlet built at the corner of UTSA blvd and Vance Jackson, the only construction projects built along this area of Vance Jackson within the last 25 years have been residential development in the form of homes or apartments. d. Health, Safety, and Welfare. In conjunction with this large tower, a large commercial building is supposedly going to be built wherein 300 employees will work. This area has hundreds of children walking, riding their bicycles, and being dropped off by their parents at the nearby middle school, elementary school, and high school. Moreover, large towers like these have come under immense public scrutiny when located near residential areas and schools. We should be allowed time to evaluate these concerns, in addition to other environmental or health factors that can apply in these situations. e. Public Policy. Zoning changes, special exceptions, variances, etc. should never be taken lightly or rushed through commissions or local government. Thus, notice is required in numerous situations. Here, that process was thwarted due to a mistake by the Developer or their agents (or through clever tactics employed by a politically savvy firm) as the notice was mailed to the incorrect address for the Woodland Park HOA. Public Policy requires that all affected property owners should be provided with clear notice of the possible impacts and proposed changes to land within their communities. The residents of Woodland Park, Oakland Heights, and Cantera Village have been deprived of their right to properly evaluate this project and voice all remaining objections to this change. f. Size of the Tract: Again, the attempt to only rezone a small portion of the tract to accommodate the wireless tower appears to be an abuse of the City of San Antonio’s rules and the intent of those rules. By only rezoning this small tract of land that is not even officially platted with the city or listed as a separate tract of land with the appraisal district, individual notice to numerous landowners was circumvented in direct contravention of the purpose of the rules put in place to protect adjacent landowners and allow them time to form a consensus and a voice. g. We require more time to properly discuss and allow for other legitimate concerns not listed above to be addressed or voiced before this vote can be properly heard. ACCORDINGLY, WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF PROPERTY AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING CHANGE DESCRIBED ABOVE AND IN THE REFERENCED CASE, DO HEREBY PROTEST AGAINST ANY CHANGE OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOP CODE AND ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE IDENTIFIED PROPERTY, WHICH WOULD ZONE THE PROPERTY TO ANY CLASSIFICATION ALLOWING A SPECIFIC USE AUTHORIZATION FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM.
Petition to Nathan Warren, email@example.com
NO TO PD521, NO TO MULTI FAMILY (APARTMENTS)
DO YOU WANT 3 STORY MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS? Rezoning PD 521 may just allow it…... Neighbors on: DID YA KNOW? The vacant lot/tree line at the intersection of Mountain Creek Parkway and adjacent vacant lot/tree line on Camp Wisdom (both sides) is subject to rezoning where TALL residential/multifamily 3 story apartment buildings and non residential structures can be built. Not only is your quality of life about to be changed, it’s possible your property value could plummet. Your neighbors who live directly on Mountain Creek Pkwy and Camp Wisdom intersection are specifically impacted and are asking for your help to voice your concerns and present PROPOSALS and AMENDMENTS to the City of Dallas Planner, Nathan Warren Nathan.Warren@dallascityhall.com I spoke at the 21 February 2019 commissioner meeting and it will give you some idea of the impact.http://dallastx.swagit.com/play/02212019-864 Forward to 54 minutes into video. Did Ya Know……. there were 12 steering committee MEETINGS THAT SPOKE FOR YOU and two (2) community meetings that proposed changes YOU never had feedback on? The powerpoint from the last Community Meeting on 10 January 2019 is below and will show the specific areas of S1-a (land on Mtn Creek Pkwy) and S1-b (land across from new warehouse being built off I 20/Mtn Creek Pkwy)...their current uses, proposed uses and added uses: https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustanabledevelopment/planning/DCH20documents/authorized%20hearings/pd521/01.10.19_powerpoint.pdf In S-1a and S-1b: We need input on (1) front yard setback; (2) dwelling unit density/stories; (3) floor area ratio/height (FAR) and (4) Lot coverage. (We specifically need multifamily 3 story apartments removed from “additional use” as well as remove 54 ft for non residential structures.) *Do you want 3 or 4 story apartments or other non residential structures as tall as 54 feet? Do you want to dedicate 80% of land to non single family development? Do you want to see parking lots as close as 15 feet from a residents back yard? PLEASE ATTEND THE 21 MARCH 2019 COMMISSION MEETING AT 1 PM, 6TH FLOOR OF DALLAS CITY HALL AND PRESENT YOUR FEEDBACK AND PROPOSALS/AMENDMENTS. * *IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND, PLEASE EMAIL THE CITY PLANNER DIRECTLY AT NATHAN.WARREN@DALLASCITYHALL.COM WITH YOUR INPUT.
Petition to Mayor Adler, fayez
More Housing Now In Downtown Austin!
Our city is in crisis. Austin is experiencing an unparalleled housing emergency in which we are losing our class and racial diversity at an alarming rate, with the majority of Austinites (being renters) bearing the brunt of the cost. "Austin City Council passed a resolution in 2005... which reiterated the goal of 25,000 residents living Downtown in ten years" [Downtown Austin Plan (DAP), pg. 5]. We have fewer than 15,000 residents fourteen years later. In fairness to a plan that helped accomplish much, modeling tools have improved dramatically during the Land Development Code (LDC) rewrite effort. The exercise the City of Austin is conducting: mapping to support our land development goals is a top priority and a goal of 25,000 Downtown residents is equally valid as the goal of 135,000 new residential units citywide. Clearly the more we go beyond 25,000 in the CodeREWRITE, the better we can achieve other goals related to opportunity, 50/50 mode share, and flood management. No part of downtown should be an enclave exempt from contributing to this goal, or that excludes people, families, or housing types. Accordingly, we ask the Mayor and City Council to enable the following: 1. Assign CBD or equivalent zoning to NE quadrant of Downtown Austin [from east of Red River Street over to SB I-35 frontage road.] 2. Assign CBD or equivalent zoning to NW quadrant of Downtown Austin [from west of Guadalupe St. over to North Lamar Boulevard.] 3. Due to often higher densities, recognize West Campus as the northern extension of Downtown Austin. 4. Within Downtown Austin, enforce “compact and connected” wherever possible in land development code. While Austin is engulfed in a housing emergency, preserving exclusive single-family zoning downtown creates de-facto barriers to class and race which is a betrayal of Austin values. What's allowed in many places downtown should be allowed throughout downtown. That's why we need MORE HOUSING NOW!
Petition to Members of the Rome City Commission, Mr. Tony Patel
Halt the construction of the proposed Sleep Inn hotel in Summerville Park
The operation of a hotel at the corner of Martha Berry Boulevard and Charlton Street in Rome, Georgia will significantly increase the traffic flow in the quiet neighborhood of Summerville Park. Moreover, it is likely that this hotel brand in this particular location will exacerbate the crime problem in our neighborhood that has been promoted by the proximity of other low-cost lodging establishments to the homes in Summerville Park. As a result of the above concerns, we anticipate that the construction and operation of this hotel will adversely affect the values of the properties in Summerville Park. For all of these reasons, we passionately oppose the construction of this hotel at the entrance of our neighborhood. The signers of this petition request that you do all within your power to halt the construction of the proposed hotel at the Charlton Street entrance of Summerville Park.
Petition to City of Mansfield, Texas
Keep Pork Chop at home.
Hi everyone. This is yet another case of outdated, uneducated and fear based city ordinances that don’t allow pigs to be kept as pets in Mansfield, TX. I need all the help I can get to keep my cherished pet I’ve had for almost 4 years. I never really knew what it meant when people said their pet “changed their life or saved them” until I got my little guy. He’s taught me kindness, respect, patience, understanding and most of all unconditional love. It would mean the world to us if you help, by signing.
Petition to Board of the Town of Ramapo
Houses of Worship Should NOT Be Allowed in Multi-family Dwellings
Preserving a residential environment is key to civilian life. The nature of high occupancy houses of worship pose health and fire safety risks to both the house of worship and the families in that dwelling. In the event of an emergency, limited exits and space prove problematic for residents, worshipers, and emergency personnel. Additionally there are traffic violations when worshipers' vehicles and those of the residents provide an overcrowding of traffic. Currently in the Town of Ramapo, these zoning violations are allowed as long as there is town approval. This is a matter of public safety and the effects concern all members of the community.