Topic

wildlife management

9 petitions

Started 2 months ago

Petition to Steve Bullock, Bradley Hamlett, Dan Ashe, Anna Munoz

Keep Protections For Montana Grizzly Bears

  Tell The US Government To Keep Protections For The Northwest Montana Grizzlies We are urging the US Government to keep Montana grizzly bear protections in place. If protections are removed, this could allow for the grizzly bears to be trophy hunted. In the 1970's, Hunters and trappers decimated grizzly bear populations across the US. Grizzlies were granted protection in 1975, since then, Grizzlies have made a comeback. But Ranchers, hunters, and lobbyist are threatening the future of the Grizzlies by influencing government agencies to remove grizzly bear protections, that could allow for trophy hunting and  "incidental take" of Grizzlies in a region dominated by agricultural land. Although, grizzlies have recovered from near extinction, now is not the time to remove protections. They face more threats today than ever before with increased logging, mining, and land development; we should not add hunting to the list of threats Grizzlies have to contend with, especially when it was hunting that required the Grizzlies be protected in the first place. In July, the federal government lifted protections of an estimated 700 Grizzlies in the Yellowstone region of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming due to increased pressure from state officials. This transfer afforded state game agencies jurisdiction over Grizzlies, which could open the door to possible trophy hunts in the future. We must prevent this from happening in Northwest Montana, please sign and share our petition.  

OneProtest
7,271 supporters
Update posted 7 months ago

Petition to Ministerio de Ambiente y Energia (MINAE) (Juan-Jose Castro-Chamberlin Technical Coordinator), Costa Rica's Environmental Agency (Costa Rica Ministerio del Ambiente y Energia (MINAE)), Ministerio de Ambiente y Energia (MINAE)

Save the Sloths from unscrupulous Sanctuary in Costa Rica

The Sloth is Costa Rica's most well known iconic animal.  The recent report of two former Veterinarians who worked at the Sloth Sanctuary and reported on deplorable conditions in an article in The DODO  http://thedo.do/1OQzhCx , needs to be investigated.   They reported things such as animals crammed together in crowded cages often causing fighting and unwanted breeding.  Animals taken from the wild that should have remained in the wild captured and kept in tiny cages not allowing them to climb which causes horrible medical conditions that become life threatening, animals that can be rehabilitated and returned to the wild are kept and not released, deplorable and unnatural diets of foods that cause them to choke and then require emergency surgery to clear their airways of the food.  Babies not being feed as frequently as they should be which causes stunted growth. Sanctuary owners playing Doctor and administering medicines without proper knowledge or training, often over medicating and causing harm to the animals.  The Sanctuaries rate of intake, rehabilitation and re-release is deplorable.  As reported in The Dodo online http://thedo.do/1OQzhCx "Since its founding, the sanctuary has taken in around 725 sloths but released only 41 rehabilitated animals, fewer than two per year, according to figures provided by Dunner. In a 2014 video, Avey-Arroyo says the sanctuary has released 122 sloths in its 20-plus year history, which would be about five per year — a still-low number that appears to be inflated by including sloths who were simply relocated by the sanctuary without being admitted. Yet of the 191 sloths who lived at the sanctuary in March, Dunner said, only 25 were non-releasable."  A Sanctuary's mission should be rescue, rehabilitation and release back into the wild.  The owners of the Sanctuary are getting funds from online fundraising campaigns and using it on themselves rather than putting it towards what the animals in their care need.  The Sloth Sanctuary of Costa Rica needs to be investigated to ensure these iconic animals are properly cared for as they should be.    We ask Costa Rica Environmental Agency Ministerio de Ambiente y Energia (MINAE) to see that this is looked into.  

Candy Copeland
954 supporters
Update posted 8 months ago

Petition to California Fish & Game Commission

Stop Subsidizing CA Fur Trapping: Tell CA Fish & Game Commission to Comply with State Law

Petition by Project Coyote and the Center for Biological Diversity A coalition of wildlife conservation groups successfully ended bobcat trapping in California in 2015. But the job was left undone: thousands of gray foxes, beavers, badgers, and other fur-bearing animals are still subject to cruel trapping for profit and recreation in California. It's come to light that the state's oversight of its trapping program does not comply with existing state law.  Join us in calling on the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) to comply with a never-enforced provision of California law. If implemented, it could mean the end of commercial fur trapping in the state. California law requires that the state's costs of managing a fur-trapping program must be fully recovered through trapping-license fees. But those fees cover only a tiny fraction of the hundreds of thousands of dollars the state spends on wardens, biologists, and administrators to oversee trapping. The Commission has never raised fees to cover these costs and instead has allowed an illegal taxpayer subsidy to prop up the industry. Absent that subsidy, fur trapping would likely no longer exist in the state. That commercial and recreational fur trapping is still even allowed at all in California is shocking to most, but the fact that state wildlife managers have been illegally subsidizing this barbaric and antiquated practice at taxpayer expense is simply outrageous and unacceptable.  BACKGROUND By law (Pavley - SB 1148), the Commission is required to adjust the fees charged for trapping licenses to cover all departmental costs. This law has been in effect for several years, but the Commission has not complied!   The Commission will soon be issuing trapping licenses for the 2016-2017 season, and yet the state issues these licenses in violation of the law. Trapping license fees do not cover the actual cost of implementing the state’s trapping program. The current cost of a trapping license is just $117, which is at least 15 times less than it should be to generate enough revenue to cover the cost of the fur-bearing and non-game mammal trapping program, based on publicly available information. Existing law requires that license fees be adjusted to cover the program costs of the Fish and Game Commission and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in the management and implementation of the state’s trapping program.   What you can do: 1. The Commission is considering taking regulatory action on this issue and we need your support! Please sign this petition that will be delivered to the California Fish and Game Commissioners, and let them know that the illegal subsidy of trapping must end immediately, and that you support a ban on all commercial and recreational fur trapping in the state. After signing, please share this petition widely with friends, family, and colleagues. If you want to send your own personalized letter (see below for talking points) you can email the Commission directly at fgc@fgc.ca.gov. (Please also cc your letters to info@projectcoyote.org.) For more information about this issue, see our action alert and read our joint letter to the Commission on this issue here. 2. Join Project Coyote, the Center for Biological Diversity, and allies at the upcoming Fish and Game Commission meeting and make your voice heard in support of this petition. More information and the meeting agenda can be found here (public testimony is limited to a few minutes and should be delivered during the Public Forum, agenda item #4 on Feb. 8): What: California Fish and Game Commission Meeting
 When: Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2017 (agenda here) @ 8:30 a.m. Where: DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel, Sonoma Wine Country, One DoubleTree Drive, Rohnert Park, CA More info.: http://www.fgc.ca.gov/meetings/2017/Feb/02080917agd.pdf 3. Help keep this issue in the public eye by submitting Letters to the Editor to your local paper(s). Use the talking points below and our tips and tools for writing LTE’s. Talking points (please personalize & be sure to include your complete contact information to ensure that your letter is counted in the official record): A Fish and Game Code provision was added with the passage of SB 1148 (Pavley) for the 2013-2014 trapping season that requires license fees be raised to cover program and implementation costs from fee-based programs. Yet the Commission has failed to comply with this straightforward requirement for four years now. We cannot stand for a fifth year of non-compliance. If the Commission cannot ensure that trapping license fees are raised to a level that would realistically cover the state’s trapping program implementation costs, the Commission should eliminate the fur-trapping program. Fewer than 100 Californians engage in commercial trapping for the fur trade. As public trustees of California's wildlife, the Commission should require licensing fees that are in line with the true cost incurred by this tiny minority of people who enjoy trapping animals for fun and profit. Project Coyote is a national coalition of scientists, educators, ranchers, and citizen leaders promoting compassionate conservation and coexistence between people and wildlife. To learn more about our work, visit our website here and sign up for Project Coyote’s E-Team to stay apprised of this and other related issues. The Center for Biological Diversity’s mission is to secure a future for all species. To learn more about the Center and join us in this mission, visit us here. Thank you for taking action for California’s precious wildlife!  

Project Coyote
5,949 supporters