voter rights

21 petitions

This petition won 3 weeks ago

Petition to Jeremy Peterson, Utah State House, Justin Fawson, Patrice Arent, Rebecca Chavez-Houck, Brad Daw, Merrill Nelson, Val Peterson, Adam Robertson, Norman Thurston, Brian Bean

Tell Utah State Legislature NO on HB 193 - You will lose your Vote and your Voice

UPDATED 2/12/2018------------------------ House Bill 193 or, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC), will change the way the Utah votes in the presidential election by redistributing the votes the Utah citizens.  H.B. 193 will take away the Voices of Utah voters.To simplify the issue: H.B. 193 will change the course of the presidential election for the State of Utah H.B. 193 does not eliminate the electoral college of the State of Utah If voted for, H.B. 193 will award the 6 electoral vote of the State of Utah to the national popular vote, not the popular vote of Utah Because H.B. 193 will award the electoral votes to the presidential candidate based upon the national vote, it will no longer matter how the majority of Utah votes, thus removing the voice of the Utah citizens H.B. 193 is named the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact" but it is no where near national.  Only 10 other states currently have made this pact.  If Utah joins the pact, this bill will not change how the rest of the country will elect a president, they will stay on the same election system.  As a result, it will create confusion on a national level and Utah electoral votes will goto a candidate that Utahns did not vote for H.B. 193 is simply a bad bill.  If this country truly wants a national popular vote, then every state needs to make a change for a fair and balanced vote, not to create a bill to give citizen's votes away. Utah deserves proper representation of their voters and H.B. 193 will take the Voices of Utah away. Read House Bill 193 for your self... The bill is currently in the House Government Operations Committee.  The petition will be sent to members of that committee to help stop HB 193 in it's tracks. Tell Representative Jeremy Peterson and the House Government Operations Committee NO and to drop the bill. Tell the Utah State Representatives to VOTE NO on HB 193. -------------The following letter will be sent to the House Government Operations Committee members and Chair, Representative Peterson------------- I am informing you that I disagree with House Bill (H.B.) 193, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. Our elector votes should stay with the popular vote of the State of Utah and always show how we, as a state, have voted, no matter who has won the national popular vote for the Presidential election. Our voices must always be heard both by our vote and by the elector college in relation to our popular vote in the State of Utah. I demand that you vote NO on H.B. 193 and protect my voice in this great nation. Sincerely,(Signer's Name) -------------References Utah State Legislature proposed bill: Peterson's Perspective - further explanation of the proposed bill:  

David Pehrson
182 supporters
Update posted 4 months ago

Petition to Monrovia City Council

Tell Monrovia City Council to hold City Elections in November, not March

On November 7, 2017, the same day elections in Virginia and throughout the country had record levels of voter turnout, Monrovia’s City Council introduced an ordinance that would likely continue our low voter turnout. Recently, California approved Senate Bill (SB) 415, which aims to increase voter turnout in local elections. Under this new law, cities in California that currently hold stand-alone elections are required to schedule these at the same time as statewide elections held in either November (general election) or March (primary election), if their turnout falls below a certain threshold. For Monrovia, this threshold is 45.7%. Monrovia’s voter turnout for the April 2017 city election was 13.4%, and 23.2% in April 2015. While both options may increase voter turnout relative to current levels, the data suggest turnout will be much higher in November than March. In the last four November elections, Monrovia had an average turnout of 60.9%. On October 17, in a study session, city staff recommended moving the city elections to March, when primary elections are held, beginning in 2020, rather than November 2018. If passed, this would have the effect of extending all current Council members’ terms by 11 months, rather than reducing them by 5 months. By law, they are allowed to extend or reduce terms by up to 12 months. At the November 7 City Council meeting, several citizens spoke in opposition to the ordinance, proposing that city elections instead be held in November to align them with higher turnout general elections. Still, the City Council voted unanimously to introduce the ordinance proposing city elections be moved to March. It is currently scheduled to be voted into law on November 21, after which Monrovia residents will have no say. The time to speak up is now! Increased turnout will result in a City Council that is more reflective of all Monrovia residents and not just a small fraction. Our voter turnout is extraordinarily low, and the reasons the City Council and staff gave for preferring March over November are weak and misleading. These include logistical barriers to getting everything set up by November 2018, increased partisanship in November, and greater expense for candidates to reach the greater number of November voters. They have not described these logistical barriers or explained why they expect greater partisanship in November. On the contrary, research suggests primary elections are typically more partisan than general elections. Finally, the expense argument suggests City Council members prefer March not despite low turnout but because of low turnout.  The Mayor has repeatedly said he is not concerned about Monrovia’s low voter turnout. Voter turnout is not a partisan issue, and is something that everyone, especially the Mayor, should care about, since an engaged electorate is essential to a functioning democracy. The new state law is intended to improve voter turnout for our city, and cities throughout California. If the City Council chooses low turnout March over November, they are in fact disenfranchising voters, even if this decision raises turnout relative to current levels.   Our City Council should represent its citizens and their concerns, not the convenience and financial interests of elected officials. If you believe in increasing voter turnout so that the City Council represents all Monrovians and not just a few, please sign this petition. The petition will be presented to City Council at the November 21 meeting, before they vote to formally adopt the ordinance. If you would like to do more than sign, please consider contacting your City Council members ( or attending this meeting at 7:30 pm at City Hall.   **Please only members of Monrovia, CA sign this petition**  

Melissa Taylor
236 supporters
Started 6 months ago

Petition to Indiana Election Commission

Indiana Voter Suppression - Election Commission Response Requested

In the 2016 general election, Lake County, IN had a smaller percentage of registered voters casting ballots than the rest of Indiana based on registered voters. Indiana’s voter turnout for the election was below the national average exacerbating Lake County’s under-representation. This does not take into account that since the election, nearly half a million registered voters in Indiana have been deleted from the roles of which over 28,000 are from Lake County. Due to the poor voter turnout in Indiana, we are asking you to respond to the questions below. 1)      Based on the low voter turnout for Indiana and the even lower voter turnout for Lake County, what is the Commission’s plan to address concerns over consolidation of voter precincts in Lake County which would decrease access to polling locations for a substantial number of voters? 2)      Has the Commission reviewed the analysis in “One Person, One Vote: Estimating the Prevalence of Double Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections” by Sharad Goel, Marc Meredith, Michael Morse, David Rothschild and Houshmand Shirani-Mehr? What is the Commission’s statement about the analysis? If the Commission does not agree with the analysis, can they provide equally reputable analysis for that opposition? 3)      In combination with the data in question two and Indiana’s low voter turnout, has the data been reviewed showing that voter ID laws have little impact on an insignificant number of fraudulent votes and prevent a significant number of actual votes? What is the Commission’s response to the fact sheet on the suppression created by voter id laws? If the recommendation is to continue with the current laws, can the Commission provide equally reputable analysis for the recommendation? 4)      Has the Commission reviewed the results from DefCon where hackers were able to break into US voting machines in less than two hours? Based on these findings, does the Commission have a plan for the counties that do not currently have an auditable paper trail? If they do not have a plan to protect votes in Indiana, what reassurance can they give voters that the vote totals cannot be altered? Thank you for your time and attention to these critical issues affecting our votes.

Joanne Mitchell
8 supporters