Topic

transport

17 petitions

Update posted 14 hours ago

Petition to Luke Foley, Andrew Constance, Tony Eid, Mike Baird, NSW Legislative Assembly & Legislative Council, Howard Collins, Western Sydney Regional Organisation of Councils, Tania Mihailuk, Paul Lynch, Auburn City Council (Cumberland Council), Strathfield Council, Bankstown City Council (Canterbury-Bankstown), Liverpool City Council, Chris Bailey

Restore Inner West Line - reinstate Liverpool (and Bankstown) via Regents Park train services

The 2017 timetable features slower trains, less direct services and fails to fix the issues from previous changes. We are calling for the restoration of direct Inner West Line train services for Liverpool/Bankstown to City via Regents Park. Commuters travelling from the South West require up to 3 interchanges (at Birrong, Lidcombe, Strathfield) to reach the City/Inner West. Overcrowding on the T1 Western Line, T2 Leppington Line, and T3 Bankstown Line can also be reduced if the Inner West Line were to be restored from Homebush to Liverpool. The cuts to the Inner West Line in 2013 continue to negatively impact: Strathfield Flemington Lidcombe Berala Regents Park Birrong Yagoona Bankstown Sefton Chester Hill Leightonfield Villawood Carramar Cabramatta Warwick Farm Liverpool Restoring the Inner West Line from Liverpool/Bankstown to City via Regents Park also provides a direct route to the City for Berala - Carramar, Birrong and Yagoona once construction of the Sydney Metro from Sydenham - Bankstown commences in 2018 with the shutdown of the Bankstown Line.

Roydon Ng
1,598 supporters
Update posted 5 days ago

Petition to Stephen Mullighan MP, Jay Weatherill

Save Tonsley Station! Save our access to public transport.

The Flinders Link railway extension will remove Tonsley Railway Station permanently, adversely affecting the residents of Mitchell Park and Tonsley, particularly those with disabilities. For many wheelchair users, the train service is the ONLY ACCESSIBLE MODE of independent, affordable, public transport (as buses are inaccessible to many). If you remove Tonsley station, you remove people’s independence by taking away the option of public transport altogether.  PLEASE POSTPONE THE FLINDERS LINK PROJECT UNTIL THERE IS FUNDING TO KEEP TONSLEY RAILWAY STATION IN ITS CURRENT POSITION AND PROPERLY INTEGRATE FLINDERS LINK WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY. Removal of Tonsley station discriminates against local residents, especially wheelchair users and people with disabilities, short stature or frail health (of which Mitchell Park has a significant number) because the train is their only affordable access to independent travel.  Flinders Link is essentially 'UN-linking' the local community by withdrawing access to the train service. Access to the Tonsley train line is essential for Mitchell Park and Tonsley residents to access employment, education, healthcare, local services and the wider community. ACCESS TO TONSLEY RAIL LINE IS ESSENTIAL FOR EQUITY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. The next station, Clovelly Park (902 m away) is not accessible to all because it does not meet disability access standards and is too far away for many people due to mobility and/or safety concerns. There are no plans to renovate Clovelly Park station to make it fully accessible. (Clovelly Park station is adjacent to the Tonsley Innovation Precinct at Alawoona Ave.) Many pedestrians can not even get to that station due to dangerous and/or unsealed footpaths. When Flinders Link is complete, the new replacement station will be over 520 metres away, uphill, at Flinders Medical Centre (FMC), Bedford Park.  Many pedestrians cannot walk or wheel that distance, especially when it is an uphill journey all the way.  The distance between Clovelly Park and FMC stations will be approximately 1.54 km. Keeping Tonsley station will remove more cars from the roads, reducing air pollution and traffic congestion in the Mitchell Park, Tonsley and Bedford Park’s ‘Flinders’ precincts and reducing parking problems at Flinders University & Medical Centre and other local railway stations like Oaklands Park and Woodlands Park. The SA Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) says that the Flinders Link project will cause an incline at the location of Tonsley Station due to a bridge/rail overpass over neighbouring Sturt Road. Why can't there be a section of level track at this section to accommodate Tonsley Station? Why can't we have a replacement Tonsley station as close as possible to the overpass? If the State Government of SA can build elevated railway stations at Port Adelaide, elevated tram stops at Glandore and elevate freeways across the suburbs, I cannot see how the creation of elevated stations along the Tonsley rail line is beyond the realms of physics! The proposed community engagement by the DPTI will have no influence on the engineering of the rail extension or its design.  The community engagement is to discuss pathways and landscaping around the Flinders Link project. ABOUT THE TONSLEY & MITCHELL PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD Other people in the neighbourhood use the Tonsley Station to access the local community by travelling from one end of the suburb to the other to access local schools, community and social clubs and neighbourhood centre. The local kindergarten and Suneden School use the Tonsley Station regularly to access community resources.  Mitchell Park and Tonsley have a large amount of public / social housing and people who are elderly or living with disabilities.  This community is already disadvantaged and values the opportunities that access to the train service brings.  There are also many new residents - students and health workers - who have moved in to be closer to Flinders University, UniSA & Flinders Medical Centre. There is the potential for the local community housing organisation to increase the number of dwellings for affordable housing in the area.  Recent changes to the local council's planning zones will allow multi-storey developments along the Tonsley rail line. It seems ludicrous to take away a station from an area which is predicted to expand in population and demand for rail services. Tonsley Station is an important link to Sturt Road for services, schools and businesses; e.g. Sturt Police Station, Sunrise Christian School and an important transport link to Blackwood, Sturt, Seacombe Gardens, Marion Medical Centre and Marion Shopping Centre. Many Sturt Road buses do not stop at Flinders Medical Centre. WHY AM I PETITIONING? WHO AM I? PLEASE HELP!  I am a wheelchair user who lives close to Tonsley Station. My family and I use it regularly to access education and work.I travel to Flinders Medical Centre for treatment multiple times per week. It would have made sense to be able to catch the train from Tonsley Station to the proposed new one at Flinders Medical Centre but without Tonsley Station, not only would I not have that option, but I would no longer be able to travel elsewhere independently like other adults do.  Access taxis are expensive and often unavailable when needed.  IF I LOSE MY STATION, I LOSE MY INDEPENDENCE! FURTHER INFORMATION Removal of Tonsley Station was confirmed by the Australian Government Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, "Flinders Link" web page in June 2017:http://investment.infrastructure.gov.au/projects/ProjectDetails.aspx?Project_id=062838-15SA-NPI have printed copies of this document updated on 3 June 2017 and again on 20 September 2017. It states:"Project Description: …Removal of the existing Tonsley Station and construction of a new station adjacent to the Flinders Medical Centre;"On 30 November 2017, this document's Timetable stated:"Construction is expected to commence in late 2017 and to be completed by early - mid 2019." In August 2016 I downloaded a PDF of the Flinders_Link_concept_design2.pdf downloaded from the SA Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI). There is a label pointing to the rail line where Tonsley station is located. The label says "Existing Tonsley Station (review of station access)" This means that there will be a review of the access to the elevated walkway at this location but when I speak to people about it, many people interpreted that label as including Tonsley station in the Flinders Link design.The concept design can be found here:https://infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/249094/Flinders_Link_concept_design2.pdf Previously, DPTI had published animations of the proposed Flinders Link project. Each one omitted Tonsley Station from the animation. When I contacted the DPTI to find out the status of Tonsley station, I was continually told "Nothing is finalised", "It's under review" and was promised to be contacted when there was an answer. The only news I received about the project was via the media or my own research. Animations can be found at the DPTI YouTube channel:25 October 2016: Flinders Link Project – Concept Animation 2017: https://youtu.be/kb1foVOmku8This upgraded version of the ‘fly-through’ animation now has a long circular ramp next to Sturt Road. This was not part of the concept animation in 2016. McLauchlan, Cathryn, "All systems go for Link work", CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 17 May 2017:  “…the existing Tonsley train station will be removed, and a new station built next to Flinders Medical Centre.” This journalist's source was the aforementioned "Flinders Link" web page of the Federal Dept of Infrastructure and Regional Development. This article was the first news I received that Tonsley station was confirmed for removal. It sparked follow-up letters to the editor: Clutterham, Helen, "Railway extension", published letter to the Editor, CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 24 May 2017: “As a senior citizen, I have loved being a seven-minute walk from the Tonsley station. Please don’t remove it. If it must be removed, then perhaps move the Clovelly Park station across Alawoona closer to where to Tonsley station is.” By Helen Clutterham, Mitchell Park. Buck, Matthew, Shortsighted rail plan, published letter to the Editor, CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 31 May 2017: “The removal of Tonsley Railway Station as part of the Flinders Link seems a little shortsighted, as it will leave a distance of more than two kilometres between Clovelly Park Station and the new Flinders Station. “Those who previously used the ‘park and ride’ facilities at Tonsley will now be faced with a longer commute. “Those who walk will now have to cross two major roads (Sturt and Main South Roads) to access the new station. “Services will also be restricted due to the only passing loop being between Tonsley Junction and Celtic Avenue. “There is a real danger in not planning for the inevitable future growth of rail patronage...". By Matthew Buck of Clarence Gardens   7 June 2017: I emailed the Mayor of Marion, Kris Hanna with copies to Ward Councillors Luke Hutchinson and Raelene Telfer and received no response except to see a Letter to the Editor in the Messenger Press:Hanna, Kris, "Rail link debate", published letter to the Editor, CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 14 June 2017: “… the current Tonsley Station on Sturt Rd has to go, because the elevation of the track has to start a long way back to get up the hill. “Marion Council is talking to the State Government about relocation and upgrading of the current Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park train stations so that they cater for the northern and southern ends of the Tonsley site where 900 new dwellings are expected to be built. “The community should be consulted about station locations as details become clearer …” by Kris Hanna, Mayor of Marion 17 October 2017 The Public Works Committee Paper 343, entitled "Final Report. Flinders Link Project - Extension of Tonsley Rail Line to Flinders Medical Centre" was tabled in the South Australian House of Assembly and endorsed by the Presiding Officer Ms Leesa Vlahos MP.Document Location:https://www.parliament.sa.gov.au/HouseofAssembly/BusinessoftheAssembly/RecordsandPapers/TabledPapersandPetitions/Pages/TabledPapersandPetitions.aspx?TPLoadDoc=true&TPDocType=1&TPP=53&TPS=2&TPItemID=204&TPDocName=PWC%2bReport%2bFlinders%2bLink%2bProject%2bSIGNED%2b20171017.pdfIt states:“The Tonsley station needs to be removed due to the new elevated track. However DPTI is undertaking a review to determine if the current railway stations need to be relocated. The relocation of a station is not currently part of this project.” I identified a possible inaccuracy in this report and am concerned that there may be either members of the Public Works Committee or officers of the DPTI that are interpreting "Tonsley Station" as the station adjacent to the Tonsley Innovation Precinct and Flinders Tonsley Campus. It concerns me that there may be people making decisions about this project who are confusing The current Tonsley station (adjacent to Sturt Rd at the end of the line) with Clovelly Park station which currently serves the Tonsley Innovation Precinct. The reason I question the accuracy is that the distance quoted in the Public Works Committee Paper between "Tonsley railway station and the proposed FMC/Bedford Park railway station is, in fact the distance between the current Clovelly Park station and Bedford Park (Google Maps). “The nearest train station to the Flinders Precinct is Tonsley, which is located approximately 1.5 km from the centre of the Bedford Park campus." (Page 4. Public Works Committee Paper 343, 17 Oct 2017) This leads me to believe that Clovelly Park station will remain in its current location and will be renamed 'Tonsley' when the existing Tonsley Station near Sturt Rd is removed, despite local politicians suggesting that Clovelly Park station may be relocated further south, closer to the location of the current Tonsley station.This report says "Train services on the Tonsley passenger  line have historically experienced low patronage," but fails to provide the reason which has historically been a lack of weekend, early morning and evening services. Currently: the first weekday service to Tonsley leaves the city at 6:42 a.m. arriving at Tonsley at 7:04 a.m. the first weekday service to the city leaves Tonsley at 7:09 a.m. arriving at the city at 7:32 a.m. the last weekday service to Tonsley leaves the city at 6:42 p.m. arriving at Tonsley at 7:04 p.m. the last weekday service to the city leaves Tonsley at 7:09 p.m. arriving at the city at 7:32 p.m. Compare the Seaford line which runs trains from Seaford between 5:21 a.m. and 11:00 p.m.  and runs trains from the city between 5:30 a.m. and midnight. Local residents who would prefer to use Tonsley station and have the means, are forced to drive to other stations on the Seaford line such as Oaklands, Marion, Ascot Park and Woodlands Park.  Oaklands Park and Woodlands Park are most popular because all trains stop at these stations providing a service that is more frequent and reliable than Tonsley.  Commuters that need to work late or attend later appointments and functions in the city (and elsewhere) cannot rely on the Tonsley train to be available as late as necessary to get them home safely.This was reflected in the Darlington Upgrade Project Community Liaison Group Meeting Minutes of 24 September 2015 which can be found here:https://infrastructure.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/251350/9980213-v1-NORTH-SOUTH_CORRIDOR_DARLINGTON_UPGRADE_PROJECT.pdf"DPTI advised that ... Woodlands Park to the City accounts for 70% of the total patronage on the Tonsley Line. Essentially, if more people used the Tonsley line additional services would be added. ... A group member stated that it is like a horse and cart scenario–you need the horse before you got the cart. If DPTI increased services people would probably use it more–especially on weekends. DPTI advised that the statistics show that carriages can currently be running empty or with two or three people on them."My personal observations are that the Tonsley line is not 'running empty' during morning or afternoon peak times.  It is no surprise that patronage drops in the middle of the day because people who start work late, often finish late and the Tonsley train service does not cater for that need.  The DPTI has known about this since at least 2015. Residents have been requesting extended and  weekend services for decades. All Darlington Upgrade Project Community Liaison Group Meeting Minutes can be found here:https://infrastructure.sa.gov.au/northsouthcorridor/darlington_upgrade_project/community_engagement/community_liaison_group_meeting_records 18 Oct 2017 ABC Radio News reported:The 650 metre extension of the Tonsley rail line to Flinders University has been given the green light from State Parliament's Public Works Committee. The 85-million dollar project involves construction of a rail bridge across Sturt Road and South Road. The existing Tonsley station will be removed with a new one built at the end of the extended line, providing easier access to Flinders Medical Centre For those of us who rely on Tonsley station, the loss of it will definitely not provide easier access to anywhere! State Member for Elder, Annabel Digance MP967 South Road, Melrose Park SA 5039Ph: (08) 8374 1939Web: https://www.facebook.com/DiganceAnnabel/Email: elder@parliament.sa.gov.au Federal Member for Boothby, Nicolle Flint MPLevel 1, 724 Marion Road, Marion SA 5043Ph: (08) 8374 0511 Email: nicolle.flint.mp@aph.gov.auWeb: nicolleflint.comFacebook: NicolleFlintLiberal Kelly Vincent MLC, Dignity PartyParliament House, Adelaide SA 5000Ph: (08) 8237 9543Email: Media Advisor James Pratt james.pratt@parliament.sa.gov.auWeb: kellyvincentmlc.comFacebook: www.facebook.com/DignityParty/ Darlington Upgrade ProjectPh: 1300 759 334Email: dpti.darlington@sa.gov.au City of MarionPh: (08) 8375 6600Email: council@marion.sa.gov.auWeb: http://www.marion.sa.gov.auWarriparinga WardCr Raelene TelferPh: (08) 7420 6508Email: raelene.telfer@marion.sa.gov.au Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport 2002Australian Government Federal Register of Legislationhttps://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2005B01059 For more information please email savetonsleystation@gmail.com

Jodie Pearce
670 supporters
Update posted 2 weeks ago

Petition to Andrew Constance, Dominic Perrottet, Gladys Berejiklian

Better train services that support the Hawkesbury residents

Premier, Transport Minister, & Treasurer, The Government has announced new train timetables with 1500 new weekday services, however, changes to timetables on the Richmond line are going to have an adverse impact on commuters who use this line. Commuters will be required to spend even more time away from their families due to the changes which will require them the leave home earlier, and in many instances, arrive home later at night – this means MORE time away from our families, and does not fit with the Government’s mantra of people working 30 minutes from their homes. Travel times will increase from anywhere up to 1 hour per week depending on our destinations due to the addition of more stops between Seven Hills and Parramatta.  The addition of extra stops on Richmond line services will have a detrimental effort for commuters trying to get to the City in the AM peak, and for Richmond bound passengers in the evening peak due to overcrowding which is already occurring on the Richmond line – people will be left stranded at stations due to the extra passengers trying to board Richmond line services.  The new timetable will see the travel times from Richmond to Central blow out to 1 hour and 18 minutes – that’s if the service is running to the schedule – as regularly happens, the Richmond line is the first to be cancelled in times of crisis such which turns a 1hr 18 journey into a 3 hour journey! Our district is suffering from the lack of desperately needed infrastructure such as bridge and road upgrades due to decades of Government neglect and broken promises –  your Government’s failure to honour its pre-2011 commitment to duplicate the Richmond Line, only adds further insult to our situation. The changes proposed in the draft timetable are unfair and unreasonable for commuters of the Richmond Line and will have adverse financial, health, and social impacts on the community due to the increased travel times, and periods away from home. We the undersigned call on the Government to: - Halt the implementation of the timetable due to commence on 26 November 2017 and subsequent review timetable due in January 2018 until proper public consultation and a proper review of feedback is completed. - Provide a timetable with faster travel times to and from the City that will have a positive effect for the thousands of commuters who rely on the Richmond line each week – in contrast to the draft timetable due to commence on 26 November 2017 - Maintain DIRECT train services to and from the City without the need to change trains between Richmond and the City as promised by the Treasurer and Member for Hawkesbury in recent times. - To honour your pre-2011 commitment to duplicate the Richmond line as promised by the former Liberal Government in 1991 that will enable the provision of more frequent and reliable services on the Richmond line for the transport disadvantaged residents of the Hawkesbury. With an already 2 hour journey each way to the city the new timetable will add an additional hour a day. Not only is this not sustainable but it takes away valuable time with family

Nathan Cox
1,195 supporters