Topic

reproductive health

15 petitions

Update posted 5 days ago

Petition to U.S. State Legislators

No Tax On Tampons: Stop Taxing Our Periods! Period.

Aunt Flo is one helluva house guest. She can be painful, messy, and just keeps coming back each month. And, oh yeah, expensive! As anyone who menstruates knows, dealing with a period is a monthly necessity—and a costly one at that. Women spend upwards of $70 a year on sanitary products like tampons and pads. What’s worse, across the U.S., a whopping forty states increase the financial burden of menstruation by charging sales tax on these essential items. Not taxed: a bag of chips. Taxed: a box of tampons. WHAT?! Check out the above map to see if your state is one of the forty that taxes your purchase of tampons, pads, and menstrual cups. For anyone who has a period, these items are a necessity—not an option, not a luxury item—and should be treated as such. Eliminating the Tampon Tax is simply the FAIR and EQUAL thing to do. Change is possible! This summer, Canada made history when its Parliament voted unanimously to eliminate a national tax on menstrual products. Across the pond and down under, women in the U.K. and Australia are insisting their governments do the same. A global movement is underway! Sign this petition, share it with your friends—and let the forty state legislatures that profit from your period know that you won’t stand for it. Join Cosmopolitan in the national movement to Axe the Tampon Tax! #TamponsForAll

Jennifer Weiss-Wolf and Cosmopolitan Magazine
69,076 supporters
Update posted 6 months ago

Petition to Paul Ryan, Donald Trump, United States Supreme Court

Stop the Defunding of Planned Parenthood Now!

  The defunding of Planned Parenthood would adversely impact millions of women nationwide by limiting their access to affordable reproductive health care services. Planned Parenthood health centers provide: birth control for 2 million people over 4 million STD tests and treatments over 360,000 breast exams over 270,000 Pap tests Without access to such services, this would increase the number of unintended pregnancies and self-induced abortions.  President Trump stated that "funding (for Planned Parenthood) can stay if abortion goes." The 1977, Hyde Amendment ALREADY PROHIBITS THIS: it dictates that federal Medicaid funds can only be used to fund abortions in cases of rape, incest, or to protect the life of the mother. Abortion accounts for only 3% of the services it provided in 2014 Although abortion only comprises a small fraction of organization’s services, the GOP has used the procedure as a pretext to launch a despicable smear campaign. Without access to safe abortions, women will be susceptible to health complications and maternal death. Prohibiting abortion DOES NOT decrease the number of abortions performed; it simply forces women to resort to more dangerous methods.  For example, nationwide search rates for self-induced abortions spiked 40 percent in 2011, when states around the country implemented 92 new abortion restrictions Abortion rates DO NOT decrease with stricter laws. If we want to protect women and their children alike, we must find a common ground in reducing unintended pregnancies and self-induced abortions. Consider this: A lower rate of poverty and improved access to health care are associated with education and a lower rate of abortion. Also, unintended pregnancies may be reduced by providing no-cost contraception. Planned Parenthood addresses these findings: 1.5 million receive sex education and outreach Free birth control for 2 million people Through such services, Planned Parenthood has prevented an estimated 579,000 unintended pregnancies. Six in 10 women who access care from a family planning health care center like Planned Parenthood consider it their main source of health care. Defunding Planned Parenthood would hit the people who rely on federal insurance and public health programs most- people who already face barriers such as: people of low income people of color people who live in rural area With the defunding of Planned Parenthood, at least 2.5 million people a year would lose access to the services that Planned Parenthood offers. We must TRUST women in their reproductive choices. We must PROTECT women by providing them with safe options.  Please sign this petition if you believe that Planned Parenthood should continue to receive funding for its services that protect women and their health rights.  Sources https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000282/ http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2015/08/05/429641062/fact-check-how-does-planned-parenthood-spend-that-government-money https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/blog/how-federal-funding-works-at-planned-parenthood https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/health-care-equity/title-x http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/03/07/home_abortion_google_searches_spike_when_legal_abortion_restrictions_increase.html  

Remy Converse
133 supporters
Update posted 7 months ago

Petition to Linda Bacon Service Director of Maternity Services, Ronald C. Werft President and CEO of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Jason Boyatt MD Chief of Staff at Santa Barbara Cottage hospital

Birth Choices at Cottage: We want to bring back VBAC (Vaginal Birth after Cesarean)

VBAC Petition “Attempting a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is a safe and appropriate choice for most women who have had a prior cesarean delivery…” –American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) press release, July 21, 2010. http://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/News-Room/News-Releases/2010/Ob-Gyns-Issue-Less-Restrictive-VBAC-Guidelines Unfortunately, women do not currently have the option to choose a VBAC at Cottage Hospital in Santa Barbara, contrary to ACOG’s current practice bulletin for obstetricians and contrary to current scientific evidence supporting the safety of VBAC for most women. Therefore, we, the undersigned, request that the hospital administrators and obstetrical decision-makers at Cottage Hospital lift their ban on VBACs and begin following ACOG’s recommendation of trial of labor for most women who have previously had a cesarean birth. In making this request we affirm the following: Women have the legal and moral rights to decide what happens to their body, as well as what is best for them and their babies. Women have the right to complete, accurate, and non-biased information about the risks and benefits of CBAC (cesarean birth after cesarean) and VBAC, so that they have true informed consent about all their birthing options, both during pregnancy and throughout the birthing process.  ACOG states that that VBAC is a safe and reasonable option for most women, including some women with multiple previous cesareans, twins, and unknown uterine scars. Current evidence shows that the rate of complications from VBAC is comparable to that of CBAC. http://www.acog.org/-/media/ACOG-Today/acogToday0810.pdf?la=en Many hospitals to the north and south of Santa Barbara are not only allowing VBACs, they are actively encouraging them as a way to reduce health care costs and increase patient satisfaction. Women in Santa Barbara county who want a VBAC now must choose to travel an hour or more, or choose an out-of-hospital birth. Cottage Hospital, as our area’s ONLY hospital offering obstetric care, should bring itself into alignment with current evidence and with the practices of our nation’s best hospitals. We stand in solidarity with the mothers, fathers, doctors, nurses, and other community members who have, for years, been calling for Cottage Hospital to offer VBACs again. http://www.independent.com/news/2008/jun/24/families-protest-outside-cottage-hospital/ We also want to give special recognition to the women who have been denied VBACs against their wishes or were required to travel an hour or more to receive evidence-based care in a hospital.  

International Cesarean Awareness Network
1,321 supporters