public schools

89 petitions

Update posted 6 days ago

Petition to Eric Webb, Lorena Stankevich

Support Montessori Education in our Orcas Island Public School

If you haven’t heard, the public elementary school is planning to phase out its Montessori program — effective immediately. That means they will not let any of our island’s first graders into the program for next year (or, if the program is discontinued, for any future year). This is a successful 15-year program, which is so popular that it often turns applicants away. The Montessori Advocacy for Public Schools coalition (MAPS) has formed in the past few weeks (since this news was quietly announced to a few select parents and stakeholders). We have been working to gain clarity and ensure that our voices are heard before a final decision is made about the educational options available to our island's children. The school board is holding a special meeting on this topic on June 18, and we would love to see you there. Here are the details for the school board meeting:When: Monday, June 18 at 5:00 p.m.Where: Orcas Island Public School You may not have children, you may homeschool, you may never want your own child to go through the Montessori program...but we're guessing that you want strong and diverse educational choices available in this community. It’s good for children, it’s good for our property values, and it showcases what’s possible for public education in rural communities like ours.Montessori has been proven to work in our nation's public schools. Here is a brief summary of the Riley Institute's landmark, four-year study of Montessori education in South Carolina’s public schools. The study was finalized in January 2018, so it is extremely timely: When compared to non-Montessori public school students across South Carolina, Montessori students were more likely to have met or exceeded the state standards in each of the four subjects measured. After matching Montessori students to demographically similar non-Montessori students and controlling for student demographics and previous test scores, researchers found that Montessori students scored significantly higher on ELA state standardized tests than non-Montessori students across all three years of the analysis. There was also a significant Montessori advantage in math and social studies in two of the three years. Montessori students were significantly less likely than similar non-Montessori students to have had a disciplinary incident during the school year. Nearly all educators that participated in the study reported loving or liking their job as a Montessori teacher (98%). This is substantially higher than the 89% of South Carolina educators on the 2015 Report Card Teacher Survey who strongly agreed or agreed that they were satisfied with their current working conditions (EOC, 2016). (Here’s the link to the Riley Institute study, if you’d like to learn more.)Our goal is to have the School Board request that the Elementary Principal, Lorena Stankevich, and Superintendent Eric Webb, wait one more year before making a final decision regarding the future of Montessori education at Orcas Island Elementary.In that year, the Coalition hopes to work with the school district to assess our children's and community's needs, the school's unique situation, and to determine whether and how the Montessori model can be sustained in the elementary school.If you know someone that would be interested in voicing their support for Montessori education in our public school, please forward this link.We would love to show the OISD School Board that community comes first and that our community cares deeply about this issue.Please sign onto this letter and come and show your support for public Montessori on June 18 at 5:00 p.m. at the Orcas Island Public School.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. ADDENDUM LETTER TO SUPERINTENDENT ERIC WEB  June 14, 2018 Eric Webb Superintendent, Orcas Island School District Via email Dear Eric, I appreciate your meeting with me as a representative of the Montessori Advocacy for Public Schools (MAPS) coalition and in my personal capacity as a parent of a public school Montessori student. Thank you very much for honoring our request to maintain the Montessori 1st-3rd grade class next year, for your commitment to finding a solution for continuing Montessori and for your desire to work collaboratively with parents and the community. Tony Ghazel, Chris Sutton, and Scott Lancaster said that they were most proud of hiring you during their tenure (Islands’ Sounder interview, November 2017). You have laid out a compelling vision for alignment for the School District for the next few years. As parents, we want to be a part of that success for the District, and for the elementary school in particular. We appreciate your sharing the proposal. We do, however, have several concerns. During the last School Board meeting, Principal Stankevich and some teachers voiced hesitations about the Montessori classroom: the children don’t integrate well with their friends; scarce parent time is concentrated in one classroom; quality education should be offered to all children in the school; and, fewer children with special needs in the Montessori classroom. In addition, it was stated that public education is not for a subsection of students, and that the label of Montessori brings more exclusivity. Yet, all of these conditions are exacerbated, not solved, by the idea of moving the Montessori classroom out of the elementary school and under the ALE OASIS School and in a separate building. In addition, we would appreciate more information regarding how the proposal would enable expansion in the likely scenario of increased demand and how it could support teacher collaboration. While we appreciate the District’s efforts to respond to the concerns and interests of the parents and community, we are most interested in a meaningful exploration of the concept of public school Montessori. There are over 200 public Montessori programs that co-exist in broader public elementary schools. This is the dominant model throughout South Carolina’s highly regarded public program studied in the Riley Institute’s groundbreaking report. It is possible to have both programs co-exist alongside each other; it will take some thoughtful planning to make it successful. We believe this systematic approach will enable the community to address key issues and develop long-term strategies and implementation plans together. It is also our hope that this strategic planning will lay the groundwork for the Orcas Island Elementary School to be an award winning school. Like you, our goal is to put children and their educational best interests at the center and use data and research to determine the best path forward. During this summer and the 2018-19 school year, we would like to work together with you to plan a vision for Orcas Island Elementary that will serve the best interests of ALL of our island’s children. Creating such a process would further the District’s goals of transparency, SIP’s priority on parental involvement, and would be a great way to bring the community together. We can help provide funding, select a few members to serve on the committee, bring in outside experts and problem solve other needs that arise. We want to help you create a win/win for the School District. You have a diverse community of people willing to lend their time and talents to help the District find a great solution for the children: parents, teachers, administrators, outside experts, Montessori supporters and others in the community who support proven diverse learning programs. We parents bring economic and cultural diversity, as well as children who have IEPs and special needs. The interest in the Montessori at the public school has always been high, from the start of the program to conversations about expansion a few years back to now. Rather than a short-term phenomenon, there is broad, sustained support for Montessori at the public school. We appreciate your decision to keep the Montessori program as-is. We look forward to working with you to finding a long-term solution through a public process. We will work with you to evaluate all the options and find the best solution for the children. Sincerely,Georgette Wong Beadnall (on behalf of 104+ members of the community as of June 17, 2018)

Montessori Advocacy for Public Schools coalition (MAPS)
226 supporters
Update posted 1 week ago

Petition to Concerned Residents of NoVa

Call to Delay Fairfax County School Board June 14 Vote on Family Life Curriculum Updates

June 7, 2018 To the Members of the Fairfax County School Board: We are writing to request an extension to the public comment period closing on June 8, on changes to the Family Life Education (FLE) curriculum and a delay of the June 14th Fairfax County School Board vote on approval of those changes. The steps taken to solicit broad-based community input on the proposal were inadequate, per the guidelines set forth by the Board of Education.[i]  According to the required guidelines for implementation of the Board of Education’s approved Family Life Education program, which also pertains to programs developed locally, “There must be evidence of broad-based community involvement and an annual opportunity for parents and others to review curriculum and instructional materials prior to the beginning of actual instruction.” We, the undersigned, assert that the FCSB did not properly solicit input from the “broad-based community” or “others,” as alerts were sent primarily through the School Board’s newsletter, which only goes to parents of current students that have not chosen to opt-out. As such, residents of Fairfax County who do not have students currently enrolled in the school system, but otherwise pay taxes or may anticipate on sending their children to the public school, were not properly alerted to the process or the accompanying public input period. Furthermore, not being made aware of the opportunity for the public to weigh in suppresses residents’ first amendment rights. The proposed changes to the FLE curriculum as submitted by the FLE Curriculum Advisory Committee, which would be implemented as early as the fall for the 2018/2019 schoolyear if passed, deserve serious consideration from Fairfax County parents, residents and taxpayers.[ii] For example, there are four sections proposed that would add instruction on the PrEP drug (commercially known as Truvada[iii] from pharmaceutical manufacturer Gilead Sciences, Inc.), which is for very high-risk HIV populations.[iv]  We hope that you consider our request for an extension of the public comment period and thus a delay on the scheduled June 14 vote on the FLE CAC recommendations. Full public participation, a variety of perspectives and community involvement is all critical to an open process. Important issues such as these that involve the well-being of children deserves a robust debate. Thank you for your consideration.   [i][ii][iii][iv]

Concerned Residents of NoVa
304 supporters
Update posted 3 weeks ago

Petition to Des Moines public school board, Thomas Ahart

Stop early elementary school start times in Des Moines public schools

The short version DMPS, CDC, American Academy of Pediatrics all agree children learn better after 8:10 am DMPS polled the community the last two years about the change of school hours- this year a smaller part of the community responded to the change and they were less favorable The change polled was 7:50 but the actual change is 7:30 Inexplicably contrary to their own data and in the face of weakening support the district moved ahead with the change Other districts have attempted to adopt the same bad policy but changed course when confronted by parents Parents understand not only will this change cause hardships but hurt children the duration of their elementary education Some teachers are afraid to speak against this policy out of fear of retaliation Long version I’m a board member on the Greenwood Elementary School PTA. I’m writing you today to network as parents and teachers to bring an important issue before you - the change to elementary school hours proposed for next school year. In speaking with fellow parents and teachers, many have expressed that the change to elementary school hours will create a hardship on their family. More important than scheduling hardships and expenses associated with this change, is the negative impact to the learning of our children. There is a large body of evidence from the Center for Disease Control, American Academy of Pediatrics, and many others, that all say that children learn best when classes begin 8:10 or later. While young children might be able to fall asleep more easily at night, many of them do not have the option based on family scheduling, meaning that many elementary children in Des Moines will lose an hour or more of sleep on all school days. This will hurt both their physical well-being and their capacity for academic achievement. DMPS itself made the case during the survey period that students learn better when they start school later – the body of scientific evidence supports this – however, instead of having that data drive them to the right decision, they decided to pick middle and high school students as winners and elementary school students and their families as acceptable collateral damage. Nationally, as public schools face tightening budgets, many districts are looking at similar schedules. Boston Public Schools attempted a very similar schedule that DMPS is proposing, based on a bussing algorithm from Harvard University – the district would save money on transportation but many children would lose hours of sleep, time with their families, and experience adverse academic outcomes. After parent outcry, Boston Public Schools reversed course. This year, the state of California attempted to ban classes beginning before 8:30am. According to the data published by DMPS about 2,000 fewer families participated in the survey this year as compared to last year-fewer families are in favor of the change this year than last year. Unfortunately, our most vulnerable students will bear the weight of this bad policy. The parents of at-risk children more often work in industries that have less flexibility to adapt to this change of up to 75 minutes. This change hurts elementary school families in several ways: children will lose sleep, children will be at school during hours that they are proven to be less likely to succeed, more parents will need before/after care-more expenses, in families where those expenses cannot be absorbed many children will go unsupervised – children as young as 5 years old. I’m asking you to please help me stop this bad policy. As parents of elementary students ask yourself if your children are irritable, wild, or in the best position to learn when they are sleepy. Raise your voice with me at the School Board meeting February 6th and every meeting thereafter, together we can roll back this policy before our youngest and most vulnerable children suffer. 

Nathaniel Herron
1,196 supporters