Petition to The Moore Family, State College Borough Planning and Zoning
Stop the demolition of our historic homes (706 North Allen)!
The Moore family is proposing to demolish an historic contributing property to the National Registry of Historic Places, College Heights Historic District. Our neighborhood, steps away from Penn State is a critical piece of State College and the University's history. CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ABOUT THE DISTRICT The contributing home was built (~1925) and lived in for nearly 50 years by Fred and Mary Garner (nee Krumrine) and their children. Mary was the daughter of the Krumrine family whose historic farm home (built in 1852) is just steps away. The Krumrine farm was converted into College Heights, a neighborhood that is intimately coupled to Penn State's history. The home is sound and could be renovated, but the plans submitted to State College's Design Review Board are to demolish the building and replace with a one story modular home. Information provided to the historic review board can be found here: http://www.statecollegepa.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/1750?fileID=3971 Demolition is planned for May 10th or soon thereafter unless we can convince the Moore family to reconsider. The historic homes are a critical element of the important social history and visual narrative of our community. Our homes and families are contributing to new stories and new memories. We Are...Community members that urge the Moores to reconsider! We Are...Concerned citizens that appreciate historic properties and shared community heritage! We Are...Neighbors that wish to influence positive change in our community!
Petition to City of Miami HEP Board
Stop the removal of a 38 foot tall, 24 inch Native Ficus Tree on Day Ave in Coconut Grove
The undersigned individuals are requesting that the City of Miami HEP Board deny the removal of: One (1) 38 foot tall, 24 inch DBH Ficus Aurea on the eastern side of property and to require the most protective method be used to protect all the trees at: 3140 Day Ave Coconut Grove FL 33133 OPPOSE the proposed design of the 2-story duplex + roof top terraces with stairwell enclosures submitted for 3140 Day Ave. (corner of Gifford Lane.) This duplex, as proposed and designed, will severely impact the tree canopy and roots of three (3) wonderful, mature Oak trees on the west side of the property, adjacent to Gifford Lane. The proposed driveways, balconies, pools, fences, and extended rooftop stairwell enclosures of approx. 338 ft will severely impact the canopy and the roots, and must be redesigned to provide more space around the trees and lessen the negative impact on all remaining trees. These trees possess substantial historical, aesthetic and environmental value, and are of great importance to the neighborhood and should be protected at all costs. In addition, I/We OPPOSE the removal of one (1) 38 foot tall, 24 inch DBH Ficus Aurea (Strangler Fig) which is a Native species to South Florida on the east side of the property. This project should be redesigned to build around this tree. We respectfully request that the Board grant the appeal, deny the Intended Decision, and require a redesign of the project around the trees using the most protective method for all the trees. Thank you.
Petition to City of Fulshear, City Manager, Johnson Development Corp, C.I.A. Services, City of Fulshear Mayor
Amend Texas Legislations: Human Resource Code Chap 123 & Health and Safety Code Chap 247
Update Pending- (This is an update and change to General Petition: Opposition to Commercial Use Residential Property in Cross Creek Ranch Neighborhood due to recent facts and City Meetings.)
Petition to Setti Warren, Marc Welch
Save the Trees at Four Corners in Newton, MA!
A developer has purchased the adjacent properties at 1058 Beacon Street, 956 Walnut Street and 962 Walnut Street (the southeast corner of Four Corners) and has requested and received a permit to cut down 66 large old shady trees and countless others on those 3 properties. This will effectively clear cut all the trees on the right hand side of the above photo. The beautiful character of the Four Corners Newton neighborhood we all love is defined by the irreplaceable, natural tree canopy provided by the forest of trees on the southeast corner of Walnut and Beacon Streets. Anyone walking along the Sudbury aqueduct, sitting outside of Whole Foods, or strolling around the neighboring Newton Highlands and Newton Center benefits from this piece of nature. We would like to preserve the trees, and the first step in doing so is to prevent their removal. ***Please help support our neighborhood and SAVE THE TREES by signing this petition to appeal the Tree removal permit!*** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Below is the letter we are sending to Mayor Setti Warren to appeal the Tree removal Permit: Dear Mayor Setti Warren, In accordance with Newton Ordinance 21-83(g), we are seeking to appeal the issuance of the Tree Permit for 956 Walnut St, 962 Walnut St and 1058 Beacon St (which allows for the removal of ~66 trees) for the following reasons: 1) The Tree Permit was approved with conditions that stipulate “Any update or changes to the removal or planting of trees on this site requires City approval first”. In order for the Applicant to abide by this condition, he would have to know what final planting of trees is approved as part of the Special Permit process he intends to undertake PRIOR to tearing down the trees in accordance with the submitted plan. If the applicant removes the trees now and the subsequent Special Permit process calls for a modification of his original planting plan, he will be in breach of the permit conditions but there will be no remedy to bring back any trees that the Special Permit indicates should have remained. 2) Additionally, we believe the Tree Plan as submitted does not adequately contain the following items as required by Newton Ordinance: 1. 21-83(a): (5) Any proposed grade changes which might adversely affect or endanger any protected tree with a statement prepared by a certified arborist explaining how each such protected tree shall be protected and maintained. (6) The proposed method of protecting the remaining protected trees during the course of construction For the few existing trees that are to be preserved, the Tree Permit does not address adequate protection of these trees as required by the referenced ordinance. Additionally, there are many abutting neighbor trees with drip lines/canopies that overhang the subject properties, which also need to be protected. It is imperative that details surrounding grade changes and construction methods are well-outlined in the Tree Permit so as to ensure unintentional tree damage does not occur. 2. 21-85 (b) (1):A replacement tree shall be of the same or similar species or such other species as deemed advisable by the tree warden in accordance with the Tree Manual and shall have the same or equivalent size as measured in DBH inches as that of the protected tree that has been removed. The current Tree Permit does not adequately conform to the requirement that replacement trees be of the ‘same’ or ‘similar’ species. If the tree warden chooses to advise on a non-same or non-similar replacement tree, a justification as to why this is deviation of species is desirable would be required to conform with this ordinance. At a minimum, deciduous vs non-deciduous, species type, etc should be factors considered when determining appropriate replacements. Arborvitae are not at all similar to oak or maple trees in look, canopy, or any relatable metric other than they are both trees. While we appreciate Arborvitae are a cost effective solution, they, along with American Holly and Leyland Cypress trees will never offer any tree canopy yet make up the majority of the replacement caliper inches in the currently approved plan. Caliper inches should not be the only criteria for consideration when evaluating a tree plan on this scale, and the referenced ordinance outlines the spirit of what replacement trees are intended to be used upon removal of protected trees very clearly. For the aforementioned reasons, we appeal the issuance of the Tree Permit and believe it should be revoked in its entirety at this time. We believe the referenced Tree Permit requires detail outlining how the applicant will care for protected trees, more similar types of replacement tree species, and most importantly, it requires conditions allowing for removal of trees to be permissible only upon issuance of a Special Permit with approved tree plan. While we recognize the latter Special Permit with tree plan condition should not generally be a required Tree Permit condition, we feel that in the instance where the referenced tree removal activities are clearly pre-development work in the context of a larger Special Permit development process, and the approved replacement plan is clearly not going to be executed by the applicant on a standalone basis without Special Permit approval for a larger development project, it is a justifiable condition to ensure the Tree Plan is followed as originally intended. Sincerely, The Four Corners Neighborhood Group
Petition to Stacey Whitten, Porter County Public Library System, Stu Summers, Tom Neuffer, Paul Knauff, Roger Rhodes, Member, Board of Trustees
Save 105 Michigan
The Porter County Public Library System's Board of Trustees wants to tear down a historic residence to build a parking lot. This is unacceptable because: It changes the character and integrity of the historic neighborhood making it less walkable and livable It robs the next door neighbors of the opportunity to live in close community with other people It is wholly unnecessary since direct observations prove that an available parking spot is rarely, if ever, more than a block or two away. Read more here: http://centralneighborhood.org/index.php/2016/08/30/library-of-conflict/ And here: https://www.facebook.com/pocomuse/posts/919968984705040
Petition to Seattle Department of Transportation
15th & Columbian - Neighborhood Letter
Hi Neighbor! The letter attached is addressed to Seattle Department of Transportation asking them to stop their current design for the project at 15th & Columbian and create a design that meets (incorporates) the needs of the immediate neighborhood. Please sign in support. Main Concerns: Elimination of signalized left at 15th and Oregon Increased cut through traffic forced down neighborhood streets, making them less safe Loss of access/parking for small, local businesses at this intersection Oregon St capacity for traffic vs Snoqualmie St Back ups as a result of 4 way stop at 15th & Snoqualmie Goals: To stop the current 15th and Columbian Way design (including the 4 way at 15th & Snoqualmie) proposed by SDOT Create a design that meets (incorporates) the needs of the immediate neighborhood. Collect 500 signatures in support of this letter Link to project page : https://www.seattle.gov/transportation/NSF15andColumbian.htm To Seattle Department of Transportation, We are a coalition of neighbors of the 15th Ave S & S Columbian St. intersection who are deeply concerned about safety impacts to our neighborhood from by the Neighborhood Street Fund project proposed at this intersection. We are made up of longtime residents who are pedestrians, transit users, parents and motorists. We are writing to express our opposition to the 15th and Columbian Way project as currently designed, and demand the project is put on hold immediately and redesigned in a way that meets the needs of the immediate neighborhood. While SDOT has heard the community’s anger and redesigned the project to restore access out of S Oregon St (but removed the signalized right-of-way), and has added a four-way stop at S Snoqualmie St as an access point to 15th Ave S, we believe that these changes create even more hazardous conditions for the neighborhood due to the likelihood of traffic diversion onto neighborhood streets and collisions from those trying to exit an unsignalized Oregon St. For context, outreach on various installments of this project has been nonexistent until spring 2017, and has felt rushed and disingenuous since then to many of those engaged with SDOT on the project. Over the last two years, neighbors have been left with a very poor impression of SDOT’s ability to implement changes to the intersection, after witnessing a “Road Closed” sign being placed in the intersection that was continually knocked over, and bagged signals that caused a safety hazard to motorists. Once SDOT finally revealed plans for the intersection to the public at large, SDOT was met with overwhelming opposition and concern in public meetings held at the Jefferson Community Center and Mercer Middle School. In summary, residents of the neighborhood still have the following concerns that have not been adequately addressed through the public engagement and redesign process: The project removes the only safe access point for motorists to travel northbound on 15th Ave S between I-5 and Cleveland High School towards all major freeways and employment centers, and provides no realistic alternative for many residents.Significant traffic backups currently occur on 15th Ave S between Oregon and Cleveland High School due to the school zones. We believe the added four-way stop at Snoqualmie will greatly exacerbate these backups by creating an additional chokepoint, in turn encouraging more motorists to bypass 15th Ave S by using the neighborhood streets. This will create hazardous situations for pedestrians traveling eastbound trying to reach the intersection, school children at Cleveland High and Maple Elementary, and neighbors along the corridor leaving their houses. SDOT has not shared any results of traffic studies that assess the impact of this four-way stop to the functionality of 15th Ave S.The unsignalized left at Oregon will be hazardous for motorists due to blocked views to the north from the proposed plaza, and timed traffic from the south due to the four-way stop that will make northbound access extremely difficult for motorists. Any vehicle conflicts also create dangerous situations for pedestrians and users of the proposed plaza.The new apartment building at the corner will increase the number of motorists traveling north. SDOT’s traffic studies used to scope this project did not factor in the increased level of motorists from this building.The project removes parking access for several neighborhood businesses (the majority being minority-owned), which could be very damaging to the owners’ livelihoods and the neighborhood residents that enjoy having these businesses in the community. The parking spaces proposed to be added back are across a main arterial and are impractical, and those who attempt to access these businesses will likely use Oregon or 14th Ave S for parking instead, further increasing vehicle traffic to the neighborhood.Residents feel that Beacon Hill has a history of “pass-through” traffic from I-5, causing significant impact that has not been mitigated. A new four-way stop will create additional congestion.The project makes access to bus stops more arduous for pedestrians,Traffic will likely be diverted onto the Beacon Hill Neighborhood Greenway on 13th and 14th Ave S, undermining the safety of the bicycle facility,Residents of this area have felt impacts from several construction projects in recent years, including: The VA expansion and parking lot construction which resulted in their employees using our streets as their parking lot, and The apartment building construction, which resulted in years of lost sidewalks and increased traffic. We don’t want to endure another construction project that will jeopardize our neighborhood residents’ safety and uses our tax dollars unwisely.The process behind planning this project has been opaque and it is unclear who in the immediate neighborhood conceived of or supports the project and whether the removed protected left turn from Oregon St. is acceptable to them. Results of the last public survey (which was conducted due to overwhelming opposition from residents) emphasize residents’ wishes for the project – over 60% of responders categorized vehicle access to the neighborhood as “very important” or “important”. The first “key theme” summarized in the results is that “the signalized left turn at S Oregon St is critical to access onto northbound 15th Ave S”. As signalized northbound access is removed from the project design, we believe that the public outreach and engagement process has been a charade and disingenuous. As such, please consider this letter a Public Disclosure Request subject to Washington State law for the following information: Why SDOT did not choose to notify residents of the neighborhood when implementing restricted access in 2015,A summary of all pedestrian/vehicle collisions in the intersection, including an explanation from SDOT as to how the current design of the proposed project would have prevented the collisions, and how the level of pedestrian/vehicle collisions at this location compares citywide to other major intersections,Provide copies of any internal communications related to the removed left turn off S Oregon St, including acknowledged safety and neighborhood impacts by SDOT staff and any consultants,Provide results of the Racial Equity Toolkit analysis, including impacts on existing businesses, impacts of traffic diversion on the neighborhood population, and how equitable outreach practices were utilized during prior alterations to the intersection as early as 2015,Provide a description of low-cost strategies SDOT typically uses as safety/crossing improvements, and why these are not being implemented before drastically reconstructing the intersection at a multi-million dollar cost,Why the project budget has increased from $2.38 million (according to prior presentation materials) to $3.5-4.4 million according to SDOT’s “Capital Projects Dashboard” (an increase of 47% to 85%!),Provide historical data on traffic diversion to S Snoqualmie St caused by the removed left turn from S Columbian Way to S Oregon St, including before and after daily vehicle counts on this street,Provide results of any traffic impact studies related to the proposed four way stop installation on 15th Ave S and S Snoqualmie St, including impacts to traffic on the 15th Ave S corridor; or if no studies have been conducted, why this was deemed not important by SDOT before proceeding with project design, and if this is standard practice to omit traffic operating plans from project planning efforts,SDOT’s plan to prevent vehicle/pedestrian conflicts at uncontrolled intersections along 13th and 14th Ave S, alley exits onto S Nevada St from the new apartment building, and S Snoqualmie St & 15th Ave S resulting from forced traffic diversion of northbound drivers from S Oregon St, What impacts SDOT foresees in delaying the current project schedule to address neighborhood concerns and redesigning the project to meet neighborhood needs (in other words, what is driving the fast-tracked schedule SDOT is seeking to implement?), SDOT’s progress on the Beacon Hill traffic study proposed by Councilmember Bruce Harrell and adopted by full council during the 2017 budget process, What other prioritized transportation safety investments could be made in Beacon Hill for this project’s current budget. Frankly, it is ironic to call this a “Neighborhood” project when many of the residents of the neighborhood are in opposition and have felt left out of the scoping process. Our concerns are based on years and decades of experience living in this neighborhood and witnessing the behavior of commuters on a daily basis. Our property taxes have increased significantly as a result of SDOT’s transportation levy, and we are outraged these funds are being used to implement an ill-conceived and over-budget project that will reduce safety for our neighborhood. Please stop work on the current design of this project immediately, and commit to implementing a project that is satisfactory to all neighbors of the intersection. Sincerely, xxx CC: District 2 Councilmember Bruce Harrell,Bob Hasegawa, Mayoral Candidate, Scott Kubly, SDOT Director