Petition to Members of Congress c/o Nancy Pelosi, President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, U.S. Senate, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Adm. Michael Rogers; Dir. National Security Agency, Senator Harry Reid, Congressman Jason Chafettz
Letter to Congress re: Investigation of Russian interference in 2016 Presidential Election
Dear Members of Congress, We the people urge you investigate the evidence of Russian interference of the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The public has the right to know if Putin or anyone else corrupted the political mechanisms of the nation. If, when, and where any evidence is found that Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election has affected the final voting outcome, then new emergency repeat elections MUST be conducted by paper ballot in those affected states. We MUST not allow the 2016 United States presidential election to be hijacked by Russia or by anybody else.To allow this is to negate the very idea of democracy itself. If we allow the Russians to interfere with our democratic presidential election voting process, then all of the American people will have been made into Vladimir Putin's puppets. On 11/15/2016 the director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Michael Rogers, was asked about the WikiLeaks release of hacked information during the campaign, and he said, "This was a conscious effort by a nation-state to attempt to achieve a specific effect." He added, "This was not something that was done casually. This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily." This stunning statement that has echoed other remarks from senior US officials. Adm. Rogers is saying that Russia directly intervened in the US election to obtain a desired end: presumably to undermine confidence in US elections or to elect Donald Trump—or both. Adm. Rogers was clearly accusing Vladimir Putin of meddling with American democracy. Presumably intelligence and law enforcement agencies are robustly probing the hacking of political targets attributed to Russia. But there is another inquiry that is necessary: a full-fledged congressional investigation that holds public hearings and releases its findings to the citizenry. If the FBI, CIA, and other intelligence agencies are digging into the Russian effort to affect US politics, there is no guarantee that what they uncover will be shared with the public. The investigative activities of these agencies are not designed for public enlightenment or assurance. That's the job of Congress. That is what is required now. If a foreign government has mucked about and undercut a presidential election, how can Americans be secure about the foundation of the nation and trust their own government? So far, the only Capitol Hill legislator who has publicly called for such an endeavor is Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). Sen. Graham, has proposed that Congress hold hearings on "Russia's misadventures throughout the world," including the DNC hack. "Were they involved in cyberattacks that had a political component to it in our elections?" The possibility that a foreign government covertly interfered with US elections is staggering. It raises the most profound concerns about governance within the United States. An investigation into this matter should not be relegated to the secret corners of the FBI or the CIA. There already is reason to be suspicious. Without a thorough examination, there will be more cause to question American democracy.
Petition to United States Supreme Court, Democratic National Committee, Republican National Committee, President of the United States
Declare 2016 United States Presidential election between Clinton and Trump null and void.
The people of the United States of America have been cheated of a fair 2016 Presidential election and wish to declare this atrocity between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump null and void. We declare the right to a new election process until which time our current administration shall remain in effect.
Petition to Eric T. Schneiderman
Urge NY Attorney General to bring a case to the US Supreme Court for a Clinton victory
ACTION to AVOID TRUMP'S ELECTION: Harvard legal scholar Lawrence Lessig sees a viable court case to demand that electoral college votes be allocated proportionally, not winner take all, in THIS election. This would mean a CLINTON VICTORY.We need New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to bring this case to the US Supreme Court.On behalf of New York voters, we are asking Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to ask the Supreme Court to allocate the electoral votes proportionally in this election, ensuring our rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.Harvard Law professor Lawrence Lessig details the argument in this essay:https://medium.com/@lessig/the-equal-protection-argument-against-winner-take-all-in-the-electoral-college-b09e8a49d777#.6d4jiyhrw
Petition to James Comey
Since the FBI found that Hillary Clinton broke the law, recommend charges or resign.
You clearly stated that it is a violation of law to negligently handle classified material: "...[it is a] felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way." "... participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it." You clearly stated that Hillary Clinton negligently handling classified material: "...there is evidence that [Secretary Clinton or her colleagues] were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information." "...there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information..." "...[Secretary Clinton's emails contained] 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined...to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information..." "...None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail..." You clearly said it is not your job to make a decision for prosecution: "...the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this..." Yet, for some reason, likely due to political pressure you violently deny, you made a decision for the Justice Department by recommending no charges: "...we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case..." More importantly, your reliance upon the fact that "[p]rosecutors necessarily weigh...intent" is misplaced for two reasons. First, the private server didn't happen by accident, so what intent can be gleaned other than intentional negligence? Second, intent is irrelevant here (and you know it). To wit: 18 U.S. Code § 793 provides: "...(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both." Accordingly, if you fail to recommend charges as stated in your political speech today, you will have single handily ruined the little confidence we had left in the bureau; the undersigned, and millions of other Americans this petition may fail to reach, will view you for what you are... a man who claims integrity beyond reproach who cowers to the political whims of the day. You made a clear case today; you choose to put politics over the same thing Hillary Clinton violated... the law. Whether indicted or not, Hillary will go down in history as untrustworthy. Your legacy is up to you and hinges on this decision.
Petition to Leslie Rutledge
Former President Bill Clinton to Register as a Sex Offender
I am a neutral forensic sex offender researcher who seeks the empirical facts only. For 10 years, I have been researching and analyzing Megan's Law.[signed into law by President Bill Clinton.This Federal law mandated to all 50 states and territories to implement a statewide sex offender public profile registry on the internet as a waning that a sexual predator was living in your neighborhood. If you do a Google search on Bill Clinton there are multi millions of links of untold HORROR stories by Women who have been sexually been abused by him going back to when he was in high school from Governor of Arkansas to being the President of America! My Purpose of putting up this petition is, I don't wish to see a long time unregistered serial sex PREDATORY abuser of women back in the White House who is in reality an unregistered sex offender-therefor I ask you to sign this petition demanding that the Attorney General of Arkansas subpoena Bill Clinton to register as a Sex Offender. Side note" Do your own Google search- see for your self! Bill Clinton sex predator: About 453,000 results (0.53 seconds) Bill Clinton sex offender: About 683,000 results (0.39 seconds) Bill Clinton sex abuser of women: About 3,050,000 results (0.57 seconds) Bill Clinton Rapes women: About 1,160,000 results (8.44 seconds) Bill Clinton sex fiend: About 108,000 results (0.44 seconds) Bill Clinton sexually abuse women: About 2,780,000 results (0.46 seconds) Bill Clinton Child molester: About 209,000 results (0.45 seconds) Bill Clinton statutory rape: About 451,000 results (0.38 seconds) Here is a YouTube video of bill Clinton having sex with a 13 yr old! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZgnx5KabfY What is wrong with this Google search picture? If any man in America had multi Millions of links of sexual abuse of women on a Google search engine he would be on the sex offender registry public profile! So in essence the Google search engine shows Bill Clinton is AN UNREGISTERED SEX OFFENDER-NOT ON THE PUBLIC PROFILE -above a law he signed into law!
Petition to Democratic National Committee, Democratic Party, Voters, green party, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Elizabeth Warren, Charles Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders
Grant Hillary Clinton the title of "Honorary President" for largest popular vote in histor
What are we going to do about this chaotic situation? Many things. This is as much of a protest as it is honoring a remarkable feat by an lifelong public servant. However, this petition is unlikely to happen - just a reality. That said, these are the reasons you should sign it anyway. 1) Hillary's well mannered opponent doesn't like to lose in any capacity. Any traction this gets even if it reaches his ears, it will annoy him at the very least and harm his ego at the very best. Much like how he annoys us. 2) What if you weren't recognized for shattering previous records? It's not fair. She deserves an honorary title at the very least for these accomplishments. 3) What harm could it be? Not much other than his ego. It's an itch he cannot scratch or ignore. 4) How are we supposed to deal with electoral system? It will raise awareness on the major flaws of our system. 65.853 million who voted for Hillary got their voices snuffed out due to this. Our voices and votes matter. We won the majority yet we lost. How is that fair? After the election, we trusted the Electors to cast their votes based on sound judgment. They failed in their solemn duties to put country before party and caved into fear. 5) Did we mention how much it will annoy him? A lot. With your participation we can acknowledge Hillary's accomplishments, AND ding 45's armor just a little bit.
Petition to United States Department of Justice, Internal Revenue Service, Federal Election Commission
Audit David Brock's Media Matters Conglomerate
David Brock, Chairman of Media Matters for America, is conducting a shadow campaign for Hillary Clinton. His organizations have provided the Clinton Campaign with an undemocratic and illegal advantage during the 2016 presidential election. We call upon the Department of Justice to conduct a full audit of the 14 organizations operating out of David Brock's Washington DC office: 455 Massachusetts Avenue NW 6th floor, Washington, DC 20001 Media Matters for America (501(c)3) Media Matters Action Network (501(c)4) Correct the Record (Super PAC) American Bridge 21st Century (Super PAC) Franklin Forum PAC American Bridge 21st Century Foundation (501(c)4) The Franklin Education Forum (501(c)3) The Franklin Forum (501(c)4) The American Independent (501(c)3) Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington DC (501(c)3) American Democracy Legal Fund (527 Committee) The Bonner Group (Professional Solicitor) American Priorities Joint Fundraising Committee Franklin Strategies LLC Through analysis of public facing IRS tax returns, FEC filings, and business registration documents, we’ve identified a litany of fraudulent and illegal activities occurring within this Media Matters conglomerate: 1) THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN’S PURCHASE OF SUPER PAC RESEARCH FROM AMERICAN BRIDGE 21ST CENTURY IN LATE 2015 On December 4th, 2015, the Clinton Campaign purchased opposition research from American Bridge 21st Century Super PAC. They lied in their reporting to the FEC in an effort to hide the transaction. Source 2) THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN’S ILLEGAL COORDINATION WITH AMERICAN BRIDGE 21ST CENTURY SUPER PAC The Assistant Treasurer of Correct the Record, a Super PAC that openly coordinates with the Clinton Campaign, is also the Assistant Treasurer, Registered Agent, and Custodian of Records for American Bridge 21st Century Super PAC. In total, 8 individuals are shown to have collected pay from both Correct the Record and American Bridge 21st Century during the same pay periods. This provides reasonable suspicion that the Clinton Campaign is illegally coordinating with American Bridge 21st Century. Source 3) FRAUDULENT TAX RETURNS FILED BY MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA Media Matters for America receives rent payments from American Bridge 21st Century Super PAC, but doesn’t report the rental income in their tax returns. Source 4) THE CONGLOMERATE’S USE OF AN UNREGISTERED SOLICITOR, THE BONNER GROUP The Bonner Group represents the entire fundraising overhead for the Media Matters conglomerate, but they aren’t properly registered in Washington DC or any of the States they raise funds in. Source 5) FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS OF MONEY BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CONGLOMERATE Analysis of FEC filings and IRS tax returns show a constant flow of money between the listed organizations. The Bonner Group receives a 12.5% cut every time money is moved. Source Enough is enough David Brock’s Media Matters conglomerate has been illegally influencing American public policy for far too long. There’s only so much information available for public review. We call upon the Department of Justice to review these claims and conduct a full audit of these organizations.
Petition to House of Represenitives and Senate, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Andrew Cuomo, Tim Kaine
Impeach Doanld J. Trump
We already have a president who is violating two clauses in the U.S. Constitution, one forbidding any gifts or benefits from foreign governments, the other forbidding the same from the U.S. government or any U.S. state. This is the result of Donald Trump refusing to separate himself from major business interests as past presidents have done. Those interests will also inevitably involve Trump in violating the STOCK Act which forbids the use of non-public government information to make a private profit. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states: “The President … shall not receive … any other emolument from the United States, or any of them.” This means that the President cannot receive personal financial gains from the United States government or from the governments of any of the 50 states while he is president. This restriction is absolute and cannot be waived by Congress. Trump is already in violation of it and will be more so with every law, rule, regulation, enforcement, or lack thereof that his subordinates, Congress, or any agency of the federal government enacts to the benefit of Trump’s businesses and possessions. Or, to take a state-level example: since 1980 Trump and his businesses have garnered “$885 million in tax breaks, grants and other subsidies for luxury apartments, hotels and office buildings in New York.” Continuing or increasing those subsidies puts Trump in violation of the Constitution. Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution says that “no person holding any office of profit or trust under [the United States government], shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.” This is essentially the same ban as above, but applied to foreign governments.The Trump Organization has licensing deals with two Trump Towers in Istanbul. Trump himself says, “I have a little conflict of interest, because I have a major, major building in Istanbul.” China’s state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China is the largest tenant in Trump Tower. It is also a major lender to Trump. Its rent payments and its loans put Trump in violation of the Constitution. Foreign diplomats have begun shifting their D.C. hotel and event reservations to Trump International Hotel. The Embassy of Kuwait was reportedly pressured by the Trump Organization to do so. Pressured or not, Kuwait’s business at a Trump hotel puts Trump in violation of the highest law of the land.