Petition to Malcolm Turnbull, Bill Shorten, Dr Michael Gannon, Greg Hunt MP
May 1st Changes to Pap Smears
As of May 1st the following changes will be implemented to women's Pap Smears: "-women will be invited when they are due to participate via the National Cancer Screening Register-the time between tests will change from two to five years-the age at which screening starts will increase from 18 years to 25 years-women aged 70 to 74 years will be invited to have an exit test. The new program will commence from 1 May 2017 when the new Cervical Screening Test will become available on the Medicare Benefits Schedule. Until this time, women aged between 18 and 69 years who have ever been sexually active, should continue to have Pap test when due." The government run website states that: "Based on new evidence and better technology, the National Cervical Screening Program will change from 1 May 2017 to improve early detection and save more lives." Prior to May 1 the website advises: "It is very important that women continue to participate in the current two yearly Pap test program to ensure they are not at risk of developing cervical cancer. Pap tests have already halved the incidence and mortality from cervical cancer since the introduction of the National Cervical Screening Program in 1991. Women will be due for the first Cervical Screening Test two years after their last Pap test." "The new Cervical Screening Test detects human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, which is the first step in developing cervical cancer. The procedure for collecting the sample for HPV testing is the same as the procedure for having a Pap smear. A Health Care Professional will still take a small sample of cells from the woman’s cervix. The sample will be sent to a pathology laboratory for examination. While the current Pap test can detect abnormal cell changes, the new Cervical Screening Test will detect the HPV infection that can cause the abnormal cell changes, prior to the development of cancer. Persistent HPV infections can cause abnormal cell changes that may lead to cervical cancer. However, this usually takes a long time, often more than 10 years." Some of the reasoning behind the changes are: " -cervical cancer in young women is rare (in both HPV vaccinated and unvaccinated women)-despite screening women younger than 25 years of age for over 20 years there has been no change to the rates of cervical cancer or rates of death from cervical cancer in this age group-investigating and treating common cervical abnormalities in young women that would usually resolve by themselves can increase the risk of pregnancy complications later in life-the HPV vaccination has already been shown to reduce cervical abnormalities among women younger than 25 years of age and, in contrast to screening, is ultimately expected to reduce cervical cancer in this age group." Please see petition updates and responses. Dr Michael Gannon has responded to the petition.
Petition to email@example.com , Kate Barlow, Malcolm Turnbull, Bill Shorten, Greg Hunt MP
Cred Mental Health Nurses and Nurse Practitioners care about you. Do you care about us?
The Mental Health Nurse program funding is ending June 30th. Many thousands of people across Australia in our community who experience severe mental illness will no longer be supported by Credentiaied Mental Health Nurses. The GPs they see will no longer feel supported knowing they have specialist MHNs working with them in caring for people with severe mental illness in the community. MHNs are affordable & accessible. We care about you & your families. Do you care about us? We no longer will have jobs in primary care to work with the MOST vulnerable. Let those in charge of the money know Cred MHNs are needed.
Petition to James Shaw, Jacinda Ardern, Fiordland Maternity, Kelvin Davis, Winston Peters, Grant Robertson, David Clark, Liz Craig, SDHB , Chris Flemming, Maternity Review
Save Lumsden Maternity - Stop the Closure
The Lumsden Maternity Centre is proposed to be closed with the removal of Primary Birthing Unit status) birthing and postnatal care facilities). What does this mean? There will no longer be birthing or postnatal inpatient care for mothers and babies in Lumsden. As a rural person, voter and taxpayer my family and I deserve access to a Primary Birthing Unit that is within an acceptable distance of where I reside. I object to the planned closure of Lumsden Maternity Centre and seek your support to help turn this decision around. Birth is an incredible and vulnerable time for an expectant mother and having a Primary Facility such as Lumsden available for families in my community is an essential requirement. o The SDHB decision to close Lumsden from a Primary Birthing unit is premature given Census results are not due until October. Te Anau which is within the “catchment area” is experiencing huge growth with base figures indicating 45 families a year are moving to the town. Lumsden, Garston and Athol are experiencing growth as is Kingston with over 1000 sections soon to be developed. o Research shows that Primary Birthing Units have much higher rates of natural births than those in a hospital setting, which translates to better outcomes for mothers and babies in a low risk birth situation. o The higher incidence of natural births places less pressure on SDHB budget when compared with a hospital birth which has much higher rate of interventions during the birth – even for a low risk mother (e.g. augmenting the labour with Pitocin, epidurals, caesarean sections, episiotomies etc). o Interventions from a Hospital environment can also lead to more complications postpartum including haemorrhage, difficulty breastfeeding, bonding, mental health/postnatal depression etc. The cost to the DHB of a caesarean birth is more than four times an unassisted birth. o Time and time again we are hearing from mothers that Southland Hospital is cold and unwelcoming due to the stretched workload on staff there. New mothers were struggling with breastfeeding and what to do with their newborn until their midwife referred them back to Lumsden after delivery at Southland Hospital. o The World Health Organisation (WHO), The Ministry of Health and The NZ Breastfeeding Authority all promote breastfeeding as the Gold Standard of infant feeding. There is no doubt that breastfeeding is best for mothers, and best for babies, throughout their lives, but it is also best for families, best for communities, best for the environment and best for the economy. There is evidence that indicates Primary Birthing Units such as Lumsden support women to initiate and establish breastfeeding to a far greater level than Secondary and Tertiary units. o Southland Hospital doesn’t have the bed space required to cater for additional births in the event that Lumsden Maternity Centre is closed. Parents have experienced having to birth in consulting rooms in Southland Hospital as birthing rooms were full, or being made to sit in the hallway for hours after the baby has been delivered as there were no beds available. o Ministry of Health (MoH) funding structure for Primary Birthing units appears to solely rely on the number of pregnancies in the catchment and does not give any weight to the risk to mothers of extra travel times from home to the nearest birth centre - should Lumsden be closed, labouring mothers would be required to travel up to 160km to Invercargill. The closure of these centres would increase the risk of babies being born on the side of the icy road en route to Southland Hospital (a minimum of 2 hours travel from Te Anau for example). o Removal of Primary Maternity Services at Lumsden will have a ripple effect on Voluntary organisations, in particular St John and potentially the Fire Brigade and Police. More women will be having babies on the road side (at least one baby born during March 2018 would have been delivered on the roadside if Lumsden was not there). Safety and emergency services are going to be stretched to cope if Lumsden is closed as there will be no Primary Maternity facility fit for purpose in Lumsden. o The SDHB figures appear to include years in the past where there have been lower than normal births in the facility rather than the most current years where birthing numbers at Lumsden have been higher. One local midwife has to date delivered 10 babies on her own at Lumsden (01 January 2018 to 11 March 2018). She is not the only midwife practicing at this clinic and so actual current births are higher than data SDHB is relying upon for this decision. o Lumsden is more than a place for mothers to give birth, it is also a place where mothers who have delivered their babies elsewhere can return for Inpatient Services that support and nurture. The SDHB decision has not given any consideration to where those new mothers now turn for help and respite while bonding and healing for the first few days after birth. o More mothers and fathers will suffer mental health conditions such as Post Natal Depression and Anxiety as there will be no grounding support for new Rural families to bond and learn how to look after their babies should Lumsden be closed from a Primary Maternity Facility. This will place greater stress on the Karitane and Plunket nurses whom already have a stretched workload o Rural women's health in general has been underfunded by the SDHB and the removal of this key aspect of Primary health services at Lumsden further disadvantages rural families. I rely on you to ensure our voices are heard. Our community strongly opposes the decision to close Lumsden from a centre that is fully stocked and fit for purpose to deliver our communities babies and seek for this decision to be overturned and investment considered in this essential rural community resource. We must invest in our rural communities and keep Lumsden open as a Primary Birthing Unit (birthing and postnatal care facility). Any decision to Close Lumsden Maternity is a false economy. Rural women and babies have a right to local birthing facilities. Rural communities deserve this service.You cannot remove any service from Lumsden without affecting women and babies’ rights and their health and right to a safe delivery environment.
Petition to Tania Mihailuk MP, Hon. Dominic Perrottet MP
Inadequate Provisions for Mental Health -
Blue Mountain, Hawkesbury, Lithgow Penrith LGA's
Mental Health Support in Wentworth Healthcare (NSW) has very little funding in the Local Government Areas and I believe that this needs to change. We need funding in order to maintain, or in fact improve on, mental health support within this communities in Western Sydney, Blue Mountains and Lithgow. To this day, mental health is still considered a rather taboo topic. There is a certain image that people have formed around what mental illness looks like, and if people do not fit that mould, they are often over looked. Many people look at mental illness as being both scary but also somewhat glamorised based on the diagnosis and stigma around them. Through trying to gain support, I am hoping that anyone who presents based on his or her personal struggles with mental illness, despite “not looking sick,” will be granted access. More often than not, those who struggle are told they are “over reacting” or to “grow up”, amongst other things, due to not being classed as acute enough to warrant a place within the public mental health system. The private system is often full and/or puts financial strain on people due to the high costs to receive the necessary help in an environment that is often more understanding. With the number of people being diagnosed with some form of mental illness, of which there are many both known and unknown by the vast majority of the population, I am led to ask the question as to how this has occurred with minimal changes in the public system to gain adequate mental health support. I would like to gain more services in the regions to create a mental health links in the regional Hospitals – Community Health. As I feel that there are different activities that the Community Health can help out with like counselling and Allied Health services. This will mean that more and more health Services will join the Mental health links in the future so this can create a better mental health Service in the Nepean Blue Mountain, Hawkesbury and Lithgow. I would also like to get better mental health beds in Hawkesbury and Lithgow. Transport to and from these services may come at a cost to the consumer especially for Emergency Services from Hawkesbury to Nepean hospital and also from Lithgow to Nepean hospital. I know that Lithgow and Hawkesbury should have a (PECC Unit) Psychiatric Emergency Care Centre Unit at each hospital so they don’t have to travel from Windsor to Nepean hospital (25 minutes) and Lithgow to Nepean Hospital (1 hour and 32 minutes) or Lithgow to Katoomba hospital (41 minutes). If a person is having a psychotic attack or suicidal ideation we need to have the support to get a Psychiatric Emergency Care Centre Unit in these hospitals. This is why I have created a petition for better mental health services and provisions for the Blue Mountain Nepean Hawkesbury and Lithgow Communities and beyond. The undersigned petitioners therefore ask the Legislative Assembly to make the funding available for mental health in the region as there is very little Services and to build on mentally ill peoples support Network Hub. So, we can all can access different services from youth to Adulthood.
Petition to Victorian Government
Please finish Melbournes Cyberknife cancer centre at VCCC
In 2009 I suggested to the then Victorian Labor Govt to bring Cyberknife to Melbourne. Why? I lost my wife and home due to cancer and have been petitioning since 2006 to get Cyberknife to Australia. In 2009 I suggested to the then Victorian Labor Govt to bring it to Melb. They visited Cyberknife in use in hospitals in Japan, came back and allocated funds for Australias 1st Cyberknife. They then lost the election and the incoming Bailleau Govt withdrew the money for the machine even though construction of the building was well in progress. We are asking The current Premier, Mr Andrews, to reinstate the funding to complete the Cyberknife project. Cyberknife is non invasive, treats inoperable cancers, uses no drugs or surgery and has no side effects. Link to my Australian Cyberknife information page: https://facebook.com/pages/Australian-Cyberknife-cancer-treatment-information/105566542806361
Petition to United States Department of Health and Human Services
Implement real-time prescription monitoring nationally to help stop opioid abuse.
Opioid abuse has been declared a national emergency in the US. If nothing is done, it has been forecast as many as 650,000 people will die within the next decade. That's the equivalent to the entire city of Baltimore and exceeds cause of death relating to gun violence and road accidents. The US has the highest death rate per capita for opioid abuse globally. Mandatory real-time prescription monitoring is part of the opioid crisis solution. It's already implemented and working in Australia. The first Australian state to implement the system went from the highest per capita using state to the lowest within one year, and has been directly attributed to lowering the mortality rate. The system offers health professionals issuing prescriptions and pharmacists dispensing drugs real-time information to stop patients harming themselves. The system can identify patients who are "doctor shopping" or who have been flagged as high risk by health authorities before opioids are prescribed or dispensed. Mandatory real-time prescription monitoring between doctors, pharmacists & health authorities nationally across the US will help save lives. For more information visit www.monitoropioidabuse.org