Petition to Justin Trudeau
Prevent Donald Trump from entering Canada
Donald Trump should not be allowed to enter Canada in his capacity as head of the US Government, nor should he be invited to make an official State Visit. Donald Trump's well documented misogyny and vulgarity should disqualify him from being received officially by Canada's Government. Therefore and based on the precedent set by the citizens of the United Kingdom in their petition of the same, that during the term of his presidency Donald Trump should not be invited to Canada for an official State Visit. Canada's criminal code outlaws hate propaganda, and Canada should ban Donald Trump from entering Canada and spreading his hate-mongering. For life. Especially given recent terror attack on Canadian citizens by an admitted Trump Supporter, and the response of the Trump Administration's own Press Secretary Sean Spicer not condemning the attack. Trump's comments and fear mongering risk inciting widespread religious hatred and have no place in Canada. Ever.
Petition to Vernon Saddleback, Pat Buffalo, Peace Hills Trust, Victor Buffalo, Cody Bruno, Danny buffalo, Marvin Yellowbird, Derek Bruno, Justin Trudeau
Trans Women we are caught in lethal crossfire of racism, colonization, transphobia.
My problems are transphobia in the workplace and harassment daily by Kayla, written up once for wearing a crop top with high waisted slacks, second warning was, I was wearing a long skirt with a white crop top. Third warning was I was politely telling a bully to leave a artist alone, only to find out that bully was the artist ex girlfriend. I am a openly trans-woman who just wants justice. Kayla shea minde violated my rights as a human. Trans Women we are caught in lethal crossfire of racism, colonization, transphobia and misogyny!!! I was written up for my dress code attire and for who I am as a transgender woman, that is a violation to my human rights. I was also bullied by Kayla when she sabotaged my traditional medicines and a witness saw her deliberately pour coffee in my sage and sweet grass. I want this petition to solve this problem and create a change for a dress code suited for trans-women in the workplace. I need your help on creating this change and justice for violating my human rights. As well to stop discrimination in the workplace. and to charge these three mention for discrimination on my personality, sexuality and violating my rights as a human being and as a trans-woman @ Kayla Shea Minde of Ermineskin Cree Nation, Maskwacis, Alberta and Heather MacTaggart of Toronto, Ontario I want to also want to put a end discrimination in the workplace and to establish a up to date dress code policy for Nipsis Cafe And Collective and Change It Up Classroom Connections and file a human rights charge on Kayla Shea Minde. This treatment is unfair and unethical and hate crimes and discrimination in the workplace are not to be tolerated I want to also defund nipsis cafe and collective. Thank you for reading my petition and I pray you see my side and sign. There is no allegations here just the truth.
Petition to University of Nevada, Reno
Fire & Expel Peter Cvjetanovic from the University of Nevada, Reno
Updated: October 21, 2017 By Keeping Him at the School, THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO IS AS RACIST AS WHITE SUPREMACIST PETER CVJETANOVIC TL;DR: The university has been unequivocal about their stance to keep Peter Cvjetanovic, white supremacist, on campus as an employee (he's a student also - but his status as a student is more difficult to terminate as it's a public university). Peter Cvjetanovic is the (now world-famous) white supremacist and poster boy for the violent marches that took place in Charlottesville. With this decision, the staff at University at Nevada, Reno are supporting racism, welcome hate-speech, encourage white supremacy, thus making them just as racist as Peter Cvjetanovic Scroll to the very bottom of my message to see what you can do other than sign this petition. ---- The University of Nevada, Reno has refused to take any action against Peter Cvjetanovic’s participation in the alt-right violent Charlottesville march. And they don’t plan on it. UNR has condemned the actions that took place in Charlottesville. Yet, UNR has also refused to give Peter Cvjetanovic any consequences for his actions. Marc Johnson, UNR’s President, said that firing Peter would go against Cvjetanovic’s constitutional right of “free speech” and the first amendment. While this may protect Peter from expulsion from the publicly funded school, this does not protect him from being fired as a university employee. Kevin Page, the chairman of the state Board of Regents, also said Cvjetanovic’s status at UNR would not be affected no matter how many people sign this petition. He claims “UNR police looked at it — he wasn’t arrested, he didn’t break any laws. We don’t have any right to terminate him. Expression of free speech is protected in the country. We don’t like what he said, but that’s what makes this country so great — people can have the right to say what they want.” Let me reiterate that Kevin Page “didn’t like” what he said. Kevin Page has failed to acknowledge that these are groups that promote the killing of people who are not like them and violence against those who disagree with them. In fact, it was this march that killed Heather Heyer. This is not about “not liking” what Peter did. Peter participated and contributed his physical presence to this march. He booked a ticket from Nevada to Virginia. He planned his attendance well in advance. When you befriend a Nazi, you are sympathizing with a Nazi, you enable a Nazi, you become the Nazi. Peter recently said in an interview that he ‘condemns’ Nazis and stresses he isn't an 'angry racist'. Peter, you cannot ‘condemn’ them and also participate in a rally with them. It can't be both. Your actions have spoken louder than your words. Employment attorney Andrew Rempfer agrees with this. He states that an employee checks his constitutional rights at the door of his job and that employees can be terminated for off-duty conduct. Rempfer states “I’m frankly surprised they haven’t fired him. If it were my paralegal who went off-site and was at an active rally like that, I’d fire her in a heartbeat. It’s off-duty conduct that besmirches what I do. I wouldn’t find a client who would be willing to hire me, and I don’t condone it in the first place.” I am all for freedom of speech, but there’s a huge difference between expressing your views civilly versus participating and marching in a violent rally joined by the KKK and Neo-Nazis. Free speech is not freedom from consequence at an institution of higher learning. So, it comes down to this: the university can take action, it just does not want to fire Peter. They have found a politically correct way to say ‘yea this sucks, and we can do something about it, but we don’t care enough to’. Nevada is an at-will state – in U.S. labor law, it means an employee can be dismissed by an employer for any reason (that is, without having to establish “just cause” for termination), and without warning. The university’s decision is beyond embarrassing, and scary for all current students who attend the school. The University of Nevada, Reno does not care about you. Sorry. To those who signed this petition, or to those reading who oppose their decision– here’s what you can do: 1) If you donate to the school, pull out your support. 2) If you are a current student, let the university hear you, be vocal. Suggest how they can better support you. Hold them accountable to it. Go to your local press. Be proactive and vigilant about what you will and will not stand for. I trust you do this already, but right now, it is especially important. Or better yet - switch to another school. Do not waste your money here. 3) Get in touch with people I've mentioned in this article. 4) Keep signing this petition. I am not taking it down (my latest update explains why). 5) All prospective students - Keep away from UNR! I promise you, you can do better. Keep spreading the word about this decision. And lastly, let this situation serve as a case study of a broader issue in America: privilege based on race and gender. Basically, you can be an outward Nazi-sympathizing white supremacist participating in world-condemned terrorism, and your all-white male superiors will still support you.
Petition to Q107 radio station
Stop the promotion and sponsorship of the Roger Waters performance in Toronto.
The man has become a bigot and Anti-Semite. his type does nothing to promote peace in the middle east and does more harm than good for the Palestinian people.
Petition to Hon. Yasir Naqvi
Hon. Yasir Naqvi -- Retract your consent for criminal proceedings against Kevin Johnston
Join the Ontario Civil Liberties Association (OCLA) in defending the civil rights of Ontario citizen Kevin Johnston. Please sign the petition. No one in Canada should be jailed or criminally prosecuted for thoughts, inferred attitudes or speech, in the absence of proven intention to have demonstrably caused actual harm to an identified person. Victimless crimes are antithetical to democracy. Supposed capability of inducing an emotional response (“hate”) in persons at large must never be the crux of a criminal prosecution. Section 319(2) (“Wilful promotion of hatred”) of the Criminal Code must be struck. OCLA The Ontario Civil Liberties Association vigorously advocates for authentic and unqualified freedom of expression of individuals, on all topics and in every form, in accordance with the right to free expression enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Civil rights and legal context The threats to civil liberties caused by the hate propaganda provisions (sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada affect all Canadians. The said sections define offences resulting in prison sentences of up to five years for speech that need not be proven to have caused physical or psychological harm to any person. The sections define crimes of expression in which the Crown is not required to prove that there was a victim, or that any person suffered actual harm. The said sections are applied at the discretion of the Government, since no proceeding can be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General. Thus, the use of such a proceeding as a political instrument is an inescapable feature of the law. The political nature of charges made under the said sections is evident. Powerful individuals calling for or condoning wars of aggression that are actually carried out are never charged. The accused typically are politically isolated ordinary bloggers and publicists, who express highly unpopular views that attract the political opportunism of influential lobby groups, or are social media pundits who have a following that can be politically exploited because of its minority views that repel a majority constituency. At the Government’s whim, the accused is confronted with the disproportionate legal resources of the Crown, and the investigative resources of the police – who will typically make a home-invasive seizure of all storage and communication equipment and agreements (mobile phones, computers, account statements, stored emails, books, etc.). The arrested individual must apply for bail release. If released from custody, bail conditions can include a partial or total gag-order about the proceedings and about the impugned expression. Prosecution of Kevin Johnston According to multiple media reports, the charges against Kevin Johnston are solely regarding section 319(2) of the Criminal Code. The social-media context is one where there are intense societal debates involving positions that can be characterized as “anti-Muslim” or “anti-Jewish” or “anti-freedom” and such. Mr. Johnston is on an “anti-Muslim” side of public expression. Section 319(2) has also been used against a blogger who was on an “anti-Jewish” or “anti-Israel” side (whose civil rights OCLA also defended). These topics are ones where there is a high potential for political use of the Criminal Code: either to placate influential lobbies or to exploit public sentiment about racism of opinion. OCLA urges the Attorney General not to use section 319(2), which could result in jailing a citizen for unpopular expressed views — clearly political views about multiculturalism and security. Instead, the government should trust a robust and wide-ranging societal debate to produce the best possible outcome, and trust the police and state prosecutors to pursue crimes having actual victims that have personally and demonstrably suffered actual harm beyond a threshold higher than the emotional-response realm. The Ontario Civil Liberties Association believes that the proceedings against Mr. Johnston are systemically political in nature and should not be consuming public, police, and judicial resources. We believe that the proceedings are harmful to Canadian society, in addition to being unacceptably unjust towards a citizen. We ask that the Attorney General retract his consent for the proceeding against Mr. Johnston, in the interest of preserving a just and democratic Canada.