government corruption

27 petitions

Update posted 1 day ago

Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, Justin Amash, Dave Brat, Jim Bridenstine, Michael Burgess, Jason Chaffetz, Curt Clawson, Ron DeSantis, Jeff Duncan, Scott Garrett, Chris Gibson, Louie Gohmert, Paul Gosar, Trey Gowdy, Morgan Griffith, Tim Huelskamp, Walter Jones, Jim Jordan, Raul Labrador, Cynthia Lummis, Ted Poe, Bill Posey, Thomas Massie, Tom McClintock, Mark Meadows, Mick Mulvaney, Reid Ribble, Dana Rohrabacher, Todd Rokita, Matt Salmon, Mark Sanford, David Schweikert, Jason Smith, MARLIN STUTZMAN, Greg Walden, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, Mitch McConnell, U.S. Senate, Brian Sandoval, Nevada State House, Nevada State Senate, Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Adam Laxalt, Gloria M. Navarro, David Vitter

Impeach Judge Gloria M. Navarro

We the People of the United States petition the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach Judge Gloria M. Navarro of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada for committing treason and collaborating in the insurrection against the Constitutional authority of the federal government pursuant to Article I Section 8 Clause 15, Article 3 Section 3 and Article 2 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2831 and 18 U.S. § Code 2383. Whereas Judge Navarro, at the direction of the FBI, BLM, and other federal agencies, is unlawfully detaining (Amendment VIII of the Bill of Rights & 18 U.S.C. § 3142), and has been for over nine months, prominent activists within the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom political movement for exercising their First Amendment protected rights—protesting against federal government overreach [the fact it had sold 9,000 acres of public land bordering Bundy Ranch and other people who own grazing rights to the division to a Communist Chinese energy firm represented by Rory Reid (Harry Reid's son), EMM, for $4.5 million, $34.1 million less than its value, and began rounding up the Bundy’s cattle and holding them in inhumane conditions … at least 60 purportedly suffering death or missing]—and, in order to suppress C4CF 's education of the People, they have been charged by the FBI for violating 18 U.S.C. § 371 - Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the United States; 18 U.S.C. § 372 - Conspiracy to Impede and Injure a Federal Officer; 18 U.S.C. § lll(a)(l) and (b) - Assault on a Federal Officer; 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(l)(B) - Threatening a Federal Law Enforcement Officer; 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) - Use and Carry of a Firearm in Relation to a Crime of Violence; 18 U.S.C. § 1503 - Obstruction of the Due Administration of Justice; 18 U.S.C. § 1951 - Interference with Interstate Commerce by Extortion; 18 U.S.C. § 1952 - Interstate Travel in Aid of Extortion; 18 U.S.C. § 2 - Aiding and Abetting. Among the political prisoners are Cliven, Ammon, Ryan and Mel Bundy, Peter Santilli (a journalist), Ryan Payne, Blaine Cooper, Eric Parker and Jerry DeLumus—all of whom provide C4CF with necessary influence. Whereas the discovery comprises substantial evidence proving the innocence of the defendants but is being concealed from the public at the order of Judge Navarro (in violation of Amendment VI of the Bill of Rights and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure). These prisoners have also been subjected to mistreatment by the FBI, U.S. Marshall Service and employees of the correctional facilities. Whereas Judge Navarro is consciously proceeding with falsified charges filed by the FBI against C4CF and refusing to grant motions to dismiss after learning that Sheriff Douglas Gillespie and many other local, state and federal officials ordered the BLM to return the cattle to the Bundy’s and withdraw from the land, and being presented with relevant laws [Article I Section 8 Clause 17 & Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Nevada Revised Statute 568.225] were presented to her by the defense. Whereas, after being ordered by Sheriff Gillespie to stand down, Special Agent Dan P. Love of the BLM continued to impede on the rights and jurisdiction of the People of Clark County and all People of Nevada unabated; Committing acts of aggression that should be considered attempts to seriously injure or even kill peaceful protesters, including tazing several individuals and using blunt force (some already challenged by physical disabilities)—an apparent result of its militarization. Sheriff Gillespie stated that "anyone who had been in policing would question their tactics." Whereas Judge Navarro is participating in a cover up of the suppression by the FBI (by way of COINTELPRO tactics) of the right to the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, peaceful assembly, and petition the Government for a redress of grievances. One of the main functions of government is to enforce contracts, and in this case not only is the government failing to enforce a contract but it is also the contractor, and have abridged their obligations in addition to preventing the contractee(s) [Cliven Bundy—We the People] from discharging our duties enumerated in Article I Section 8 Clause 15 & 16 of the U.S. Constitution & 10 U.S.C. § 311 and pursuant to Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Whereas Judge Navarro has proven herself unfit to be an impartial Federal Judge; Consistent to the extreme bias expressed by her assistance given to the federal government and its usurpation of power and by covering up the inhumane treatment of political activists who are being unlawfully detained for exercising their rights protected by the First Amendment to enforce the rule of law—to establish justice, insure domestic Tranquility, secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, guarantee a Republican Form of Government, and secure the right to life, liberty and property, as ordained by the Creator in the U.S. Constitution.

Matthew Deatherage
11,545 supporters
Update posted 2 days ago

Petition to Indiana State House, Department of Justice, Eric Holcomb, United States Supreme Court, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Human Rights Campaign, President of the United States

#MeToo victim, Re-Victimized by Mike Pence FAILURE OF DUTY and a Criminal conspiracy

My Name is Gary Jackson Sr and I am a Convicted Sex Offender in Indiana, and my "Victim" was RE VICTIMIZED by the [State] and Government Officials sworn to uphold our Laws and Constitution; who made a promise to her and Myself through a Plea Agreement, and then failed to uphold the promise. I am writing this petition to you today, so that we may clear up a matter with a Federal Court Civil case, which includes Criminal Conduct by the Indiana Government Officials named in the Federal Civil lawsuit. Mike Pence as former Indiana Governor and in his Personal capacity is named in this suit along with Eric Holcomb and several other (19) Individual Indiana Officials and (8) Offices or agencies. Bringing a total of (27) Defendants' (under 2 different 6/2017 amendments) and an additional amended 3rd complaint in 12/2017.                                     Available for viewing [1-16-cv-2551-WTL-MPB]   ***NOTICE***  ***Federal Court Website*** User acct. required - Official use only The Indiana Attorney Generals Office allowed Numerous violations of my Constitutional Rights to continue and even assisted in the violations, to cover up the Illegal, Unconstitutional and unethical conduct of parole Officials and other parties. The specific Deputy Attorney General who used his position to allow this and protect the Guilty Parties is Benjamin Legge, along with David Arthur assisted [Legge] as Co-Counsel and [Arthur] was also primary Counsel for the [Bleeke] Defendants of a previous case by another [S.O] for similar reasons.    This is in Regards to a Sex Offender who had a plea agreement and Indiana's Sex Offender Parole Conditions, which failed to be changed even after their [already known] Unconstitutional Conditions were taken to court by a previous Sex Offender. David Bleeke was a Previous Indiana Sex Offender Parolee who had taken his action to 4 different Court levels and won in all 4 Courts (although not on all claims); but nobody (Parole or Government Officials) changed the [Status Quo]. My Sexual Conviction involved my Bio-logical Daughter and it is something I regret Daily. My offense came about as an "Inappropriate" touch of her breast on the "Exterior" of her clothing. I explain this in such emphasis to help the Individuals reading this to better understand the details of the "Crime and Conviction". Every Sex Offense is Different, they are [Generally] perpetrated by a single Individual. Our Laws, Society and Judicial system has FAILED to understand how to "Fix" the problem. In fact, it's Growing at such a rapid rate and even including Celebrities, Politicians, National product spokespeople, Different athletic Coach's, School Officials and everybody down to the Man/Woman next door, or in my case, not even outside (the) home. Each "Crime" has it's own "Elements" that make it different than the others committed by the Individuals who was before and those After each others "Individual" Conviction or case. There is No One size fit's all. If were ever going to accept this as what it is, and try to "Cure" the "Individual" then ALL probation, parole, and Community Corrections conditions and Agency's; along with our Laws should be Tailored towards the "Individual" and ENFORCED as written. We have cases which are heinous, involve horrible acts by the "Individual Perpetrator", some are so heinous they involve Death. However, We also have cases which are far less severe and can be an "inappropriate" touch, urinating in public (Public Indecency), Jack and Jill crimes of "Lovers" of separate ages; some of those "Lovers" even go on to Marriage after their "Crime" and Conviction. Our Jail's and Prisons are overcrowded and mostly because of Unconstitutional Sex Offender Conditions. This Hurts the Public Because we have people Incarcerated who DON'T Truly pose a threat, (wasted tax dollars). Overcrowding which causes those who are a Danger to be released back into the public. Our Sex Offender Laws are all looked at as some Monster and extreme heinous acts were committed. I DO NOT say this to MINIMIZE ANYTHING. Our Probation, Community Corrections, and Parole "Standard Conditions" AUTOMATICALLY sets your "INDIVIDUAL" Conditions "STANDARD". Your the scum of the earth, and Parole takes it so much further; why, as Melissa Pine put it - my Parole agent for the 1st 10 Months of my 1 year term " They are the [STATE] and are Not controlled by the courts, but THE GOVERNOR OF INDIANA. My case as I said earlier involved my Daughter and an "Inappropriate Touch", there was no forcing, violence, threats, weapon, computer or Internet, and was not even outside the doors of my own home. I Signed a plea agreement which [allowed] "contact with Minor Relatives as long as it was supervised by another adult, and the minors parent(s) agreed in writing", ...... Further; it also"allowed contact with [victim] after she turned 16, as long as she agreed and Initiated the Contact". I was sentenced to 6 years [ 2 yrs Comm Corrections, 4 yrs Probation], I completed my CC time and was then placed on probation. I had several probation violations which mainly stemmed from Financial issues and the Court Ordered classes at ICC [Indianapolis Counseling Center] which required payment "at time of service". These classes can range as high as $50 per session and can be at least once if not more, times per week. If you fail to have payment in full; you were denied entry, (at one point in time I was a dollar short). When these circumstances arise and you are denied entry, It is considered "an unexcused absence" even though you showed up and had money, but not full payment. (Marion Cty. Probation failed to Intervene)  After you received 2 U.A at ICC, you were terminated or suspended from class. This causes a Probation Violation for being removed from class or having an unexcused absence.  I Violated my Probation and was eventually sent to the IDOC [Indiana Dept Of Corrections] for 2 years and had probation revoked. I spent 9 months in New Castle Indiana IDOC facility, I was Court approved to spend the remaining 3 months of my (50% 2 days credit) Sentence in the IDOC CTP [Community Transition Program] (2yr sentence = 1 prison + 1 parole). I completed the program and on July 12th 2016 I was placed on Parole (for my last remaining year of my IDOC sentence), at the 30th St. Indianapolis Parole District 3. Indiana's Parole Scheme is Mandatory, and along with several other States, has very HARSH and Unconstitutional conditions for Sex Offenders. The rules are put in place in Indiana on a ‘standardized’ form 49108, in violation of I.C 11-13-3-4 , I.C 4-22-2 and without Due Process as required by Law and the U.S. Constitution. Sex Offender Parolees are REQUIRED to sign [under duress] and "Agree" to abide by all the "Standard" Conditions. Many of these Conditions restrict contact with ALL MINORS, regardless of the "Individuals" offense, personal circumstance, history or "Element" of their Crime. These Conditions go as far as keeping family away from each other, not even being allowed pictures of "minor" family members even after the [minor] becoming a grown adult; not being able to talk on the phone, write a letter, buy a gift, or have any "3rd Party" contact - Meaning a child, whose been in the life for 3 yrs of the "Sex Offender Parolee", After the Conviction, can have NO CONTACT with that [S.O], This Further destroys lives, and it did.  This Clearly Amounts to "Cruel and Unusual Punishment", Torture; especially KNOWING "that the Parolee had a history of Mental Illness and was a substantial suicide risk". The [State] said in their  by (Filipow) M.C.P.O, Deputy Prosecutor: “The State would not object to enforcement of the terms of the plea agreement to the extent the Defendant was placed back on probation for supervision;…” and [Gary] had previously said in an email to [Legge] and [Arthur] “all we really want is what he bargained for in his plea agreement”. [Arthur] during his Arguments in front of the Indiana Supreme Ct. (David Bleeke v. State of Indiana, (12-5-2013) 02S05-1305-PL-00364) was directly asked about a “liberty interest” by Justice Rucker @ 23;00 (watch the oral argument video webcast at and [Arthur] agreed that parole and probation are Identical concerning that Liberty Interest, then again @ 28:00 Justice David went back to clarify with [Arthur] and asked “Is it your position that [his] Rights are the same had he been under Probation from a Court or terms and Conditions of parole” [Arthur] emphatically stated “Yes, Yes, No Different”.  Going further Justice David @ 30:57 asked specifically about parole automatically imposing conditions which should not apply to that person and referencing an analogy that (a parolee is released from prison with the automatic conditions, not allowing contact with children and being subject to immediate violation if children are present to pick a parolee up, just being released from prison, without being able to challenge those conditions – David Arthur replied “that was the situation at the time, that’s under review right now because of this case”. This never changed and [Arthur] knew it and (he) stood by and allowed parole and [Legge] to continue violating my Rights and my plea agreement all to allow parole to maintain [their] Unconstitutional conduct, using Illegal and Unethical conduct to keep the Status Quo. This is in every since of the words = OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE Further, these conditions restrict "Sex Offender Parolee's" [but not other parolees] from going to Public venues, locations, malls, sporting events or many other type of [COMMUNITY or Public access]. These Conditions "Restrict" and "Hinder" the very purpose of parole "To Successfully Reintegrate the parolee into SOCIETY", the exact opposite of what Indiana Parole does. This IS an "Equal Protection claim". A Murderer can walk our streets freely without restrictions, but a [S.O] cannot. The public is led to "Believe" law enforcement will protect against terror but not a [S.O]? If they gave the [S.O] Due process they would know "Exactly" who and what to restrict them from doing or going to. I.C. § 11-13-3-4 states in particular   “Sec. 4. (a) A condition to remaining on parole is that the parolee not commit a crime during the period of parole. (b) The parole board may also adopt, under IC 4-22-2, additional conditions to remaining on parole and require a parolee to satisfy one (1) or more of these conditions.  These conditions must be reasonably related to the parolee's successful reintegration into the community and not unduly restrictive of a fundamental right.” I.C 4-22-2 requires the Parole Board to publish notice of the proposed parole conditions in the Indiana Register, hold a public hearing, receive and respond to public comments, submit a final version to the Attorney General of Indiana and the Governor of Indiana for approval, and then submit the approved version for publication in the Indiana Administrative Code. NONE OF THIS HAS BEEN DONE OR FOLLOWED BY THE STATE OFFICIALS When David Bleeke sued the Indiana Parole Officials in Federal Court Northern Indiana - The Court stated that the "Parole Board had a constitutional obligation to provide some procedural safeguard allowing for an individualized determination . . . . . before imposing . . .  parole conditions,”. Id. at *13.  Bleeke v. Server, 2010 WL 299148 at *1 (N.D. Ind. January 19, 2010)(Quoted from Ind Sup. Ct. Opinion) (IND Supreme Court, 02S05-1305-PL-364 Bleeke v. Lemmon 2014.) The Indiana Supreme Court even commented in their response to the [States] Appeal from the Allen Superior Court giving [Bleeke] an Injunction because [Bleeke] was being restricted from his Wife and Children. “Certainly the Parole Board, by virtue of having control over offenders about to be released to parole, may be fully capable of developing individualized assessments for each parolee prior to imposing any parole conditions. And it may be more efficient, long-term, for such determinations to be made up front rather than waiting for them to be judicially ordered as a consequence of a legal challenge.” (IND Supreme Court, 02S05-1305-PL-364 Bleeke v. Lemmon 2014.) “When the State takes a person into its custody and holds him there against his will, the Constitution imposes upon it a corresponding duty to assume some responsibility for his safety and general well-being” . . . . . “it is the State's affirmative act of restraining the individual's freedom to act on his own behalf -- through incarceration, institutionalization, or other similar restraint of personal liberty -- which is the "deprivation of liberty" triggering the protections of the Due Process Clause, . . . . Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services 489 U.S. 189 (1989)       Also see: Bowers v. De Vito, 686F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982) "During the past 60 years, the practice of releasing prisoners on parole before the end of their sentences has become an integral part of the penological system. …. Rather than being an ad hoc exercise of clemency, parole is an established variation on imprisonment of convicted criminals. Its purpose is to help individuals reintegrate into society as constructive individuals as soon as they are able, without being confined for the full term of the sentence imposed. (quoting Morrissey v. Brewer) (Bold emphasis added) As MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN has written.., "this Court now has rejected the concept that constitutional rights turn upon whether a governmental benefit is characterized as a 'right' or as a 'privilege.'" Graham v. Richardson, 403 U. S. 365, 403 U. S. 374 (1971). Whether any procedural protections are due depends on the extent to which an individual will be "condemned to suffer grievous loss." Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U. S. 123, 341 U. S. 168 (191) (Frankfurter, J., concurring), quoted in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U. S. 254, 397 U. S. 263 (1970). The question is not merely the "weight" of the individual's interest, but whether the nature of the interest is one within the contemplation of the "liberty or property" language of the Fourteenth Amendment. Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U. S. 67 (172).  (Quoting Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471) (1972), “Procedural due process imposes constraints on governmental decisions which deprive individuals of ‘liberty’ or ‘property’ interests within the meaning of the Due Process Clause[.]” Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332 (1976). “The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity be heard ‘at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.’” Id. at 333. The essence of due process is the requirement that ‘a person in jeopardy of serious loss (be given) notice of the case against him and opportunity to meet it.’” Mathews, 424 U.S. at 348, quoting Joint Anti-Fascist Comm. v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123, 171-172 (1951) (Frankfurter, J., concurring). Due process also requires that, following the hearing, the decision maker must issue a written statement as to the evidence relied upon and the reasons for the determination. See, e.g., Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 489. “When protected interests are implicated, the right to some kind of prior hearing is paramount.” Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-570 (1972).  These Court Rulings, Ind Code and Laws, and Federal Laws set "Clearly Established Rights" to Due Process and the [State] Fails to abide and tries to shield themselves under the 11th Amendment. However, these ARE "Clearly Established Rights to Due Process". The Indianapolis Division Federal District Court has allowed these Individuals to get by with this behavior, even after all the cited cases and court decisions, even citing criminal conduct which was even listed in the Court Documents, Which was perpetrated by the Government; and the fact of me being a "Sex Offender" and "Pro Se" and the "Cover up" because I was suing Mike Pence for "Deliberate Indifference" for failing to make parole change their actions AFTER he Settled the [Bleeke] lawsuit. Remember I.C 4-22-2 gives the Governor of Indiana the FINAL APPROVAL of Parole Conditions - Not the Parole Board. A right is clearly established when it is defined clearly enough to put officers on notice of their duties under the circumstances they confront. See Hope v. Pelzer, 536 U.S. 730, 739 (2002) (“For a constitutional right to be clearly established, its contours must be sufficiently clear that a reasonable official would understand that what he is doing violates that right.”) (quotation omitted).This does not require a prior case “directly on point, but existing precedent must have placed the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate.” Ashcroft v. al‐Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 741 (2011). For 3 years prior to Gary going on parole he was allowed contact with his minor relatives, just as the plea agreement stated. This even happened when Probation and CC had the same or similar "Standard" conditions like Parole; Probation and CC chose to follow the plea agreement because they were required to, just as the Court was required and the [State] being required to abide. (Becker v. State 992 N.E.2d 697 In Sup. Ct. (2013)  Citing "Criminal cases are prosecuted in the name of the “State of Indiana.” But as Shakespeare famously asked, “What's in a name? that which we call a rose/By any other name would smell as sweet.”[1] Gertrude Stein's answer was that “Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose.”[2] Similarly, we conclude that in this matter related to the sex offender registry, “the State is the State,” whether it acts through a deputy prosecutor or through the Department of Correction. Both entities share the same substantial interest—to maximize an offender's *699 registration obligations—and are therefore in privity with each other in cases involving that interest. Accordingly, we hold that when the State (via a local prosecutor) fails to appeal an adverse sex-offender registration ruling, the State (via the DOC) becomes bound by it under principles of res judicata. [1] William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet act 2, sc. 2.[2] Gertrude Stein, Sacred Emily, in Geography and Plays 178, 187 (1922). Parole was required to follow those same terms of the plea agreement but refused. Not just because they are a [State] Agency, but because they are in "Privy with each other", BECAUSE "the local prosecutor had the same interest in mind; that being - to protect the community and another relative from becoming a victim. see (Becker v. State 992 N.E.2d 697 In Sup. Ct. (2013)  “[A] ‘privy’ is one who after rendition of [a] judgment has acquired an interest *701 in the subject matter affected by the judgment,” or “whose interests are represented by a party to the action.” MicroVote Gen. Corp. v. Ind. Election Comm'n, 924 N.E.2d 184, 196 (Ind.Ct.App.2010). “[A]n entity does not have to control a prior action ... for privity to exist.” Id.Quoting (Becker v. State 992 N.E.2d 697 In Sup. Ct. (2013)  Parole refused to follow my plea agreement, Why? Because I was a "Sex Offender Parolee", Not because I posed a "Threat". I screwed up yes, but that was a stupid, selfish, Intoxicated moment; but that's not who I am. And the Prosecutor and Judge seen that, in the beginning, which is why I had these terms in my plea agreement in the first place; and NOTHING had changed from the time of my conviction to the time I was placed on parole; other than "Probation violation" mainly for Monetary reasons. This Destroyed lives, not just mine. This effected friends, family members, and quite frankly I believe it Destroyed my 3 Dogs lives and when I say this I mean Literally. In Jan 2017 Heidi, our Rot of 12 years and the sweetest thing, was drinking water one day, everything was normal, playful; all of a sudden she fail to the floor into a seizure. We rushed her to er vet and she kept getting worse and more seizures, and then the bloating. We had to make the decision to put her down, she was everybody's friend and the little dogs loved her. Next, around late March to April, our cheweenie (Precious) was forgotten outside when I left for work, the little thing got out of the yard and was hit by numerous cars; [terrible site]. Lastly was Dolly, we had her about 14 yrs and she just got old and really depressed after the other two were gone. We had to put her down in late June/July. May they all 3 Rest in Peace. It just goes to show life can change in a moments notice. I have 9 Grandchildren and that 1 year I was away was extremely hard on the entire family, kids don't understand why they can no longer go to Mamaw and Papa's. They grew up quick in that year also, so a lot was missed. While I was in prison my [Daughter] "victim" made contact with me after she turned 18 yrs old in November of 2015. She had previously wanted contact with me after she turned 16 but she was forbidden by her Bio-logical Mother. She contacted me sometime around the Christmas Holiday of 2015. She made this contact through the IDOC New Castle J-Pay [email] service, we sent emails back and forth and I apologized and did the best I could to explain,.. WHY?     We talked a few times on the phone during my stay in prison, she came up to see me as a [surprise] when I was to be released into the IDOC CTP on April 14th 2016. I was immediately returned back to IDOC due to conflicts of my Home Address and "Plea Agreement" issue's. The IDOC CTP Marion Cty. CC had no clue what was going on and sent me back to prison. I had to go back through an entirely New Intake process at IDOC RDC before being returned back to New Castle Facility. My Daughter returned home before I was re-released a week later back into IDOC CTP MCCC. My Daughter and I spoke on the phone a few times during my time on CTP (3 Months), Once was even an all night appx 3 1/2 - 4 Hr long phone call. We were planning to meet in person, but my time to go on parole was nearing and I began contacting them prior to my Start date about my Plea agreement. Parole refused to abide by the Plea agreement, I protested, sent a letter to the parole board, filed a lawsuit, asked to have my plea revoked and then asked to have it enforced. Everything was denied. My Daughter and I lost that contact and I have never been able to get it back. These Parole conditions Destroyed my Family and the Re-building of a Father - Daughter Relationship. I filed a civil lawsuit in September 2016 and asked for an injunction, it was denied; the Attorney Generals Office said I was a "threat" and parole "needed to protect the Community". There were NEVER any allegations, behavior or anything to support this claim, but the Court sided with the [State], (res judicata Becker v. State). When I filed for my Plea agreement to be "Enforced" on parole in the Criminal Court, the Judge [Grant Hawkins M.C.S.C (5)] told the [State] to respond within 30 days. The [State] responded by the Original Marion County Deputy Prosecutor Elizabeth Filipow and Benjamin Legge entered his appearance and Motion to Intervene for IDOC, (Res Judicata) Judge Grant Hawkins (M.C.S.C 5) who has already been previously reprimanded PUBLICLY; DENIED the Motion without any reason given. (Due Process101) Further Mr. Legge nor the State by Filipow EVER said I was a "Threat" or the need of "Protecting the Community" as [Legge] had argued in the Civil case. Further, [Legge] trying to "Intervene" in [Gary's] Motion to Enforce his plea; was completely against more case law, Because; “An intervenor is treated as if it was an original party and has equal standing with the parties.” Mercantile Nat. Bank of Ind. v. Teamsters Union Local No. 142 Pension Fund, 668 N.E.2d 1269, 1271 (Ind.Ct.App.1996). But that means that intervenors, just as any other party, are “not permitted to re-litigate matters already determined in the case,” and are bound “to all prior orders and judgments in the case.”(Becker v. State) I asked the Federal Court (Judge Lawrence) to correct his ruling and allow monetary damages in Feb, 2017 since I had named the Defendant's "Individually" and in their Official Capacity. (Pro Se Complaint's are to be construed "Liberally") Motion Denied. Motioned for Expedited discovery: Motion Denied, (2) Motions to Amend: Denied, Motion for Sanctions for unethical conduct and abuse of a Motion: Motion Denied, (2) Motions for Recusal: Motions Denied. The Federal Court helped to Cover up this Case and Closed Judgment in the [Defendants] Favor (ie. The Government) on November 17th 2017. Ironically, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission closed my complaint on 5 Individuals (Judge Hawkins, Legge, Filipow, Arthur, Zoellor) on this same date. The Federal Court Judge William T. Lawrence continually allowed Constitutional violations and Conduct by the Attorney Generals Office which was Criminal in nature and also has been disclosed by the Plaintiff (Gary=Pro Se) in the Court Documents. After Continually allowing delay after delay to the [Defendants], even one to "Extend the deadline for Dis-positive (ie. Dispose) Motions for 14 Days" because "[Legge's] wife had a new baby". Certainly this Baby had been coming for 9 months, it was not a surprise. The Original Dis-positive Deadline was set for July 5th 2017; and [Legge] had even discussed the deadline AND [Gary's] Parole release date during the Status conference in May 2017. Benjamin Legge asked for this extension only to have a claim to "Dispose" of the case. The Proof is in the details, There was an original date to file motions to "Dispose" of the case by July 5th 2017, However; [Gary] was being released from parole on July 12th 2017; so a 14 Days extension gives you July 19th 2017. In which [Legge] proceeded to make the claim that the case should be dismissed because [Gary] was no longer on parole. The Defendants' NEVER even Commented or Objected to the (2) Motions to amend. But yet the Judge Granted their request for Summary Judgment and denied the Plaintiff's Objection and Motions to Amend (which again is to be construed "Liberally" and in a Motion for Summary Judgment (In reviewing a motion for summary judgment, a court must view the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party). [Gary] Fought in State Court and Federal Ct and the Government tried to hide it all because it was a huge case and very damaging to a lot of Officials, including Mike Pence, and would put Several people in Prison. The Fed. Ct. even ran a "fake news" story on Fox 59 about "Clogged Court Dockets" after [Gary] had left a voicemail for the Court Deputy telling her if Judge Lawrence did not hurry up and make a decision or set a hearing date(as was requested in a Motion); Gary was filing a Writ of Mandamus with the 7th Circuit. 2 days later; and the day following the deadline expiration [Gary] had given the Ct Deputy is [Ironically] when the Story went On Fox 59. Mike Pence had a relative Nicole Pence who worked for Fox 59, and one of the other Lead Defendants, [Bruce Lemmon] (possibly) has a relative working in the Att. Generals office directly with MR. [Legge] and [Arthur] in the same [Civil Rights Division] that being Jennifer E. Lemmon. The Original Victim to this "Crime" of mine, is now out there lost and on Drugs. Help Stop this abuse of power and Bring these Individuals to Justice. [Gary] now must move for PCR since his Plea agreement was denied to be revoked AND denied enforcement - WITHOUT ANY REASONS GIVEN. Due Process101 - See also (Santobello v Newyork) Where the "plea bargain" is not kept by the prosecutor, …..the state court will decide in light of the circumstances of each case whether due process requires             (a) that there be specific performance of the plea bargain or (b) that the defendant be given the option to go to trial on the original charges. One alternative may do justice in one case, and the other in a different case. In choosing a remedy, however a court ought to accord a defendant's preference considerable, if not controlling, weight inasmuch as the fundamental rights flouted by a prosecutor's breach of a plea bargain are those of the defendant, not of the state. (Santobello v. New York) To Finalize this I want to say I miss my Daughter and the [State Officials] destroyed what we had started. On Jan 26, 2017 and email was sent to Benjamin Legge and David Arthur and it said "we are offering to drop our suit if we can come to some common ground and reach an agreement in how things will be from here on out". . . . [Gary] is on parole for another 5 1/2 Months and all we really want is what he bargained for in his plea agreement" They Refused to give Justice and chose to fight this battle and use unethical, Illegal conduct. And to Silence me from the demand for Justice, they put me in Contact with a U.S. Marshall Garrett Hawk (USMS) and would not treat my case PROPERLY or give JUSTICE. PLEASE HELP OUR CAUSE AND HELP US RECEIVE JUSTICE, WE HAVE FILED AN FRCP 59 & 60 MOTION WITH THE COURT (12-2017) WE HAVE ALSO FILED A 3rd AMENDED COMPLAINT (12-2017) Please make sure the Courts and Government Officials do their job properly. The Followings links below are for our Organization and help Support Equality!  Civil Rights Orginization Support

Sex Offender and Minority Civil Rights Organization
130 supporters
Update posted 3 weeks ago

Petition to Gary Herbert, Utah State House, Utah State Senate, Wayne Niederhauser, Gregory Hughes, Rob Bishop, Chris Stewart, Todd Weiler, Allen Christensen, Curtis Bramble, Brian King, Daniel Thatcher, Angela Romero, Evan Vickers, Howard Stephenson, J. Stuart Adams, Patrice Arent, Bradley Last, Jeremy Peterson, Jerry Stevenson, Val Peterson

Say NO to dumping toxic coal ash, lead and mercury on the Great Salt Lake!

An east coast corporation is seeking a Class V permit to dump out-of-state toxic coal ash at the tip of the Promontory Point peninsula - putting one of the nation’s largest industrial waste collections in the center of the Great Salt Lake and next to the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge and active fault lines. Coal ash, also referred to as coal combustion residuals or CCR, is produced primarily from the burning of coal in coal-fired power plants. Coal ash contains contaminants like mercury, lead, cadmium, selenium and arsenic and is considered to be hazardous. These contaminants can pollute waterways, ground water, drinking water and the air. If approved, this east coast corporation will have created one of the nation’s largest industrial waste landfills - putting humans and animals at risk. Millions of Birds at Risk The proposed coal ash dump is less than 20 miles from the Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge and the Ogden Waterfowl Management Area, and it lies directly on the migratory path of millions of birds consisting of more than 250 species, including such species as the bald eagle, white-faced ibis, american white pelican, snowy plover, black-necked stilt, cinnamon teal and tundra swan. The Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge contains nearly 80,000 acres of marsh, open water, uplands, and alkali mudflats. The concentrated pollutants in coal ash, such as lead, mercury, arsenic, chromium and selenium, cause fatal deformities in birds nesting and feeding near CCR landfills and polluted waters. Purity of Fresh Water Supply at Risk When you combine one of the largest municipal solid waste landfills with some of the largest bird habitats in the nation, you get double trouble for the drinking water supply of nearby residents. Birds, especially gulls, feeding on decomposing waste deposit very high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus into nearby streams, rivers, wetlands, lakes and reservoirs when they defecate into the water. This results in eutrophication, a leading cause of damage to freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems. Among the results are noxious toxins (e.g., microcystin and anatoxin-a; Chorus and Bartram 1999). Associated algal blooms (HABs) have been linked with degradation of water quality (Francis 1878),  destruction of economically important fisheries (Burkholder et al. 1992) and (3) public health risks (Morris 1999). There is a whole industry related to landfill bird deterrent methods and products, as landfills attract birds. It is simply unacceptable to build a landfill of this size where these birds are already nesting! A Ticking Earthquake Time Bomb Making matters worse, the proposed toxic coal ash dump is located next to active fault lines. Over 25 earthquakes have hit within 70 miles radius in recent history, including one 13 miles NW of the dump and another 19 miles NE. Astonishingly, no significant earthquake study has been done related to the toxic coal ash landfill and the risks of being located so close to fault lines. Like with many other environmental concerns, the east coast corporation that stands to profit from the toxic coal ash dumping is denying any risk. They stated, “The landfill’s geologic and hydrogeological setting is appropriate for developing a landfill because there are no major geologic hazards (active faults or subsidence areas)...” despite the proximity of known faults. Join the fight. Take Action. Sign our petition to keep toxic coal ash from being dumped at the shores of the Great Salt Lake and near millions of birds. Submit a comment to the Governor of Utah and the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) related to the lack of comprehensive environmental and geological studies that have been conducted for the proposed dump.Comments to DEQ should be emailed to and include the subject line: “Promontory Point Landfill”. Share this petition with friends and families who are concerned about protecting the Great Salt Lake, Utah’s water supply and the millions of protected birds that call the shores of Great Salt Lake home.

The Great Salt Lake
4,858 supporters
Update posted 2 months ago

Petition to John Cornyn, Michael Burgess, Royce West, U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, Greg Abbott, Steve Chabot, Steve Knight, AT&T, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, The Walt Disney Company, CVS Pharmacy, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Boeing, Cory Booker, John Lewis, Mark Zuckerberg

Black owned Company not allowed Access to Government and Regulatory Fairness Hearing.

The reason for this petition is to disclose Breach of Contract and Good Faith Effort violations, fraud, corruption, cover-up and terrorist attacks against emancipated blacks using the 13th Amendment, regarding the federal government excluding 100% black owned companies in the SBA 8(a) certification program and Small Business Disadvantage Subcontracting Plan 5% goal, procurement (By race) for socioeconomic and disadvantage minorities who have encountered discrimination, exclusion and racial bias.  Our request for Regulatory Fairness Hearing would be recorded and delivered to Congress for Breach of Contract and failure to show Good Faith Effort hearing, why is the government blocking our right for this hearing to disclose government agencies, politicians, prime contractors, and institutions refusal to enforce laws, regulations, policies and procedures to include qualified emancipated 100% black owned companies based on our merits. Based on (Racial Consciousness), we are the black people affected by the 13th Amendment due to the War Powers Act regarding emancipated property to prevent human property being returned to their plantation owners.  Third generation born free Americans from plantations not The Land of The Free, SBA refusal to process our 8(a) application filed in 2014 and denied access (By SBA, politicians, government agencies, prime contractors and institutions) to participate in the federal government SBA 8(a) certification program and Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal (By race), based on our merits not a handout. Our registration filed by NAICS Codes to participate in the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal verified in the federal government SAM database.  We qualify and followed all the laws, rules, policies  and  procedures, and discovered the laws, rules, policies and procedures do not apply to emancipated blacks.  We must deal with the terrorist actions of the Sons and Daughters of the Confederacy and persons loyal to the cause everyday, this is our history its not shared by every black person in this country, "Hidden Figures" continues regarding the government concealing the truth about our experience and history from the public.  Where do we find Greatness in this America? Non-minorities, Asian and persons U. S. first generation Americans after two years of becoming an U. S. citizen, born in a country from the African continent  using loopholes to receive government contracts as (African American) on federal government SBA 8(a) certification program and federal government contracting and subcontracting under the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal (By race), while billions in federal government contracts are denied emancipated blacks using the 13th Amendment against  the only black people in this country who can be treated as slaves denied rights and protection from the federal government.  Federal government contract managers use the (African American) loophole to cover-up contract awards for persons described as (African American) are not all black people. July 20, 2017 AT&T Services Inc. sent overnight letter regarding response for Randall L. Stephenson, CEO AT&T Inc. regarding EEO discrimination complaint.  Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC is a Master Re-seller/Platinum Solution Provider for AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobile,  Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC sent Randall L. Stephenson CEO AT&T Inc. notice of Breach of Contract and violation of Good Faith Effort on federal government Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal excluding emancipated 100% black owned re-sellers.  Randall L. Stephenson, CEO AT&T Inc. changed the subject to an EEO employment discrimination complaint using AT&T Services Inc. sent an UPS Express Envelope, containing a letter copy (Missing the original letter, misspelled our company name, contact person and address in violation of our contract agreement) signed by Derek Zamagni Lead Consultant, EEO representing  AT&T Services Inc, San Antonio, TX.   The letter was not sent from AT&T Inc authorized personnel regarding Breach of Contract and Good Faith Effort violations of the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal. SBA, politicians, government agencies, prime contractors and institutions in defiance of Small Business Disadvantage Subcontracting 5% goal under the Individual Subcontracting Plan, exclude based on their merits qualified 100% black owned disadvantage companies who have encountered discrimination, exclusion, and racial bias pursuant to Title 48 CFR 52.219-8, Title 48 CFR 52.219-9, and Executive Order 13170. Major corporations in the late 70's created and annually fund Minority Business Development Councils (MBDC) in every state in defiance and violation of Public Law 95-507, to prevent 100% black owned companies (owned by emancipated blacks) from participating in federal government subcontracting.  (MBDC) certification is not necessary to receive subcontracts from federal government Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal from prime contractors, the federal government SAM database can be used to authenticate minority status as valid.  Corporations, institutions, state and federal government agencies refuse to use the SAM database to search for qualified 100% black owned companies, this is a violation of Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal for authentication of a qualified minority.  This is Breach of Contract and failure to show Good Faith Effort. SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) blocked our complaint number 20160007, blocking FOIA request case SBA-2016-000155 by changing the name of our company on our complaint, SBA Ombudsman blocked our complaint number 1412110001 by altering our complaint number to stop investigation, Texas Senator Cornyn and Congressman Burgess refusal to represent the owners of Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC and blocking our request for Regulatory Fairness  Hearing.  The Regulatory Fairness Hearing would disclose the truth in this matter before congress, they don't want this to happen. The owners of Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC denied Due Process by prime contractor corporations taking and keeping billions from qualified based on merits emancipated black owned companies using Diversity Programs, false eSRS reports, Politicians creating State minority procurement programs in defiance of federal government Small Business Disadvantage Subcontracting 5% goal using programs like Texas HUB program.  Scam, SBA using Treasury to threaten to use (TCS Treas. 449) to cover -up 2014 fraud refusing to process our application in the 8(a) program filed by Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC and its owners.  Treasury using false claim of debt for 2014 and 2015.  SBA wants to create a false Levy against the owners of Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC without records using Holtsville, NY and Cincinnati, OH and without form 566 and denied Appeals Review from Memphis, TN our processing center, the only center with access to our records. Discrimination, Facebook blocking the truth from reaching the public.  Three (3) times in February 2018, Facebook conspiring with SBA to disable our verified account page @celesp2 processed on Facebook. Facebook accepted funds for an Ad on this account then proceeded to disable and unpublished our account.  SBA using Facebook to cover-up discrimination against qualified black IT, Telecom companies registered by NAICS Codes and registered in SAM database seeking contracting pursuant to the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal.  This is the Black History we deal with everyday, its not a movie! SBA using false SSDD with assistance from State and Federal agencies blacklisting Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC from receiving government contracts, SBA hiring GP&M to delete our information and existence in the federal government SAM database, SBA awarding disadvantage Subcontracting 5% goal to Non-Minorities, minorities not listed on SAM database and false Score Card reporting the contracts awarded to all categories by race.  SBA also awarding contracts to people with connections not certifications in the industry they receive awards, supported by their resume including Office Supply Companies and recruiting companies in violation of NAICS Codes filed in the SAM database.  These companies are awarded cyber security, programming, provisioning, maintenance support and more then outsource the contract to non-minority companies, SBA cover-up this practice.  SBA Pay-to-Play program awarding 8(a) contracts to minorities not registered on 8(a) and receiving billions in contracts annually on the program for over 17 years when 8(a) participation is a maximum nine (9) year program. The following is a small sample of the cover-up, terrorist attacks, and threats against Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC and its emancipated owners attempt to participate in government programs in America.  We are denied participation in the federal government 8(a) program and  subcontracting 5% goal created by law for us to receive prime contractor and subcontracting opportunities due to discrimination, exclusion and racial bias,  We are Third Generation Born Free Americans, there will always be a Candie Land (Candy Land) mentality keeping us in our place: Emancipated black constituents denied representation, 1.5 years Texas Senator John Cornyn and Congressman Michael C Burgess refusal to represent black constituents regarding General Privacy Release Form affidavit filed requesting their assistance in this matter.  Small Business Administration (SBA) cover-up hiring GP&M to alter and delete our records in federal government System for Award Management (SAM) database to blacklist our company and stop congressional investigation. 3.5 years the emancipated black owners of Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC following all the procedures and policies denied processing our application in federal government 8(a) program, and denied participation as prime contractor and subcontracting  pursuant to the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal filing required  by prime contractors on every contract let by the federal government.  All prime contractors must attempt to show Good Faith Effort to include minorities by race denied contract participation due to discrimination, exclusion and racial bias are provided the opportunity to participate as subcontractors in all contracts based on their merits to meet requirement of the contract, details on twitter @celesp22. Based on our merits we have provided subcontracting work on the NMCI Contract for the military in 16 states, providing over 1,600 Ethernet installations Fiber Optic and copper, site surveys, drafting updates and network support. Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC an authorized re-seller for AT&T, Dell, HP and HPE and others. We are Rapid Gate authorized to enter military bases nationwide.  SBA 8(a) program managers refuse to process our application filed early 2014, they removed our Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) from the decision process.   Please sign to demand that the Small Business Administration (SBA) and Congress provide equal rights to qualified emancipated 100% black companies,  receive representation by Texas Senator John Cornyn and Congressman Michael C. Burgess, to have the right to process our 2014, SBA 8(a) application, Access the Government and Regulatory Fairness Hearing regarding Breach of Contract and Good Faith Effort, participate in federal contracts for products and services provided by AT&T, Dell, HP and HPE, purchased by the federal government every day, not from us. The federal government does not purchase a single product or service from emancipated 100% black owned qualified AT&T re-sellers, AT&T outsource its contracts to the top 100 government IT Companies excluding black owners with the statement “Not on boarding at this time”, placing black companies on their EEO Supplier Diversity database.  Diversity has nothing to do with the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal for the inclusion of qualified emancipated black companies, this is "Breach of Contract" and failure to show "Good Faith Effort” requirements for prime contractor compliance on all contracts they receive for the life of the contract.  We want contracts not seeking 1099 employment.  If you register on a prime contractor supplier diversity database you waive your right to participate in their federal government subcontracting 5% goal, you are allowing the prime contractor to bypass the federal government SAM database to find subcontractors for compliance with the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal participation (By race).  This is "Breach of Contract" with their federal government contract and failure to show "Good Faith Effort".  Prime contractors based on their false eSRS they use the (SSDD) created by the (SST) to violate your rights for federal government Subcontracting Plan including Executive Order 13170, taking and keeping billions from qualified 100% black owned companies. SBA hired GP&M to alter and delete information in our account with SAM database to delete our existence, GP&M changed spelling of our company name, contacts, address, Google listing, Altered information with U.S. Postal Service, Texas business registration, Our insurance agent Blackburn Insurance altered our coverage policy identifying our company NAICS Code as an auto cleaning company located at a different business address, The Hartford Ins. sent us a check for fire claim at our correct business address, we never filed a claim with The Hartford Ins., their goal was to find us guilty of insurance fraud.  SBA wanted to use this to stop our right to participate in federal government subcontracting.  SBA, used our hosting account with eHost (India owned company) taking down our website, SBA blocked processing our SBA 8(a) application, SBA Office of Inspector General (OIG) blocked investigation by changing the name of our company on the complaint and SBA Ombudsman blocked an investigation by changing the case number on our complaint.  Working with SBA and GP&M AT&T, Dell, HP and HPE submit false eSRS to the federal government stating they cannot find qualified black companies for subcontracting and SBA use this eSRS to submit false SSDD to instruct contract managers to exclude blacks from subcontracting on federal government contracts.  The Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS), Source Selection Decision Document (SSDD) and Source Selection Team (SST) are protected from Freedom of Information request. Why is there a loophole in the federal government subcontracting program allowing the contract Source Selection Team (SST) operate in secret their names and qualifications to sit on the committee hidden, with the power to decide which companies by race can participate in federal government Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal?  Who are these people and what organizations are they members of? Why are they allowed to exclude emancipated 100% black owned IT, Telecom companies and other industries participation in federal government contracting? How many are Sons and Daughters  of the Confederacy or loyalist to the cause enforcing the 13th Amendment against emancipated blacks? There will always be a Candie Land (Candy Land) mentality holding back the progress of emancipated blacks. Texas State Sen. Royce West, staff Richard Dominquez and AT&T Marcus Montemayor blocked our purchase order received from Texas Parks and Wildlife for mobile phone service, support, Internet, VoIP, network support, and blocked our contract talks with Disney World, and CVS Health talks to provide AT&T services for new CVS Target Pharmacy. AT&T threaten to use lawyer to stop subcontracting and blacklisting Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC. AT&T, using Texas DIR award contracts to re-seller Genesis Networks with four (4) Texas HUB certifications and non-minority re-sellers , not listed on SAM database exclude black IT, TX re seller Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC from receiving federal government subcontracting opportunities. Pay-to-Play SBA 8(a) certification program allows companies like ActioNet remain on 8(a) for 13 years other companies for over 17 years.  Maximum limit on SBA 8(a) is nine (9) years.  ActioNet paperwork never processed, SBA managers added ActioNet on the 8(a) certification program in 21 days, average is 100 days.  ActioNet contract awards total over a billion annually.  ActioNet will not subcontract with 100% black owned companies, Asians first and second generation American, control over 90% of government SBA 8(a) certification program IT and Telecom contracting there documents not registered in database sending dark money kickbacks to political  U.S., India etc... SBA used to cover-up. In violation of federal government procurement, NAICS Codes, and not approved on SAM, four (4) India job placement company's each with over 400,000 IT employees paid slave wages contracted to AT&T, Dell, HP, HPE, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics, Raytheon, JC Penny, etc... cover-up by SBA using fraudulent eSRS, SSDD, H-1B visa documents. Asian companies do not subcontract with qualified 100% black owned IT, Telecom company's. Politicians create state EEO Diversity programs to cover-up the top 100 prime contractors including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, and General Dynamics, are re-sellers for AT&T, Dell, HP, HPE etc… selling the same products we offer from these companies.  Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, General Dynamics, AT&T, Dell, HP, HPE refuse to allow our company to provide these products under the Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal blocking emancipated black companies using their in-house EEO Diversity Program to cover-up taking and keeping billions in subcontracting dollars annually from blacks. 2016, SBA blocked order from President Obama to investigate this matter sent fraudulent certified letter with false signature of a person not employed by SBA regarding our SBA 8(a) application. SBA & CMS changed name of contract from ESD II to SPARC to stop Lockheed Martin subcontract agreement with Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC.  Lockheed Martin changed the managers on the contract.  The new managers stating they have no record of an agreement concealing the fact they are using the new name of the contract not listing our company as subcontractor, this is breach of contract and violation of federal government procurement laws. HP conspired with GP&M using the altered spelling of our company name to block Enterprise ESP Service Provider, LLC from participating in TX HUB subcontracting opportunities subsidized by federal government. HP conspired with attorneys from ACLU and NAACP LDF to cover-up their actions. SBA used to Cover-up, politicians creating state minority EEO diversity programs like Texas Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) designed in defiance of federal government subcontracting Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal, States are preventing the federal government from including qualified emancipated black IT and Telecom re-sellers.  The Texas HUB program allows companies not registered on federal government SAM database white female owner of Austin Ribbon and Computer an (Office Supply Company) control over a billion annually in minority federal government subsidized IT contracts purchasing with the help from HP, Dell, and HPE the owner worked on Texas State procurement procedures and policies.  We will protect our rights as emancipated blacks to participate in government procurement opportunities based on our merits not a handout.  Our re-seller agreements with AT&T, Dell, HP and HPE supports our position in this matter there actions results in "Breach of Contract" and failure to show "Good Faith Effort", this is a violation of federal government Individual Subcontracting Plan 5% goal.  We hope you will agree and help emancipated 100% black owned companies, by demanding SBA, the House Small Business Committee, Texas Senator John Cornyn and Texas Representative Michael C Burgess enforce our rights for participation and representation by law.  

Clarence E Lindsey
404 supporters