Topic

government corruption

31 petitions

Update posted 1 week ago

Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, Justin Amash, Dave Brat, Jeff Duncan, Louie Gohmert, Paul A. Gosar, Trey Gowdy, Walter B. Jones, Jim Jordan, Raul R. Labrador, Thomas Massie, Mark Meadows, Dana Rohrabacher, Greg Walden, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, U.S. Senate, Brian Sandoval, Nevada State House, Nevada State Senate

Impeach Judge Gloria M. Navarro

We the People of the United States petition the U.S. House of Representatives to impeach Judge Gloria M. Navarro of the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada for committing treason and collaborating in the insurrection against the Constitutional authority of the federal government pursuant to Article I Section 8 Clause 15, Article 3 Section 3 and Article 2 Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2831 and 18 U.S. § Code 2383. Whereas Judge Navarro, at the direction of the FBI, BLM, and other federal agencies, is unlawfully detaining (Amendment VIII of the Bill of Rights & 18 U.S.C. § 3142), and has been for over nine months, prominent activists within the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom political movement for exercising their First Amendment protected rights—protesting against federal government overreach [the fact it had sold 9,000 acres of public land bordering Bundy Ranch and other people who own grazing rights to the division to a Communist Chinese energy firm represented by Rory Reid (Harry Reid's son), EMM, for $4.5 million, $34.1 million less than its value, and began rounding up the Bundy’s cattle and holding them in inhumane conditions … at least 60 purportedly suffering death or missing]—and, in order to suppress C4CF 's education of the People, they have been charged by the FBI for violating 18 U.S.C. § 371 - Conspiracy to Commit an Offense Against the United States; 18 U.S.C. § 372 - Conspiracy to Impede and Injure a Federal Officer; 18 U.S.C. § lll(a)(l) and (b) - Assault on a Federal Officer; 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(l)(B) - Threatening a Federal Law Enforcement Officer; 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) - Use and Carry of a Firearm in Relation to a Crime of Violence; 18 U.S.C. § 1503 - Obstruction of the Due Administration of Justice; 18 U.S.C. § 1951 - Interference with Interstate Commerce by Extortion; 18 U.S.C. § 1952 - Interstate Travel in Aid of Extortion; 18 U.S.C. § 2 - Aiding and Abetting. Among the political prisoners are Cliven, Ammon, Ryan and Mel Bundy, Peter Santilli (a journalist), Ryan Payne, Blaine Cooper, Eric Parker and Jerry DeLumus—all of whom provide C4CF with necessary influence. Whereas the discovery comprises substantial evidence proving the innocence of the defendants but is being concealed from the public at the order of Judge Navarro (in violation of Amendment VI of the Bill of Rights and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure). These prisoners have also been subjected to mistreatment by the FBI, U.S. Marshall Service and employees of the correctional facilities. Whereas Judge Navarro is consciously proceeding with falsified charges filed by the FBI against C4CF and refusing to grant motions to dismiss after learning that Sheriff Douglas Gillespie and many other local, state and federal officials ordered the BLM to return the cattle to the Bundy’s and withdraw from the land, and being presented with relevant laws [Article I Section 8 Clause 17 & Article IV Section 3 Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Nevada Revised Statute 568.225] were presented to her by the defense. Whereas, after being ordered by Sheriff Gillespie to stand down, Special Agent Dan P. Love of the BLM continued to impede on the rights and jurisdiction of the People of Clark County and all People of Nevada unabated; Committing acts of aggression that should be considered attempts to seriously injure or even kill peaceful protesters, including tazing several individuals and using blunt force (some already challenged by physical disabilities)—an apparent result of its militarization. Sheriff Gillespie stated that "anyone who had been in policing would question their tactics." Whereas Judge Navarro is participating in a cover up of the suppression by the FBI (by way of COINTELPRO tactics) of the right to the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, peaceful assembly, and petition the Government for a redress of grievances. One of the main functions of government is to enforce contracts, and in this case not only is the government failing to enforce a contract but it is also the contractor, and have abridged their obligations in addition to preventing the contractee(s) [Cliven Bundy—We the People] from discharging our duties enumerated in Article I Section 8 Clause 15 & 16 of the U.S. Constitution & 10 U.S.C. § 311 and pursuant to Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Whereas Judge Navarro has proven herself unfit to be an impartial Federal Judge; Consistent to the extreme bias expressed by her assistance given to the federal government and its usurpation of power and by covering up the inhumane treatment of political activists who are being unlawfully detained for exercising their rights protected by the First Amendment to enforce the rule of law—to establish justice, insure domestic Tranquility, secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, guarantee a Republican Form of Government, and secure the right to life, liberty and property, as ordained by the Creator in the U.S. Constitution.

Matthew Deatherage
13,326 supporters
Update posted 2 months ago

Petition to The City of Cleveland Heights, Cleveland Heights police department, City of Cleveland Heights City Council

Stop U.S. Cities from committing acts of Intentional infliction of Emotional Distress

https://www.facebook.com/270250279686631/photos/a.307590609285931.73733.270250279686631/1950514738326835/?type=3&theater In Ohio, To establish a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and to win my case, the plaintiff must prove all of the following elements: (1) the defendant either intended to cause serious emotional distress, or knew or should have known that the actions taken would result in serious emotional distress to the plaintiffs; (2) the defendant’s conduct was so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and was such that it would considered utterly intolerable in a civilized community; (3) the plaintiffs’ psychic injuries proximately resulted from the defendants actions; and (4) the plaintiff suffered mental anguish that is serious and of a nature that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it 1. Your court negligently forgot to remove one of my warrants. & because of your careless negligence. I was disqualified for a job, I had received a job offer for a better paying job . Your court should have known that the careless negligent actions would result in serious emotional distress to the plaintiff. The plaintiff could have experienced a number of unfortunate situations, because of your city’s negligence. I had honestly waited to turn in the papers till , I went to court to make sure all the warrants were removed. I gave the employer the signed paper and the go ahead to run my background check the next day after, I went to court and It came back that I had a warrant . Honestly the lady was acting different toward me. First impressions are everything and I told the lady I didn’t have any issues. It was because of your city’s negligence, I was disqualified from a better paying job. When she ran my background check a warrant from your city popped up. I explained to her, I went to court yesterday and It was suppose to be removed with the other ones. But, she told me It didn’t matter . I was disqualified. I have documentation to prove that, I lost a job opportunity because of that warrant. That situation created emotional distress. I was sad because I worked to find a better job, to help provide for my family. & then to be disqualified because of your cities negligence, put a burden on me. Your city’s careless negligence has forced me to work a lesser paying job. 2.An officer employed at Cleveland heights police department, displayed a level of extreme and outrageous behavior, the type of behavior that exceeded all possible bounds of decency. The officer Javon Jackson lied and impersonated a officer with authority. The officer lied and told me he was in charge of removing warrants. Officer Jackson tried to use aggressive threats and intimidation tactics as a way to scare me into coming into the police station. Officer Javon Jackson threaten to come to my house, (a house out of his jurisdiction, to do unspeakable acts to me) The Severe act of menacing has left me emotionally distraught and has put me in fear for me and my families lives. I tried to pursue a protection order to protect me and my family. Unfortunately, my protection was denied. I feel exposed, helpless and unprotected against a officer who has threaten to come to my place of residence to do an unspeakable act, only adding to my Severe Emotional distress. 3.The plaintiff states, The City Of Cleveland Heights Is solely liable for the Severe Emotional Distress of the plaintiff. The Defendant (The City of Cleveland Heights), & the defendant’s Employees (police officers, government officials, court appointed officials), Agents and Representatives initiated and were the sole and primary cause of the Plaintiff’s Severe emotional Distress. 4.On July 6, 2018, The Plaintiff was seen and evaluated by a Psychiatrist in a desperate effort to pursue treatment of his Severe Emotional Distress. (Paranoia, Panic attacks, Anxiety, Nightmares, restless nights). & Is now receiving counseling and treatment for the severe symptoms of the emotional distress. I meet all (4) Qualifications, and I am Prepared to speak. I believe that the jury will be moved by my case. The empathy for me after I speak, will outweigh any & everything.   “(4) the plaintiff suffered mental anguish that is serious and of a nature that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it” I can personally guarantee, no member of any Jury would be able to endure, this series of unfortunate events. Nuisance: The Cleveland Heights police Chief, Chief Annette Mecklenburg’s actions are classified as, a act of Public Nuisance, by denying my public records request. (Ohio Public Records act, Ohio Revised code Section 149.43.) Nuisance is defined as the wrongful invasion of a legal right or interest. “Wrongful invasion” encompasses not only the interest in personal enjoyment of property, but also legal rights and privileges. Nuisance encompasses two separate fields of tort liability: public nuisance and private nuisance. A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public.  Unreasonable interference includes “those acts that significantly interfere with public health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience, conduct that is contrary to a statute, ordinance, or regulation, or conduct that is of a continuing nature or one which has produced a permanent or long-lasting effect upon the public right, an effect of which the actor is aware or should be aware.”   Menacing: An officer employed at Cleveland heights police department, displayed a level of extreme and outrageous behavior, the type of behavior that exceeded all possible bounds of decency. Officer Jackson tried to use aggressive threats and intimidation tactics as a way to scare me into coming into the police station. Officer Javon Jackson threaten to come to my house, (a house out of his jurisdiction, to do unspeakable acts to me) The Severe act of menacing has left me emotionally distraught and has put me in fear for me and my families lives. I have a one year old son, and girlfriend. We are all African American. (A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person's unborn, or a member of the other person's immediate family. In addition to any other basis for the other person's belief that the offender will cause physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person's unborn, or a member of the other person's immediate family, the other person's belief may be based on words or conduct of the offender that are directed at or identify a corporation, association, or other organization that employs the other person or to which the other person belongs. (B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of menacing. Except as otherwise provided in this division, menacing is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. If the victim of the offense is an officer or employee of a public children services agency or a private child placing agency and the offense relates to the officer's or employee's performance or anticipated performance of official responsibilities or duties, menacing is a misdemeanor of the first degree or, if the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to an offense of violence, the victim of that prior offense was an officer or employee of a public children services agency or private child placing agency, and that prior offense related to the officer's or employee's performance or anticipated performance of official responsibilities or duties, a felony of the fourth degree.(C) As used in this section, "organization" includes an entity that is a governmental employer.    

Joshua Bradley
27 supporters