285 petitions

Update posted 4 days ago

Petition to Target CEO Brian Cornell

TARGET: Improve your paid parental leave policy

I’m a super busy mom and have always chosen to shop at Target because I thought its policies towards employees were more humane than Walmart. But I just learned Target is worse than Walmart -- it only offers two weeks paid parental leave plus some short-term disability for people who give birth! Leaving my tiny two-week-old baby would be extremely painful, and yet 1 in 4 women in this country have to go back to work within 2 weeks of giving birth because of inadequate policies like Target's. When I gave birth to my son Oliver, I only had six weeks of paid parental leave, barely enough time to recover from my C-section. I can't imagine what it would have been like if me or my husband would have had to leave him after just two weeks. So when I see Target employees stocking shelves, working the check-out line or answering questions I can’t help but wonder whether they’ve got a tiny baby at home who they can’t be with. I believe being there and providing for those you love isn’t negotiable. That’s why I’d love for you to join me in calling on Target to provide 12 weeks fully paid parental leave to ALL employees. Petition text To: Target CEO Brian Cornell As one of the largest employers in the U.S. your family leave policies have an enormous impact on the lives of working families. Right now Target is failing to live up to its image as one of America’s favorite family brands, but you’ve got a clear opportunity to close that gap by expanding Target’s paid parental leave policy for ALL of its employees to 12 weeks fully paid. As Walmart recently showed there is a huge opportunity to provide employees the leave they need, and employers who don’t keep up will lose out in the race for talent.

Erika and PL+US
55,444 supporters
Update posted 1 week ago

Petition to Google, Inc, Apple

Add AED locations to Google Maps and Apple Maps as a searchable feature to save lives.

THE PROBLEM Within two seconds, with your cell phone, you can find the closest Starbucks, including directions, maps, pictures and more. But if someone collapses from a Sudden Cardiac Arrest, and when every second counts, why can't I use the same technology to find where the closest Automated External Defibrillator (AED) is located?  Google My Business listings will tell you if a location has WiFi, Free Parking, Handicap Access, and much more. Why can't an AED be on that list? If I am in a shopping area and someone collapses, I should be able to ask Google or Siri and instantly know the location of the closest AED.  This feature has the potential to save thousands of lives, and over time, tens of thousands of lives, or more.  (UPDATE: Here's a news story about our petition that aired last night.)   THE SOLUTION How do we make this happen? Is it Bob on the 7th floor in the Maps Department? Is it legislative? Is it public pressure? As I start this, I have no idea and need help with guidance and ideas.    HOW CAN YOU HELP If you have any insight or ideas on how to make this happen, please connect with us directly. If you agree with this initiative, please: Sign up to keep in the loop Post this campaign on your social media pages   WHY IS THIS MY MISSION? This is my mission because my wife Julie, had a cardiac arrest. When she collapsed, she was not breathing and her heart was not beating. Within 45 seconds of her collapse, she was receiving CPR. Within 2 minutes, she got a shock from an AED, followed up by a second shock. Three minutes after her collapse, the ambulance arrived. By that time, she already started breathing and her heart started beating again. Today she has fully recovered because of the quick actions of those around her and because of the AED.  Watch this video for Julie's story.  This technology has the potential to save thousands of lives, if not tens of thousands of lives over time.    SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST STATISTICS Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a leading cause of death in the United States, killing nearly 300,000 every year. SCA can strike persons of any age, gender, race and health. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is a device used to administer an electric shock and restore the heart's normal rhythm. The survival rate for SCA is less than 5%. This is due to limited AED accessibility. If an SCA victim receives defibrillation through an AED within the first minute, the survival rate is 90%. For every minute that passes without defibrillation, survival decreases by 7 - 10%. 30% - 50% of SCA victims would survive if AEDs were used within five minutes. If defibrillation is delayed by more than ten minutes, the survival rate is less than 5%.

Greg Coon
9,014 supporters