Topic

equality act

3 petitions

Update posted 5 months ago

Petition to The Prime Minister

MAKE IT LAW for county councils to put Changing Places Toilets in all town centres with a bench and hoist for Severely disabled people - No more changing on public toilet floor

I am a mum of 3 and my youngest son is 10 Years old and was born with quadriplegic cerebral palsy (massive brain damage) due to being starved of oxygen at birth  http://youtu.be/OdpioDSZd8g This link is of him and some of his friends using Eye gaze technology to use their eyes to access a computer because they are severley disabled. We access Horsham Town on a regular basis to shop, have lunch, and meet up with other mums for coffee with their disabled children/teenagers in same situation. He attends Ingfield Manor School in Billingshurst   http://youtu.be/9KwnIZBHyvs   where all of the students have Cerebral Palsy and are equally severley disabled, they all also access Horsham Town. He attended the Dame Vera Lynn School for Parents also http://www.dvltrust.org.uk/dame_vera_lynn_trust/school_for_parents_west_sussex.htmlWhen he was 5 years old we were given a RADAR key to access the disabled toilets in Horsham which i was very pleased with, until I actually used the disabled toilet I realised that disabled loos are not for the severley disabled/elderley, they are for the limping/walking with sticks or wheelchair users with upper mobility and can get themselves onto a toilet.We also access Crawley Town on a weekly basis for shopping, eating, entertainment.. but Crawley Town has the same LACK of facilities for the severley disabled and elderley?I know that Gatwick Airport has a ‘Changing Places’ toilet, but not Crawley Town ?If you are severley disabled or paralysed, you need carers to lift you out of the wheelchair and place you on a flat surface to have your continence pad changed... This is what I am forced to do with my 7 seven year old son, I have to lay him on a urine soaked floor inside the disabled loo, with the 2nd carer standing outside with the wheelchair they have to pass to me the changing accessories through the open door for all passers by to view, this is one of the most awful experiences I have to face every time I come into Horsham Town..Thousands of people with physical and/or learning disabilities cannot use standard disabled toilets because they cannot walk or stand. They need support from one or two carers to use the toilet or to have their incontinence pad changed.; Standard disabled toilets do not provide changing benches or hoists to lift the person on to the toilet or bench. Most are too small to accommodate more than one person. Without 'Changing Places' toilets; the person with disabilities is put at risk; and families/carers are forced to risk their own health and safety by lying their daughter; son or loved one on a toilet floor.; This is dangerous; unhygienic; humiliating and undignified. We take it for granted that we would not change a baby on the floor of a public toilet - so why on earth is this acceptable for disabled adult people?;This link is to what is needed, it provides room for the disabled person and wheelchair with two carers, bench and hoist  http://www.changing-places.org/install_a_toilet/design/example_layout_and_design.aspxIt should be accessed by all who use a RADAR key.This link is to the Equalities Act section 20  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/section/20In the West Sussex County Times, .. Is a short story on this problem, I also have the same problem when visiting Crawley to shop, they do not have a ‘Changing Places Toilet’ either..I have also posted the photograph of my little boy laying on the ‘pee pee’ floor of the disabled toilets, and there are alot of comments from local people who face the same problem or are suprised and embarrased they there is NO facility for the most disabled people, there are comments on there that they simply do not go out at all in fear that the toilet will be needed!!  This is not a problem I want to face when my son gets older. Brighton already have a changing places toilet and are about to open a second one..see link  http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/content/leisure-and-libraries/public-toilets/changing-places-public-toilets   and Gatwick Airport also have a changing places toilet.. see link http://www.gatwickairport.com/at-the-airport/special-assistance/prm-facilities/On 30th May 2013 Myself and some mums and dads with their disabled children/teenagers and Simon Wilson an adult with severe Cerebral palsy http://www.simonsable.com/   met up with David Smith Equalities Officer in Caffe Nero Horsham Town to prove that we do use Horsham Town, but do not have any toilet facilities.**David Cameron is quoted here on the Families and Childrens Bill : David Cameron recently said ‘When you've had the privilege of bringing up a profoundly disabled child, you suddenly realise there are two different sets of places: those that are disabled-friendly, that are accessible, that are helpful; and those that aren't… And what this all about really, is greater equality in our country, making sure that all places are more friendly, and accessible to disabled people** This is the thing, most people don't realise unless you are in that situation, and to be fair, why would you? We just need to raise awareness that this is real life for many, and not just children either.. all those service men and women who have come back and are now disabled through head injuries, old age, people have strokes and it leaves them paralysed, all these people need to access a changing bench and hoist to have continence pads changed.. times really have changed, children with sensory and unseen disabilities wear continence pads and need to lay down to have them changed, some lick the floor or whatever is near them and a toilet floor is just disgusting, so it really is important to have a changing bench and hoist inside these changing places toilets.. anyone who uses a radar key really   In the words of NELSON MANDELA himself when he spoke of EQUAL RIGHTS for the disabled in a letter to the SCOPE charity "We cannot claim to have reached anywhere near to where a society should be in terms of practical equality of the disabled. We continue to try. We realise that legislation and regulations are not sufficient or the end of the long walk to equality and non-discrimination. Education, raising of awareness, conscientisation, eradication of stigmatisation: these are key elements in achieving non-discrimination against the disabled in practice and in their everyday lives"(please see link) http://blog.scope.org.uk/  

samantha buck
38,582 supporters
Started 8 months ago

Petition to UK Cinema Association, Odeon Cinemas, Vue Cinemas, Cineworld

Cinemas to show more subtitled films at reasonable times!

Do you have a hearing loss and feel you hardly get to see a subtitled film of your choice at a cinema near you? My name is Ellie, also known as Deafie Blogger. I’m 20 and profoundly deaf. During my childhood, teenage years and even now, I hardly get a chance to go to the cinema, as there is always a lack of subtitled showings. I miss out on cinema trips with my friends and family because of this. It makes me feel like an outsider, and is very frustrating and isolating. My hearing friends eagerly await the latest blockbuster movie, but I know that I probably won't get the chance to see it. People like me, who have a hearing loss often rely on subtitles to understand what’s being said on screen. I’ve contacted the cinemas multiple times and I’ve heard every excuse imaginable. The main reason, that there’s “no demand”. This is only because Deaf people have given up going to the cinema, as there’s a lack of showings! Most subtitled showings appealing to teenagers/adults are either during the day when they are at school or working, or early morning at the weekend- which for a child or teenager, they don’t want to get up at that time! It’s not reasonable. Cinema managers have tried to justify not showing subtitles by using the excuse that hearing people don't want to see subtitles on the screen, but they have the choice to go and see any of the other many showings on that day, we don’t. I've done some work with Action on Hearing Loss for their SubtitleIt- TV on demand campaign which was a success, with the government forcing broadcasters to display subtitles on their On-Demand channels. I feel the cinemas are the next area we should be targeting. The Equality Act 2010 states that organisations must make “reasonable adjustments” for those using their services. I don’t see this as reasonable and cinemas should follow accessibility regulations. In an ideal world, we should be able to go the cinema when we want and request subtitles, but as this can’t happen, I’m asking you to help me. My aim is to have a compromise of more subtitled showings at more reasonable times and days, for example as well as showings during the day, some should be at evenings during the week, especially weekend afternoons. Please sign my petition to help prove to cinemas that there is demand for subtitled showings, and to have more subtitled showings at reasonable times.

Ellie Parfitt
2,161 supporters
Update posted 8 months ago

Petition to Andy Parkinson, Andrew Lewis, David Bell

Ban clubs who actively discriminate from British Rowing events.

I experienced active discrimination and victimization as a woman whilst at London Rowing Club which is affiliated to British Rowing, hosts the Metropolitan Regatta which is a British Rowing recognized event, and who are highly involved in the rowing scene and compete at all levels around the country and internationally, and pride themselves on being 'one of the most prestigious clubs in the UK'. This club refuse to provide the same level of membership, participation and support to women as they do men. Women train alongside the men in the squad but do not receive coaching and are not supported in entering races, and are told they 'need to be very self sufficient women to train in the squad'. When I raised complaints I was harassed by a member of coaching staff and subsequently removed from training, along with the remaining women in the squad, when I made a complaint. I was victimized by club officials who explained away inapproptiate behaviour and the difference in treatment of men and women in the club and I eventually left in August 2016, as many before me have, due to their denial and refusal to address this issue. I have, since October 2016, been refused a hearing. Firstly, after protecting my legal case due to the process having taken nearly 6 months, the deadline by which you must protect a case in court should out of court processes be unsuccessful, and after finding out that the club had purposely tried to undermine the formal hearing even occurring by sending an email to the chair of the panel and British Rowing stating: 'At this point we do not know where you are with the panel selection, but it is my belief that Petra does not actually want her complaint heard as she knows that the club has tried to help her. She has received more care and guidance than any other member at the club over the winter and through the summer.' This revealed a fact that the club were prepared to tell barefaced lies, unless they felt that answering my questions about lack of support for women, although not quite in the same way I would expect, was in some way "guiding" and "supporting" me. Yes, I will be forever grateful to them for showing me the light that men are given support while women are not good enough and need to train harder and earn it, and even then are not supported. After receiving this, among other emails where the club had purposely withheld information, and it was clear they were determined to undermine the grievance process, I raised a complaint against the club chairman for doing this and the club refused to continue to comply with British Rowing grievance procedures and I was told to 'kindly get a lawyer'. I have since made complaints to British Rowing regarding the club's handling of my complaint and refusal to comply with their grievance procedures and continuing to deny me a hearing which resulted in my having to start legal proceedings. The governing body spent three months apparently communicating with the club to finally get them to cooperate, but when they did, they told me they would be willing to give me a hearing but only in front of members of the club. Since informal discussions with the club had already failed, and my complaint being against the governance of the club itself, this was entirely inappropriate. I had previously been granted independent people to sit on the panel, this is not a requirement of the grievance guidelines which states that those sitting on the panel must be independent of the dispute, but the complainant also has the right to disagree with panellists put forward, within reason, my reason being that no member of the club could be independent of the dispute, and I had already experienced issues of bias from the club itself in the way I was treated after making a complaint regarding inappropriate behaviour. Also, that the then chairman of Thames Regional Rowing Council, and now the President (it seems people get promoted in rowing when complaints are made about them) felt he could not communicate with me regarding my complaint after I was directed to him by British Rowing themselves, because he is a member of London Rowing Club. If someone who barely spends time at a club, and is only a member in name more than actual participation, feels their membership would cause issues should they get involved in a complaint against the club, then surely members sitting on my grievance panel would cause the same issues, so how London Rowing Club could then justify this is inexplicable. This was done simply because they had been caught, and they have since shut their doors and refused to respond. Since January 2017 the governing body, in full awareness of my outstanding grievance which had not been addressed in 8 months and counting, had not only previously congratulated the chairman of London Rowing Club on becoming one of the new stewards at Henley Royal Regatta and were in full knowledge he was heavily implicated in my complaint for discrimination and victimisation, as well as avoidance of the process, but the Chairman of British Rowing, and British Rowing themselves, continued to have a public and affectionate relationship with the club, with the Chairman attending social events and tweeting about what a 'lovely atmosphere' it was. This was whilst I was still battling with the club, and with British Rowing, for something to be done about this situation, but which fell on deaf ears, and I had for some time been forced to communicate through British Rowing's lawyers, who the governing body brought on in September 2016 after I had contacted the Department of Culture Media and Sport for advice on the situation. The governing body are funded by Sport England for grassroots rowing in sport in the UK. British Rowing are in turn responsible, in their own words, for 'creating and enforcing the rules to do with all aspects of rowing in the UK', including grievance procedures and rules of equality, and you cannot be an affiliated club if you do not abide by these rules, and treat person/s differently based on protected characteristics. London Rowing Club purport to be an equal club but they are not. They allowed women into the club in 2007 but the elite women who trained at the club, a long time ago, are long gone, and they were allowed into the club after LRC were funded by British Rowing to take them on. Since this funding was taken away the club has continued to allow women into the club, but on second rate terms to the men yet paying the same fees, and the numbers of women never changed this. When I was a member there were at least 20 women, however, many had either previously trained in the squad and given up or were discouraged from progressing and never allowed to train in the squad, being told that recreational rowing was their level and 'don't try to do what the men do [and sweep], stick to sculling', is one choice example I can quote from the volunteer who ran the "affectionately" named 'Irregulars' recreational group at the time.  I never realised until after my grievance was raised it even states on their website two completely different things for men and women. On the men's squad page in the FAQs it reads: 'Q. I'm worried I might not be experienced enough to row at London. A. Don’t worry. Firstly, anyone can join London. We have a squad system, which allows us to accommodate varying levels of experience. For example, those who haven't rowed before would join the "Learn2Row" group on a structured course, then continue to row casually until competent enough to join the Senior squad.' It says nothing like this on the women's page, in fact only if you are an "elite" rower are you encouraged to even consider being taken seriously. Whilst on the Recreational Rowing page it states: 'In recent time ladies have become an important part of the group which has some 25 oarsmen and 10 oarswomen covering a wide spectrum in age and ability but all share the same joy in boating, exercise and comradeship.' Quite, I mean it is the sheer "joy in boating, exercise and comradeship" and not personal achievement, which is why we join the club. London Rowing Club are still living in the 1890s, however, the treatment of women in the club is far more serious and less lighthearted than their advertising would let on. Throughout my time at the club I came across woman after woman who complained of discrimination, who had tried and failed to be taken seriously, and that this had affected their morale. One girl telling me the treatment she experienced 'destroyed her confidence'. They had trained in the squad, as I had, been ignored and left, and after I raised my complaint of harassment after I had told the head coach I had sought extra help, at my own cost, due to the lack of support I was being given, which I thought they would have been encouraging of at the least, at the most realised they were failing the women who were having to seek private tuition due to the coaches not coaching the women or supporting them in their endeavours to race, I was removed from training altogether. When I asked why I was the only one they had removed all the women were subsequently palmed off into the recreational group, where we would go from training 10x per week to 2x per week, and the "coach" was an inexperienced volunteer who had questionable knowledge about rowing, the rules of the river, and who had made sexist and discouraging comments to the women. I refused to be treated in this undignified way by the club, who turned around and tried to claim I had insulted the club by refusing to cooperate with this "solution", and were outrageous in the excuses given for the behaviour I had experienced from the head coach. The Chairman citing his nationality and background in sport saying 'women would have given as good as they got', and the club captain, a woman, telling me 'well I've removed you from the situation now so you don't have to worry'. It was not the first time this behaviour had been raised, and which I subsequently received reports not just from the women, but the men as well, of harassment and bullying within the squad. But it was clear this was condoned by club personnel. During the incident I complained of I had approached the head coach during a training session to explain I had decided to seek 1 2 1 tuition from another coach at the club, after being told I would categorically no longer be receiving support as they were coaching the men for Henley and I'd be better off in the recreational group, this was after 7 months of training with a few other women in the squad, where I had been actively encouraged to stay in the squad by a 3x Olympic rower, who had also allowed me to row solo on the tideway based on my ability even though I had never taken a steers test but was an experienced canoeist and knew the rules, I was not the fastest rower, having only been training for 4 months when I started at LRC, but I was a competent rower, and perfectly capable of the apparently "gruelling" training schedule which I easily fit around my work and life, except on the odd occasion I was called away on business, which was subsequently used against me to try to question my commitment when I raised issues regarding a lack of support for women. The men do exactly the same, and again it says on the men's squad page: 'Q.How much training will I have to do? A.The senior squad has a training programme akin to other clubs' of similar ambition. Typically, athletes have one day off per week but some days there are two training sessions. Obviously, work/family/study commitments are inevitable, but ideally, athletes will try to make up the sessions in their own time to keep themselves, and the team, on track.' The men's squad is a wide mixture of ages and abilities, they would happily take men on from the recreational group or learn to row, as well as experienced rowers coming into the club, and they would all train together. This is initially what happened when I joined the squad and I was never lead to believe the women should expect to receive any less. The club always put the lack of support down to the number of women in the squad so I and others asked them to recruit more women, but they wouldn't and said 'we will never poach athletes from other clubs', which is not what I had asked them to do, I had asked them to simply put an ad up on social media as nearly every club does when it wants to recruit. They did eventually, but this only advertised for men, and low and behold men came from other clubs. It was clear they were using numbers as an excuse to justify discrimination, but they wouldn't recruit nor let the women who wanted to train and progress to do so. During this incident with the head coach on 25th of May 2016, after telling him I had sought extra support, he became irrationally enraged, told me if I didn't like the program they had for women then I should leave the club, started using the fact I'd gone away on business and temporarily lived further away as a reason why I could no longer be in the squad. I walked away and he stormed out the gym in a rage. 2 minutes later he came back in after I'd resumed my weights training, marched up to me, glared at me and said 'Petra, you can't go out rowing anymore on your own without a coach until you're signed off!'. This was after 7 months of having been allowed to, and several months ago I had asked him if I could take the safety test which other's had been telling me I needed to do, but when I asked the head coach if I could do this he had said 'no, I've seen you row and it's not necessary, you've been out at night and you know the rules'. I asked him why had he not let me be signed off months ago and continued to let me go out rowing alone, usually when there was no one around to coach a session or the men were off doing something else and I wanted to train. He said 'us Australians aren't so bothered about health and safety as you Brits'. Nevertheless, I felt he had used the fact I was not signed off as leverage to do what he wanted me to do. I said I wouldn't go out alone but that he had to organise for me to take the test. However, he persisted in hounding me around the gym whilst I was doing my weights, continuing to tell me I couldn't go out rowing anymore as though he thought I was just going to go and help myself to a boat and take it out, when historically I had never gone out without his express permission. It is something I would never have done, not only out of respect for the club, but also for safety reasons and someone knowing where I was. I was brought up sailing and canoeing and safety had always been taught as paramount priority, as well as knowledge of the rules and environment. He continued to follow me around the gym in this frenzied fashion and paid no attention when I told him to leave me alone. I eventually said his behaviour was harassing me and he stopped. I said I didn't feel he was being straight with me and he then switched moods, from a fit of rage to joking around inappropriately, and said, 'no, I don't think I bat for the other team'. He asked me where I had been during training the night before. I said I was out for dinner, he shouted for all the men in the gym to hear 'oh, who's the lucky guy!', I said it was a female friend, he responded 'maybe it's you who bats for the other team!' He continued by saying 'Petra, I think you're a really great bird', I told him he was being inappropriate and he said 'no, I'm just a charmer'. He then came and sat down beside me whilst I was doing an exercise, told me 'I bet you're doing that wrong', I said 'well why don't you show me how to do it correctly then', which took him aback but he did show me, which was rare. His general approach to being asked for help was stubbornness, but if you had the patience to wait for 45 minutes while he rambled at you, you might eventually get 2 minutes of advice. I said to him 'I just want what they are given, no more no less', pointing at the 10 or so men in the gym I was training with. I was the only woman in the session, as often happened. He said to me, 'if you want coaching I'll coach you' which I found astonishing after being told to leave the squad for no reason whatsoever, and declined his offer after his conduct. After this incident I reported this to the club. I received a response stating they would look into this, and a week later I had been removed from training with no notice. I had to call up to find out what had happened. They said 'oh, you said you wouldn't pay the fee for coaching so we took you off the list' or words to that effect. The story goes that 2 weeks prior to this incident in the gym, I had had a conversation with the Captain stating there was a complete lack of support for women and that I felt the extra fee for coaching was discriminatory as the women weren't coached. Her response was 'I don't think making the men pay and not the women would be a step forward for equality', side stepping the issue with coaching as though it wasn't happening, and yet we were being expected to subsidise this for the men. She said 'well I'm happy to remove you from the squad if you don't want to pay the fee'. I did not agree to this and continued to train in the squad without any notice of being removed for raising this issue. I continued to receive training schedules and emails from the head coach, however, it was at this point he started playing up and it felt he was actively looking for reasons to force me out of the squad, whether it be my work, location, but this didn't work because I made up for missed sessions in my spare time, which was corroborated by the assistant coach. This issue, I believe, culminated on 25th May 2016 where I was harassed by the head coach in the gym in an effort to make me leave, and is the reason I was removed from training by the club after making this complaint, because they had no intention of giving women in the club support of any kind. One telling remark made to me by the club's administrator after I left was 'women have to be very careful, we have so much more to lose', she also stated 'I don't know why the club doesn't do more with you [women]'. The fact the governing body have refused to get involved and yet continue to allow this club affiliation is completely against their own rules, and against their funding obligations. This goes against British Rowing guidelines, and the Equality Act 2010, that clubs are not allowed to discriminate against women, as well as a number of other protected characteristics, and yet it is known to the governing body that the club are offering membership on a different level to women as they do men, to the detriment of women in the club, and no action is being taken. I am asking British Rowing to set an example and also send out a clear message that you cannot be affiliated or participate in British Rowing events if there is discrimination in your club. I am also asking Sport England to ensure that NGBs they fund abide by their responsibilities in upholding their rules of governance and affiliation, and are not supporting or allowing affiliation to clubs who discriminate, and therefore perpetuating this issue in sport. The problem being it has not yet been "proven" they do discriminate because they have avoided and refused to give me a hearing. So the first step is for the governing body to uphold their grievance procedures with an affiliated club, if the club do not cooperate, which they have had 10 months to do, they lose their affiliation and rights to take part in British Rowing events.  If British Rowing do not act in this situation then it is Sport England's responsibility to ensure governing bodies are upholding their rules regarding grassroots affiliation. The problem is there are several members of London Rowing Club on the governing body. I should have been able to go to Thames Regional Rowing Council regarding this issue, but when I did, I received no response because their Chairman at the time, and now President, is a member of London Rowing Club. In fact during my grievance the Regional Rowing Council counselled the rowing club and not me. I have received no support from any of the governing bodies representatives who are responsible for participation in the area and would say all have actively avoided engaging with me on this matter. My complaint was eventually pushed to the head of finance, who then employed lawyers to deal with the matter. So all in all there is a complete lack of accountability, and it is not really understood what the governing body are paid to do by Sport England to govern grassroots rowing in the UK. 

Petra Saxby
28 supporters