environmental justice

127 petitions

Update posted 6 days ago

Petition to Alison Arwady

La Villita Community Deserves Clean Air!

We are asking Little Village residents and allies to support our ongoing efforts to bring a just transition to our community by signing and sharing our petition. After twelve years to organizing which resulted in the shutdown of the Crawford & Fisk Coal Power Plant, we are once again calling the attention of our elected officials to put first our public health & environment over corporation$! Below is a letter to Alison Arwady, Interim Commissioner, Chicago Department of Public Health, requesting further information / action steps that should be completed and addressed as soon as possible before the total demolition is completed. This is imperative to further address remediation process of site and the wellbeing of our city, since pollution does not stop at neighborhood boundaries. ~~~~ August 20, 2019 Alison Arwady Interim Commissioner Chicago Department of Public Health  Dear Commissioner Arwady, We extend thanks to the Department of Public Health for sending Dave Graham to attend and present at the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s Crawford Coal Power Plant meeting on Tues, August 6, 2019. As residents clearly communicated at the community meeting, our community wants to ensure that the state site remediation process includes active participation by community members, a full and complete characterization of site contamination, as well as full and complete characterization of any potential contamination that extends further into the community or the Sanitary and Ship Canal outside of the site boundary, and a remediation that is protective of human health and the environment, now and in the future. As you know, the public health of the Little Village community has been severely and adversely affected by persistent, cumulative impacts from environmental exposure for decades, including from the operations at the former Crawford Coal Power Plant site and ongoing exposure to a multitude of toxins from transportation and industrial facilities overburdening the neighborhood. The very same concerns and realities apply to the Fisk Coal Power Plant located in the Pilsen neighborhood, which was also purchased by Hilco Global. We ask that all requests apply to the Fisk Coal Power Plant site, as well. We are happy to read in the news that the City of Chicago Chicago Department of Public Health will be doing weekly inspections at the Crawford site. As a follow up to Tuesday’s meeting, we request the following in service of the public health of the community: 1. A detailed daily timeline for work being completed on the site. 2. Names and permits of the contractors and subcontractors hired for the remediation of the Crawford Coal Power Plant site, including those handling asbestos. 3. Ongoing provision of copies of the violations and inspections on site. 4. CDPH to flyer and host local informational events to educate the community at large of the process, in Spanish & English. 5. Based on regulatory authority, the creation of rules specific to demolition, remediation, and redevelopment of this specific type of urban coal-fired power plant in advance of the demolition of Fisk such that both processes adhere to strict, protective city rules. 6. How will vermiculite-containing substances be removed from the building and site as part of demolition activities?  Where are these substances located? 7. How many boilers are located on the site and how will contamination associated with these boilers be addressed? 8. Prior to demolition activities, including the use of torches, is there an assessment of lead-based paint of building components, and how is lead-based paint being abated prior to these activities? 9. Are there any air monitors on the perimeter of the site to assess whether particulate matter is being released off-site?  Given the microscopic nature of particulate matter, is there any other credible method to detect and respond to off-site releases if they are occurring?                                   • If no, we would demand air monitoring along the Crawford Coal Power Plant perimeter and in the yards of the homes closest to the site to ensure the protection of the community at large, as well as on-site air monitoring to ensure the protection of workers. 10. Is there an existing fugitive dust control plan to control dust during the remediation and redevelopment of the site?  If so, can this plan be shared with the public? 11. What provisions are there to notify nearby residents during more intense phases of demolition and remedial activities that have the potential to affect air quality? 12. What are the impacts of the coal plant operations on residential neighborhoods north of the site boundary?  What initiatives have been taken by Midwest Generation, IL EPA and/or the Remedial Applicant to assess the nature and extent of potential contamination in these areas? 13. What remedial measure will be taken in areas of the site that will not be covered by the physical engineered barrier (concrete, asphalt, parking lots and building)? 14. Is water from the on-site wastewater treatment system being used for dust suppression on the site?  If so, is this permitted? 15. Is there coal ash in the subsurface of the site?  If so, where is it and how will it be addressed as part of the site remediation? 16. In light of historic coal ash disposal at the site, how does the Illinois Pollution Control Board’s June 20, 2019 Opinion and Order in Case 13-15 affect the IL EPA’s responsibilities in relationship to the site, separate and apart from its SRP-related activities? 17. Has the site hydrogeology been characterized?  If so, can this assessment be shared with the public? 18. What is the fate and transport of contaminants in groundwater, both now and In the future?  What measure will be taken to ensure that any groundwater contaminants will not be discharged into the CSSC? 19. What sampling and remedial measures are planned for the easternmost, waterfront portion of the property? 20. What are the impacts of the coal plant operations on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, especially in sediments?  What initiatives have been taken by Midwest Generation, IL EPA and/or the Remedial Applicant to assess the nature and extent of potential contamination in this waterway? 21. Because significant quantities of subsurface materials will remain in place under the engineered barrier, what impact will residual contaminants in this material have on groundwater conditions? 22. How will the existence of engineered barriers affect access to subsurface electric transmission infrastructure? 23. Is the Remedial Applicant still planning to utilize soil management zones?  If so, why doesn’t this initiative to reduce the toxicity and mobility of contaminants constitute regulated on-site treatment, storage and/or disposal of hazardous wastes? 24. IL EPA itself expressed, both in its comments on the Comprehensive Site Investigation Report and in its comments on the Supplement to Comprehensive Site Investigation Report, that the frequency of groundwater sampling, the analyses performed on the samples taken, as well as the overall quantity of groundwater monitoring wells installed on Site, are wholly inadequate. Why does IL EPA now believe that the groundwater sampling activities are adequate for determining the nature and extent of groundwater contamination and, specifically, whether whether contamination has/could migrate to the Sanitary and Ship Canal? 25. Can IL EPA use its authority to require additional groundwater monitoring wells be installed directly adjacent to the Sanitary and Ship Canal? 26. The Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal is listed as an impaired water on Illinois’ 2018 § 303(d) list. The section identified as IL GI-03, which borders the Crawford Site, is in non-attainment for Fish Consumption (Mercury and Polychlorinated biphenyls) and Indigenous Aquatic Life (Oxygen, Dissolved and Phosphorous [Total]).  What steps is IL EPA taking to assess the contribution of the Crawford site to the impairment, and to establish additional controls on releases from the Crawford site to address these impairments?  27. IL EPA indicated that there’s a process whereby it could perform “split sampling” and run checks on duplicate samples in order to assure the accuracy and adequacy of the sampling activities that are being performed on Site. Split sampling was said to be employed when either an unaccredited consulting agency is used, or when IL EPA has reason to question the validity of the sampling activities.   • Given the repeated discrepancies that existed between IL EPA’s characterizations of sampling results and those of V3 Companies, HRE Crawford’s consulting agency, how is this not an instance where IL EPA has reason to question the validity of the sampling activities?   • If this isn’t such an instance, can IL EPA provide examples of what an accredited consulting entity would need to do to cause IL EPA to question the validity of the sampling results? We request this information, as this is the first time that a Coal Power Plant in a dense, urban area such as the City of Chicago is being demolished, and the city and state have a unique opportunity to collaborate with the community to ensure well-being and mitigate additional pollution burdens on neighbors who cannot shoulder more.. We want to ensure that the contractors and subcontractors hired have the correct experience, know how, and permits to do said work, and we want to ensure that the community is educated on what is happening on the site to best protect themselves. Closing our doors and locking our windows is an unreasonable ask of community residents who are made to take measures to protect themselves as a result of this project, and it puts the onus of protection on the community residents, instead of compelling protective action from the company doing the work. This approach is not adequate solution for community members, hence our stated requests above. We look forward to your response.  Enclosed please find a list of organizations and individuals that have signed onto this letter in support of the community. Thank you for your time. We look forward to your response. Sincerely,  Kim Wasserman, Little Village Environmental Justice Organization Organizations / Networks that support our effort: Blacks In Green; Chicago Food Policy Action Council; Chicago Inspiring Connections Outdoors; Clean Power Lake County; Climate Justice Alliance; Climate Reality Project - Chicago Chapter; EarthJustice; Elevate Energy; Enlace Chicago; Faith in Place Action Fund; Illinois Environmental Council; Ixchel; Metropolitan Planning Council, Movement Generation; Moving Forward Network; Neighbors for Environmental Justice; Nuclear Energy Information Service; Openlands; People for Community Recovery; Pilsen Environmental Rights and Reform Organization (PERRO); Preservation Chicago; Respiratory Health Association; Sierra Club; Southeast Environmental Task Force; Southeast Side Coalition to Ban Petcoke (SSCBP); Union of Concerned Scientist CC: Roberto Perez, CEO, Hilco Redevelopment Partners Michael Rodriguez, Alderman, 22nd Ward George Cardenas, Alderman, 12th Ward; Chair, Committee on  Environmental Protection and Energy 48 Aldermen of Chicago’s City Council Mayor Lori Lightfoot, City of Chicago Candace Moore, Chief Equity Officer, City of Chicago Dave Graham, Associate Commissioner, Chicago Department of Public Health President Toni Preckwinkle, Cook County Board of Commissioners Alma Anaya, Cook County Commissioner, 7th District Celina Villanueva, State Representative, 21st District Martin Sandoval, State Senator, 11th District John Kim, Director, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Chris Pressnall, Environmental Justice Officer, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Jay Robert Pritzker, Governor, State of Illinois Cathy Stepp, Regional Administrator, Region 5, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Nathan Frank, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Alan Walts, Director, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tammy Duckworth, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin, U.S. Senator Jesus Garcia, U.S. Representative, Illinois 4th District

Little Village Environmental Justice Organization
1,372 supporters
Started 1 week ago

Petition to Gov. David Ige


Dear, Government/State Of Hawai’i/ETC, Mauna Kea does not belong to anyone, it is sacred land to Hawaiians and this TMT bullshit needs to stop. This may be a poor comparison but how would Christianity followers (since it is a widely spread religion) like it if the government chose to put a 6 handed satanic star in every church, by law? Is it not disrespectful, insulting, and very distasteful (to the people)? The church is an open and sacred place. I’m sure Christians would be fighting the government about this as well.   But what “OUR” government is doing is just straight up wrong, they’re arresting kūpuna (elders) and hurting the land more than they realize (I believe some old Hawaiians are spiritually connected to such an area.) Signing this petition will hopefully get Hawaii’s government to realize that we are fighting for a reason. There is a reason all these people are out here risking and spending their whole lives protesting against these bastards. There are already 13 ‘smaller’ telescopes on the mauna (mountain), now you want -another- one that costs 8.3 million dollars to build? Are you going to make Hawaiians pay for it as well? There is so much wrong with this.. Hawai’i has been through enough, it’s Queen was taken over by foreigners, Hawaiians were almost slaughtered many times. What do you not understand? Why do you think there are so many people here, verbally fighting you with their aloha? They haven’t hurt anyone, this government has hurt more than helped. This is crossing the line. If you’d like to know more, go to This fight has been going on since BEFORE 2012, it’s 2019. This is the “last” telescope they say, they said that 13 telescopes age. . .Get your act together.  Stop looking up there, while you’re killing down here.  . . Somethings that may need to be addressed more simply, because clearly some people do not understand what is happening; •“I am not against science, but I am against irresponsible decision making in science.” I may not be a completely trustworthy source of why or what exactly is happening at the moment (it’s also just worth noting that it’s tiring when you see tourists who claim things like; “Hawaii is my favorite place!” When they’re very much ignorant to what’s actually going on.) Again, none of this is absolutely correct. It is opinionated and could be considered biased by some. I was feeling inspired nothing more and nothing less. Especially that nothing was being done, even if I’ve made a fool of myself I’d at least be pleased if anyone who saw this shared, so that people will not be so ignorantly aware that their “next tropical island vacation” may not be as spiritually inviting... -With Aloha, to whom it may concern.

AK Perry
10 supporters
Update posted 2 weeks ago

Petition to Dianne Feinstein, Gavin Newsom, Julia Brownley, Jared Blumenfeld, Rick Perry

No more kids with cancer: clean up the Santa Susana Field Lab

When my daughter Grace Ellen was diagnosed with a very rare form of cancer, at age four, I thought that our family had the worst, most devastating luck. But after spending months in the hospital with her, we learned that she was one of over 50 children who may have been poisoned by one of the worst nuclear meltdowns in America. Sign to demand that California's EPA and the Dept. of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) enforce the AOC cleanup of the Santa Susana Field Lab and prevent any more children from getting cancer. Grace Ellen’s form of cancer was incredibly aggressive. At age four she was put on several clinical trials, had ten times the normal amount of chemotherapy, and spent two years fighting her cancer. A year and a half later her cancer came back and she underwent a bone marrow transplant. She was unable to walk or eat or drink, and had to fight for her life in the hospital isolation floor. Her childhood was stolen from her, and it haunts me to know her cancer might have been avoidable. She, like the other 50 children, grew up within 20 miles the Santa Susana Field Lab, land which was developed in the 1940s to conduct nuclear research. In 1959 an uncontained partial meltdown of a sodium reactor caused such a devastating radiation leak that many consider it to be the worst nuclear disaster in U.S. history – and it was completely covered up for years. Our community has up to 60% higher cancer rates, 20% higher invasive breast cancer rates, we have the reports to prove it. It is the Department of Toxic Substance Control’s job to clean up this mess. They know our children are sick and dying, but they aren’t taking any meaningful action against those who own the land – Boeing, NASA and the DOE. The Woolsey Fire, which began on Santa Susana Field Lab, may have exposed millions of people in Southern California to the chemical and radioactive waste from the site, via ash and smoke. It proved once again that we will not be safe until the site is 100% cleaned up. I will protect my children even if I have to tear down mountains with my bare hands – and I am one of many parents fighting for our kids. To win this, we need DTSC and CalEPA, with the support of California's elected officials, to enforce the AOC cleanup once and for all. Will you join us? 

Melissa Bumstead
699,395 supporters