69 petitions

Update posted 1 day ago

Petition to Hon. Dan Tehan MP, The Hon Scott Morrison MP, The Hon Michael Sukkar MP, Dr Emma Campbell, Senator Cory Bernardi, Senator Stirling Griff, Senator Rex Patrick, Senator Nigel Scullion, Senator Derryn Hinch, Senator Tim Storer, Senator Fraser Anning, Senator David Leyonhjelm, Senator Brian Burston, Malcom Turnbull

Please Help to Prevent Older Australians from Financial Hardship in their Late-lives

The Government announced Tightening of Residency Requirements for Age Pension & Disability Support Pension Eligibility effective from 1st July 2018. The New enhanced residency requirements for the Age pension & disability support pension will require claimants to have up to 15 years of continuous Australian residence requirements, instead of 5 years continuous residence together with 10 cumulative years residence, 3 times as long as the current continuous residency requirements. One of Our Compelling Stories: My parents have started helping me to look after my child since my child was 3 months old in order for me to do full-time work in financial field. My parents subsequently became permanent residents in 2007. After they have looked after my child for a considerable number of years, now my parents are going to turn 78 and 82 years of age in 2018 respectively. My parents would qualify for the age pension in 2019 under the current residency requirements, but will no longer qualify under the new tighten proposal until after further 10 more continuous years in 2029. The proposal has not recognised the value and contributions that these Older migrants have brought to our community through their significant support to their grandchildren to let their children/tax payers/Australian citizens concentrating on their work commitments. Under the tighten proposal, it will have a real the biggest financial hardship on that Older people Primarily Older Migrants especially in their middle of 70s age will not able financially live at an adequate basic standard of living & in their dignity in the very late of their lives. these seniors may not have much longer time to meet the new proposed residency requirements to qualify for the age pension. It is unfair, cruel, inhumane changes to these Seniors in their middle of 70s. Please help Senior Australians by Signing my petition calling on the Turnbull government to get Elderly Seniors on 1st July 18 to EXEMPT from the new enhanced residency requirements for the age pension in accordance with the humanitarianism.  Please sign & share this petition & play your part in preventing elderly Australians from considerable financial hardship. Read More: 1. Tightening Residency Requirements for Age Pension & Disability Support Pension eligibility in Federal Budget Review 2017-18: 2. Labour opposed to these changes. 3. FECCA (The Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils of Australia) has raised concerns that the measures will disproportionately impact migrant Australians.  FECCA believes that migrant Australians should not be punished in their older age or because they require support for living with a disability. FECCA concerned about impact of key budget measures on migrant Australians:        

Tracey Tingting Boyce
174 supporters
Update posted 1 week ago

Petition to Ken Wyatt, Malcolm Turnbull

Mandate aged care staff/resident ratios. Stop the neglect

This is my darling mum, Phyllis, she had dementia and died in March 2012. Her aged care facility did not care about her.   Food is a very important part of care, and often the only thing residents have to look forward to, for many it's the focus of their day. The facility served food that she and others found unpalatable and inedible, cheap junk food, hot food often served cold AND badly cooked to boot!  At times she’d go without anything from midday till 8am the next day - that’s 20 hours without food. And she would have starved if I hadn’t intervened, Mum feared complaining because she’d be told off like a child and once was slapped by a staff member.  When I complained, the aged care facility threatened me with an intervention order and ten years jail for stalking. And when I spoke out about THAT, people got in touch sharing horror stories of neglect and abuse and thankedme for speaking out – the common thread was shortage of staff and inadequate basic care leading to neglect. Many of the elderly and their families won’t complain for fear of retribution. This is when I realised the lack of staff ratios was a huge problem. With no mandated staff / resident ratios in aged care facilities across Australia, our elders are at risk of abuse and neglect. What I see is a system that needs changing. Over-worked staff are stressed and undervalued. In many aged care homes, one staff member can care for 20 or more residents with residents waiting for long periods to receive the care they urgently need by overstretched carers and nurses who feel that they can never get the job done. Ken Wyatt, if you really care about elderly Australians mandate staff/resident ratios for all aged care facilities across Australia, to protect our elders, to keep them safe,respected and valued.

224,185 supporters
This petition won 2 weeks ago

Petition to Hon Kevin Andrews MP, Dan Tehan, Ray Williams

Stop NSW Govt from forcing families to abandon children with intensive disability needs

When NDIS was introduced, funding for 1700 children/young people in NSW with profound disabilities went to NDIA. BUT NSW Government DID NOT ask NDIA to keep providing the intensive, 24/7 services they were already receiving. Now Govt is asking us to give up our kids to 'fix' this bureaucratic bungle. Please help - we want to reach 10,000 signatures by Friday 16 March! THE ISSUE IN A NUTSHELL Our children have such severe disabilities they need the intensive, 24/7 services. Those services were provided under the state disability service system until now … Somehow, during the establishment of the NDIS, the NSW Government handed over our children’s funding to the NDIA BUT DIDN’T ask the NDIA to continue providing our children’s services.Now the NSW Government has said if we want our children to continue to receiving intensive, 24/7 services, we must give our children up. But we love them and they need us so we say NO!Please sign our petition to ask the NSW Government and NDIA to amend their agreement to include our children’s funding AND the provision of the services they need and were already receiving – as should have been done in the first place! What can you do? Please sign this petition to help us continue to keep our much-loved, very vulnerable safe. MORE INFO IF YOU WANT IT - OR SKIP TO SIGN PETITION NOW!     Pictured: much-loved Jordan and Olivia Smith, two of the 1700 children the NSW Government is asking their parents Vanita Connery and Robert Smith to give up in exchange for essential disability services. MORE INFO IF YOU WANT IT - OR SKIP TO SIGN PETITION NOW!Why has this happened?When the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was introduced two things happened: Our children’s funding was transferred into the NDIS bucket. BUT the responsibility for providing those services was not. Why would the NSW Government hand over funding used to provide our children with services essential to their survival, but NOT include the provision of those same services in its agreement with the NDIA? We’ve asked but no one can tell us.Why is the NSW Government asking loving, involved, engaged parents to give up their children?If we want our children to consider receiving the intensive, live-in, 24/7 services they need, we need to give them up to the state.Why? The NSW Government still has two buckets of money available left available to them: #1 to support children who are at risk from their parents. #2 to support children whose parent cannot or will not care for them. They are asking us to give our children up so we can fit into bucket #2.These are much-loved children who are vulnerable and who we are constantly advocating for to keep them safe and well – we will not give them up or give up on them to fit into a bucket.

vanita connery
20,627 supporters
Update posted 2 weeks ago

Petition to Stephen Mullighan MP, Jay Weatherill

Save Tonsley Station! Save our access to public transport.

NOTE: This petition commenced on 22 November 2017. This campaign is still continuing and will be redirected to the new Minister for Transport, Hon Stephan Knoll, MP for Schubert.  Please read this original petition in conjunction with petition updates. The Flinders Link railway extension will remove Tonsley Railway Station permanently, adversely affecting the residents of Mitchell Park and Tonsley, particularly those with disabilities. For many wheelchair users, the train service is the ONLY ACCESSIBLE MODE of independent, affordable, public transport (as buses are inaccessible to many). If you remove Tonsley station, you remove people’s independence by taking away the option of public transport altogether.  PLEASE POSTPONE THE FLINDERS LINK PROJECT UNTIL THERE IS FUNDING TO KEEP TONSLEY RAILWAY STATION IN ITS CURRENT POSITION AND PROPERLY INTEGRATE FLINDERS LINK WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY. Removal of Tonsley station discriminates against local residents, especially wheelchair users and people with disabilities, short stature or frail health (of which Mitchell Park has a significant number) because the train is their only affordable access to independent travel.  Flinders Link is essentially 'UN-linking' the local community by withdrawing access to the train service. Access to the Tonsley train line is essential for Mitchell Park and Tonsley residents to access employment, education, healthcare, local services and the wider community. ACCESS TO TONSLEY RAIL LINE IS ESSENTIAL FOR EQUITY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES. The next station, Clovelly Park (902 m away) is not accessible to all because it does not meet disability access standards and is too far away for many people due to mobility and/or safety concerns. There are no plans to renovate Clovelly Park station to make it fully accessible. (Clovelly Park station is adjacent to the Tonsley Innovation Precinct at Alawoona Ave.) Many pedestrians can not even get to that station due to dangerous and/or unsealed footpaths. When Flinders Link is complete, the new replacement station will be over 520 metres away, uphill, at Flinders Medical Centre (FMC), Bedford Park.  Many pedestrians cannot walk or wheel that distance, especially when it is an uphill journey all the way.  The distance between Clovelly Park and FMC stations will be approximately 1.54 km. Keeping Tonsley station will remove more cars from the roads, reducing air pollution and traffic congestion in the Mitchell Park, Tonsley and Bedford Park’s ‘Flinders’ precincts and reducing parking problems at Flinders University & Medical Centre and other local railway stations like Oaklands Park and Woodlands Park. The SA Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) says that the Flinders Link project will cause an incline at the location of Tonsley Station due to a bridge/rail overpass over neighbouring Sturt Road. Why can't there be a section of level track at this section to accommodate Tonsley Station? Why can't we have a replacement Tonsley station as close as possible to the overpass? If the State Government of SA can build elevated railway stations at Port Adelaide, elevated tram stops at Glandore and elevate freeways across the suburbs, I cannot see how the creation of elevated stations along the Tonsley rail line is beyond the realms of physics! The proposed community engagement by the DPTI will have no influence on the engineering of the rail extension or its design.  The community engagement is to discuss pathways and landscaping around the Flinders Link project. ABOUT THE TONSLEY & MITCHELL PARK NEIGHBOURHOOD Other people in the neighbourhood use the Tonsley Station to access the local community by travelling from one end of the suburb to the other to access local schools, community and social clubs and neighbourhood centre. The local kindergarten and Suneden School use the Tonsley Station regularly to access community resources.  Mitchell Park and Tonsley have a large amount of public / social housing and people who are elderly or living with disabilities.  This community is already disadvantaged and values the opportunities that access to the train service brings.  There are also many new residents - students and health workers - who have moved in to be closer to Flinders University, UniSA & Flinders Medical Centre. There is the potential for the local community housing organisation to increase the number of dwellings for affordable housing in the area.  Recent changes to the local council's planning zones will allow multi-storey developments along the Tonsley rail line. It seems ludicrous to take away a station from an area which is predicted to expand in population and demand for rail services. Tonsley Station is an important link to Sturt Road for services, schools and businesses; e.g. Sturt Police Station, Sunrise Christian School and an important transport link to Blackwood, Sturt, Seacombe Gardens, Marion Medical Centre and Marion Shopping Centre. Many Sturt Road buses do not stop at Flinders Medical Centre. WHY AM I PETITIONING? WHO AM I? PLEASE HELP!  I am a wheelchair user who lives close to Tonsley Station. My family and I use it regularly to access education and work.I travel to Flinders Medical Centre for treatment multiple times per week. It would have made sense to be able to catch the train from Tonsley Station to the proposed new one at Flinders Medical Centre but without Tonsley Station, not only would I not have that option, but I would no longer be able to travel elsewhere independently like other adults do.  Access taxis are expensive and often unavailable when needed.  IF I LOSE MY STATION, I LOSE MY INDEPENDENCE! FURTHER INFORMATION Removal of Tonsley Station was confirmed by the Australian Government Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development, "Flinders Link" web page in June 2017: have printed copies of this document updated on 3 June 2017 and again on 20 September 2017. It states:"Project Description: …Removal of the existing Tonsley Station and construction of a new station adjacent to the Flinders Medical Centre;"On 30 November 2017, this document's Timetable stated:"Construction is expected to commence in late 2017 and to be completed by early - mid 2019." In August 2016 I downloaded a PDF of the Flinders_Link_concept_design2.pdf downloaded from the SA Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI). There is a label pointing to the rail line where Tonsley station is located. The label says "Existing Tonsley Station (review of station access)" This means that there will be a review of the access to the elevated walkway at this location but when I speak to people about it, many people interpreted that label as including Tonsley station in the Flinders Link design.The concept design can be found here: Previously, DPTI had published animations of the proposed Flinders Link project. Each one omitted Tonsley Station from the animation. When I contacted the DPTI to find out the status of Tonsley station, I was continually told "Nothing is finalised", "It's under review" and was promised to be contacted when there was an answer. The only news I received about the project was via the media or my own research. Animations can be found at the DPTI YouTube channel:25 October 2016: Flinders Link Project – Concept Animation 2017: upgraded version of the ‘fly-through’ animation now has a long circular ramp next to Sturt Road. This was not part of the concept animation in 2016. McLauchlan, Cathryn, "All systems go for Link work", CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 17 May 2017:  “…the existing Tonsley train station will be removed, and a new station built next to Flinders Medical Centre.” This journalist's source was the aforementioned "Flinders Link" web page of the Federal Dept of Infrastructure and Regional Development. This article was the first news I received that Tonsley station was confirmed for removal. It sparked follow-up letters to the editor: Clutterham, Helen, "Railway extension", published letter to the Editor, CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 24 May 2017: “As a senior citizen, I have loved being a seven-minute walk from the Tonsley station. Please don’t remove it. If it must be removed, then perhaps move the Clovelly Park station across Alawoona closer to where to Tonsley station is.” By Helen Clutterham, Mitchell Park. Buck, Matthew, Shortsighted rail plan, published letter to the Editor, CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 31 May 2017: “The removal of Tonsley Railway Station as part of the Flinders Link seems a little shortsighted, as it will leave a distance of more than two kilometres between Clovelly Park Station and the new Flinders Station. “Those who previously used the ‘park and ride’ facilities at Tonsley will now be faced with a longer commute. “Those who walk will now have to cross two major roads (Sturt and Main South Roads) to access the new station. “Services will also be restricted due to the only passing loop being between Tonsley Junction and Celtic Avenue. “There is a real danger in not planning for the inevitable future growth of rail patronage...". By Matthew Buck of Clarence Gardens   7 June 2017: I emailed the Mayor of Marion, Kris Hanna with copies to Ward Councillors Luke Hutchinson and Raelene Telfer and received no response except to see a Letter to the Editor in the Messenger Press:Hanna, Kris, "Rail link debate", published letter to the Editor, CoastCity Weekly newspaper, Messenger Press, 14 June 2017: “… the current Tonsley Station on Sturt Rd has to go, because the elevation of the track has to start a long way back to get up the hill. “Marion Council is talking to the State Government about relocation and upgrading of the current Clovelly Park and Mitchell Park train stations so that they cater for the northern and southern ends of the Tonsley site where 900 new dwellings are expected to be built. “The community should be consulted about station locations as details become clearer …” by Kris Hanna, Mayor of Marion 17 October 2017 The Public Works Committee Paper 343, entitled "Final Report. Flinders Link Project - Extension of Tonsley Rail Line to Flinders Medical Centre" was tabled in the South Australian House of Assembly and endorsed by the Presiding Officer Ms Leesa Vlahos MP.Document Location: states:“The Tonsley station needs to be removed due to the new elevated track. However DPTI is undertaking a review to determine if the current railway stations need to be relocated. The relocation of a station is not currently part of this project.” I identified a possible inaccuracy in this report and am concerned that there may be either members of the Public Works Committee or officers of the DPTI that are interpreting "Tonsley Station" as the station adjacent to the Tonsley Innovation Precinct and Flinders Tonsley Campus. It concerns me that there may be people making decisions about this project who are confusing The current Tonsley station (adjacent to Sturt Rd at the end of the line) with Clovelly Park station which currently serves the Tonsley Innovation Precinct. The reason I question the accuracy is that the distance quoted in the Public Works Committee Paper between "Tonsley railway station and the proposed FMC/Bedford Park railway station is, in fact the distance between the current Clovelly Park station and Bedford Park (Google Maps). “The nearest train station to the Flinders Precinct is Tonsley, which is located approximately 1.5 km from the centre of the Bedford Park campus." (Page 4. Public Works Committee Paper 343, 17 Oct 2017) This leads me to believe that Clovelly Park station will remain in its current location and will be renamed 'Tonsley' when the existing Tonsley Station near Sturt Rd is removed, despite local politicians suggesting that Clovelly Park station may be relocated further south, closer to the location of the current Tonsley station.This report says "Train services on the Tonsley passenger  line have historically experienced low patronage," but fails to provide the reason which has historically been a lack of weekend, early morning and evening services. Currently: the first weekday service to Tonsley leaves the city at 6:42 a.m. arriving at Tonsley at 7:04 a.m. the first weekday service to the city leaves Tonsley at 7:09 a.m. arriving at the city at 7:32 a.m. the last weekday service to Tonsley leaves the city at 6:42 p.m. arriving at Tonsley at 7:04 p.m. the last weekday service to the city leaves Tonsley at 7:09 p.m. arriving at the city at 7:32 p.m. Compare the Seaford line which runs trains from Seaford between 5:21 a.m. and 11:00 p.m.  and runs trains from the city between 5:30 a.m. and midnight. Local residents who would prefer to use Tonsley station and have the means, are forced to drive to other stations on the Seaford line such as Oaklands, Marion, Ascot Park and Woodlands Park.  Oaklands Park and Woodlands Park are most popular because all trains stop at these stations providing a service that is more frequent and reliable than Tonsley.  Commuters that need to work late or attend later appointments and functions in the city (and elsewhere) cannot rely on the Tonsley train to be available as late as necessary to get them home safely.This was reflected in the Darlington Upgrade Project Community Liaison Group Meeting Minutes of 24 September 2015 which can be found here:"DPTI advised that ... Woodlands Park to the City accounts for 70% of the total patronage on the Tonsley Line. Essentially, if more people used the Tonsley line additional services would be added. ... A group member stated that it is like a horse and cart scenario–you need the horse before you got the cart. If DPTI increased services people would probably use it more–especially on weekends. DPTI advised that the statistics show that carriages can currently be running empty or with two or three people on them."My personal observations are that the Tonsley line is not 'running empty' during morning or afternoon peak times.  It is no surprise that patronage drops in the middle of the day because people who start work late, often finish late and the Tonsley train service does not cater for that need.  The DPTI has known about this since at least 2015. Residents have been requesting extended and  weekend services for decades. All Darlington Upgrade Project Community Liaison Group Meeting Minutes can be found here: 18 Oct 2017 ABC Radio News reported:The 650 metre extension of the Tonsley rail line to Flinders University has been given the green light from State Parliament's Public Works Committee. The 85-million dollar project involves construction of a rail bridge across Sturt Road and South Road. The existing Tonsley station will be removed with a new one built at the end of the extended line, providing easier access to Flinders Medical Centre For those of us who rely on Tonsley station, the loss of it will definitely not provide easier access to anywhere! EDIT 10 April 2018 PLEASE REFER TO PETITION UPDATES FOR NEW INFORMATION POST STATE ELECTION: State Member for Elder, Annabel Digance MP967 South Road, Melrose Park SA 5039Ph: (08) 8374 1939Web: Federal Member for Boothby, Nicolle Flint MPLevel 1, 724 Marion Road, Marion SA 5043Ph: (08) 8374 0511 Email: nicolleflint.comFacebook: NicolleFlintLiberal Kelly Vincent MLC, Dignity PartyParliament House, Adelaide SA 5000Ph: (08) 8237 9543Email: Media Advisor James Pratt kellyvincentmlc.comFacebook: Darlington Upgrade ProjectPh: 1300 759 334Email: City of MarionPh: (08) 8375 6600Email: WardCr Raelene TelferPh: (08) 7420 6508Email: Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport 2002Australian Government Federal Register of Legislation For more information please email

Jodie Pearce
1,803 supporters