Petition to President of India, Prime Minister of India, Chief Justice of India
Review the life imprisonment of IPS Sanjiv Bhatt. We are with Sanjiv Bhat.
This is Shweta Sanjiv Bhatt,The sessions court today sentenced Sanjiv to Life Imprisonment for a crime he did not commit. To all of you who have stood by Sanjiv as his pillar of support - Your words of support are comforting and encouraging, but words without action will amount to nothing. your support will mean nothing if you let such travesty of justice happen to a man who has done nothing but serve his country and his people diligently. To the IPS association - today one of your very own has been vindictively persecuted for being a true IPS officer. You didn’t stand by him, you didn’t protect him … he keeps fighting his battle against this vindictive government, the question is till what end are you prepared to remain as silent spectators?We as a nation are going through an extremely dark phase. We shall continue fighting till our last breath, the only thing remaining to see is whether we will be fighting a lone fight? or will the people of this sovereign democracy fight for a man who never stopped fighting for them. The following is the press release detailing the particulars of this case and the judicial miscarriage we have been subjected to. Attached are copies of Sanjiv’s Further Statement and the Forensic Medico-Legal Expert’s Opinion.India, Its time to wake up. Today it is us, tomorrow it can be you.God bless#Timeforactionsnotwords #Enoughisenough #JusticeforSanjivBhatt (Please find attached, Sanjiv’s Further Statement and Dr.Reddy’s Expert Medical Opinion) Press Release: On 24th October 1990, major communal violence had broken out in different parts of Jamnagar city following the stoppage of L.K. Advani’s Rath Yatra in Bihar and his subsequent arrest. At that time Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was posted as ASP Jamnagar Rural Division; wherein the district of Jamnagar was divided into three police divisions as Jamnagar City, Jamnagar Rural and Khambhalia. Following the absence of Dy. Sp. Of Khambalia division who had proceeded on a sick leave, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was handed over with additional charge of the Khambalia Division on 16th October 1990. On 24th October 1990, the day of the mass break out of the communal riots in Jamnagar district, Mr. Pravin Gondia IPS proceeded on leave, following which Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was asked to immediately take over the additional charges of Jamnagar City Division as well and to prepare, implement and supervise the bandobast in Jamnagar city. Thus, on 24th October 1990, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was officially holding charge of entire Jamnagar District and was effectively dealing with the communal violence in the city. A call for Bharat Bandh on 30th October 1990 was given by Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP). Large scale communal violence was expected across the country during the Bandh call of 30th October 1990 and all communally sensitive states of India were put on high alert. Following the break-out of communal violence on the 30th in Jamnagar, the Collector, District Magistrate, Mamlatdar and the Executive Magistrate of Jamjodhpur announced for immediate imposition of curfew in the entire town. While the implementation of curfew was yet to begin, the entire town was in the grip of violent miscreants who were spreading terror by indulging in targeted violence including loot and arson against individuals, shops, establishments and properties belonging to the minority Muslim community of Jamjodhpur. The first priority of Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was to quell the riotous mobs and ensure strict enforcement of curfew to maintain peace, law and order. After handling various incidence of violence across the state, and having ensured enforcement of curfew, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt reached the Jamjodhpur Police station at around 1:30 pm on 30th October 1990, wherein he was informed by CPI Bhanvad that a total of 133 people including the deceased Prabhudad Madhavji Vaishnani had been arrested by the local police led by PSI Jamjodhour between 9:30 am and 12:15 pm from 15 separate incidents of mass communal violence and arson across the city under the single offence C.R. No. 96/90 registered under sections 147, 148, 336, 337, 395, 436, 151, 327, 452, 454, 455 of the IPC, Section 3-6 of the TADA Act and Section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act. The deceased, Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani was arrested by a team consisting of K.N. Patel, CPI, Bhanvad, PSI Thakor and Mahashankar Joshi hours before Shri Sanjiv Bhatt and his staff had reached the Jamjodhpur Police Station. While the 133 persons including the deceased and his brother were being arrested for arson and communal violence, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt along with his staff were diligently dealing with riotous mobs in a different part of the city between 9:30 and 12:15 pm. At no point in time were any of the arrested 133 persons including the deceased and his brother were in custody of Shri Sanjiv Bhatt or any of his staff. None of the arrested 133 persons including the deceased and his brother were interrogated by Shri Sanjiv Bhatt or any of his staff. The complaint filed by Amrutlal Madjavji Vaishnani, an active member of the VHP/BJP falsely accusing Shri Sanjiv Bhatt, alleges that the arrested rioters were made to do sit-ups while in custody and were kept in an open chowk adjoining the police station. It is to be noted that on being presented before the nearest Magistrate by the local police on the 31st October 1990, no complain of torture or any grievance was made by the deceased Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani or any of the other 133 arrested rioters. The 133 rioters including Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani were sent to Judicial Custody on orders of the Magistrate and were to remain in jail till 8th November 1990. No complaint of any grievance or torture was made by any of the arrested 133 rioters including the deceased Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani. Even after the rioters including Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani were released on bail, there was no complaint of torture or any grievance. On 12th November 1990, owing to ill health Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani was taken to the hospital in Jamnagar and then Rajkot. During his visit to the hospital as well, no complaint of any grievance was made against Shri Sanjiv Bhatt. On 18th November 1990, while undergoing treatment in Rajkot, Mr. Vaishnani passed away. The hospital records as well as the forensic postmortem records of Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani have noted that there were no internal or external indication of any injury/torture or any grievance. The complaint of custodial torture was made by Amrutlal Madjavji Vaishnani who also happens to be an active member of the VHP/BJP after the demise of the Mr. Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani 30th October 1990, the day of the communal violence and the subsequent arrest of Prabhudas Madhavji Vaishnani, was only the 20th day of Shri Sanjiv Bhatt’s posting in Jamnagar. He did not know any of the persons arrested, let alone have a grudge against anyone. The complaint filed against Shri Sanjiv Bhatt is a classic case of political vindictiveness, as the then Chief Minister of Gujarat Mr. Chimanbhai Patel was to face a vote of confidence in the Gujarat Assembly on 1st November 1990 and was very keen to ensure the support of Patel MLAs from the BJP as well as the INC. Shri Sanjiv Bhatt’s refusal to remove the sections of TADA from an offence where majority of the arrested persons were from the Patel community was seen as a personal affront to the then Home Minister Narhari Amin and the then Chief Minister Chimanbhai Patel, both of whom happened to belong to the Patel community. Shri Sanjiv Bhatt’s superiors in the Police Department as well as the Home department were fully aware that Shri Bhatt was being falsely victimized for having performed his duty with utmost sincerity and diligence. Hence the Home department Government of Gujarat decided to accord Shri Sanjiv Bhatt Legal Assistance vide Government of Gujarat Resolution No. MIS/1090/6152-B dated 9th January 1991. The investigation conducted by CID declared that there was no evidence found against Shri Sanjiv Bhatt, and the state government refused to give sanction to prosecute. The State Government protected the police officers and Shri Bhatt in earnest up until 2011. In 2011, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was summoned as a commission-witness by the Justice Nanavati and Justice Mehta Commission inquiring into the riots of 2002, where Shri Bhatt truthfully deposed regarding the role of the then Chief Minister of Gujarat, other ministers and high-ranking officials in the 2002 riots of Gujarat. Following Shri Bhatt’s deposition, there was an immediate withdrawal of the Revision Application filed by the State of Gujarat on the very same evening, and instructions were given the very next day to start the immediate prosecution of Shri Sanjiv Bhatt and other officers who were being duly protected by the Government of Gujarat till that date. Since the commencement of the vindictive persecution, out of the 300 witnesses only 32 witnesses were examined. The complainant who sat silent from 1990-2012, suddenly became vigilant and engaged senior lawyers before the courts including the Supreme Court. In a blatant miscarriage of justice, Shri Sanjiv Bhatt was not permitted to call in any defense witness. On having requested to summon Forensic Medicine Expert Dr. Reddy; the court in mockery, ordered at 12:30 pm for him to report in court by 3:00 pm on the very same day, despite knowing that he resides in Hyderabad and would require at least a day’s notice to make the commute. Thereby dismissing the request to examine a key defense witness. Moreover, the order to complete the trial was conducted ex-parte, without the knowledge and in absence of Shri Bhatt’s lawyers. Shri Sanjiv Bhatt today was convicted for a crime he did not commit and under S. 302 of the IPC was given life imprisonment for being an upright officer and doing his duties diligently, irrespective of political pressure. It is strange that how a death which occurred after 18 days of being out of custody; without any indications of internal or external trauma or injury, a death which was examined and reported by the forensic medicine experts to have no indication of torture or grievance, was declared to be a Homicidal death. There cannot be a more blatant example of vindictive persecution of totally innocent officers including Shri Sanjiv Bhatt and his staff who had performed their duties in an outstanding and exemplary manner during the most difficult phase of the communal rioting. We shall be examining the order minutely once we receive it and we shall challenge it in the appropriate forum. Justice has not only been denied, but an innocent man has been persecuted for doing his duty with diligence.
Petition to Mr. Narendra Modi, Mr. Ram Nath Kovind
Mr. Modi, We the people of India want your resignation.
Why we are doing this? This is not a politically motivated petition. We write this because we are concerned about the national security of our country, the safety of our men & women in the armed forces and the unacceptable influence big business houses have on this Govt. Through the Rafale matter, it has become clear, that the Modi govt. will go to any lengths, put at stake anything to help its friends make money. Who in turn fund construction of expensive BJP offices, election campaigns and BJP's PR machinery. This unholy nexus has to be done with. Refer list of invitees to the PM Modi's Paris visit where the deal was announced. No prizes for guessing who was at the top of the list. Even BJP old timers have criticized the govt. on this deal. As a first step, we demand the resignation of our Hon'ble Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose govt. has time and again mislead the nation on this matter and is clearly a significant partner in this unholy nexus. You don't believe us ? Read the French Report on How Modi Govt Pushed Anil Ambani as Rafale Deal Partner. What are we talking about? The recent statements by ex-Prez. of France have put a serious question mark on the integrity of the Defense Ministry, Finance Ministry and the PMO. The "Business Friendly" Modi govt. has always been accused of being partial to business houses of India. That the friendship would trump India's national security itself has been an eye-opener. Not only has the Rafale deal cost 3 times than originally intended to the tax payer, Indian govt's push for selection of Reliance Defense as partner to Dassault has also raised questions on Modi govt's attitude towards National Security of the country. The Modi govt. first made a flip flop in Parliament on commercials of the deal, it then deemed HAL as an unfit partner for Dassault and claimed it had nothing to do with Reliance Defense being selected as a partner, all highlight the multiple attempts the Modi govt. has made to conceal facts from the public and mislead the nation.HAL, a govt. owned unit has 70 years of experience in aircraft manufacturing. It has worked on LCA Tejas, Sukhoi Su-30MKI and other aircrafts. Whereas, Reliance Defense has ZERO experience in aircraft manufacturing. In fact it was less than a month old when it was awarded the contract. However, defying all common sense, Modi govt., deemed HAL unfit to partner with Dassault. Ex-HAL chief TS Raju told HT, "When HAL can build a 25-tonne Sukhoi-30, a fourth-generation fighter jet that forms the mainstay of the air force, from raw material stage, then what are we talking about? We could have definitely done it (licence produced the Rafale jets)". The selection of Reliance Defense as partner to Dassault in such a critical deal has made India unsafe. In a neighbourhood with two not so friendly nuclear powers at our borders, national security takes paramount importance. Based on his government's attempts to mislead the nation on this matter we consider Prime Minister Narendra Modi unfit for the office that she holds. Therefore, we demand his resignation in the interest of national security. We all should speak in one voice and let it be known that money cannot run this country and we will not allow people to sell this country to big business houses. Facts for your perusal: Our hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi announces, India will purchase 36 Rafale fighter jets off the shelf from Dassault, a French aircraft builder Inter-governmental agreement with France signed. India to pay about Rs.58,000 crore or 7.8 billion Euros for 36 off-the-shelf Dassault Rafale twin-engine fighters (3 times higher than the cost under UPA) France to invest 20% of 7.8 billion Euros into local production of Rafale components Defense Minister Sitharaman does a flip flop in Parliament, agrees to reveal price of Rafale aircraft and later backtracks citing a secret agreement preventing her from revealing commercial details of the deal French Prez. Macron says he has no objection if PM Modi wants to share some details under the secrecy clause Reliance Defense, less than a month old company with ZERO experience in aircraft manufacturing is chosen as an offset partner to Dassault Reliance Defense and Govt. claim that choice of offset partner was with Dassault and Govt. had no role to play Francois Hollande states that Indian Government chose Anil Ambani for Rafale deal French journal Mediapart has quoted ex-French Prez. Francois Hollande as saying: "We did not have a say in this... the Indian government proposed this service group and Dassault negotiated with (Anil) Ambani group. We did not have a choice, we took the partner who was given to us." Even BJP old timers Yashwant SInha & Arun Shourie have criticized the govt. - The entire deal was a "textbook case of criminal misconduct, of misuse of public office and of enriching parties at the expense of the national interest and national security", they alleged, adding there was an "effort" by the government to "conceal" facts
Petition to India parliament, Central Government
Section 381 in Merchant shipping act to be included in MS bill.
For Seafarers Central GovernmentAct Section 381 in The Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 381. Power of Central Government to cancel or suspend other certificates.—Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Central Government may, at any time, without any formal investigation or inquiry, cancel or suspend any certificate granted by it under this Act, other than a certificate granted to a master, mate or engineer, if, in its opinion, the holder is, or has become, unfit to act in the grade for which the certificate was granted to him: Provided that no order under this section shall be passed by the Central Government unless the person concerned has been given an opportunity of making a representation against the order proposed. ��section 209 of the MS Bill will allow the bureaucrats to take away our license without going to a court. This is not just against sec 381 of the existing Act, it is also against para2 of Art 97 of UNCLOS. Govt. is committed to bring the new MS Act within a few day. For the betterment of seafarers and their dedication towards their hard life Section 381 of MS Act to be included in MS bill which prevent cancellation of their license without any formal investigation. Pls sign this petition if you want for betterment of seafarer this section 381 of MS act to be included in new MS bill.
Petition to Chief Justice, Chief Minister, prime minister, Norka
Justice for pravasi Sajan & Family (Kannur Partha convention centre)
The tragic fate of a young NRI Entrepreneur The 49 year old Nigeria returned Pravasi Businessman, Mr. Sajan Parayil, who had spend Rupees 16 crore for the Kannur Partha Convention Centre, hanged himself at his home on June 18 after the municipality had refused to grant him the ownership certificate over his project. The World Malayalee Federation (WMF) pleads for justice. The government of Kerala is requested to set up an inquiry commission on this tragic incident and to speed up an adequate compensation for wife and kids of Sajan and action to be taken for the responsible. #JusticeForSajan #JusticeForNRI’s #WMF Regards World Malayalee Federation (WMF)
Petition to managing director - cidco, commissioner - nmmc, urban development department, Gurunath Arse, Chief environment secretary, Conservator of forest, Konkan divisional commissiner, Somraj , sunil agarwal, Devendra Fadnavis
Save Navi Mumbai Wetlands Save Yourselves .
Chief Minister of Maharashtra, 80 hectares of Mangroves & Wetlands worth crores on prime location on Palm Beach Road saved by High Court orders from being handed over to a private builder for residential and commercial development in name of golf course by changing the land use from No Development Zone to Regional Park Zone and Residential Zone . The Bombay High Court on 1st November 2018 shelved the state government’s ambitious proposal to build a golf course and a residential colony near the upcoming Navi Mumbai airport calling it a destruction of water bodies/wetlands “which will infringe the fundamental rights of citizens.”A division bench of Justices Abhay Oka and Riyaz Chagla was hearing a bunch of PILs against an October 2016 notification of the state’s Urban Development Department. Interestingly, one of the reasons cited by the state in favour of its plan was that since the area was frequented by migratory birds and was located within 4 km of the proposed international airport, it could pose a danger to aircraft by exposing them to bird hits.“There is no material placed on record ito show that for preventing possible bird hits, making of the golf course is the only solution,” the bench observed.. It then added that the water bodies maintain ecological balance and therefore, “public trust doctrine” imposed an obligation on the state government and related agencies to protect them. The PILs also sought protection for two city lakes – the DPS lake in Sector 52, Nerul and the other one at Palm Beach Road, Navi Mumbai – both of whom were in danger due to garbage and construction debris dumping. The court directed that all the water bodies shown in the National Wetlands Inventory and Assessment prepared by Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad must be protected. On the issue of the golf course and a residential colony, the court also noted that although the proposal was being discussed by the planning authority – City and Industrial Development Corporation – since 2002, the authorities had failed to show that the impact on the ecosystem and environment was assessed or at least “such assessment was made available to the Planning Authority or the state government” while clearing the proposal. Why waste public money in unnecessary litigation ? Action should be taken & legal cost should be recovered from officials responsible for such decisions . Thanking you For complaints about wetlands destruction call 1926 or post online complaint on newly launched website https://www.konkanwetland.com/ Link to our Facebook page : https://www.facebook.com/groups/savenavimumbaienvironment/ https://www.facebook.com/saveTalaweWetlands/ Link to Twitter : saveNaviMumbaiWetlandsTweets (@sunnyagro): https://twitter.com/sunnyagro?s=09 Link to a short film on this issue by international channel Zoomin.tv : �This wetland in Navi Mumbai, India, acts as a natural barrier against floods and is home to more than 80 bird species, which is exactly why the Agarwals are doing everything they can to protect it ✊ https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=840898439434325&id=432708166912159 Youtube link to film : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQEPa0jRuDs Another very informative film on Citizens initiative & Mangroves warriors . FB link : https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1732876363438678&id=165818073477856 You tube link: https://youtu.be/-dnb2c0QUuA
Petition to Municipal Council Zirakpur, RERA Punjab, punjab cm, SSP Mohali, Deputy Commisioner Police
Cheated Investors In Maya Garden Magnesia,Zirakpur Project Seek Help
We are the investors in the commercial project that is known by the name of Maya Garden Magnesia. The project is located on the Chandigarh-Ambala highway on NH-22 opposite McDonalds and is promoted by Barnala Builder Pvt Ltd (Owned by – Mr Satish Jindal & Mr Deepak Jindal) A Brief Background: Back in 2017-18 many investors from all over India and abroad invested in this project. At the time of sales, the salesmen persuaded the builder that the project will be handed over to investors by September 2022. The investors were offered 1% of the amount invested per month till the possession was offered by the builder around the above said date. The salesman also showed computer generated clips of the project (Available on Youtube) and guaranteed the finished project would be what was shown on the graphic video. To this proposal many investors like us did invest their precious corpus into this commercial project. Current Situation: As of today, the promoters have gone back on their words and the investors feel cheated. Below are the points to support our statement: 1. Though the project was scheduled for possession in September 2022, the builder started forcing premature possession of a section of the complex which they term as block A back in April 2020 (during 1st lockdown because of Covid). It may be noted that the building being offered for possession was nowhere near completion. On further opposition and analysis by the investor group it was found that the building possession was being offered based on a false completion certificate. After a lot of efforts by the investors the matter was investigated, and corrupt officials suspended. After this development of events the builder had to cancel his possession offer and had to roll out the assured returns of 1% per month. Surprisingly and against promises made the builder adjusted the money to be paid out to investors in the form of balances the customers owed to him (5% in most cases). There were even cases where investors had paid 100% of the money in advance to the builders and yet they had to run pillars and post to get a refund. 2. On the present date, the builder has once again offered possession of a specific part of the building – Block A to its investors while the other parts of the building continue to be built. Overall, the property is nowhere near completion as promised and is not in a condition to commence business. Below are the points to support our claims: a. Electrical wiring not in place. b. No fire fighting equipment installed. c. No escalators provided as advertised. d. No washroom fittings. e. No certificate from NHAI f. No NOC from Environment,fire fighting,pollution,disability In addition to the above discrepancies, it may be noted that there is no provision for this project to be offered for possession in parts via partial occupancy certificate. As per CLU letter issued by town planning govt it is clearly mentioned that “the site shall not be bifurcated for the purpose of development and will be developed as one single unit.” – Please find the document attached for your reference – Ref# PBIP/LORC-1/1607355764) 3. It may be noted that the assured carpet area promised by the builder in the agreement letter has been changed on the offer of possession letter. The actual carpet area being offered is almost 40% less than the Super Area that was mentioned to the investors during the sales process and mentioned in the agreement document. This point must be investigated. 4. Currently the investors are being forced to take possession or pay hefty holding charges (late payment fees) despite all the above pending work and present discrepancies. 5. The investors are being asked to pay a hefty maintenance charge of Rs 8 per sq feet which is very high compared to what other commercial projects charge in tricity. 6. The investors are being forced by the builder to pay 3 years maintenance fee in advance. This was never discussed during the sales process and is a surprise to us. 7. The property is stated to be maintained by a company called My Space. This company is promoted by the same promoters as Barnala Builders (Promoters of Maya Garden Magnesia). During the sales process, the promoting company advertised that JLL would be maintaining the project. This is clearly stated in the marketing document provided to investors. This is a clear case of mis-selling. Finally, as investors in this project we feel cheated and dejected having to follow-up with the builder and their staff without any results on demanding promised services and product during sale. It is clear that the builder has all intentions to cheat its investors and wants to make his profit while letting their customer suffer! Please beware that many investors in this project are retired working professionals who decided to put their life savings into this hoping for assured returns. Many of our investors are middle class working professionals who put the majority of their savings into this project for some security. But alas they have been treated like dirt by Barnala Builders and its associates. This incident is an example of theft and loot which is currently being carried out in the broad daylight. This must be attended to and dealt with strictly. We the investors in this project seek your help in dealing with this issue and helping us get our just rights.
Petition to Mr. Narendra Modi
Do we need a new building of Parliament in such fragile state of economy @Rs.970 cr.
A new building of Parliament is being constructed at a cost of Rs.970 Crores. Do we need this just because we are anticipating more number of Lok Sabha members in 2025. Are these MPs homeless or do not have offices to work from. Parliament is not a revenue generator that such an amount should be spent in such a fragile economy. We should stop it before it the foundation stone of this is laid.
Petition to Honorable Chief Minister of West Bengal Mamata Banerjee, Government of India
Regulate Power Utility Bill amount under CESC which is sending huge Electricity bills.
To,The Hon'ble Chief Minister,Government of West Bengal. Respected Madam, CESC Ltd. a Power Utility service provider company based out of Kolkata is sending huge electricity bills to consumers across Kolkata and nearby municipality area which comes within the purview of CESE for Electricity consumption. In the month of July,2020 CESE has been instrumental in providing irrelevant Electricity bill which amounted from Rs. 4000 to Rs. 200000 for all its consumers in Kolkata and nearby municipality area. Therefore we request you to intervene in this matter so that consumers money do not dissipate in this crucial Covid-19 conditions . Thanks & Regards, Consumers under CESE Ltd.