Topic

corporate accountability

8 petitions

Update posted 2 weeks ago

Petition to The Cancer Industry, Cancer Organizations, and Governments

PETITION FOR BRIGGS FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR ALL - A New Era

Thanks for coming here in Briggs's memory.  I tried for a year to get access to the immunotherapy she needed.  Just four days after I heard we finally had a chance, I lost her to complications brought on in what was meant to be a short emergency hospital stay.  It should never have been that close.  And no-one should ever have to go through all Briggs did.  Cancer disguises itself.  Immunotherapy either alerts the immune system to it or does such things as block the disguise.  The immunotherapeutic vaccine (curative not preventive) I'd been pursuing for Briggs had brought complete remissions in stage IV colorectal cancer.  Immunotherapy's a potential cure in all other solid-tumor cancers such as breast, lung, renal, and pancreatic.  The Vice Chair of Neurosurgery at University of California, Los Angeles has successfully used it in the usually incurable brain cancer that took Senator Ted Kennedy and, in 2015, Joe Biden's son Beau.  She has patients still cancer-free at over 10 years. In early 2016 an immunotherapy put President Jimmy Carter's stage IV melanoma into complete remission despite it having already spread to his liver and brain.  Development of it was led by a professor on this petition. Immunotherapy's also worked in acute leukemia.  In 2012 all treatment had failed with a 6-year-old girl at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.  Her condition was terminal, but a test after 3 weeks showed no cancer.  60 Minutes later ran a story on it.  Memorial Sloan-Kettering has succeeded in adult leukemia. If you'd like to read more on immunotherapy, this article of mine about it and Briggs was featured by the Huffington Post and Stand Up to Cancer: 30 Stars and Doctors Sign the 'Petition for Briggs for Cancer Immunotherapy for All'. Former NYC mayor Mike Bloomberg and Amazon's Jeff Bezos and his family have donated tens of millions to cancer centres for the development of immunotherapies.  Bill and Melinda Gates have invested in a company focused on them.  It takes anywhere from $350 million at a biotech to $5 billion at a major drug company to bring one new treatment to the market.  Tens of billions are needed from, among others, Congress. Please join us in calling for governments, the cancer industry, and cancer organizations to reorient the primary direction of funding, research, and treatment to the safest, most potentially effective immunotherapies in every cancer, and, notably in this context, curative immunotherapeutic vaccines.  (The one I'd tried to get Briggs had a perfect safety profile.)  Not trials for trials' sake, which has too often been the case in the past with chemo, etc.  An overabundance of unwarranted trials only leads to lack of oversight and harm.  And in conjunction with that, to make information on immunotherapy routinely and widely available to patients and caregivers. (If you've read Briggs: Love, Cancer, and the Medical Profession, comments to build awareness would helpfully reach more people as a book review on the Amazon kindle/paperback page: www.Amazon.com/BRIGGS.  Only the latest show below.) Heartfelt thanks for signing in Briggs's memory, to begin changing this for others as she so wanted, and for anyone you know with cancer; I hope not a close loved one or you yourself. Paul_________________________________A sister petition to this addresses medical errors especially, the Petition for Briggs for a New Era in Medical Care and Treatment _________________________________Join Rod Laver, Martina Navratilova, Nick Kyrgios & 10 squash greats in the Volleying Challenge for Briggs's Petition_________________________________Twitter: @BRIGGSsBook  

Paul Sanderson
6,157 supporters
Started 1 month ago

Petition to Kelechi Anyadiegwu, Zuvaa CEO

Zuvaa Inc: Release Designers' Sales Revenue Immediately

On October 16, 2017, Zuvaa.com, a multi-vendor African fashion website with  headquarters based in Atlanta, was shut down after several months of withholding sales revenue from the designers whose Africans fashions were sold on the website. Zuvaa Inc. was founded in 2014 by Kelechi Anyadiegwu, Founder and CEO, and is also led by Adia Dightman, Head of Business Development. Since July 2017, Zuvaa Inc has refused to remit payments to its designers on the now shut-down website and past pop-up sale events, where these designers' items were sold. Reportedly, outstanding payments for sales and stock in Zuvaa's possession may exceed $300K. As a result, Zuvaa has crippled several businesses of these African fashion designers. Meanwhile Kelechi or Adia have failed to provide a definite date for payment.  The business agreement between Zuvaa and designers is that Zuvaa takes 17% commission of online sales and  25% commission of products sold at Zuvaa pop-ups. The rest of the sales revenue (83% for online and 75% for pop-ups) is to be remitted to the seller/fashion designer of the sold items within 14- 30 days after sale. However, it has been over 3 months since the last payment from Zuvaa to the affected designers. Zuvaa CEO, Kelechi Anyadiegwu, claims "Zuvaa needs to care of Zuvaa before we can help [the designers]." An official response from Kelechi (Zuvaa CEO) maintains Zuvaa's refusal to remit sales and also occurred 2 weeks after placing all designers' items for sale on the Zuvaa website at 40% off the retail price for Labor Day weekend in early September 2017. Zuvaa received an estimated 3000 plus orders from that retail weekend alone, and implored its designers to fulfill those orders. However, Zuvaa Inc fully refused to pay designers' their sales revenue from that weekend.  Zuvaa touts itself as a global marketplace for online African fashions, allowing western audiences easy access to authentic or inspired African fashions from designers all around the Diaspora. Zuvaa has been featured in The New York Times, Essence Magazine, Ebony Magazine and Fast Company to name a few. Kelechi Anyadiegwu has been recognized by Forbes Magazine 30 Under 30 in the Retail & E-commerce Category, BET CNN and Voices of America for her contributions. Upon receiving an official demand letter for payment for product sales, Kelechi Anyadiegwu informed designers that she had spent the revenue on her business needs, and wouldn't be able to remit payments at this time.When pressed for more clarification, Kelechi emphasized that it is her business model to spend designers' revenue on her business needs, and that she had spent it all and wouldn’t be able “to help”. Additionally, Kelechi has shared the following:  Zuvaa's current business model is that "all funds Zuvaa receives goes to Zuvaa" Zuvaa Inc is an investment/marketing company. Designers selling on Zuvaa.com agreed to invest our sales revenue with her company, and that any money she lost are investment losses. However, designers never agreed to business terms that forfeit all designer sales revenue to Zuvaa. This is fraud and misappropriation of funds on a massive scale, as she is indebted to every vendor who sold items on her website and at her pop-up shops. These vendors are located in the United States, Africa and across the world. We are Chinero Nnamani YTPshop Sosome Adensecret Udianna Fashion House of Sarah Melange Mode Enagancio Ashanis and many more Help us get our money from Zuvaa. You can reach out to the affected Zuvaa designers here: zuvaavendors@gmail.com Zuvaa's contact for Kelechi (CEO) is kelechi@zuvaa.com and Adia (Head of Business Development) is adia@zuvaa.com For more stories from affected designers, read their stories on social media here Sign and share this petition to help raise awareness of Zuvaa Inc's refusal to pay designers their sales revenue. Help designers' get their money!  

Zuvaa Pay Your Designers
806 supporters
Update posted 6 months ago

Petition to Starbucks Corporate, Claudia Bill-de la Peña, Rob McCoy, Al Adam, Joel Price, Ellen Rosa, Jay Spurgin, Andrew Fox, Jim Mashiko, Kathy Lowry, Haider Alawami, Geoff Ware

City Officials and Starbucks Need to Fix Traffic Problems - Public Safety Issue

  Starbucks Drive-Thru in Thousand Oaks, on Rancho Rd/Thousand Oaks Blvd is a traffic mess. The city and Starbucks agreed to measures in the permit for the Starbucks. Call on the City and Starbucks to do what they said they would. The city was warned that the traffic would be bad; they ignored the warnings, and now are not even enforcing their own resolutions. Starbucks shares the lot with a local small lighting business. Their business is affected daily by the car queue from Starbucks.  An injury or accident can be prevented - the city was warned. We need to alleviate the problem for all parties! In Ventura County Star: VC Star Letter In Thousand Oaks Acorn: TO Acorn Letter Acorn Letter from another resident: Letter in Acorn from Resident who Warned City Video: https://youtu.be/ly2TuwdbX5c UPDATE: An engineer for the city has said "nothing needs to be done at the location", saying a "comprehensive study" was done in 2015 and 2017, a study which ended up being a basic line graph, with no details or context. Even in that graph, cars, more often than not, exceeded the 9 car limit specified in the resolution permit. The engineer also said no cars have were EVER observed backed up onto Rancho Road. Anybody who has been through that intersection during the morning hours has seen that line back up onto the street. There are multiple recorded instances of this as well. Full Article:  Starbucks Brews Public Safety Concerns                 Starbucks is notorious for putting small shops out of business, from forcing out small vendors selling coffee at the V.A. Medical Center to stampeding adjacent properties with its high traffic. The large corporation has continued to increase its number of stores every year, and has a very loyal base of Starbucks aficionados. The company cannot keep up with the increasing amount of consumers waiting in line, whether in store, or in their cars. Starbucks has been trying to deal with this through their mobile app, which allows customers to place their orders ahead of time. Still, even after the rollout and promotion of the app, the coffee baristas are overworked in the morning rush hours, lines remain long, especially for drive-thru locations, and customers consequently sometimes don’t get their coffee at their preferred temperature. The increased demand for their products is a problem for them, in the sense that Starbucks has TOO much demand.                 Starbucks plans to add 40,000 drive-thru locations over the next few years, with many of those locations being drive-thru ONLY. As of April 2017, there is only one Starbucks in the Conejo Valley that is drive-thru only – the Thousand Oaks location at the intersection of Rancho and Thousand Oaks Blvd, which opened in 2013.  If you have been to this location before, then you most likely know that it has a major traffic problem. In order to fully understand how and why this unfortunate situation came to be, we must look at how it got approved in the first place. It was the first location to be approved after a drive-thru related amendment to the Thousand Oaks Specific Plan 20. This is the plan for improving Thousand Oaks Blvd east of Moorpark Road and west of Duesenburg Drive. It was first adopted November 2011, with two amendments in the middle of 2012, and an amendment in 2016.  Basically, the plan deals with establishing future guidelines for the street and the businesses located on the street.  The plan is very ambitious in terms of the overall vision for the boulevard, wanting a high amount of foot traffic, buildings that are pleasing to the eye, and for buildings to include landscaping and extended sidewalks.  The May 2012 amendment dealt with drive-thru restaurants.                 For drive-thru only restaurants on Thousand Oaks Blvd, approval must come from the City of Thousand Oaks Planning Commission, and requires a special use permit for the property. The special permit was granted after review of an ATE study dated April 5th, 2012; this study was referenced in the permit resolution. That ATE study, which dealt with predicting the traffic of this Starbucks location, cited 3 other Starbucks drive-thru locations, the primary one being the location in Oxnard on Channel Islands Blvd. The study inferred that the Oxnard location would have the same traffic patterns as the Thousand Oaks location. It projected about 91 vehicles for the weekday morning period (7:00 am – 9:00 am), with an average queue during this time of 6 vehicles, and a maximum of 9 vehicles. The resolution states that if the activity and resulting queues exceed those projections and thus adversely affect on-site circulation or block project driveways, that the applicant agrees to correct any identified deficiencies in a “timely manner to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer and Community Development Department” by implementing measures recommended in the ATE study. The first measure would be to station a Starbucks employee, similar to In-N-Out drive-thru order takers, near the end of the queue in order to expedite the time spent in the queue. The second measure would be to restrict the Thousand Oaks Blvd entrance driveway to outbound traffic only – if the first measure doesn’t reduce the queue.                 Anyone who has been to this Starbucks location in the last couple of years knows that on-site traffic circulation has been adversely affected. It is also a daily occurrence during those weekday morning hours for the queue to be so long that it stretches all the way out to the Rancho Rd entrance driveway. But have you seen a Starbucks employee taking orders for vehicles in the queue? If so, how often? I drive past this lot twice a day on my way to and from work, and I have yet to see a Starbucks employee outside. Even outside those peak morning hours the queue goes onto Rancho Rd. Once actually through the drive-thru and coffee in hand, getting out of the parking lot is another nightmare itself. With cars entering the drive-thru from both entrances, getting out is a major headache and requires patience, skill, cooperation with other drivers, and even then, it is still frustrating and unsafe. I understand the City of Thousand Oaks felt that prior to the Starbucks being there, it was somewhat of an eyesore, but their own resolution says that the permit will be revoked if those previously mentioned two measures aren’t enacted, and/or don’t help traffic circulation.                 Imagine the frustration for the other tenant in this parking lot, Lighting and Bulbs Wholesale Supply. The long queue at Starbucks routinely blocks the entrance and parking spaces of that business. Customers who manage to park in a spot have even more difficulty getting out. Customers are forced to park in the adjacent lot, or at the Chevron across Rancho Road. Many of these customers are landscape contractors who drive heavy load pickup trucks. Parking and leaving Lighting and Bulbs Wholesale Supply is much more difficult for them than the average compact car with or without a backup camera. I spent one day in the morning hours recording action from the viewpoint of this local lighting business, which has been in Thousand Oaks since 1999. The customers were frequently agitated over the traffic situation, but they themselves could only imagine the stress of the owner of Lighting and Bulbs Wholesale Supply.                 Why has there been no media coverage, or even local media, about this situation? As a local resident of Thousand Oaks for 6 years, who lives on a side street off of Thousand Oaks Blvd, I always liked the amount of genuine small businesses operating in the city, especially on Thousand Oaks Blvd. Many of these businesses have been in operation for a very long time. In recent history we have seen more commercial chain stores come to Thousand Oaks Blvd, but this Starbucks is the biggest concern, because not only is it adversely affecting the neighboring local business, but also because it is affecting public safety (there has been a very noticeable increase in police/crime activity at that location in the past four years), and thus embodies the commercialization of large corporations negatively impacting the local community. According to Google Maps, there are about 16 other Starbucks in the Thousand Oaks/Westlake Village/Newbury Park area (more if the Oak Park area is included). As residents of these cities, do we really need more big corporations pushing out small businesses as they swallow their own footprint? With the growing rate of population, do we really want to become the next San Fernando Valley? The Conejo Valley has always been a tight-knit community. Let’s keep it that way. Watch the video, give your signature to show your support, and help preserve our community. Video: https://youtu.be/ly2TuwdbX5c Sources: Thousand Oaks Specific Plan 20 http://www.toaks.org/departments/community-development/planning/thousand-oaks-blvd-specific-plan Small Business Owner Forced out of VA Medical Center due to Starbucks http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/05/15/feds-forcing-small-business-owner-out-in-favor-of-starbucks/ Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-2012 PC http://71.165.173.179/WebLinkPublic/0/doc/741882/Page1.aspx        

Dan Kim
111 supporters
Update posted 7 months ago

Petition to Twitter, Inc

Vote Yes to a Co-op with Your Users

WE'VE MOVED! Come see our new site at buytwitter.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Twitter is under threat of being sold, and selling out its users. For a lot of us Twitter is the fastest, easiest way to know and share what’s going on around us – it sparks conversations, spreads information, and energizes movements. But Wall Street thinks the company is a failure because it’s not raking in enough profit for shareholders. That means that Twitter is up for sale, and there is a real risk that the new owner may ruin our beloved platform with a narrow pursuit of profit or political gains. We want the company to share its future with those whose participation make it so valuable: its users. There’s a growing movement urging Twitter to work with users to find a way to buy it, and to turn it into a cooperatively owned platform. We can foster innovation from the community and create a better, more user-friendly business model. The Associated Press, REI, and the Green Bay Packers all demonstrate the profitability and popularity of democratic ownership models. In April and May, shareholders will vote on our proposal for Twitter to research the benefits of converting into some kind of co-op. Sign our petition urging Twitter to say YES to a co-op. YES gives shareholders analysis and insights into the value of an exit to democratic user ownership. No means we'll never know :( It's time we expand our imaginations in order to create a more open, inclusive, and people-centered Internet. Join us! 1. Send @Twitter a tweet 2. Sign this petition 3. Smile :) Questions? Please email info@wearetwitter.global You can sign the petition in other languages, too: Spanish/ español German/ deutsche Italian/ italiano French/ française Arabic/ عربى Hebrew/ עִברִית Chinese traditional/ 中文 Chinese simplified/ 中文

Maira Sutton #WeAreTwitter
3,719 supporters