Petition to United States Supreme Court, United States Department of Labor
Bring an End to Cannabis Drug Test Discrimination
* All data has been derived from the world’s only data-driven Marijuana Drug Test Calculator (Patent US 13/866,015)* Empirical data collection ongoing since 2011 The Fourth Amendment"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The Core IssueDrug testing violates every person's core Privacy and Due Process Rights set forth by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. These programs have increasingly been used to justify discriminatory policies against people who use cannabis - especially minorities and people of color. In the 1970s and 80s, President Nixon, further implemented by his successor, President Reagan, introduced and began to heavily promote workplace drug testing. In a relatively short amount of time, drug testing proliferated from safety sensitive jobs to non-safety sensitive jobs where the Federal Government then created financial incentives for companies to create and enforce the pre-employment drug test - where you are presumed guilty until proven innocent for no reason. Today, suspicionless drug testing of public high school students takes place and doctors throughout the nation are using "medication contracts" to force their patients (many of them veterans) into taking a urine drug test in exchange for medication. Make no mistake about it, there is no end in sight when it comes to finding an excuse to drug test someone. A Discriminatory Look at the PracticeRacial discrimination and drug testing is running rampant. After normalizing five years of our drug test submission data with an Ethnic Population Distribution Report and then cross-referencing with labor force characteristics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, it has been determined that if you are Black or African-American, then you are 1.3 times more likely to be drug tested for any reason, including random. These findings corroborate with the well established fact that on average, a Black person is nearly four times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than a White person, even though both groups use marijuana at similar rates. Hispanic and Latino people are 1.3 times more likely to be drug tested while on probation. Further information about the racial breakdown of drug testing can be found here. Cannabis Drug Testing FactsBased on our data and research, it has been determined that the average person who smokes cannabis once has a failure rate of 50% at 12 days. It is also the only substance on the standardized SAMHSA 5 Panel Drug Test (used throughout the country) that can be detected for more than a month. This is due to the non-polar, hydrophobic nature of cannabinoids at the molecular level. When consumed, the fatty tissues in our bodies attract and soak up these molecules, and then slowly release them back into the blood stream over time for metabolization. This, unfortunately, ensures a very long detection window that has been exploited for capital gain. Without drug testing for cannabis, which doesn’t prove if a user was under the influence at the time of the test, the six billion dollar drug testing industry that exists today would collapse. Help us End Cannabis Drug TestingWarrantless drug testing is a violation of the Fourth Amendment with programs that are invasive, unproven, expensive, and discriminatory. With the wave of reformation that is taking place across the nation as the acceptance of cannabis grows, it is time to uproot the discriminatory drug testing practices of the 1980s and bring an end to cannabis drug testing as a condition of eligibility for employment, school-based extracurricular activities, and medical attention. No one should be punished for using a natural herb that heals the mind, body, and soul. Please Sign and Share Marijuana Central
Petition to Senator José Menéndez, Representative Jason Isaac, Representative Dan Flynn
Abolish Daylight Saving Time in Texas
Texas State Senator Menéndez and State Representatives Flynn and Isaac have introduced three bills (with identical language), during the 2017 Texas legislative session, which would end Daylight Saving Time in our state, beginning next year. Arizona and Hawaii already do not observe DST, so Texas would be joining two other states which have decades of experience keeping standard time year-round, even while the other states change their clocks twice a year. The timing is perfect; since DST was made permanent in 1966, we now have a full fifty years of data and experience to show that this experiment in trying to shape citizens' behavior by changing the time twice a year has not brought the promised blessings. Daylight Saving Time is a federal law which reaches into the homes of almost every citizen in the United States, and causes negative disruptions to our personal lives twice a year, including: - Strain on family life- Harm to physical health- Reduction in work productivity (For example, here is a recent article from the Boston Globe highlighting selected research about the effects of DST: https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2017/03/10/proof-daylight-saving-time-dumb-dangerous-and-costly/kOqQs7T33rYHMEnCraQSJO/story.html ) Yet the daylight saving time federal law allows any state which wishes to, to remain on standard time year-round. This is a simple bill that easily attracts bi-partisan support. We urge the Texas Senate and House, and Governor Abbott, to pass the bill to abolish Daylight Saving Time in Texas, in the 2017 legislative session. Here is the full text of the bills (SB 238, HB 95, and HB 2400): AN ACT relating to daylight saving time. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 312.016, Government Code, is amended byadding Subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) The state, acting under the exemption provisions of the Uniform Time Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. Section 260a(a)), is exempt from the provisions of that law that establish daylight saving time. The exemption provided by this subsection applies to both the portion of the state using central standard time as the official standard time and the portion of the state using mountain standard time as the official standard time. SECTION 2. This Act takes effect November 5, 2017, tocoincide with the end of daylight saving time for 2017.
Petition to Truckers United For Freedom
Repeal The ELD Mandate And The 14 Hour Rule
Three of the worst federal regulations that govern the trucking industry are: The Electronic Logging Mandate (ELD) The 14 Hour rule The 30 minute Break The ELD is a violation of American's Constitutional Rights. The 14 hour rule limits shift flexibility for the truck driver, which creates less than desirable travel conditions on America's roads. The 30 minute break is an unnecessary regulation considering that drivers routinely stop for rest breaks throughout their day. Therefore, it is problematic and stressful for drivers to follow this rule. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration received 580 million dollars in 2016 to regulate the trucking industry and they claim that these regulations will save 26 lives a year but they have not provided the information on how they came to this conclusion. The members of the trucking industry feel that these regulations were created in the interest of crony capitalism and that these regulations are having an adverse effect in regards to safety on America's roads. Nearly 25% of all fatalities in accidents that involve large trucks are truck drivers. Truck drivers have a stake in safety as much as anyone else and they should have a voice in the matter, too. Please, sign the petition in order for our members of Congress to understand the importance of removing these heinous regulations. We want Title 49 U.S. Code section 31137 repealed and there shall be no replacement of a similar law.We want the repeal of 49 CFR 395 Subpart B - Electronic Logging DevicesWe want the repeal of 49 CFR 395.3 (2). "14 Hour Period". We want to have shift flexibility to drive up to 11 hours before being required to take a 10 hour break, without a continuous running clock.We want the repeal of 49 CFR 395.3 (3) (ii) Rest Breaks. We know when to take a break without being told that we are required to take one.We want an assigned committee of truck drivers to advise the DOT, FMCSA, and all House and Senate Committees and Subcommittees. All new laws and regulations must pass through the truck driver committee before being applicable for legislation to ensure that the interest of truck drivers, owner-operators, and small fleet owners are appropriately taken into consideration for economic plausibility and safety for the members of the trucking industry and for the general public. More details on this matter may be found at https://tuffadvocate.weebly.com/protect-our-rights.html Thank you and God bless.
Petition to Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, Nick Freitas, Ted Cruz
Make Our Constitution the Supreme Law Again: Read, Re-read, and Restore Liberty!
American youth have chosen to look to the federal government to define and establish the precedence of their individual liberties while surrendering liberty for safety. With Benjamin Franklin erased from their socialist public education cirriculum, they have forgotten that by doing so they will 'lose both and deserve neither.' Individual liberties are found within, a gift from the Almighty. By allowing the very body most capable of tyrrany and oppression to dictate what is and is not a right, American youth are handing over the keys to the future of us all. By signing this petition, you are stating that you want the American youth present in Washington D.C. to: (1) walk a few blocks further and find the sacred document written on parchment headlined with "We The People," (2) READ IT!, (3) re-read it!, (4) internally reflect upon what it took those men to create such a document, and (5) go home! The men & women who fought for this nation did not do so for you to hand away the rights they insured through their sweat and blood; nor is there an expiration date to our solemn oath of defending the Constitution against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC (like you). The liberties of free people are not yours to surrender or debate. - WE THE PEOPLE
Petition to U.S. CONGRESS
Take our demands and make them law. FIX DEMOCRACY
Whereas we the people are created equal, and whereas we the people are endowed with certain inalienable rights, and whereas we the people instituted a government to secure these rights, and whereas we the people lay the foundation on such principles, and organize its power in such form, as to us shall seem most likely to effect the above objective, do require the following Bill of Rights for Voting Equality. 1. Each citizen of the United States at or exceeding the age of majority has the right to vote in any public election in the jurisdiction where he or she resides. That right shall not be denied or abridged by the United States, any State, agreement, person, or entity. After incarceration all rights shall resume. REASONING: No More Stolen Election says: Most Americans believe that the "legal right to vote" in our democracy is explicit, not just implicit, in our federal Constitution. In fact, the federal Constitution recognizes each state’s guarantee of voting rights, and furthermore, guarantees equal protection of those rights. Additionally, the federal Constitution provides for elections for the U.S. House and Senate, and repeated amendments to the Constitution have affirmed that the right to vote belongs to all citizens regardless of race (15th Amendment) or sex (19th Amendment), and to all citizens over the age of eighteen (26th). Despite two centuries in which the right to vote has been affirmed and expanded as a constitutional right, the U.S. system of elections still does not adequately protect voting rights. Indeed, Justice Scalia in Bush v. Gore claimed that, "the individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States." (Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98, 104 (2000)). Because the Supreme Court, election administrators, and elected officials have, for the most part, proven themselves unable or unwilling to implement the reforms required to protect American voting rights, we must work to adopt a federal constitutional amendment confirming every citizen's right to vote. 2. a) All citizens of the United States, residing in all states, shall have equal access, (the same requirements), to creating a political party and achieving a ballot line. b) All candidates and parties shall have equal time constraints to qualify for ballot access. c) All proofs will be received by a multi-partisan regulatory board, such as the Board of Elections. d) All citizens that desire to be candidates, shall register at their local Board of Elections. e) The Board of Elections shall divide equally, the campaign tools for election purposes. All tools must be properly labeled as having been provided by the revenue stream and not a direct private donation. f) Corporations are NOT people and Money is NOT speech. Elections shall be publicly funded. No private money may be used for a public office, or seat in the government. No ads may be purchased for the purpose of an election. No candidates may appear in an ad for an election for themselves or others. The citizen must have full confidence that no bribery or appearance of bribery is taking place. REASONING: Equal Access Amendment says: a & b) The 14th amendment provides for equal treatment under the law, but since currently every state has it's own rules for gaining ballot access, that effect is made moot. In addition a party that has current standing does not have to repeat the qualifications but instead rides through on past performance. For this reason we submit that every citizen should have equal access (rules) to forming a party and achieving a ballot line. And we advocate that this requirement be met by all, each election. No More Stolen Elections says: c) It is time to overhaul our federal, state, and local election agencies to guarantee fair elections. We must replace the current system of partisan election administration, in which partisan secretaries of state, county clerks, election commissioners, and other partisan officials are able to issue rulings that favor their own political parties and themselves, with a non-partisan, independent system of running elections. We must end the practice of contracting out fundamental election functions, such as the maintenance of voter lists, to private corporations. We must also insure that independent international and domestic election observers are given full access to monitor our elections. d) e) It is time to overhaul our federal, state, and local election agencies to guarantee fair elections. We must replace the current system of partisan election administration, in which partisan secretaries of state, county clerks, election commissioners, and other partisan officials are able to issue rulings that favor their own political parties and themselves, with a non-partisan, independent system of running elections. We must end the practice of contracting out fundamental election functions, such as the maintenance of voter lists, to private corporations. We must also insure that independent international and domestic election observers are given full access to monitor our elections. Equal Access Amendment says: f) The United States, must have integrity in its elections. It can not be tempted with money or power, to deviate from true equality, from the poorest of its citizens to the richest. Any donation to a campaign is in essence a bribe to ask a candidate to do what the donater wants. Elections must be decided based on the veracity of the candidates' words. 3. The District constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall elect Senators and Representatives in the Congress in such number and such manner as it would be entitled if it were a State. DC Vote says: An amendment to the Constitution needs to be passed to give DC voting rights. Congress has passed laws to modify the DC government structure in the past. In 1961, the 23rd Constitutional amendment granted DC residents the right to vote in Presidential elections. In 1973, Congress passed the District of Columbia Home Rule Act giving DC the right to a local government (mayor and city council). For decades DC residents have written letters, protested, and filed lawsuits striving to change the city’s voting status. Unfortunately, to date they have been unsuccessful. While DC residents have an elected mayor and city council, all locally passed laws must be reviewed by Congress and the local budget must be sent to Congress for affirmative approval. In many cases, Congress has attempted to include noxious riders on the budget that overrule decisions of the local government. DC Vote is working to end this injustice and to protect DC's local democracy. Americans living in our nation's capital pay full federal taxes, fight and die in wars and serve on juries, but are denied voting representation in the House and the Senate. 4. All citizens must be able to verify that the vote has been counted accurately. All ballots must be ABLE to be counted by hand. All counting must be supervised by multi-partisan personnel and recorded. Currently supporting the Dechert Method https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=au3w1Kyztg8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_HOGDobRMg https://youtu.be/7gkQ8w0Pneo REASONING: Black Box Voting says:: These indicators must be present to insure fair voting. 1. Who can vote (the voters list) 2. Who voted (the polling place sign in book) 3. Whether ballots counted are same ones as were cast (chain of custody) 4. Whether the count was accurate (public count) No More Stolen Elections says: Every voting system in the United States must be equipped to facilitate a permanent, visible record of every vote cast, and to honor the right of the voter to mark their own ballot themselves. The public is the only realistic check on vote counts, because elections determine the composition of government itself; those in power cannot be trusted to count or process -- unsupervised -- the very ballots by which they came to office. The acid test for a free people is the guaranteed right to remove incumbents at will, especially criminal incumbents, from office. Any system that allows secret and therefore unaccountable vote counting is unacceptable because it denies the right to vote and to “kick the bums out” at precisely the moment when that right is needed the most. Voters must know that their vote will count and make a difference. Election officials must ensure that every voting precinct and wards is adequately staffed with sufficiently trained personnel and professional supervision; that absentee ballots are mailed with a sufficient time for delivery; that every ballot, including provisional ballots, are counted; and that provisional ballots count for statewide and federal contests regardless of where the vote is cast. Election officials should wait until after any recounts have been completed to provide final certification of election results. 5. a) The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every Thirty Thousand, per state.b) Each state shall divide its population by 30,000 to determine its number of representatives. c) Each Representative shall have the voting power equal to the number of citizens that voted for them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hDj795PCuId) Congress shall be unicameral, and the Senate shall be dissolved. REASONING: Thirty-Thousand.org says: a) The intended purpose of the very first amendment proposed in the original Bill of Rights was to ultimately limit the maximum size of congressional districts in order to complement the minimum size already established by the Constitution. However, though affirmed by many states, “Article the first” was never ratified due to an inexplicable defect in its language. b) Several empirical studies show that there is a clear relationship between the population size of legislative districts and the size of government; specifically, government spending increases as the population size of electoral districts increases. c) With respect to how a representative assembly should be constituted, John Adams stated: “It should be in miniature an exact portrait of the people at large. It should think, feel, reason and act like them.” It is no longer necessary, or even advantageous, to require all federal Representatives to commute weekly to a single distant location. Current technology makes available other means – which would have been unimaginable at the time of the drafting of the Constitution – for virtually assembling and voting on bills. Choice of Representation says: c) The justification espoused by plurality voting is that the most popular candidate is capable of and concerned with adequately representing people who voted against him or her even if it conflicts with interests of the people who elected the representative. This premise is obviously false, especially in this day of huge special interest investments in campaigns and the molding of messages, NOT on what the candidate believes, but on what the consultants believe will attract enough votes for their candidate to win. When the representatives we vote for are denied office (RDO’s = Representatives Denied Office), and are barred from participating in the legislative process, the citizen is being denied full participation in our government. The present system is partial or exclusionary representation. What we need and deserve is full inclusionary representation. A Choice of Representation System treats a vote as a durable proxy of voting power that the representative carries to the governmental body in which he or she serves. When they vote, they do not have one vote equal to all of the other representatives, they have a vote that has a weight equal to the number of people who voted for him or her. Under Choice of Representation, there are no wasted votes, every vote marginally increases the power of the person receiving it, a person obtaining the representation of his/her choice does not reprieve another person of the representation of his/her choice. No More Stolen Elections says: We must adopt Proportional Representation (PR) for legislative elections to ensure the fair representation of all voters. Millions of Democrats in Republican areas and Republicans in Democratic areas are unrepresented in our system, and the majority of Greens, Libertarians, and other independents are unrepresented at all levels of government. The right of representation belongs to all citizens. NOTE: The concept of a single-seat office as different from a multi-seat office, needs a larger audience. Multi-seat offices such as LEGISLATIVE branches, must hold votes to make decisions. The single-seat office decides on it's own. Even a change of one representative to 300,000 citizens would be an improvement. WE NEED MORE REPRESENTATIVES. WE NEED THE RIGHT TO THE REPRESENTATIVES OF OUR CHOICE.Wikipedia says: d) The principal advantage of a unicameral system is more efficient lawmaking, as the legislative process is much simpler and there is no possibility of legislative deadlock. Proponents of unicameralism have also argued that it reduces costs, as even if the number of legislators is the same as it would be in a multicameral system, there are fewer institutions to maintain and support. Legal Information Institue says: Not until 1842 did Congress undertake to exercise the power to regulate the ''times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives.'' In that year, it passed a law requiring the election of Representatives by districts. A number of state legislatures, following the Revolution, were created unicameral, and the Continental Congress, limited in power as it was, consisted of one house. 6. All citizens shall have equal early voting hours in which to cast their vote. sufficient voting places, materials, and personnel shall be provided to reduce the voting time to within an hour. No More Stolen Elections says: Many citizens are discouraged from voting by unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles and restrictions. We must simplify and rationalize voter registration so that no one is again disenfranchised for failing to check a superfluous box, as occurred this year in Florida, or for not using heavy enough paper, as nearly occurred in Ohio. We must require voter registrars to sign affidavits promising to submit any registrations in their possession in a timely manner. We must eliminate police intimidation, language, physical disability, extra-legal requirements of personal identification, and other barriers to voting. To ensure that all qualified voters are able to vote, we must follow the lead of states like Minnesota and Wisconsin by replacing restrictive voter residency requirements with same-day voter registration, allowing qualified voters to register at the polls on Election Day itself. Our current system forces millions of voters to wait up to ten hours to vote. This is unacceptable, and it disenfranchises those who cannot afford to wait. To increase access to the polls, all states must provide sufficient funding for enough early voting and election-day polling places to guarantee smooth and speedy voting. To ensure equal access and minimize the wait at the polls, election authorities must allocate resources based upon the number of potential voters per precinct. We must put an end to the government-backed practice of allowing partisan activists to challenge the voting rights of individual voters at the polls. Instead, the government must invest in campaigns designed to educate voters about how they can exercise and protect their right to vote. 7. The Presidential/Vice-Presidential election shall be counted by (score or approval) counting. https://youtu.be/2q_eMUGCU5U https://youtu.be/AuKDXeJt7KA https://youtu.be/AhVR7gFMKNght No More Stolen Elections says: We must replace our current "first-past-the-post" system. Our winner-take-all elections award representation to the largest factions and leave everyone else, often the majority, unrepresented. The winner-take-call system unnecessarily restricts choice, polarizes politics and limits political discourse. It is time to end the safe state/battleground state dichotomy and make all votes equal, no matter the state of the voter. We must amend the Federal Constitution to replace election of the President by the Electoral College with direct election by the voters. The Center For Election Sciences says: The concept of a single-seat office as different from a multi-seat office, needs a larger audience. Multi-seat offices such as LEGISLATIVE branches, must hold votes to make decisions. The single-seat office decides on it's own. Approval voting is the simplest and fairest way to vote in a single-seat election. _______________________________________________________________ Bills must be addressed in numerical order. Bills must have a time limit such as 30 days for research, and 30 days for dissemination of said research, and 2 minute comment, at the end of which time a vote on the bill must occur. Thus eliminating the control of Majority or Minority party. Supreme Court Justices and Federal Justices will be determined as a jury pool. Judges will submit their names for consideration. A review period will be established, to where these judges can be asked questions. ALL POLITICAL PARTIES recognized by the Federal Election Commission shall have an equal amount of exemptions. In addition, ANY Elected Representative WITHOUT a party shall have the same number of exemptions. Once all exemptions have been exhausted, the President may select from the remaining body. Judgeships shall not be vacant for more than 60 days.
Petition to Brian A. Benczkowski Assistant Attorney General
COALITION AGAINST PUBLIC CORRUPTION
"PUBLIC CORRUPTION" damages Americans more than any other problem. Corrupt lawyers, judges, and politicians taking bribes damages everyone, our families, businesses, communities, nation and the world's economy, freedom and democracy. If you care about America, your health and safety, your children's future, then sign this PETITION AGAINST PUBLIC CORRUPTION. Where "the rubber meets the road" for CHANGE is in the courts. Corrupt judges and lawyers bribed by special interests don't give a damn about you, our health, safety, environments and quality of life. By signing this PETITION AGAINST PUBLIC CORRUPTION you will be casting your vote for CHANGE, including greater transparency and public oversight of the Justice Department and "Justice System" that is "totally out of control." This CHANGE can happen by forcing the Judicial Branch of Government into the sunlight of public scrutiny with grassroots coalition regulation administered by independent oversight committees. This solid practical remedy and PETITION AGAINST PUBLIC CORRUPTION especially opposes the multi-national corporations that are bribing most politicians (i.e, law-makers) while replacing you with robots, "artificial intelligence 'AI'," and imposing dangerous and deadly technologies on everyone. These new government-licensed corporate-imposed risks include frequency-based wireless services and genetically engineered (GMOs) foods, drugs, and vaccines. By signing this PETITION AGAINST PUBLIC CORRUPTION, you will be sending a strong message to President Trump and his administration's chief criminal division law enforcer, Brian A. Benczkowski, encouraging POSITIVE CHANGE and POWER RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE for GREATER JUDICIAL REVIEW, LAW ENFORCEMENT, CIVIL RIGHTS, HUMAN FREEDOMS and JUSTICE FOR ALL!
Petition to U.S. House of Representatives, Thomas Massie, Rand Paul, U.S. Senate, President of the United States
Pass a Real 2nd Amendment Restoration Act
Proposed ~ A Bill: IN RECOGNITION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE 2nd AMENDMENT, AND IN UTILIZING THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE AND RECOGNIZING THAT CERTAIN LAWS ARE AN OBSTACLE TO THE ACCOMPLISHMENT AND EXECUTION OF THE FULL PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES OF CONGRESS, (1) All federal, state, regional, and local laws which in any way infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms, including, but not limited to, any laws which would require any (individually or in combination) marking, recordkeeping, serialization or registration of firearms or ammunition, are hereby deemed null and void by Congress, as they are an obstacle to the people's ability to exercise the 2nd Amendment right, and are an obstacle to the full purposes and objectives of Congress. (2) Any federal, state, regional, and local laws which would require any (individually or in combination) marking, recordkeeping, serialization or registration of any firearm parts, or of any objects which would later be made part of a firearm (whether or not the object would ultimately become a regulated part of a firearm), are also deemed to be null and void, as they are an obstacle to the people's ability to exercise the 2nd Amendment right, and are an obstacle to the full purposes and objectives of Congress. No further laws of the type in (1) and (2) shall be able to have any effect. CAVEATS, EXCEPTIONS: a) UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST (USML): Federal government may control by permit, and limit the use of, USML CATEGORY II, IV, V, VI, VIII, XIV, XV, and XVI items that are weapons, except for technical data or weapons and items routinely or commonly available in the civilian market. b) PROHIBITED PERSONS: It is unlawful for the following categories of persons to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition, to include any person: - convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, unless that crime was due to enforcement of a gun law of a State or a political subdivision of a state;- who is a fugitive from justice;- who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);- who has been adjudicated as a mental defective, due to the decision of a court, or has been committed to any mental institution, and due to the decision of a court, has been deemed unable to ship, transport, receive, or possess firearms or ammunition;- who is an illegal alien;- who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions, except that all such persons must have be given the right of appeal in a district court to address the issue of firearms and ammunition possession and use;- who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;- who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner Laws of a State or laws of a political subdivisions of a state that establish or attempt to expand upon these prohibited persons categories, shall have no force or effect. c) CAVEAT REGARDING EVIDENTIARY NEEDS OF POLICE, CUSTODY, AND IMPRISONMENT: Any persons who are taken into custody or who are about to be incarcerated can be relieved of arms by police, provided however that the affected individuals may petition the courts for relief and restoration of rights. This is not intended to limit the rights of persons bearing arms, concealed or otherwise, in circumstances where involvement in an incident would require that a person involved in a self-defense scenario (who had, following the incident, retreated to a safe location and notified a lawyer) notify police of the circumstances of what had transpired, but it would allow the police to request temporary custody of a weapon that was used in such an incident for evidence and documentation. IMPOSTS, DUTIES.Notwithstanding the preceding, any laws of a State or laws of political subdivisions of a State that impose a tax on conduct or possession of firearms or ammunition shall have no force or effect. Consistent with Article I, Section 10, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, no state shall "without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing its inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress."
Petition to Monica Burton Sherree Spence, Magistrate Kathleen Lenski
Cps Corruption, the American Holocaust
YouTube https://YouTube.com/PennyLane Bichute https://bitchute.com/937lane Facebook https://facebook.com/937lane WordPress https://937lane.wordpress.com/ Scribd http://bit.ly/scribed-937lane Steem it https://steemit.com/@lane11 Contact https://bit.ly/expose-cps