Topic

civil liberties

14 petitions

Update posted 2 months ago

Petition to Steve Bullock, Donald Trump, Jon Tester, Steve Daines, Greg Gianforte

Release U.S. Political Prisoner Ron Glick! Investigate Montana Corruption!

    Governor Bullock, President Trump:     Do not allow your legacy to stand as supporting imprisoning American citizens for their political ideas, regardless what label you mask their detention under.     In 2003, Ron Glick uncovered sexual and physical assaults against minors by the Kalispell Police Department in Montana through his work running a youth recreations program he had operated for seven years. When he urged the youth to speak out against the abuse, he was targeted with harassment and intimidation by both City and Flathead County officials. Two days after he brought suit for these threats - exercising his constitutional right to petition the government for redress of grievances without fear of molestation - he had his step-daughters abducted, and months later his freedom stripped from him under a falsely manufactured sexual assault charge.  In spite of volumes of records proving that his conviction was acquired through felonious activity to cover up the official misconduct of city and county officials, Ron Glick has remained a political prisoner in his own country since 2004.       The State of Montana is complicit in covering this all up, since corruption is largely a standard in Montana government.  Three different attorney generals have presided over defending the actions of the state, with the first - Mike McGrath - being elevated to head justice of the Montana Supreme Court, effecting a control over that court that continues to deprive Ron of his constitutional right of due process.  A second, Steve Bullock, is presently governor of the state, and kept Ron's application for clemency in limbo for over a year before ultimately affirming his own actions as attorney general.     Ron has been very outspoken about his status as a prisoner of conscience, maintaining a blog (http://monspiracy.wordpress.com) and even published a book (U.S. Political Prisoner Since 2004) chronicling the path by which he became a prisoner of conscience.  His assets have been stolen, the courts actively obstruct his claims to them, and he is detained under the most draconian conditions the state can manage - under conditions no other detainee is held under.  All because - AFTER FOURTEEN YEARS - Ron has refused to confess to a crime he did not commit and thereby exonerate the real criminals operating under pretense of government.     And since May, 2016, the very people named in his autobiographical expose are pushing to return Ron to prison for another fifteen years - specifically for content published within that very book!  This makes the longest revocation effort on record for Montana - a revocation that has been "pending" for almost two years as of March, 2018 - all because the State wishes to keep Ron under an elevated fear of retaliation for continuing to speak out against his unconstitutional detention!     In October, 2015, Montana's legislature granted the power of clemency to its governor.  Governor Steve Bullock - in conformance with his former duties as Montana Attorney General - denied Ron Glick's clemency after sitting on the application for over a year!  Governor Bullock has the executive power to free this man held for no other reason than speaking out against the real criminals operating without consequence from behind the shelter of their elite government positions.  Yet Bullock refuses to do so, since he knows that freeing Ron will expose the corruption in the state and remove any threats used to silence the full involvement of himself in covering up this scandal!     Please do the right thing: free Ron Glick (#FreeRon).     After fourteen years, hasn't Ron suffered enough for his political beliefs?     (Updated March, 2018)  

Ron Glick
232 supporters
Update posted 3 months ago

Petition to Jessie Liu, Rizwan Qureshi, Jennifer Kerkhoff, Sarah Flores, Michael Horowitz, Robin Ashton

Drop the Charges Against Trump Inauguration Protesters

On January 20, 2017, tens of thousands of people converged in Washington, D.C. to protest the inauguration of Donald Trump. A wide variety of demonstrations countered the spectacle of the inauguration, making it clear to the world that many of us reject the president's cruel and divisive leadership.  A day of defeat became a moment of resistance, setting the stage for grassroots resistance that has persisted throughout the Trump administration.  Unfortunately, with resistance comes repression. After attacking protesters (including small children, and other unlikely 'rioters') with pepper spray and ‘sting-ball’ grenades, DC police cordoned off an entire city block and mass-arrested more than 230 people.  In an unprecedented move, the US Attorney for DC later indicted more than 200 people with at least eight felonies each—for rioting, inciting a riot, conspiracy to riot, and property destruction—which carry sentences of up to 75 years in prison.  As the cases progressed, some charges were dismissed for various reasons (including legal mistakes and lack of evidence). The first trials were a complete defeat for the prosecution, with a jury returning 42 'not-guilty' verdicts.  Yet, 59 defendants still face sentences of more than 60 years.  With these unprecedented, excessive charges, the US Government is cracking down on dissent. This strategy corresponds with a broader wave of repression—including state legislation to criminalize protest, and the demonization of #BlackLivesMatter and #TakeAKnee.  Join the ACLU, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Defending Rights and Dissent, the Committee to Protect Journalists, and many other civil liberties advocates in standing with the J20 defendants. Call on the U.S. Attorney’s Office for DC to stop criminalizing dissent! --------------------------- Learn more at DropJ20.org, or read about us in the NY Times. Please follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, and share this petition widely! #DropJ20

DropJ20
9,505 supporters
Update posted 4 months ago

Petition to Keith Cota, New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Tell NHDOT: Evaluate a Temporary Bike/Ped Lane over Little Bay during GSB Rehab

NHDOT thinks that a shuttle bus with a bike rack is the only solution for providing non-motorized users passage across Little Bay between Dover and Newington during the 2-3 year reconstruction of the General Sullivan Bridge. Seacoast Area Bike Riders (SABR) believes that there is another solution: a temporary multi-modal (bicycle/pedestrian) lane on the shoulder of the southbound Little Bay Bridge. Both the southbound (current) and northbound (newly renovated) Little Bay bridges will be open by the time NHDOT closes General Sullivan for reconstruction (tentatively Fall 2019), so there should be plenty of room for all users to have unrestricted passage. Benefits of Multi-Use Path Across Little Bay The results of the December 2017 SABR survey regarding the Memorial Bridge shuttle service show that a shuttle bus decreased cycling (only 10% of cyclists reported using it) and was considered “not a success” by 80% of the survey respondents. The problems most frequently cited were the shuttle’s inconvenience, unreliability, long wait times, and insufficient room for bicycles. Decisions on how to accommodate non-motorized travelers did have an impact on walking and cycling behaviors. The survey results show that 36% of the respondents stopped walking and cycling during the Memorial Bridge construction. This reverses the numerous health benefits and environmental stewardship resulting from active transportation. The proposed shuttle will likely decrease non-motorized use and will result in additional traffic congestion or non-legal use. The bridge is an important connector for commuters, tourists, and bicycle clubs. Because of the inconvenience of a shuttle, people who bicycled or walked across Little Bay will be encouraged to drive instead, setting back years of bicycle advocacy work meant to ease additional traffic congestion. During the construction of the Memorial Bridge, bicyclists and walkers frustrated by the inconvenience of the shuttle rode or walked across the Sarah Mildred Long Bridge, an unintended risk. A similar situation might occur with the Little Bay Bridge. New Hampshire needs to retain and attract millennials (those under 35 years old and the largest segment of the American workforce). They have the lowest rate of driving to work and the highest increase in bicycle commuting. (1). To attract these workers, especially those living in Dover/ Durham and working in Portsmouth, there needs to be viable non-motorized access connecting the two cities. Pedal-assist electric bike sales are currently exploding. Pedal-assist bike sales are strong in the Millennial and the Baby Boomer demographics, allowing riders to commute greater distances that were otherwise out of reach of the average rider (2). SABR expects strong increases in commuting by bike, but only if proper infrastructure exists. As our research has shown, the bike shuttle decreases bicycle commuting behavior by local citizens. Bicycle infrastructure is becoming more important to today’s tech corporations, especially those that have a high number of Millennial employees. It is interesting to note that the 20 finalists for Amazon’s second headquarters ALL are Bicycle Friendly Cities as designated by the Bicycle League of America. Of Amazon’s current Seattle workforce “Fifty-five percent walk, ride bikes or use public transportation.” according to the NY Times (3). Motorists using the Little Bay Bridge are accustomed to lane changes, lane closures, and Jersey barriers for the long-term benefit of motorists. Creating a multi-modal lane by using Jersey barriers will not be perceived by motorists as unusual. There is a perception of unfairness if these actions are deemed too costly by NHDOT for the benefit of non-motorized transportation users, but a reasonable cost for motor vehicle operators. The current plan to use a shuttle bus has potential American with Disabilities Act issue. The law requires reasonable modifications and accommodations to avoid discrimination. The General Sullivan bridge is used by riders on hand cycles, tandems, triplets, and modified bicycles that would not be accomodated in the current plan (using a van/bus for transport) but would be accommodated by a bike lane. University of New Hampshire’s Durham campus is 4.5 miles away from the General Sullivan Bridge. The campus has numerous users who bicycle on adaptive cycles as part of the Northeast Passage educational or rental programs. The Gen. Sullivan Bridge is used by bicyclists in the winter. Given the low temperatures and wind chill factor common in New Hampshire, cyclists risk hypothermia as they cool down from a sweat while waiting for a bus. This is a strong deterrent from riding in cold weather. A multi-use path has a zero-carbon footprint. In the May 2017 Commute Smart B2B Challenge, hundreds of bicyclists and walkers rode 15,000 miles (2,566 trips), which reduced their carbon footprint in the Seacoast by 5.9 tons. A bus shuttle can only accommodate one type of bicycle. It would not accommodate cargo bikes, recumbent bicycles, tandem bicycles, triplet bicycles, hand cycles, velo-mobiles, electric bikes, bikes with trailers, etc. These types of cycles are used by people for an assortment of reasons (physical disabilities, transporting children, transporting cargo, medical conditions, personal preference). The Memorial Bridge shuttle could only accommodate four bicycles per trip which was one of the major reasons it was not used. It is not uncommon for groups of 20-30 cyclists to arrive at the bridge at one time during a group ride. How could a shuttle service accommodate the 500-1000 bikers and pedestrians who use the Gen. Sullivan bridge on a weekly basis, especially during rush hour? Under the current proposal if the shuttle operated once an hour for 16 hours a day, with four single bikes accommodated by van, then it is possible for 52 cyclists to cross the bridge a day. If you multiply by seven days only 364 cyclists could be accommodated per week under perfect use. Perfect use assumes cyclists arrive at the van shuttle in groups of four for every hour of shuttle service operation for a week. A person who arrives at the bridge non-motorized and is unable to cross the bridge would have a choice of a 28.7 mile detour to the north, or a 30 mile detour by following around Great Bay to the south. This is the equivalent of asking a car to detour over 100 miles. Bicycle riders and pedestrians cause negligible wear to roadways and bridges when compared to much heavier four-wheeled motor vehicles. Multi-modal users pay taxes, have to pay for parking lots, highways, DOT projects through their taxes like other citizens, but receive less benefit. The disparity is most apparent in this current project. References: 1.American Commuter Survey, U.S. Census, 2013 2.“Electric bikes are exploding right now because they have no age associations, offer an authentic riding experience, and appeal to the two strongest purchasing generations in the U.S. – Boomers and Millennials,” said Matt Powell, vice president and sports industry analyst, The NPD Group. “Being experiential yet non-arduous they draw Boomers, while Millennials enjoy that they are technological, experiential, and offer a more economical way of getting around.” Source: The NPD Group, Inc. / Retail Tracking Service, 12 months ending July 2017 3.https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/business/amazon-headquarters-competition.html

Ian Sleeper
295 supporters